Connect with us

Arizona

Some Republicans want to mitigate Arizona abortion ban. Democrats call it backpedaling

Published

on

Some Republicans want to mitigate Arizona abortion ban. Democrats call it backpedaling


play

A handful of Arizona Republican lawmakers and officials called for action on Tuesday to mitigate the impact of a court decision reinstituting a 160-year-old ban on nearly all abortions in the state.

Former Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, called on officials to “address this issue with a policy that is workable and reflective of our electorate.”

Advertisement

Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, called on Republican leaders to immediately repeal the 160-year-old law, saying “the law cannot stand.” Sen. T.J. Shope, R-Coolidge, also called for a repeal of the law. Both lawmakers favored a ban on abortions after 15 weeks.

The statements, while made in reaction to a shocking court decision that will reverberate for months if not years, were dismissed by Democrats as GOP backpedaling.

The statements come during an election year in which Democrats have sought to make abortion rights a mobilizing issue to get voters to the polls. In addition to driving support for a state constitutional amendment on abortion rights, Democrats hope their policy positions will win favor with voters and tip the scales in competitive races on the ballot.

“Arizonans remember Gov. Doug Ducey and the Republican legislature pushing through a 15-week ban after Donald Trump was able to get Roe overturned,” Arizona Democratic Party Chairwoman Yolanda Bejarano said in a statement.

Advertisement

“Arizonans will usher in a pro-choice Democratic majority in our legislature, send Joe Biden back to the White House, and once again reject abortion extremism to secure the US House and Senate.” 

In 2022, while the U.S. Supreme Court was considering a case that later overturned abortion rights nationally, Arizona GOP lawmakers and Ducey enacted a ban on abortions after 15 weeks. It was more restrictive than what was allowed at the time in the Grand Canyon State, and supporters acknowledged it was a contingency plan to put a more stringent law in place if the U.S. Supreme Court permitted doing so.

Ducey said on social media Tuesday that he signed the 15-week law because it was “thoughtful conservative policy, and an approach to this very sensitive issue that Arizonans can actually agree on.”

“The ruling today is not the outcome I would have preferred, and I call on our elected leaders to heed the will of the people and address this issue with a policy that is workable and reflective of our electorate,” the former governor wrote.

Advertisement

Democrats say GOP backpedaling on Arizona abortion ban

Those words, however, drew the ire of Democrats who noted the 2022 law included language that it did not repeal the pre-statehood ban. The state’s top court relied on that language in upholding the 1864 law on Tuesday, banning abortions at any point in gestation except to save the life of the mother. A person who aids in an abortion can face prison time.

Also noted by Democrats were Ducey’s efforts to expand and pack Arizona’s top court when he was governor. Ducey in 2016 signed a bill to increase the court from five to seven justices — even though the justices opposed the expansion.

In his eight years as governor, Ducey appointed justices to five of the seven seats. The other two, who dissented from the majority decision on Tuesday, were named to the bench by former Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, also a Republican.

The Arizona Republic requested an interview with Ducey, but a representative declined, saying Ducey stood by the statement.

At a news conference on Tuesday with female Democratic lawmakers in the state, Sen. Eva Burch, D-Mesa, and Rep. Stephanie Stahl-Hamilton, D-Tucson, called out Republican lawmakers as they began releasing statements against the territorial ban.

Advertisement

Stahl-Hamilton specifically called out Gress, who sponsored “fetal personhood” bills in 2023 that would have allowed child support and tax credits to be paid during pregnancy, enhanced domestic violence penalties for people who assault pregnant women, and allowed pregnant women to use HOV lanes. Those bills were either vetoed by Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs or died in committee.

Gress disputed that those bills gave fetuses personhood rights akin to a separate state law dealing with abortion and shared a 2022 campaign flyer that says he opposes the pre-statehood abortion ban and supports exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother.

“This is about providing support, financial support and resources for women,” Gress said of his bills. “It’s about empowering women and protecting women. I’ve been pretty consistent in that.” 

Shope said the Arizona Supreme Court “ignored our legislative intent” in its ruling. Shope voted in favor of the 15-week law in 2022 and said he would work to repeal the 1864 law.

Burch shut down any idea of compromising with Republicans on ending the territorial ban in favor of the less strict 15-week ban.

Advertisement

“Am I willing to compromise the lives of pregnant people after 15 weeks to have the appearance of being diplomatic?” Burch asked. “Absolutely not.”

Burch made national headlines in March after revealing on the Senate floor that she was pregnant and obtained an abortion because her pregnancy was not viable.

Despite Republicans like Gress and Shope pledging support for the 15-week law instead of the 1864 ban, Burch said she doesn’t expect action from her Republican colleagues.

A bill to repeal the 1864 ban was introduced earlier this year and has made it nowhere in the GOP-majority Legislature. Lawmakers are convening once a week now and will have voting sessions on Wednesday.

“I really appreciate and respect my Republican colleagues; I co-sponsor bills with my Republican colleagues. We agree on some things, and we disagree on others,” Burch said. “Do I think that they are going to now become champions for reproductive health care because of this ruling and their fears about what the political consequences might be?

Advertisement

“Not even then, absolutely not.”

160-year-old law upheld: Abortion in Arizona set to be illegal in nearly all circumstances, state high court rules

Republic reporter Mary Jo Pitzl contributed to this article.

Reach reporter Stacey Barchenger at stacey.barchenger@arizonarepublic.com or 480-416-5669.

Reach reporter Reagan Priest at rpriest@gannett.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Arizona

3 men sentenced in Arizona for multi-million dollar scam against Amazon

Published

on

3 men sentenced in Arizona for multi-million dollar scam against Amazon


PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Three Valley men have been sentenced for their roles in what prosecutors described as a “sophisticated fraud scheme” against an online shopping giant.

In a news release, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said Mughith Faisal, 29, of Glendale, was sentenced on Feb. 5 to 18 months in prison. His brother, Basheer Faisal, 28, of Glendale, was also recently ordered to spend 18 months in prison.

The feds said a third defendant in the case, Abdullah Alwan, 28, of Surprise, was sentenced to six months in prison after the trio pleaded guilty to wire fraud.

Prosecutors said the three were also each ordered to pay $1.5 million in restitution to Amazon.

Advertisement

According to federal officials, Alwan worked in Amazon’s logistics division and left the company in 2021 when he reportedly used his knowledge to manipulate rates for transportation deliveries assigned to Amazon’s third-party carriers.

The feds said Basheer and Mughith Faisal used “Blue Line Transport” to knowingly get to increased transport rates that Alwan would then input into Amazon’s system, ripping them off out of $4.5 million.

The FBI’s Phoenix Division helped in the investigation, which was then prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Arizona.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 KTVK/KPHO. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 results for March 3, 2026

Published

on

Arizona Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 results for March 3, 2026


play

The Arizona Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at Tuesday, March 3, 2026 results for each game:

Advertisement

Winning Mega Millions numbers

07-21-53-54-62, Mega Ball: 16

Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers

2-0-8

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Fantasy 5 numbers

02-05-18-27-41

Advertisement

Check Fantasy 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Triple Twist numbers

11-14-17-19-23-24

Check Triple Twist payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news and results

Advertisement

What time is the Powerball drawing?

Powerball drawings are at 7:59 p.m. Arizona time on Mondays, Wednesdays and Saturdays.

How much is a Powerball lottery ticket today?

In Arizona, Powerball tickets cost $2 per game, according to the Arizona Lottery.

How to play the Powerball

To play, select five numbers from 1 to 69 for the white balls, then select one number from 1 to 26 for the red Powerball.

You can choose your lucky numbers on a play slip or let the lottery terminal randomly pick your numbers.

To win, match one of the 9 Ways to Win:

Advertisement
  • 5 white balls + 1 red Powerball = Grand prize.
  • 5 white balls = $1 million.
  • 4 white balls + 1 red Powerball = $50,000.
  • 4 white balls = $100.
  • 3 white balls + 1 red Powerball = $100.
  • 3 white balls = $7.
  • 2 white balls + 1 red Powerball = $7.
  • 1 white ball + 1 red Powerball = $4.
  • 1 red Powerball = $4.

There’s a chance to have your winnings increased two, three, four, five and 10 times through the Power Play for an additional $1 per play. Players can multiply non-jackpot wins up to 10 times when the jackpot is $150 million or less.

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Arizona Lottery retailers will redeem prizes up to $100 and may redeem winnings up to $599. For prizes over $599, winners can submit winning tickets through the mail or in person at Arizona Lottery offices. By mail, send a winner claim form, winning lottery ticket and a copy of a government-issued ID to P.O. Box 2913, Phoenix, AZ 85062.

To submit in person, sign the back of your ticket, fill out a winner claim form and deliver the form, along with the ticket and government-issued ID to any of these locations:

Phoenix Arizona Lottery Office: 4740 E. University Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85034, 480-921-4400. Hours: 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, closed holidays. This office can cash prizes of any amount.

Tucson Arizona Lottery Office: 2955 E. Grant Road, Tucson, AZ 85716, 520-628-5107. Hours: 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, closed holidays. This office can cash prizes of any amount.

Advertisement

Phoenix Sky Harbor Lottery Office: Terminal 4 Baggage Claim, 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85034, 480-921-4424. Hours: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Sunday, closed holidays. This office can cash prizes up to $49,999.

Kingman Arizona Lottery Office: Inside Walmart, 3396 Stockton Hill Road, Kingman, AZ 86409, 928-753-8808. Hours: 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, closed holidays. This office can cash prizes up to $49,999.

Check previous winning numbers and payouts at https://www.arizonalottery.com/.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by an Arizona Republic editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arizona

Autopsies show Arizona teens were both shot in the head while camping

Published

on

Autopsies show Arizona teens were both shot in the head while camping


play

  • Two teenagers were fatally shot while camping northeast of Phoenix in May 2025.
  • Both Evan Clark, 17, and Pandora Kjolsrud, 18, were shot in the head, autopsy reports said.
  • A 31-year-old man was arrested and indicted on two counts of first-degree murder in connection with the deaths.

A 17-year-old boy who was fatally shot while camping with a female classmate northeast of Phoenix died from gunshot wounds to the head, according to the first page of his autopsy report.

Evan Clark, 17, and Pandora Kjolsrud, 18, were camping just off State Route 87 near Mount Ord when the two were shot and killed. Investigators discovered their bodies, which had been moved into nearby brush to conceal them, on May 26, 2025.

Advertisement

The first page of Clark’s autopsy report, which The Arizona Republic obtained March 3, found that his death was a homicide with multiple gunshot wounds to the head. The first page of Kjolsrud’s autopsy report also ruled her death a homicide with her cause of death being gunshot wounds to the head and upper body.

Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office detectives ultimately arrested Thomas Brown, 31, of Chandler on Oct. 2, 2025, in connection with their deaths. Brown was indicted on two counts of first-degree murder and remained in jail on a $2 million cash-only bond.

Detectives found Brown’s DNA on gloves inside Clark’s SUV that had Kjolsrud’s blood on them as well, the Sheriff’s Office said.

Partial autopsy reports made available following legal fight

While The Republic has obtained the first pages of both Clark’s and Kjolsrud’s autopsy reports, the remaining pages appeared to remain sealed as of March 3 since Simone Kjolsrud, Pandora’s mother, petitioned to have the autopsy reports sealed or redacted. Simone Kjolsrud argued that various details about her daughter and aspects of her personal life, potentially included in such documents, should remain private and outweigh the public’s right to know.

Advertisement

A Sept. 25, 2025, motion that sought to block the report’s release argued the report could contain information law enforcement hasn’t yet shared and could impair the ongoing criminal investigation.

“Simone Kjolsrud fears that, if released, her daughter’s Medical Examiner’s Report may end up on the internet or be broadcast on the news, which would undoubtedly cause additional trauma and even jeopardize her constitutional right to justice in this case,” the motion stated.

Kjolsrud asked that Clark’s autopsy be sealed as well, arguing that it would likely contain details similar to her daughter’s.

Matthew Kelley, an attorney representing The Republic and other Arizona media outlets, previously objected to the autopsies being sealed and asked that the temporary protective order be vacated.

Advertisement

“To be sure, these killings are particularly traumatic for a surviving family member,” Kelley wrote in his objection. “But the pain felt by a family member cannot override the public’s right to inspect public records reflecting the performance of law enforcement and other public agencies entrusted with investigating such crimes. A veil of secrecy only raises unnecessary speculation about such public performance.”

It was not immediately clear whether Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Geoffrey Fish, who initially ordered the autopsies remain sealed as he reviewed their contents, would unseal additional pages in their entirety or with redactions.

Reach the reporter Perry Vandell at perry.vandell@arizonarepublic.com or 602-444-2474. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter, @PerryVandell.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending