Arizona
Prisoners use locks as weapons in video that appears to show fight in Arizona prison
Video appears to capture fight inside Arizona prison
In a cell phone video that appears to have been filmed inside an Arizona prison, one man tries to get away from two others. It’s not clear when or where the video was shot.
A video capturing a fight in what appears to be an Arizona prison was posted on social media, showing a man bloodied and being followed by two others with makeshift flails — metal locks hanging from the ends of tethers.
Representatives of Arizona’s prison system declined to immediately comment on the 3-minute video.
The combatants were dressed in orange pants and shirts with “ADC” stamped on them.
It’s not clear when or where the video was shot. It follows a fight between one man and two others that moves from inside a building, through a doorway and outside into a prison yard. No correctional officers or prison personnel are visible at any point in the footage that appears to be shot on a cell phone.
Cell phones are considered contraband in Arizona prisons and are prohibited. How the person filming the video obtained the device was unclear.
Arizona’s prison system is run by the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry. Reached by email on May 16, department officials said they would respond to The Arizona Republic’s inquiries about the video, including whether they could confirm it had been filmed in an Arizona prison, next week.
On April 4, three men were killed inside the Cimarron Unit at the Arizona State Prison Complex in Tucson. The Department of Corrections identified Ricky Wassenaar, a violent repeat offender serving 16 life sentences for a 2004 attempted prison escape that turned into a hostage crisis, as the sole suspect in the triple homicide. Saul Alvarez, 51, Thorne Harnage, 42, and Donald Lashley, 75, were the men killed.
The incident prompted strong criticism from state lawmakers, including House Judiciary Chair Quang Nguyen, R-Prescott Valley, who demanded accountability from the department and questioned why Wassenaar was placed in a lower-security unit despite repeated warnings and past disciplinary violations.
3-minute video shows conflict move through multiple prison areas
The video begins with two men on the ground, legs interlocked, wrestling away from each other.
One man, with long black hair, stands up holding an orange tether. At the end of it swings a metal combination lock — he holds it like a weapon.
Another man, with short black hair, still on the ground, pushes himself backward. His face and clothes are bloodied.
In the background, voices can be heard.
“Joseph, give me the password.”
“Get the (expletive) out of here.”
“You want the password?”
“Let him go. Let him go, man.”
The bloodied man stumbles to his feet and backs out of the frame. The man with the makeshift flail follows, and another man, also in orange, holding a tethered lock, joins behind him.
The room comes into view: white cinderblock walls, waist-high dividers, rows of bunk beds and two long, rectangular windows letting in sunlight.
The second man with a flail steps forward and feigns a move. The man with short hair picks up a chair, trying to shield himself.
Heavy breathing fills the audio. Someone off-camera says, “Go on, get out of here.”
The camera dips behind a wall and then shows the scene again. One man holds his lock by his shoulder, ready to strike. The other crouches behind the chair, blood on his face and shoulder.
“You want me to leave or not? Move,” says the bloodied man.
“Leave right now,” one of the men replies, pointing.
Then to the other: “Bro, just get the (expletive) over here, on this side. Hurry up.”
“There — go,” the man with long hair says, motioning at the man with the chair.
“Alright. Password?” the man with the chair asks, holding his hand up.
“I don’t give a (expletive),” comes the response.
The bloodied man walks away through an open doorway, and the long-haired man with the flail follows.
“Leave. Leave, (expletive),” the man with long hair yells, walking out the door.
The camera follows them outside.
A cement walkway cuts between blue buildings on one side and a tall metal fence on the other.
The two men face off again. The bloodied man, still carrying the chair, suddenly throws it and runs.
The man with the flail catches him. Grabs him. The second man with a weapon rushes in, swinging his lock. It hits.
The bloodied man falls, a trail of dust lifting as he rolls away.
He gets back up near the metal fence, barbed wire above him, then takes off along the edge.
“(Expletive) the rat,” someone says off camera.
The bloodied man walks off into the distance. The two men stalk after him.
In the background, a loud banging sound — like wheels hitting seams in the concrete — echoes as the camera trails far behind and the video ends.
Video reflects known dangers in Arizona prisons, advocate says
Maria Morris, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union’s National Prison Project, reviewed the video and said it reflected troubling patterns reported by incarcerated people in Arizona, including assaults involving improvised weapons such as locks in socks.
Morris, whose work focuses on solitary confinement, said many people are placed into general population units despite warning staff that they do not feel safe.
Prisoners often feel unsafe after they opt out of prison gang affiliation by signing what’s known as an “Integrated Housing Program agreement,” which indicates a willingness to be housed with people of any race, Morris said. In Arizona prisons, that decision can mark someone as a target.
Often, prison staff tell them they must go into the general housing unit anyway, she said.
“They are told that they need to stay on the unit until they are threatened or assaulted,” she said.
Afterward, they’re typically moved into solitary confinement — sometimes for months — before the cycle repeats, Morris said.
Arizona
Colorado River wins personhood status from Arizona tribal council
Tribe seeks to conserve the Colorado River and secure water rights
The Colorado River Indian Tribes aim to conserve the Colorado River flowing through their land, yet they still lack certain water rights.
Joel Angel Juarez, Arizona Republic
The Colorado River Indian Tribes have formally accorded personhood status to the Colorado River, creating a powerful new mechanism to protect the eponymous river that makes life possible in their arid homelands.
The resolution was approved by the CRIT Tribal Council on Nov. 6 in Parker.
The nearly 4,300-member tribe has long been alarmed at the state of its life-giving waterway, CRIT Chairwoman Amelia Flores wrote in a statement shared with The Arizona Republic.
“The Colorado River is in jeopardy,” she said. The tribe, which holds the largest quantity of senior water rights in the state, regards the river as a living being, so the resolution codifies that belief and the tribe’s commitment to protecting its needs and ability to provide water for future generations.
CRIT’s leadership conducted a rigorous process, including consultations with its membership, to formulate the resolution.
Personhood status opens a door to legal actions
During the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting, Earth Elder Coordinator Mindahi Crescencio Bastida Munoz said the state of the natural world is in “such a systemic crisis that we need to rethink our position in the world as human beings.” Munoz also questioned why corporations have more rights than rivers, mountains or oceans.
Granting personhood to natural resources, such as rivers, allows people or parties to take legal action to protect them. For example, forum participants said a person could sue a company or entity that pollutes a river because the river has the right to be pollution-free.
CRIT is now authorized to include the river’s needs in transactions involving its water, Flores said in her statement, supporting the river’s long-term health, restoring habitats, designating flows for the river delta or building new wetlands.
The Colorado is now the third river with such legal protections in North America. The Yurok Tribe was the first to grant personhood to the Klamath River in 2019, which “establishes the Rights of the Klamath River to exist, flourish, and naturally evolve; to have a clean and healthy environment free from pollutants; to have a stable climate free from human-caused climate change impacts; and to be free from contamination by genetically engineered organisms.”
The Magpie River in Quebec was granted “legal personality” in 2021 by a joint resolution of the Conseil des Innu de Ekuanitshit, a Canadian First Nation and the Minganie Regional County Municipality, the local county government.
Other rivers, most notably the Whanganui River in New Zealand, have received personhood protections, which are enabling local Indigenous communities to begin the long process of restoring natural flows and habitats. Representatives from CRIT and other Southwestern tribes have met with Maori peoples to share ideas and concepts on how best to protect water and waterways.
“The river is a part of who we are and who we will always be,” Flores said. “The Colorado River Indian Tribes.”
Debra Krol reports on Indigenous communities at the confluence of climate, culture and commerce in Arizona and the Intermountain West. Reach Krol at debra.krol@azcentral.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter, @debkrol and on Bluesky at @debkrol.bsky.social.
Coverage of tribal water issues in the Colorado River Basin is supported by the Water Desk.
Arizona
Shutdown may be ending, but here’s why deal doesn’t suit Mark Kelly, Ruben Gallego
Senate strikes deal to end historic government shutdown
Lawmakers agree to end longest-ever government shutdown, reopen government through Jan 30
A faction of Senate Democrats joined with Republicans in preliminary steps to end the record-long federal government shutdown, although Arizona’s senators oppose the emerging deal.
On its 40th day, enough Democrats appeared ready to begin the multi-step legislative process needed to end the shutdown that began Oct. 1.
“It looks like we’re getting very close to the shutdown ending,” President Donald Trump told reporters in Washington.
Democratic Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego each issued statements Nov. 9 against the short-term spending agreement.
“In the richest country in the world, families shouldn’t have to choose between putting food on the table and their health care,” Kelly said. “But that’s exactly what Donald Trump has done to Americans with this shutdown.”
Gallego signaled that he would not be moved by anything less than a deal to preserve the insurance subsidies that expire at the end of the year.
“I have been clear on this from the beginning: I will not turn my back on the 24 million Americans who will see their premiums more than double if we don’t extend these tax credits,” he said.
“At a time when prices are already too high, Americans are shopping for health insurance and experiencing such sticker shock that they are being forced to sign up for a crappy, overpriced plan or not signing up for insurance at all.”
The agreement, which could take several more days to finalize, appears to have enough Democratic support to allow it to move to a vote and would fund the government through January, along with several pieces of the annual budget bill that are supposed to be in place before the start of the federal fiscal year on Oct. 1.
It does not include any extension of the pandemic-era health insurance subsidies for those who buy coverage through the Affordable Care Act, which was the main Democratic demand. Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, who has been one of the three non-Republicans to consistently vote to end a shutdown, said Republicans had indicated they would allow a vote on the insurance issue.
“I think people were saying ‘We’re not going to get what we want,’ although we still have a chance,” he said, according to the New York Times.
The deal also includes a provision to bring back government workers fired by the Trump administration during the shutdown, said Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Virginia, who told reporters that was instrumental in moving him to support it.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-New York, remained against the deal, reflecting the deep division within his party.
“On Friday, we offered Republicans a compromise: a proposal that would extend the ACA tax credits for a year and open up the government at the same time,” he said.
“They once again said no, and when they said no on our compromise they showed they are against any health care reform. Instead, they passed the biggest health care cuts in our nation’s history — just to give tax breaks to billionaires.”
When will Adelita Grijalva get sworn in?
The process of approving the plan will require several Senate votes and will necessitate calling the House of Representatives back into session.
That could bring with it the belated swearing-in of Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva, D-Arizona, who has been kept officially out of office since she easily won the special election to fill the seat vacated by the March death of her father, Rep. Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz.
Grijalva’s arrival in the House is expected to provide the last needed signatory to force the House to vote on publicly releasing the investigative files for Jeffrey Epstein.
The disgraced financier killed himself amid allegations of sex trafficking underage girls to VIPs. Trump is widely believed to be mentioned in the files involving his former friend.
Food benefit cuts and flight cancellations
For weeks, the shutdown had enough exceptions that many Americans could perhaps overlook the stalemate, but it has become more impactful for millions with impending limits on the government’s food benefits program and the growing cancellations of hundreds of domestic flights each day.
Kelly maintained there “should’ve never been a shutdown in the first place, and I worked to find a solution with Republicans and this administration.”
He accused Trump of not caring “about rising costs, skyrocketing health care premiums, or working families struggling to put food on the table. He has spent more time working on his ballroom than working to open the government. He sued to block food assistance for hungry families.”
Gallego said it was “disgusting that Republicans have put the country in the place, where they are pitting working people against each other.”
“There’s a phrase in Spanish, ‘Con salud, lo hay todo; sin salud, no hay nada.’ It means ‘With good health you have it all; without your health, you have nothing.’”
Arizona
Babies hospitalized with infant botulism linked to formula under recall in Arizona
PHOENIX (AP) – Federal and state health officials are investigating 13 cases in 10 states of infant botulism linked to baby formula that was being recalled, authorities said Saturday.
ByHeart Inc. agreed to begin recalling two lots of the company’s Whole Nutrition Infant Formula, the Food and Drug Administration said in a statement.
All 13 infants were hospitalized after consuming formula from two lots: 206VABP/251261P2 and 206VABP/251131P2.
The cases occurred in Arizona, California, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas and Washington.
The formula can be purchased at Target, Amazon, Whole Foods, Sprouts, Albertsons, Walmart and more. For a full list of locations, click/tap here.
No deaths were reported. The FDA said it was investigating how the contamination happened and whether it affected any other products.
Available online and through major retailers, the product accounted for an estimated 1% of national formula sales, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
People who bought the recalled formula should record the lot number if possible before throwing it out or returning it to where it was purchased, the CDC said in a statement.
They should use a dishwasher or hot, soapy water to clean items and surfaces that touched the formula. And they should seek medical care right away if an infant has consumed recalled formula and then had poor feeding, loss of head control, difficulty swallowing or decreased facial expression.
Infant botulism is caused by a bacterium that produces toxins in the large intestine.
Symptoms can take weeks to develop, so parents should keep vigilant, the CDC said.
A ByHeart spokesperson did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment Saturday.
Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
-
Austin, TX5 days agoHalf-naked woman was allegedly tortured and chained in Texas backyard for months by five ‘friends’ who didn’t ‘like her anymore’
-
Southwest3 days agoTexas launches effort to install TPUSA in every high school and college
-
Seattle, WA1 week agoESPN scoop adds another intriguing name to Seahawks chatter before NFL trade deadline
-
Hawaii2 days agoMissing Kapolei man found in Waipio, attorney says
-
World5 days agoIsrael’s focus on political drama rather than Palestinian rape victim
-
Southwest6 days agoArmy veteran-turned-MAGA rising star jumps into fiery GOP Senate primary as polls tighten
-
New Jersey1 day agoPolice investigate car collision, shooting in Orange, New Jersey
-
Seattle, WA2 days agoSoundgarden Enlist Jim Carrey and Seattle All-Stars for Rock Hall 2025 Ceremony