Connect with us

Arizona

Montezuma Castle among Arizona national park sites combating vandalism

Published

on

Montezuma Castle among Arizona national park sites combating vandalism


Montezuma Castle National Monument is wrapping trees to prevent vandalism.

In March, natural resources technicians at the national monument used
burlap to cover the bark of six Arizona sycamore trees along public
trails at Montezuma Castle. Portions of the bark were written and carved
on. Many of the carvings included the year, which made it obvious there
had been a recent increase in incidents.

But national park vandalism isn’t just a problem at Montezuma Castle –
it’s been an issue many Arizona national park sites have dealt with.

While incidences of defaced trees have increased at Montezuma Castle
in the past few years, the method of wrapping them in burlap has never
been used there, according to a representative from the monument.

Advertisement

Rangers chose to cover the trees in burlap because it is resistant to
cutting and can be used through the warm spring and summer months
without risking the health of the trees. The burlap is intended to give
the trees a chance to recover from their injuries and to enhance visitor
experience by covering graffiti on the bark.

Before they resorted to burlap-wrapping, Montezuma Castle National
Monument rangers had posted signs near the trees and stationed
volunteers to speak with visitors to discourage tree defacement and
explain its harm. The trees, however, remained frequently carved, not
leaving enough time for the old carvings to shed carved bark before new
ones were added.

The sign on each wrapped tree reads: “This tree has been vandalized.
Defacing trees is vandalism. Please help us preserve and protect our
nation’s unique natural and cultural heritage. Do not write on or carve
the trees.”

Defacement and vandalism of trees at the site would be considered a
federal misdemeanor, which could be punishable by six months in jail or a
$5,000 fine.

In the past, carvings were few and small enough that natural
resources technicians at the park could safely fill them in with wood
glue and sawdust. If that method were used to cover the current extent
of the damage, however, it would harm the tree’s health, according to
the monument representative.

Advertisement

The National Park Service, which manages Montezuma Castle National
Monument, investigates crimes at national parks through its National
Park Service Investigative Services Branch. The branch has been
successful at preventing vandalism at a different Arizona park – Saguaro
National Park.

Saguaro National Park spokesperson Cam Juárez said the park’s most
recent act of vandalism was in 2016, when someone cut down eight or nine
saguaro cactuses. Juárez said that visitors to the park are discouraged
from vandalism because they know it has consequences, such as fines.

“We have an amazing law enforcement team here,” Juárez said of the park.

Juárez said, however, there is not enough staff to have investigative
units at every national park in Arizona, and some struggle with
security.

“I think our law enforcement teams … are definitely understaffed, and
that’s a problem nationwide, and I think they all do their best to
interact within current units but also interact with local law
enforcement,” Juárez said.

Advertisement

Therefore, the parks have to trust the public to act responsibly, Juárez said.

“It’s impossible to close off a national park. … It’s hard to keep
people out,” he said. “We’re just hoping that people do the right
thing.”

The park rangers tend to be effective at preventing smaller acts of
vandalism, such as breaking into cars or stealing personal items, Juárez
said.

“The community is definitely part of that process in protecting our natural and cultural resources,” Juárez said.

Richard Ullmann, program manager for visitor services for Flagstaff
Area National Monuments, said visitors play the largest role in
mitigating park vandalism.

Advertisement

“Majority of the people understand and do the right thing,” Ullmann
said. “We assume good intentions when visitors come to the national
parks.”

Educating people about the harmful effects of vandalism is crucial to
preventing it in the future, Ullmann said. If a person is caught
vandalizing a national park, Ullmann said he hopes to give them an
opportunity to learn and to demonstrate better behavior.

“In the case of an act of vandalism, it’s an opportunity to help that
individual or that person or group of people do something different
next time,” Ullmann said. “It’s an educational opportunity.”



Source link

Advertisement

Arizona

Following scandal, this Oregon sewer board will move its subsidiary from Hawaii to Arizona

Published

on

Following scandal, this Oregon sewer board will move its subsidiary from Hawaii to Arizona


It’s official: Washington County’s embattled sewer agency will trade Hawaiian beaches for Arizona desert by the end of 2026.

In a move that had been telegraphed for months, the Clean Water Services board of commissioners voted 4-0 Tuesday to relocate its controversy-producing insurance subsidiary from Hawaii to Arizona, citing financial savings. The vote comes eight months after the company’s location came under scrutiny in the wake of an Oregonian/OregonLive investigation that found that agency executives on the insurance company board stayed at a rotating cast of five-star resorts for annual board meetings and insurance conferences in Hawaii.

Seven trips cost at least $165,000, including $42,000 to send six officials to the Big Island in 2023 and at least $41,000 to send seven officials to Kauai last year, records show. The sewer agency did not send any employees to Hawaii last month for the annual insurance conference.

Following the newsroom’s investigation, the sewer board, made up of the members of the Washington County Board of Commissioners, implemented a slew of oversight measures and the agency’s executive director eventually resigned, privately citing a hostile work environment. The board’s review included requiring the agency to conduct a new domicile review for its wholly-owned captive insurance company, a form of self insurance that is rare among public agencies.

Advertisement

That review, conducted this summer by consultant Aon, identified Arizona, not Hawaii, as the best state for Clean Water Services to locate its insurance subsidiary. The agency endorsed that recommendation and asked the board to approve it, primarily based on Aon’s review, spokesperson Julie Cortez said.

The sewer board did not make public statements before voting Tuesday but asserted in previous meetings and in its official board resolution that the decision to relocate the insurance company from Hawaii to Arizona made financial sense and was not simply a response to public outcry. However, Clean Water Services declined to provide a complete picture of why the move made financial sense.

The Clean Water Services board, made up of the Washington County Board of Commissioners, voted 4-0 on Tuesday to move the agency’s insurance subsidiary from Hawaii to Arizona. Director Jerry Willey was not present for the vote. Mark Graves/The Oregonian

An August estimate by Aon found it would cost the agency about $203,000 annually to remain in Hawaii while it would cost nearly $192,000 to be in Arizona.

That analysis factored in board member travel. Aon estimated it would cost only $10,000 to continue traveling to Hawaii for annual board meetings and up to $16,500 for optional training and education. In comparison, it estimated it would cost $7,500 to go to Arizona annually for board meetings and up to $9,500 for optional training and education.

Those figures are well below the more $40,000 annually that the agency had been spending in recent years to send its entire board to Hawaii. Rick Shanley, the interim CEO/general manager for Clean Water Services, told the board in an Oct. 10 meeting that was because the agency would only send three board members to future conferences.

Advertisement

Aon’s analysis estimated there would also be an additional $45,000 in one-time costs to move the company to Arizona, including legal costs and the costs of a tax adviser and captive manager. But staying in Hawaii would cost about the same, Shanley told the board in the Oct. 10 meeting. That’s because the agency needed to update its operating agreement and make other legal and administrative changes to the insurance company.

Board member Jason Snider pledged his support for Arizona at the time, saying he was swayed by the fact that there would be similar one-time costs no matter what.

“For me, the decision becomes much easier when I realize we were likely going to have to redo a bunch of work in Hawaii anyway,” Snider said. “I think the right decision, given that, is to make the move to Arizona.”

If you purchase a product or register for an account through a link on our site, we may receive compensation. By using this site, you consent to our User Agreement and agree that your clicks, interactions, and personal information may be collected, recorded, and/or stored by us and social media and other third-party partners in accordance with our Privacy Policy.



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Homes for Heroes program announces 4 grant winners

Published

on

Homes for Heroes program announces 4 grant winners


PHOENIX — Four organizations were honored with grants from the Homes for Heroes program that assists veterans with transitional housing, health care and more.

The winners of the grants, which total $750,000, were announced by Gov. Katie Hobbs and the Arizona Department of Veterans’ Services on Tuesday.

Three grants for $200,000 were issued to Axiom Community of Recovery, U.S. Vets – Prescott and Esperanza en Escalante.

Scottsdale Recovery Center was awarded a grant for $150,000.

Advertisement

“By creating pathways to housing for our veterans, we are helping them realize the opportunity, security and freedom that underpin the Arizona Promise,” Hobbs said. “Working hand in hand with community organizations, we are committed to realizing our goal of ending veteran homelessness in Arizona.”

“Our veterans have sacrificed so much for our country,” ADVS Director John Scott said. “We owe it to them to ensure they have a safe place to sleep, and the support they need to rebuild their lives. With these new investments, we are taking meaningful steps toward that goal.”

What will the organizations do with the grant money?

Axiom is planning to create 30 new transitional housing beds and provide more detox services for veterans in crisis.

The Scottsdale Recovery Center is also adding transitional housing beds and detox services, in addition to pet boarding.

Services in northern Arizona will increase drastically with the U.S. Vets – Prescott organization providing 100 new housing plans at the Fort Whipple campus set to open in Jan. 2026.

Advertisement

The Tucson-based Esperanza en Escalante will offer 32 veterans emergency housing, detox and pet boarding services in southern Arizona.

The grant program includes $750,000 to help veterans with substance use disorders, mental health conditions and other challenges from military service that increase the risk of homelessness and an additional $500,000 grant to coordinate efforts to reduce homelessness.

In total, $2 million worth of grant financing is dedicated to helping military veterans.

We want to hear from you.

Have a story idea or tip? Pass it along to the KTAR News team here.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Baylor football expert previews the Arizona game, makes a score prediction

Published

on

Baylor football expert previews the Arizona game, makes a score prediction


Another week, another unfamiliar foe for Arizona football. So it goes in a new conference.

Baylor has never been on the UA schedule before, their only meeting coming in the 1992 Sun Bowl, with the Bears winning 20-15. Ironically, the Wildcats could be headed back to El Paso next month based on the latest bowl projections.

The 2025 Bears are 5-5 overall and 3-4 in the Big 12 after losing 55-28 at home to No. 13 Utah. That was their third home loss this season and they’ve also dropped their last two road games.

To better understand Baylor, we reached out to Garrett Ross of 247Sports’ Bears Illustrated for some insight and a score prediction. Below are his vigorous answers to our lethargic questions:

Advertisement

AZ Desert Swarm: Baylor has dropped three of four since a 4-2 start. What has gone wrong lately, and can things be fixed in time to avoid missing out on a bowl?

Garrett Ross: “Everything that could go wrong with a program has gone wrong for Baylor this season. During that stretch, Baylor has fired their offensive line coach due to an incident in practice, the fanbase has completely bailed on head coach Dave Aranda, and AD Mack Rhoades was caught up in an incident with tight end Michael Trigg and a separate scandal that forced him to step down as CFP committee chair and be placed on administrative leave with no likelihood hood of returning. It’s going to be difficult to salvage the season with all of the distractions and uncertainty surrounding the future of the athletic department, but Aranda should be the coach for the remainder of the season.”

Sawyer Robertson leads the Big 12 in passing, both in yards and touchdowns. The Bears also have the league’s leading receiver in Josh Cameron and three other guys with at least 500 yards. How do you think they will try to exploit one of the top pass defenses in the country?

“Baylor’s offense is the most effective when they get Michael Trigg involved early and often. TCU and Utah did an excellent job of eliminating Trigg and making the Bears rely on their other targets to carry the load. Josh Cameron is really good, but he’s not the type of player who can completely take over a game. Ashtyn Hawkins will be unavailable for the first half following a fight against Utah where he was ejected. Kobe Prentice didn’t play last week, but he’s a walking touchdown, while Kole Wilson can be effective when he’s focused.

“If Baylor has any hope of upsetting Arizona, they have to get the ball to Trigg.”

Advertisement

The most effective teams against Arizona are the ones who can run the ball, particularly with the quarterback being involved. Is Baylor’s run game good enough to keep the Wildcats honest?

“Baylor’s rushing attack has been limited with injuries and constantly having to play from behind. Bryson Washington looked like he was set for a breakout game against Utah, but the Bears got behind and abandoned the run. Sawyer Robertson will run if needed, but he prefers to be a pocket passer. Freshman duo Caden Knighten and Michael Turner have proven that they can make plays when needed, but Knighten has just one 100-yard game this season.

Utah ran for 380 yards last week and all but one Big 12 opponents has scored at least 27 points. What has caused Baylor’s defense to struggle so much?

“It’s honestly a lack of talent and execution when needed. The defensive line is weak and struggles to create any pressure, while getting bullied by opposing offensive lines. Outside of Keaton Thomas, the linebackers are irrelevant.

“The secondary has a history of getting burnt and their most effective player is former walk-on Jacob Redding. Two of Baylor’s best players (Redding, Josh Cameron) are former walk-ons, you can’t compete for championships like that, especially in the transfer portal and NIL era.”

Advertisement

Dave Aranda’s name has been mentioned on plenty of ‘hot seat’ lists, and there’s a possibility of a third losing season in the last four. What does the fanbase think of him, and do you think his job is on the line these last few weeks?

“The fans have been out on Aranda for a couple of seasons now, but it’s officially over at this point. He’s made multiple staff changes and adjustments to his approach, but it’s just not working. Aranda is a tremendous person and the team absolutely loves him, but it’s a billion-dollar entertainment business now, and nothing is entertaining about Baylor football. I personally believe he finishes out the season and rides off into the sunset with a nice check.”

Prediction time. Does Baylor become bowl eligible and spoil Arizona’s Senior Day or do the Wildcats stay hot and win their fourth straight? Give us a score pick.

“I think Baylor makes it interesting for about a half, but Arizona finds a way to run all over the Bears and capitalize on a couple of turnovers while winning 42-31.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending