Arizona
‘I’m not afraid. Let’s do it’: the Arizona abortion clinic taking a stand for patients
Gabrielle Goodrick’s day has barely begun and she’s already poring over a stack of legal documents. As the nurses and other doctors at her clinic start seeing the first of what will be upwards of 40 patients that day, the 59-year-old family medicine doctor and owner of Camelback Family Planning – one of Arizona’s few abortion clinics – has a decision to make.
Since the supreme court overturned Roe v Wade in June 2022, Arizona has banned all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy – with a small but vague carveout for medical emergencies. In November, Arizona voters will get to weigh in on a ballot measure that would enshrine the right to abortion until viability, or around 24 weeks.
But that ballot initiative won’t help the 32-year-old woman in Goodrick’s waiting room. The woman had been thrilled five months ago when she’d gotten pregnant, seven years after the birth of her first child, until her water broke prematurely 17 weeks into her pregnancy – far too early for her baby to survive. With no amniotic fluid left in her uterus, it’s only a matter of time until an infection sets in.
In the clinic’s break room, Goodrick sets down the stack of papers – which include a letter four state representatives wrote to Arizona’s attorney general this summer asking what qualified as a “medical emergency” and the attorney general’s response. Dressed in turquoise corduroy trousers and a white button-up, Goodrick pulls her hair into a claw clip before she begins describing the case to a few of the clinic’s nurses. Across the room, her colleague Barbara Zipkin, an obstetrician-gynecologist, listens in as she strokes her 5lb, 16-year-old dog Scooter. The Maltese-Yorkie mix is a fixture at the clinic, regularly accompanying Zipkin into patient rooms to provide emotional support.
“No one will do it,” Goodrick says. So far, the only known abortions after 15 weeks in the state have been performed when a patient develops a severe infection, but Goodrick doesn’t want to make this patient wait that long.
The woman’s healthcare network has already said it won’t end the pregnancy, and so she and her husband have started talking to a doctor in Las Vegas. But the six-hour drive to Nevada is no small hurdle. And that clinic – like most offering abortion care in the second and third trimester in the United States – only offers a procedure called dilation and evacuation. During a D&E, a patient’s cervix is dilated, often using small rods called laminaria that slowly expand over the course of one to two days, before a doctor empties the patient’s uterus using suction or surgical instruments. It’s difficult for providers to remove the fetus intact during a D&E – but this woman wants to hold her baby to say goodbye.
Camelback is one of only a handful of clinics in the US offering an alternative called induction abortion. Like a medication abortion, in which patients take the abortion pills mifepristone and misoprostol to end a pregnancy in the first trimester, an induction abortion involves taking the same pills in the second or third trimester. Because the fetus is larger than in the first trimester, the misoprostol triggers contractions that are more akin to labor than an earlier medication abortion, and the procedure usually occurs in a hospital instead of at home. (Camelback manages the pain of that labor – which is quicker and less severe than childbirth – with painkillers and conscious sedation). The result is that patients – like this one – can hold and grieve the fetus afterwards, and even take home footprints.
There’s legal risk to helping this patient – Goodrick’s not sure she would do it if the state didn’t have a Democratic governor and attorney general – but she’ll remark later how frustrating she finds it that more doctors aren’t willing to use their position to more aggressively challenge abortion restrictions. She is in a bind countless doctors have faced in the last two years, as stories of women denied emergency abortions in their home states have piled up.
Zipkin agrees they need to act. From her perch on a black office chair, she responds, defiant: “I’m not afraid. Let’s do it.”
In the aftermath of Roe, patients across the United States are seeking abortion care later in pregnancy, as a growing web of restrictions makes it increasingly difficult for them to access care sooner. And the procedure most physicians offer after the first trimester, a D&E, is not always the procedure patients want – for example, if they’d prefer to hold their fetus after or avoid cervical dilation with laminaria.
In the United States, abortion pills are FDA-approved through 10 weeks of pregnancy – but it’s still legal to use them “off label” later. While they’re not widely prescribed later in the US, they are the standard for second- and third-trimester care in much of northern Europe – and the World Health Organization’s abortion care guidelines describe how to use the pills up to and beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy.
Goodrick and her colleagues are hopeful that educating more physicians on the use of abortion pills later in pregnancy could expand access to care across the US by allowing more physicians with labor and delivery training, rather than only doctors with the surgical skills required to perform a D&E, to offer the procedure. Although conservative groups have called the abortion pill “unsafe” in an attempt to undo the FDA’s approval of the medication, Goodrick believes it could be an equalizer for physicians.
In that spirit, this year they published a study sharing their experience providing hundreds of induction abortions to end pregnancies between 18 and 24 weeks before Roe fell. They also regularly host and train medical students.
Offering that care has been harder – but not impossible – since Arizona banned abortions after 15 weeks. Since the ban went into effect, Camelback has directed patients whose pregnancies are past that mark to a clinic in southern California, where they’re able to receive and take mifepristone, which stops the pregnancy from progressing. The next day, after they’ve returned to Arizona, Goodrick and her team administer misoprostol, which induces contractions. They’re able to do so because the pregnancy has already ended, Goodrick says, meaning they’re essentially treating a stillbirth. It’s a loophole that Goodrick’s attorneys have reassured her is legal – and it helps patients avoid the cost of a surgical procedure and out-of-state hotel.
But this patient, who has found her way to Camelback one day in mid-September, is the first the clinic will treat entirely in Arizona since the state’s 15-week ban went into effect in 2022.
“When she found out that we could see her, she started crying,” Goodrick said. “She was so upset still about the hospital not helping her. She was just overwhelmingly relieved.”
“I know it’s scary” for doctors to push back against restrictions, says Goodrick – and she understands that hospitals and their legal teams are even more risk averse. But she’s steadfast: “I think it’s up to the medical field to say [to the state], ‘You don’t know what you’re talking about.’”
Goodrick never intended to provide abortion care – but early in her career she saw the need.
She remembers Henry Morgentaler’s name appearing in the news when she was an undergraduate student at McGill University in Montreal in the 1980s. A Holocaust survivor, Morgentaler had emigrated to Canada, where he began his career, like Goodrick, as a general practitioner. Over time, he became one of the first Canadian doctors to offer vasectomies, IUDs, birth control to unmarried women, and eventually abortions – and his repeated challenges of Canadian law would lead to abortion being legalized nationwide in 1988. The next year, Goodrick enrolled in medical school.
At the University of Vermont, Goodrick felt drawn to women’s health – but not obstetrics and gynecology, a surgical specialty. Instead, she gravitated toward family medicine, where she could receive some obstetrics training but follow patients through their full lives. In 1990 anti-abortion protesters descended on Burlington with the intention of closing two clinics there. That year, she co-founded a pro-choice alliance of medical students at the university.
“I didn’t really think of abortions like, ‘This is what I’m going to do,’” she said. But when Goodrick began her residency at Phoenix Baptist hospital (now Abrazo Central) in 1993, she did a rotation at the local Planned Parenthood and enjoyed it. She would ultimately open a family practice clinic, where she also offered occasional abortions, though they weren’t the focus of her work.
That changed after 2000, when the Food and Drug Administration approved mifepristone for use in the US. Goodrick says she was the first provider in the south-west to offer the abortion pill – and she remembers patients flying in from across the country to access it.
In those years, even though Roe was still standing, there were few physicians providing second-trimester abortions in the US, and one of the most prominent, George Tiller, was murdered in 2009. As she developed her skills in D&E, Goodrick began to wonder, “How am I going to get help? How am I going to be doing this five days a week for the rest of my life?” The surgical procedure required advanced training, and she worried about finding other physicians to fill in at and eventually take over her practice.
In 2018, Goodrick was attending the International Federation of Abortion and Contraception Professionals’ biannual conference in France when she walked into a session led by Swedish midwives. She discovered that it’s standard in Sweden to provide second trimester abortions not with surgical instruments, but with pills.
“We VERY rarely use D&E and almost exclusively use medical abortion”, or pills, in Sweden, said Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, via email. In the 1980s, she helped develop what would become the WHO protocol for using abortion pills in the second trimester.
“Due to our geography and [the fact] that many live far from a hospital, surgical abortion in the second trimester is not feasible,” she said. Today, medication abortion in the second trimester, a rarity in the US, is available “in all OB-GYN clinics in the whole country”, she adds. It is often performed by midwives.
When Goodrick returned to Arizona, she told the doctors at her clinic she wanted to bring the practice to the clinic. They were wary at first. D&Es had been in use in the US since the 1970s and were by far the most common way to end a pregnancy in the second trimester; today, they make up about 95% of abortions after 14 weeks in the US. Studies in the late 2000s had found that D&Es resulted in fewer complications than inductions (though research today suggests they’re equally safe) and many providers preferred a 20-minute procedure to hours-long labor.
But Zipkin would get on board and today prefers the inductions. While the risk of perforating the uterus with surgical instruments during a D&E is low, with induction abortions it disappears – and patients don’t have to spend the day before in discomfort as laminaria dilates their cervix.
Although training in D&E is still vital for any clinic offering care later in pregnancy – in case, for example, a patient’s uterus doesn’t expel all of the pregnancy tissue with pills alone – Goodrick believes the medication might allow more providers to offer abortions in areas where OB-GYNs are few and far between.
There are about half a dozen protesters outside Camelback when Goodrick returns to work the morning after meeting with the patient who needs help as her pregnancy approaches 20 weeks. The sight isn’t unusual, and Goodrick notes that they’ll be gone by the time the Arizona sun is high in the sky, pushing temperatures into the 90s on this relatively cool summer day. Two cheerful clinic escorts greet patients at their cars and use large umbrellas to block them from the protesters’ views.
As she holds the clinic door open for patients, one of the escorts – a 66-year-old sporting a rainbow vest, straw witch’s hat and a bevy of buttons and pins promoting feminism and voting rights – recalls the second-trimester abortion she received in 1999. She’d been trying to get pregnant and, at one of her regular prenatal appointments, her doctor realized her fetus had stopped growing, probably two weeks earlier. Her regular OB-GYN had been able to offer her a D&E. “Now in Arizona I would not be able to do that,” she says, declining to give her name.
The 32-year-old mother in need of care is now resting in a recliner inside. When she arrived at the clinic that morning, Zipkin gave her a small dose of misoprostol to induce labor and painkillers to ease the ensuing cramps. By lunchtime, when Zipkin sits down to sip an orange Sunkist, it’s delivery time: “Doctor!” a nurse beckons down the hall. Within a few minutes, Goodrick joins her in the patient’s room.
Less than an hour later, they’re both back in the break room. The woman is coming out from under sedation; her husband is about to join her to say goodbye to their baby. “She did great,” Zipkin says.
Goodrick has by now spoken with the Arizona attorney general, who has reassured her the case falls under her definition of a medical emergency. But she worries the Arizona department of health will still flag the case after Camelback reports it – and that the conservative county attorney could decide to prosecute the clinic despite the state AG’s position.
She’s hopeful she won’t have to deal with these kinds of concerns after Arizonians vote in November on whether to enshrine the right to abortion until 24 weeks. “Obviously what happens federally is very important, but every state needs their own ballot initiative,” Goodrick said.
In moments like these, Goodrick reflects on the legacies of abortion providers who came before, like Dr Tiller. “A lot of us still think of him. ‘What would he do now? How would he act? How would he be calm and sure of himself?’” she says.
It’s why, she says, she told the attorney general, “In the future, if you hear of these cases and they can’t get done in the hospital, tell us. We’ll see them.”
Arizona
5 big Powerball lotto prizes won across Arizona days before Christmas
PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Five more lucky lotto players are heading into the holidays with a little extra cash in their pockets.
According to state lottery officials, the big winning tickets were sold around Arizona, each worth $50,000.
The tickets were sold at:
- Goldfield Chevron
- 3265 S. Goldfield Rd, Apache Junction, AZ
- Circle K
- 2088 W. Orange Grove Rd, Tucson, AZ
- QuikTrip
- 918 E. Baseline Rd, Tempe, AZ
- Desert Springs Travel Center
- 4031 Fleet St., Littlefield, AZ
- Terrible’s
- 19985 N. Hwy 93, White Hills, AZ
The winning numbers from Monday’s drawing were 3, 18, 36, 41, 54 and Powerball 7. Nine $1 million tickets were sold nationwide.
The jackpot remains unclaimed and is estimated at $1.7 billion — the fourth largest ever — with the next drawing set for Christmas Eve.
Powerball tickets cost $2 per play, with odds of winning the jackpot sitting at 1 in 292.2 million, according to the lottery.
More information on games and prizes can be found on the Arizona Lottery website.
See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.
Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.
Copyright 2025 KTVK/KPHO. All rights reserved.
Arizona
No. 1 Arizona wraps up Bethune Cookman 107-71
Koa Peat flushes a dunk against Bethune Cookman in McKale Center on Dec. 22.
Arizona wrapped up their pre-Christmas schedule with a nice bow in the form of a 36 point victory over Bethune Cookman. Seven players scored double figures as Brayden Burries lead the game with 20 points. Partway through the first half Mabil Mawut was ejected from the game while on the bench, a rare occurrence under the Tommy Lloyd led team. Arizona will take Christmas off with practice resuming on the 26th and their next game at home on the 29th.
Arizona
Will Arizona see a white Christmas? What the holiday forecast says
Why does it snow so much in Flagstaff? Here’s what to know
Flagstaff may be in a state known for its scorching summers and years-long droughts, but it is one of the snowiest cities in the United States.
Arizonans dreaming of a white Christmas will likely have to settle for rain this year as warm temperatures persist.
A storm system off the West Coast is expected to funnel moisture into the state later this week, giving much of Arizona chances for rain around Christmas Eve and Christmas Day.
The unsettled pattern could bring measurable rainfall, but temperatures are expected to stay too warm for snow, even in the high country. Arizona won’t get the soaking Southern California is expecting from incoming atmospheric rivers slamming the coast, but that same system will push moisture into the Southwest.
“Unfortunately, no white Christmas. I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news,” said Ted Whittock, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Phoenix.
In Phoenix, rain chances as temperatures cool from record highs
In Phoenix and the lower deserts, Christmas week will start off unusually warm before gradually cooling as rain chances increase.
Phoenix could break a daily temperature record for the second day in a row on Monday, Dec. 22. The current record is 79 degrees, with a forecast high of 82. A high of 81 degrees on Sunday, Dec. 21, broke the daily record for the third time this month.
But the weather should shift as a low-pressure system moves in from the Pacific.
“We’ll see a strong low-pressure system move in just off the West Coast and bring plenty of moisture into the region starting tomorrow,” Whittock said. “As a result, we’re going to see periodic rain chances this week.”
Forecasters say there will be two main windows for rain: late Tuesday into early Wednesday and again from Christmas Eve into Christmas Day.
Temperatures will start to trend downward midweek, with highs potentially dropping into the 60s and low 70s by the weekend.
Rainfall totals in the Valley could add up to around a half-inch or more in spots.
In Flagstaff, mostly rain early with uncertain snow chances later
Up north, Flagstaff will also see an unsettled and warmer-than-normal Christmas week. But snow lovers may be disappointed.
“It’s very warm for this time of year compared to what it usually is in December, so we’re expecting this week’s events to mainly be rain instead of snow,” said Jacob Lewandowski, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Flagstaff.
The first chance of rain in the forecast is Tuesday, Dec. 23 in the evening. Snow levels are expected to stay high through midweek, generally between 9,000 and 10,000 feet. That puts Flagstaff below the snow line during the initial rounds of precipitation.
Chances for snow could increase later in the week as cooler air moves in, but confidence drops significantly after Wednesday.
“The chances for snow start increasing by Thursday and Friday, but it’s still a lot of uncertainty with it,” said Lewandowski. “It’s just how warm it is through the week and whether it’s going to be all rain or a little bit of snow mixed in. Most likely not a white Christmas, though. It’s too warm.”
Atmospheric rivers hit the West Coast as much of the U.S. stays warm
The storm system affecting Arizona is part of a broader pattern impacting much of the western United States. Atmospheric rivers, or long plumes of moisture from the Pacific, are expected to bring heavy rain to parts of coastal California this week.
“The atmospheric rivers are going to impact Southern Calfironia, particularly on Wednesday,” Whittock said. “This is an especially impactful system for people that are traveling to and from Southern California, especially coastal areas.”
Forecasts from the National Weather Service in Los Angeles show an extended period of heavy rain expected from Tuesday through Saturday, with 4 to 8 inches of rain likely across coastal and valley areas. Prolonged rainfall could lead to flooding and debris flow concerns, especially in burn scar areas.
Unusual weather isn’t limited to just the West. Much of the United States will have a warmer than normal holiday, with some areas experiencing their warmest Christmases on record.
A northward shift in the jet stream over the middle of the country is allowing warmer air to spread east, causing above-normal temperatures. From the Rockies to parts of the Appalachians, temperatures could reach 15 to 30 degrees above average for Christmas Day.
So whether it’s rainy or warm, much of the country will miss out on a snow globe Christmas this year. In Arizona, that likely means a damp holiday instead of a snowy one.
Hayleigh Evans writes about extreme weather and related topics for The Arizona Republic and azcentral.com. Email her with story tips at hayleigh.evans@arizonarepublic.com.
-
Iowa1 week agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Maine1 week agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Maryland1 week agoFrigid temperatures to start the week in Maryland
-
New Mexico1 week agoFamily clarifies why they believe missing New Mexico man is dead
-
South Dakota1 week agoNature: Snow in South Dakota
-
Detroit, MI1 week ago‘Love being a pedo’: Metro Detroit doctor, attorney, therapist accused in web of child porn chats
-
Health1 week ago‘Aggressive’ new flu variant sweeps globe as doctors warn of severe symptoms
-
Maine1 week agoFamily in Maine host food pantry for deer | Hand Off