Arizona
Arizona volleyball easily dismissed by Kansas State in listless performance
After Kansas State volleyball easily dismissed Arizona 3-0 (26-24, 25-17, 25-18), UA head coach Rita Stubbs did not accompany her team back to the locker room.
“Rita let us go, because she didn’t want to speak out of emotions, which we totally respect,” said freshman outside hitter Carlie Cisneros.
Cisneros and her team didn’t emerge from the locker room until about half an hour after the match was over.
“We needed to have a talk after the game,” Cisneros said. “That’s actually where we were. We talked for a while, and we’re just we’re going to, we will bounce back from this and it’s just fine tuning those little things. We’re close every single set. Same as last week. We are right there, it’s just finishing these games and we just need to keep talking to one another.”
Perhaps talking to each other is what the team needs. At Tuesday’s media availability, both Stubbs and junior outside hitter Jordan Wilson were asked about the leadership situation and how the upperclassmen fit into the team’s success or lack thereof.
Stubbs was specifically asked what she needed from her upperclassmen.
“For them to show that they’re upperclassmen and be able to put the team on their back a little bit when push come to shove,” Stubbs said.
Wilson was asked how the upperclassmen can help lead the team. She was careful in her reply, saying that it was the underclassmen who are taking that role for the most part. Wilson noted that the younger players on the team tend to be the more extroverted ones and are more willing to speak up, but that the older ones were willing to listen. She found positives in that.
“I think the underclassmen kind of beats (the upperclassmen) in the vocalizing their opinions or their feedback,” Wilson said. “I think the upperclassmen, they do give feedback, they are vocal, but I think that it could be to a point where you’re holding that person accountable, rather than just like sugar coating it. And I think the freshmen and…the underclassmen, they’ve really been showcasing that they’re okay if someone gets upset, or if something happens and the other person doesn’t take it well, because they know that they shouldn’t be taking it personal, and they make that known.”
This was a match the team certainly needed. The hometown Wildcats were coming off a run of playing eight of 10 matches against ranked opponents to start Big 12 play 2-8.
Many of the losses were close, but those count like other losses when all is said and done. With Kansas State on the schedule before yet another ranked opponent comes to town on Friday, the time to stop the bleeding was now.
Instead, the cardinal and navy Wildcats fell into the same old patterns. They didn’t close out sets. They let the opponent go on runs then tried to respond after it was too late.
Arizona came in ranked No. 57 in the RPI. KSU was No. 108. This wasn’t one of the top 25 teams that UA had been playing match in and match out, but the home Wildcats looked listless.
Stubbs may not have wanted to talk to her players while she was emotional, but she did speak to the media after the match. The head coach’s voice, which she has been losing since the match at BYU last Saturday when much of the team was sick, was almost completely gone. She admitted that the team played with little energy but took some of that responsibility on herself.
“One hundred percent,” Stubbs said. “If I don’t have energy, I think that’s how I’m going feel the team feels.”
It wasn’t just the team or the coach. McKale Center was quieter than ever. It is tough enough that Big 12 matches are played at 6 p.m. on Wednesday evenings when people are just getting off work. The small crowd was given little reason to get into the match.
Arizona led for most of the first set, but it could never shake the visitors. The lead was never more than two points and KSU came back to tie and even take the one-point lead on a regular basis.
Still, Arizona was the first to reach set point when a serve by Hodge trickled over the net and found the floor.
But K-State Wildcat Aliyah Carter rose to the occasion, as she did again and again in the match. The fifth-year outside hitter wiped away the set point with a kill. On the next point, she got the assist to give KSU its own set point.
Kansas State didn’t win its first set point, but unlike the other Wildcats, it did win its second to go up 1-0 in the match.
There were positives in the opening frame, though. Cisneros and Hodge were both effective and efficient on offense. Wilson wasn’t terribly efficient, but she was effective.
Cisneros had four kills without an error in the first set. She ended the evening with eight kills and only one error, but it took her more attacks to get those kills as the match wore on. She took 31 swings in all, ending with a .226 hitting percentage, but there were steps forward, especially in the early going.
“I’m working on playing with my team, honestly,” Cisneros said. “Offense changes as you go through the game. You know, it’s different from club. It’s different from high school. So I’m adapting to playing offensively in college, because I have my shots, but colleges will see the shots I have and take them away. And Rita is really emphasizing me learning more shots, expanding my game, getting better. And it was effective tonight, because my other teammates were doing their jobs and holding the block, and I was able to try new things.”
Hodge ended the night with nine kills on .129 hitting. She added seven digs, three total blocks, and two aces for a team-high 13 points.
Wilson had a team-high 11 kills but she almost matched that with nine errors on a team-high 37 swings for an .054 hitting percentage. She added nine digs, three assists, and one total block. She accounted for 11.5 points.
Arizona didn’t pick itself up after letting the first set slip away. K-State tied the second set at 4-4 and never trailed again. KSU went up 13-7. UA went on a five-point run to cut the lead to one point but never got closer than that. Before long, it was set point with the score 24-16 in the second.
The third set was a bit more competitive for a while, but not by a lot. Arizona took an 8-5 lead, but KSU responded with a 7-0 run. Hodge led a brief attempt at a comeback to pull UA within a point at 15-14, but KSU used a 10-4 run to close out the match.
Stubbs tried a number of lineup changes during the match to see if it could spark something for Arizona. She used all four of her middle blockers. While senior Alayna Johnson sees reserve time on a fairly regular basis, it was the first Big 12 appearance for freshman Adrianna Bridges. Bridges had one kill and one total block in her conference debut.
Arizona had no answer for Carter all evening. The grad student ended with 16 kills on .268 hitting. She added 12 digs for a double-double. Carter was one of three K-State Wildcats to have double-digit kills.
Arizona’s next opponent is No. 8 Kansas (20-2, 11-1). The Jayhawks dropped their first Big 12 match of the season in a 3-1 loss to No. 11 Arizona State on Wednesday evening. The two teams are now tied atop the league standings but the Sun Devils won the only contest between the two this season.
Lead photo courtesy of Arizona Athletics
Arizona
Data centers are good for Arizona. Here’s why | Opinion
Data centers have gotten a bad rap lately, but here’s why we think they are actually good for Arizona. It starts with jobs.
Chandler City Council votes no on AI data center
Chandler becomes one of the first Phoenix-area cities to reject a data center, despite months of lobbying by former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema.
Arizona data centers have generated a lot of political heat in recent weeks.
At her State of the State address, Gov. Katie Hobbs questioned the social benefit of data centers and signaled an interest in reinstating a sales tax on data center equipment purchases. Neal Carter, a Republican state legislator, agrees with Hobbs. So too might Republican state legislator Leo Biasiucci.
A month ago, the Chandler City Council unanimously rejected a proposed data center despite the lobbying efforts of former U.S. Sen. Kyrsten Sinema. Hundreds of Chandler residents filled the auditorium for the vote, and 256 residents submitted online comments opposing the data center.
In Tucson, the city council unanimously rejected connecting a large data center (Project Blue) to the city’s water system. Attorney General Kris Mayes is now looking deeper into Project Blue, Tucson Electric Power and the Arizona Corporation Commission.
Here at The Arizona Republic, the opinion section published an editorial on Jan. 20 (Arizona data centers bring hidden water risks), and the news section printed an article on Jan. 18 (Gas power plant for data center project stirs concerns in Surprise), both of which cast data centers in a less-than-flattering light.
And earlier this week, handfuls of speakers at the Corporation Commission blamed data centers for proposed APS rate hikes.
Each situation has its own complexities and justifications (and I’ll get into some of them in future weeks). Some opposition is more factually substantiated than others. But they’re all rooted in a suspicion that these large warehouses of computer servers that power the modern world are no longer great things for Arizona.
Arizona data center benefits starts with jobs
If we may be so bold, and to set the stage for future articles here at the Republic, here are a few reasons why Arizona should celebrate our position as a top 10 state for data centers:
- Jobs. It’s not just the people employed by data centers (many of which are high-paying jobs), but the ancillary jobs needed by data centers: contracted electricians, carpenters, pipefitters, HVAC technicians, etc. PricewaterhouseCoopers (“PwC”) found that data centers accounted for 81,000 jobs in Arizona as of 2023.
- Taxes. It’s the start of the state legislative season and, sadly, this is going to be one of those years in which we hear lots about the things we can’t afford. But data centers help that equation. According to the same PwC report, data centers generated $2.3 billion in state and local tax revenue from 2017 to 2021. That means money for schools and roads. Or lower state income taxes (as happened).
- Tech center. It’s a truism that tech begets other tech. We’ve said this as we’ve celebrated the massive expansions of TSMC and Intel. It’s also true of data centers. And if proprietors of data centers – companies like Amazon and Microsoft – are happy with Arizona as a data center home, they’ll likely consider Arizona a home for other tech investments.
- Buying unwanted power. Normal businesses use power during the day (8 am-5 pm). Homes use power during the evening (5-11 pm). But few users demand power overnight (11 pm-8 am). This means we often have to dump unsold power. But data centers need power around the clock, and they can buy that overnight power, generating revenue for Arizona utility companies that then doesn’t have to be generated from Arizona households.
Those are the benefits.
Detractors focus on power, water and land. They’re all important, but solvable.
On power, public utilities can, and should, ensure data centers pay for all the power they use–not the public. The Salt River Project (SRP) website states this explicitly on its website. APS announced a proposed 45% increase on data center electricity costs to “make sure that (data centers) will continue to pay their fair share.” The recent agreement between Tucson Electric Power and Project Blue intends to do the same. And some data centers are even looking at generating their own power.
Data centers aren’t our biggest water worry
Regarding water, data centers have gotten so efficient at water use that, in some cases, they would use less water than vacant warehouses (of which there are, sadly, many). The Project Blue data center before Tucson City Council promised to be water-positive for the city, and other cities, such as Chandler have proposed caps on water usage by data centers. These caps are the same that apply to other businesses; data centers don’t get a special water deal. And, really, if you’re looking to pin water woes on any industry, it’s not chip-manufacturing, and it’s not data centers. It’s farming (over 70% of Arizona’s water supply goes to agriculture).
Lastly, regarding land, of course people don’t want to have neighborhoods disrupted by massive warehouses. And nobody should feel like they got into a bidding war with a data center for a home in a cute, quiet neighborhood. That’s why we have noise ordinances and zoning laws. Arizona still has plenty of space. The smart people in city planning can figure it out. And unlike big box stores, data centers don’t have 18-wheelers constantly delivering supplies.
Arizona is a state known for growth. We’ve grown massively in residents. We’ve grown massively in housing (and need to do more). We’ve grown massively in tourism. We’ve grown massively in healthcare. We’ve grown massively in education. And we’ve recently grown massively in semiconductors.
There’s no reason we can’t keep growing in data centers.
Stephen Richer is the CEO of Republic Affairs, a fellow at the Cato Institute, and a former Maricopa County Recorder. Josh Heywood is operations manager at Republic Affairs.
Arizona
Arizona men’s basketball at BYU fan discussion
The top-ranked Arizona Wildcats hit the road for a Big Monday matchup against No. 13 BYU. The Wildcats won in Provo last season.
Here’s all the info you need to watch, listen to or follow the game online. Come chat with us!
Arizona-BYU game time, details:
How can I watch Arizona-BYU?
Arizona-BYU will be shown on ESPN. Jon Sciambi (play-by-play) and Fran Fraschilla (analyst) will be calling the game.
How can I stream Arizona-BYU online?
The stream of Arizona-BYU can be viewed on ESPN.com.
How can I listen to Arizona-BYU on the radio?
How can I follow Arizona-BYU?
Arizona-BYU pregame coverage:
Arizona
Arizona towns fight for federal disaster funding after deadly flooding
MIAMI, AZ — Late last week, officials with Arizona’s Department of Emergency and Military Affairs (DEMA) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) were back in Gila County, meeting with state and local leaders to reassess damage created by deadly flooding in September and October last year.
Late last year, Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs ‘ office announced that FEMA had denied their request for a Major Disaster Declaration, which would have provided critical funding for the towns of Miami, Globe, and the rest of Gila County.
Globe Mayor Al Gameros told ABC15 they’ve estimated their damage to be around $96 million, with Miami leaders telling ABC15 the damage is about $56 million.
If FEMA approves funding for towns, the percentage of the overall cost that is owed by each town is reduced substantially, critical for towns with smaller populations.
Nick covered the initial round of flooding in late September 2025 and returned to Globe in late October to get an update on the recovery there.
Late last week, ABC15 returned to Gila County – this time to Miami – to see how leaders there were rebounding, nearly four months after the flooding that killed three people.
“We had some floods here, but it wasn’t anything like that,” explains Miami Mayor Gil Madrid, who was also born and raised in the small Gila County mining town.
“It was unbelievable. Unbelievable. And sad to see what was going on.”
It’s damage the Mayor says totals about $56 million, but as of right now, FEMA isn’t helping cover any of it.
In December 2025, FEMA officials sent the state a letter, denying their request for a major disaster declaration, saying in part, “this event was not of such severity and magnitude as to be beyond the capabilities of the state and affected local governments.”
“How could they not stand with us in that disaster?” questioned Mayor Madrid.
So the Town of Miami sent its own appeal to FEMA, citing not just the flooding events in September and October last year, but also another major natural disaster – The Telegraph Fire in 2021, which burned more than 180,000 acres, creating larges areas of erosion on the Pinal Mountains, that helped send flood water, tree limbs, and other debris down the mountains, and into areas like downtown Globe and Miami.
ABC15 surveyed the area of Mackey Camp Road and saw several areas covered in dirt and sand that had accumulated in the nearly five years since the fire.
For Miami Town Manager Alexis Rivera, who reached out directly to ABC15 after seeing his follow-up series in Globe, not having that funding from FEMA means money from other critical departments and resources will have to wait for key projects to begin, things like new work trucks, new police vehicles, and infrastructure improvements.
“We are going to keep fighting,” says Rivera.
ABC15 reached back out to FEMA late last week and received this statement:
FEMA has received the State of Arizona’s appeal related to the September 25–27, 2025 severe storms and flooding. The appeal is currently under review in accordance with the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act. FEMA has sent staff to Arizona to join state and local representatives to validate new information contained in the State’s appeal. There is no timeline for appeal determinations, as each request is evaluated based on the specific circumstances.
-
Sports1 week agoMiami’s Carson Beck turns heads with stunning admission about attending classes as college athlete
-
Illinois5 days agoIllinois school closings tomorrow: How to check if your school is closed due to extreme cold
-
Pittsburg, PA1 week agoSean McDermott Should Be Steelers Next Head Coach
-
Lifestyle1 week agoNick Fuentes & Andrew Tate Party to Kanye’s Banned ‘Heil Hitler’
-
Pennsylvania1 day agoRare ‘avalanche’ blocks Pennsylvania road during major snowstorm
-
Sports1 week agoMiami star throws punch at Indiana player after national championship loss
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoNortheast Ohio cities dealing with rock salt shortage during peak of winter season
-
Science1 week ago‘It is scary’: Oak-killing beetle reaches Ventura County, significantly expanding range