Alaska Airlines’ acquisition of Hawaiian Airlines is progressing, albeit slowly. We were just advised that it is largely on schedule, which could mean it is still up to a year or more away. Meanwhile, others in high positions have mentioned it could conclude much sooner than that.
Most recently, the shareholders of Hawaii Airlines gave their approval. This is despite an ongoing shareholder lawsuit we were told would likely have no impact. In addition, earlier this month, the U.S. Justice Department’s Antitrust Division requested additional information and documentary material as part of its review process.
Hawaii’s four county mayors recently spoke out about the merger.
The mayors have concluded that the merger would enhance airline service for Hawaii’s communities, improve connectivity, and offer more options for residents. We’ll add that it will provide many of the same benefits for Hawaii visitors.
The mayors confirmed what we already know: for neighbor island residents, like BOH editors here on Kauai, air travel is much like a bus service. It is vital for accessing essential services like business meetings, medical appointments, seeing family and friends, and even dining out.
Advertisement
Not only that, but these airlines, on a daily basis, move workers between islands and small towns, including those in construction, medicine, and other fields. That is essential to keeping all business moving forward in Hawaii and in Alaska, including the travel business.
Both Alaska and Hawaii residents share significant similarities. Alaska has provided local and reliable service in that state for close to 100 years, and Hawaiian has done the same here in Hawaii.
What Hawaii’s mayors didn’t say seems clear.
They believe that allowing Hawaiian Airlines to merge with Alaska Airlines is the best path to ensure the continued health and longevity of our state’s largest airline, enabling it to serve local residents for generations to come.
The implication is there is no assurance that Hawaiian Airlines can continue in business without the pending merger. You’ll recall that Hawaiian Airlines has amassed about $1 billion in debt, which at last count, is increasing to the tune of $1 million per day.
Benefits for Alaska Airlines.
Alaska Airlines is #5 on the list of largest airlines in the US. That position isn’t expected to change. Hawaiian’s long-haul aircraft, flights, and experience, including widebody aircraft of two types (A330 and B787), should provide Alaska with a new means for long-distance expansion. That could provide more competition on routes across the Pacific and even help reduce costs.
Benefits for Hawaiian Airlines.
The merger reveals improved operational efficiency and expansion opportunities at the Hawaii bellwether. With a much larger fleet, new technologies, and other resources across the board, Hawaiian will have needed economies of scale that should improve performance while driving down operating costs. It offers them the potential for many new routes.
In addition, Hawaiian has nearly 7,000 employees, most of which are based in Hawaii. The merger would result in most people, especially union ones, retaining their jobs.
Advertisement
But flight attendants aren’t so sure yet.
Alaska and Hawaiian Airlines flight attendants are saying that they aren’t ready to give their blessing to the planned merger of the two airlines.
The flight attendants’ unions representing Alaska Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines have now halted that merger approval. Their unions want the commitment of both airlines to handle merger concerns to their liking and preserve what they deem essential elements of their respective contracts.
Public opinion on the proposed Hawaiian/Alaska merger.
We’ve already had a range of comments on this topic. Just today, Chris said, “Listen… Alaska wants to eliminate Hawaiian. As in the past they may tacitly promise things then when they can, dump all those promises. Alaska wants Hawaiian to cease to exist along with contracts, aircraft leases, employee bases, international routes, everything. It’s all going to end.
Yet, another comment responded, saying: “The Association of Flight Attendants, the union that represents both Alaska and Hawaiian flight attendants, is powerless to stop this merger. Hawaiian shareholders voted 98% in favor of the merger last week. DOJ Anti-Trust Division is not going to have cause to stop this from happening as it did with the failed Jet Blue and Spirit. Hawaiian is in a terrible financial situation and the future looks even more bleak without this acquisition. Sorry…it’s the hard truth. Get on board with Alaska or go the way of Aloha Airlines.”
JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – The Supreme Court of Alaska will be taking up the case of the State of Alaska, Division of Elections v. Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.
The oral arguments will be held Monday at 10 a.m. via Zoom, according to an order and opening notice.
The document also specifies that a decision is expected to be made before noon on Tuesday.
According to documents from the Division of Elections, the state must start printing ballots at noon on the same day.
Advertisement
This comes after an Anchorage Superior Court Judge ordered Dan J. Sullivan on to the ballot Friday.
See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com
A new home under construction in Potter Valley in Anchorage. (Loren Holmes / ADN)
This June, two very different offers reach Alaska families, and both amount to the same thing: $10,000. The difference is everything.
Bill Walker, running for governor, would hand every eligible Alaskan a one-time $10,000 check and then end the Permanent Fund dividend for good. Ask one question: Where does his $10,000 come from?
It comes from the Permanent Fund, the people’s own money and the savings Alaskans built for their children. Walker would spend that endowment once to pay Alaskans to give up the yearly dividend forever.
Think about what that does. It cancels the annual check that gives a family a reason to keep an Alaska address and replaces it with a single payout. You hand people their own savings, call it a gift and cut the tie that held them here in the same motion. It is the oldest mistake in governing money: raid what you have saved to buy a moment’s applause and call the spending generosity.
Advertisement
A plan that spends the people’s savings to send the people away is not bold. It is foolish.
Now consider the other $10,000. Through Alaska Housing Finance Corp., the state offers families up to $10,000 to build a new, energy-efficient home. AHFC raids nothing. It earns its own way. Over the years, it has returned more than $2 billion to the state treasury, and it spends some of that income the way any good business does: to win a customer.
Here, the customer is an Alaskan who wants to own a home, put down roots and stay.
That is the oldest sound move in business: Invest a little of what you earn to bring in someone who stays. The homeowner remains, the community gains a family and the corporation keeps earning. The money spent comes back. A plan that puts earnings to work to bring people home is not charity. It is clever.
Same amount. Opposite source. Opposite wisdom. One spends savings; the other spends earnings. One pays Alaskans to leave; the other pays them to stay. One empties the state; the other fills it.
Advertisement
This Homeownership Month, the choice is the size of a single check, and the whole question is where the check comes from and what it asks of you. Ten thousand dollars of your own fund, to wave you goodbye. Or $10,000, earned and reinvested, to help you stay and build.
Evan Swensen is the publisher of Publication Consultants in Anchorage and the author of “What’s the Money For: A Permanent Fund Mortgage Proposal.”
• • •
The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.
