Connect with us

Alaska

What to know about the controversial Willow oil drilling project in Alaska | CNN Politics

Published

on

What to know about the controversial Willow oil drilling project in Alaska | CNN Politics




CNN
 — 

The Biden administration is anticipated to decide quickly on whether or not to approve the controversial Willow Mission in Alaska.

ConocoPhillips’ huge Willow oil drilling challenge on Alaska’s North Slope has been shifting via the administration’s approval course of for months, galvanizing a sudden rebellion of on-line activism in opposition to it, together with multiple million letters written to the White Home in protest of the challenge, and a Change.org petition with greater than 2.9 million signatures.

Right here’s what to know in regards to the Willow Mission.

Advertisement

ConocoPhillips’ proposed Willow Mission is an enormous and decadeslong oil drilling enterprise on Alaska’s North Slope within the Nationwide Petroleum Reserve, which is owned by the federal authorities.

The realm the place the challenge is deliberate holds as much as 600 million barrels of oil. That oil would take years to succeed in the market because the challenge has but to be constructed.

The state’s lawmakers say the challenge will create jobs, enhance home vitality manufacturing and reduce the nation’s reliance on overseas oil. All three lawmakers in Alaska’s bipartisan congressional delegation met with President Joe Biden and his senior advisers on March 3, urging the president and his administration to approve the challenge.

A coalition of Alaska Native teams on the North Slope additionally helps the challenge, saying it might be a much-needed new income for the area and fund companies together with training and well being care.

“Willow presents a chance to proceed that funding within the communities,” Nagruk Harcharek, president of the advocacy group Voice of the Arctic Iñupiat, advised CNN. “With out that cash and income stream, we’re reliant on the state and the feds.”

Advertisement

Different Alaska Natives dwelling nearer to the deliberate challenge, together with metropolis officers and tribal members within the Native village of Nuiqsut, are deeply involved in regards to the well being and environmental impacts of a significant oil improvement.

In a current private letter to Inside Secretary Deb Haaland, Nuiqsut Mayor Rosemary Ahtuangaruak and two different Nuiqsut metropolis and tribal officers stated that the village would bear the brunt of well being and environmental impacts from Willow. Different “villages get some monetary advantages from oil and gasoline exercise however expertise far fewer impacts that Nuiqsut,” the letter reads. “We’re at floor zero for the industrialization of the Arctic.”

As well as, a surge of on-line activism in opposition to Willow has emerged on TikTok within the final week – leading to over a million letters being despatched to the Biden administration in opposition to the challenge and over 2.8 million signatures on a Change.org petition to halt Willow.

By the administration’s personal estimates, the challenge would generate sufficient oil to launch 9.2 million metric tons of planet-warming carbon air pollution a yr – equal to including 2 million gas-powered automobiles to the roads.

“This can be a large local weather menace and inconsistent with this administration’s guarantees to tackle the local weather disaster,” Jeremy Lieb, an Alaska-based senior legal professional at environmental legislation group Earthjustice, advised CNN. Along with considerations a couple of fast-warming Arctic, teams are additionally involved the challenge might destroy habitat for native species and alter the migration patterns of animals together with caribou.

Advertisement

Willow advocates, together with Alaska lawmakers, vow the challenge will produce fossil gas in a cleaner manner than getting it from different international locations, together with Saudi Arabia or Venezuela.

“Why are we not accessing [oil] from a useful resource the place we all know our environmental observe report is second-to-none?” Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska stated throughout a current press convention.

Sure.

Throughout his 2020 presidential marketing campaign, Biden vowed to finish new oil and gasoline drilling on public lands and waters – which he initially carried out as a part of an early government order.

Nonetheless, the drilling pause was struck down by a federal decide in 2021, and since then the Biden administration has opened up a number of areas for brand spanking new drilling. A number of of those new oil and gasoline drilling areas have been challenged in courtroom by environmental teams.

Advertisement

If the Willow Mission is authorized by the Biden administration in any kind, it’ll nearly actually face a authorized problem.

Environmental authorized group Earthjustice has advised CNN it’s getting ready authorized motion in opposition to the challenge. Attorneys have already began laying out their authorized rationale, saying the Biden administration’s authority to guard floor sources on Alaska’s public lands contains taking steps to cut back planet-warming carbon air pollution – which Willow would in the end add to.

A choice on the Willow Mission might come as early as this week.

The Biden administration might approve the scope of the challenge with three drilling pads – which is what was really useful by the Bureau of Land Administration in Alaska – or provide a scaled-down model of the challenge with two drilling pads. It might additionally determine to disclaim the Willow Mission all collectively.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska Senate Education Committee advances new school funding bill with $1,000 per-student boost

Published

on

Alaska Senate Education Committee advances new school funding bill with ,000 per-student boost


The Senate Education Committee advanced a new version of a House school funding bill with a $1,000 boost to the BSA on Wednesday, April 2, 2025 (Sean Maguire/ADN).

JUNEAU — The Alaska Senate Education Committee on Wednesday advanced an amended school funding bill with a $1,000 increase to the Base Student Allocation, the state’s per-student funding formula.

School administrators have been advocating for a $1,000 BSA boost, saying the public education system is in crisis. Districts report that hundreds of educators face being fired, popular programs are set to be cut and that school facilities are crumbling.

But many in the Legislature, including some members of the Democrat-dominated Senate majority, believe a school funding increase of that size would be unaffordable with the state facing a substantial deficit. The $1,000 BSA boost would cost roughly $250 million per year.

Last month, the House approved House Bill 69 with the same school funding increase. It contained several policy provisions intended to appeal to Gov. Mike Dunleavy who vetoed a bipartisan education package last year.

Advertisement

The House measure included limits on cellphones and plans to make it easier for students to attend the public school of their choice, regardless of where they live, among other policy provisions.

“We recognize that we need to have a substantial increase to school funding,” said Anchorage Democratic Sen. Löki Tobin, chair of the Senate Education Committee, at a Tuesday media conference.

A new version of House Bill 69 was unveiled Wednesday in the committee. But its total cost has not been estimated yet.

Staff for Tobin highlighted some of its new policy provisions: School districts would be required to set target class sizes and explain why they are unable to meet them; if three-quarters of a class shows improvement academically, the school can get recognition or financial benefits; and provisions were added to make it easier for charter schools to appeal denials of applications — among other changes.

“I’m generally pretty excited about it. I think it’s a good bill,” said Sitka independent Rep. Rebecca Himschoot, who was the lead sponsor behind the original version of HB 69.

Advertisement

The measure advanced from the Senate Education Committee on Wednesday with unanimous support. Tok Republican Sen. Mike Cronk, a minority member, was absent from Wednesday’s hearing.

At the start of the legislative session, the nonpartisan Legislative Finance Division estimated that a BSA boost of more than $1,800 would be needed to make up for losses from almost 15 years of inflation.

Since then, education advocates have been calling for the $1,000 BSA increase.

Anchorage School District began informing more than 180 educators this week that their positions will be eliminated unless the Legislature substantially raises school funding. Displaced staff would get opportunities to fill vacant positions, district officials said.

However, some Republican lawmakers have said that a school funding increase must be tied to improvements of Alaska’s bottom-of-the-nation test scores.

Advertisement

Lisa Parady, executive director of the Alaska Council of School Administrators, told a joint meeting of the House and Senate Education Committees on Monday that the state’s public school system needs a major investment to be made whole.

“When I hear, ‘education is failing,’ I say, ‘No, education is starving. It’s not failing. It’s starving,’ ” she said.

HB 69 heads now to the Senate Finance Committee. It remains unclear whether the $1,000 BSA boost will be approved by the full Senate.

Kodiak Republican Senate President Gary Stevens acknowledged Tuesday that his majority caucus remained split on the BSA, reflecting similar divides across the Legislature.

Lawmakers are balancing a school funding boost against this year’s Permanent Fund dividend.

Advertisement

“As you’re well aware, when we raise education funds, we sometimes have to lower the dividend amount,” Stevens said at a Tuesday media conference. “So that’s an issue that our caucus is dealing with, and hopefully we will come to a conclusion and be able to come to agreement with the House as well.”

In contrast, Wasilla Republican Sen. Mike Shower, the Senate minority leader, said his six-member caucus was not split on the BSA. He said by text Tuesday that the caucus could “tolerate” a $680 boost to the funding formula, which would match the same figure appropriated last year on a one-time basis.

The cost of a $680 boost to the BSA would be roughly $175 million per year.

Sitka GOP Sen. Bert Stedman, a co-chair of the Senate Finance Committee, said there was broad recognition that the current school funding formula is insufficient. He said the Legislature should approve “a minimum” of a $680 BSA boost this year, matching the school funding figure modeled in the Senate Finance Committee’s budget discussions.

Senate majority members on Tuesday spoke in favor of new revenue measures to bridge the state’s fiscal gap over the next several years.

Advertisement

Senators have introduced bills to raise state revenue, including by hiking oil taxes, but those measures could face long odds of being approved by the narrowly divided House.

But a $680 boost to the Base Student Allocation may not be enough for many of the state’s 53 school districts.

Clayton Holland, superintendent of the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District, told lawmakers that a school funding increase of that size would still see layoffs. The district is set to send out warning notices this week to 160 educators that their positions could be cut with a $680 increase to the BSA, he said.

Legislators have shown a renewed interest in increasing spending for school maintenance after a report by KYUK and ProPublica detailed the results of years of underfunding rural school infrastructure.

Holland, who also serves as the head of the Alaska Superintendents Association, told legislators Monday that Kenai schools have a $400 million deferred maintenance backlog. He said walls and roofs in schools across the district are crumbling.

Advertisement

Holland said his most “shocking story” about infrastructure failings comes from Nanwalek, a small community off the road system on the Kenai Peninsula. He said the school’s pipes are old and corroded.

“On a regular basis, my principal has to have a vacuum cleaner to suck up sewage coming out of those pipes in order to keep the school going,” he said.

One potentially contentious policy area of House Bill 69: provisions affecting homeschooled students.

The Alaska Supreme Court recently asked a lower court to determine whether it is constitutional for those students to use public funds to pay for private school tuition.

HB 69 would require greater district oversight of how homeschool allotments are used.

Advertisement

Additionally, House Republicans sought a funding boost for homeschooled or correspondence students, but those proposals were rejected and do not appear in the Senate’s education bill.

One new provision added to HB 69 would require homeschooled students to take state tests, alternative assessments or to produce a portfolio to receive allotments from the state. Currently, around 15% of homeschooled students take a key annual state test, which has frustrated some in the Legislature, who say the performance of correspondence students is difficult to track.

Nikiski Republican Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, a former teacher, amended the bill so that the testing requirements would only take effect in July 2026.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska Legislature OKs 18-year-olds serving alcohol in some venues

Published

on

Alaska Legislature OKs 18-year-olds serving alcohol in some venues


Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage, speaks in support of a measure that would allow 18- to 20-year-olds to serve alcohol in some venues on Wednesday, April 2, 2025 (Sean Maguire/ADN).

JUNEAU — The Alaska Legislature on Wednesday approved a measure that would allow 18-year-olds to serve alcohol in some venues.

The Legislature passed an almost-identical version of the bill last year. It was approved by lawmakers after the constitutional deadline for the end of the legislative session. Gov. Mike Dunleavy vetoed the bill, along with four others, arguing that they could face legal challenges.

Senate Bill 15 would allow 18- to 20-year-olds to serve alcohol under supervision in restaurants, breweries and hotels, but not bars or liquor stores. Currently, Alaskans must be 21 or older to serve alcohol in those venues.

The measure also adds a warning wherever alcohol is sold of its risks of causing cancer.

Advertisement

Supporters of the measure said lowering the age limit to serve alcohol would help address some of the Alaska hospitality industry’s labor challenges. Anchorage Democratic Rep. Zack Fields said the policy change would help the industry for the upcoming summer tourism season.

“For young adults who are attending college outside of Alaska, this bill increases the likelihood that they can return and work during the summer season and get really good-paying jobs,” he said before Wednesday’s final vote.

Anchorage independent Rep. Alyse Galvin supported the bill and said she worked in restaurants during college. She said being unable to serve alcohol meant she earned less money.

The House passed the measure Wednesday on a 32-8 vote. All eight no votes were by minority Republicans. They did not explain their opposition during floor debates. The Senate passed the measure unanimously in February.

Wasilla GOP Rep. Cathy Tilton voted against the measure. She said after the floor session that she supported a right to work, but she was concerned about introducing younger Alaskans to alcohol, considering the state’s high rates of addiction and abuse.

Advertisement

Only three U.S. states — Alaska, Utah and Nevada — require alcohol servers to be at least 21 years old.

Sarah Oates, president of the Alaska Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant and Retailers Association, or CHARR, said that Alaska’s age limit has caused labor challenges for the hospitality industry.

“Employers struggle to promote or retain quality employees who are 18-20 years of age because they are prohibited from serving alcohol or supervising other employees who serve or sell alcohol,” she said. “Alaska is not competitive in this space, and our industry is experiencing an outmigration of young workers.”

The measure also requires new language to be added to warning signs wherever alcohol is sold. Currently, those signs say that drinking alcohol “during pregnancy can cause birth defects.”

SB 15 would require an additional warning about cancer risks, stating on signs that “alcohol use can cause cancer, including breast and colon cancers.”

Advertisement

Former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy in January called for cancer risk warnings to be added to alcoholic beverages. Adopting Murthy’s advisory nationally would require a measure passed by Congress.

Anchorage Democratic Rep. Andrew Gray, a physician assistant, supported adding the cancer warning signs last year. On Wednesday, Gray said he drinks alcohol, and that he isn’t trying to demonize alcohol.

“Rather, I just want Alaskans to make informed decisions about their health,” he said.

The Legislature has now approved two of five vetoed bills passed last year after the constitutional deadline for the end of the session. In February, lawmakers again approved a $75 million bonding package for a new cruise ship dock in Seward.

After Wednesday’s vote, SB 15 now advances to the governor’s desk for his consideration.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Cheeseburgers and chicken so far fail to entice a rescue dog who's spent weeks on the run in Alaska

Published

on

Cheeseburgers and chicken so far fail to entice a rescue dog who's spent weeks on the run in Alaska


JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) — In the days after wildfires devastated the Los Angeles area, a formerly stray dog named Jackie lucked into a new life. She was rescued from an overburdened shelter in Los Angeles County, where she faced possible euthanasia, and given a home far away in Juneau, Alaska.

But Jackie didn’t stay long.

The German shepherd-husky mix slipped her collar on the first day with her new family in mid-February and absconded to a pocket of forest. Since then, she has been living by her wits — eluding a trap that was set with food such as cheeseburgers or chicken by animal control workers and volunteers worried about her.

The forested area Jackie frequents is near a busy road. Further, black bears are starting to reemerge from hibernation, raising the potential the dog could have an unfortunate run-in. Volunteers have stopped putting out food and cat kibble to avoid attracting bears.

Advertisement

“Maybe this is what she wants, is to be free and feral like this,” said Thom Young-Bayer, a Juneau animal control officer. “It’s not a safe way for her to live here.”

Young-Bayer and his wife, Skylar, have been searching in their free time, often at night, for the skittish canine, painstakingly trying to build trust with her. Jackie has been known to burrow into the soft moss on the forest floor for cover and to avoid looking directly into the Young-Bayers’ headlamps, making it hard to detect her eyes in the dark.

On videos Thom Young-Bayer has taken with his infrared camera, Jackie’s red heat signature resembles something out of the movie “Predator.”

On a recent day, Young-Bayer caught a fleeting glimpse of Jackie in the lush forest, her dark coat helping camouflage her movements among the stumps and roots. He surveyed the undergrowth and surroundings but came up empty — as did a nearby trap he had been monitoring for weeks.

When Young-Bayer returned to a trail where a fellow animal control officer had been waiting, he learned Jackie had trotted past on a frozen pond.

Advertisement

Lately Young-Bayer been encountering Jackie on every visit. Young-Bayer says that’s progress. Weeks ago, if Jackie saw someone, she would flee. He and his wife aren’t trying to sneak up on the dog and want to help her feel safe, he said.

Juneau Animal Rescue, a local pet adoption agency that also handles animal control and protective services, has asked that people who see Jackie report their sightings. Given the dog’s skittishness, officials want to limit those searching for her.

Little is known about Jackie’s history. She was brought into a California shelter as a stray in early January, days before deadly wildfires swept through the Los Angeles area. She is believed to be 2 to 3 years old. Her intake forms listed her as quiet with a moderate anxiety and stress level.

Skylar Young-Bayer, who has volunteered with rescue groups in that region, helped arrange for Jackie and two other dogs at risk of being euthanized to be transferred to Juneau for adoption. Jackie was with a foster home before her adoption placing.

Other dogs have gained fame as fugitives, including Scrim, a 17-pound, mostly terrier mutt who was recaptured in New Orleans in February — in a cat trap — after months on the lam.

Advertisement

Mike Mazouch, animal control and protection director for Juneau Animal Rescue, noted Jackie didn’t have much time to bond with her new family before bolting. Officers deemed trying to tranquilize her as too risky because they didn’t know if they would be able to find her once she was sedated.

Mazouch accompanied Thom Young-Bayer to the forest last week to disassemble the trap when Jackie came within 50 feet (15 meters) of Mazouch on the frozen pond. Mazouch snapped a photo of her as she appeared between the skinny, tall trees. He called efforts to capture her a “battle of wills.”

“She is not willing to give up, and we’re not willing to give up, either,” Mazouch said.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending