Connect with us

Alaska

OPINION: Repeal of the 80th percentile rule is absolutely not the change Alaska needs

Published

on

OPINION: Repeal of the 80th percentile rule is absolutely not the change Alaska needs


There is little scarier than the phrase “I am from the government, and I am here to help,” except perhaps a new version we’ve been hearing lately: “I am an out-of-state insurance salesman, and I am here to help, too.”

Premera Blue Cross Blue Shield, the Seattle-based insurance company with a near-monopoly on Alaska’s health insurance market, boasts more lobbyists (three) than employees in its Anchorage office, but that hasn’t stopped them from working hard to repeal a rule that has protected Alaskans for nearly 20 years. The 80th percentile rule, a longstanding consumer protection that required insurers to pay the going rate in the community for your medical bills rather than an arbitrarily low amount that left you saddled with the rest, was recently repealed following extensive lobbying and marketing by Premera.

In a recent opinion piece full of misleading statements and omitted details, Premera’s Seattle-based market manager, Jim Grazko, indicated Premera has been providing this “help” not to further their bottom line but rather to protect Alaskans from overpaid nurses and overpriced mammograms. In one example, Premera made the case that health care costs are the same in Anchorage as they are in San Francisco. Even if that were true for health care, it is not the case for health insurance. According to the independent health policy organization KFF, a silver plan costs 41% more in Alaska than it does in San Francisco for a family of four. That’s $9,360 more a year for insurance to cover the same-sized medical bills.

Advertisement

The 80th percentile rule is important for every Alaskan, even those covered by Medicare and Medicaid. Adopted in 2004, the 80th percentile rule makes insurers pay their fair share of your health care bills and helps balance Premera’s monopoly power in Alaska’s health insurance marketplace. Without it, Premera gets to pick the winners and losers in our health care system, reducing the number of providers and facilities “in network” and shifting the costs to us, the consumers, through higher ‘out of network’ copays, deductibles and balance bills.

Meanwhile, health care providers are increasingly the losers in this game of new rules, being forced to retire or leave the state; reducing the number of providers to care for Alaskans. Premera claims that repealing the 80th percentile rule will reduce what providers and hospitals charge. That simply isn’t true; it just means that the patient will have to pay an even bigger balance of the bill, just like in the ‘bad old days’ before 2004 when the rule was introduced to stop exactly this type of predatory behavior by insurers.

Competition reduces prices, and this is just as true for health insurance as it is for pencils. While no recent reputable study has blamed the 80th percentile rule for rising insurance prices, Premera hasn’t missed an opportunity to gaslight the health care community for being the cause of high insurance prices in Alaska.

An April 2022 study of insurance prices by the Urban Institute and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation revealed that “the number of competing insurers was important; the presence of one insurer meant premiums would be $189.50 per month higher, on average, relative to a market with five or more insurers” and, interestingly, that “the presence of Blue Cross Blue Shield insurers… was associated with greater than average benchmark premiums.”

In Alaska, we only have two insurers on the individual market, Moda and Premera. Worse still, Premera — a Blue Cross Blue Shield insurer — controls the vast majority of Alaska’s market.

Advertisement

Moda is trying to compete in the Alaska insurance market by, among other means, offering lower insurance premiums. Unfortunately for Alaskans, these lower prices have been rejected by Alaska’s Division of Insurance each of the past two years, with Moda required to charge Alaskans more for insurance than they wanted to.

In recent testimony before the Alaska State Senate, Division of Insurance Director Lori Wing-Heier said, “The most important thing that we do at the Division is to make sure insurance companies are solvent.” Not to make insurance affordable or even useful, not to increase competition or stability by recruiting more insurers to our very narrow market, but to protect the bottom line of insurance companies. Let that sink in.

Perhaps this explains why the Division of Insurance has artificially raised health insurance prices for Alaskans for the past two years. They’re concerned that Moda, a big company with more than $1.3 billion per year in business across several states, might go broke if they sell insurance to Alaskans at the price Moda’s actuaries calculate they can.

Premera and its predecessors have sold insurance in Alaska since 1952. Coined “regulatory capture,” over time, government regulators can become too familiar with a corporation they regulate, accepting their statements as fact without audit or research, and making decisions that are on their face both arbitrary and unreasonable.

We would like to invite Grazko to come visit Alaska and have a public conversation with us, perhaps joined by the Division of Insurance, about the 80th percentile rule, Premera’s misleading claims, and see if there might be some way that we could work together to make life better and healthier for Alaskans. For example, we could reform the 80th percentile rule to further reduce costs and incentivize providers to accept Medicare, Medicaid, and VA benefits, so that our seniors and veterans can see the provider of their choice here in Alaska. In the meantime, Premera, please help us less.

Advertisement

John Morris of Anchorage is a board-certified pediatric anesthesiologist and chair of the Coalition for Reliable Medical Access. Ric Davidge of Anchorage is the founder and chairman of Alaska Roundtable. David Morgan of Anchorage is a fellow of the Healthcare Financial Management Association. Dr. Steven Compton of Anchorage is the president of the Alaska State Medical Association.

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Alaska

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday

Published

on

Alaska Supreme Court to take up case on Dan J. Sullivan, decision expected by Tuesday


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – The Supreme Court of Alaska will be taking up the case of the State of Alaska, Division of Elections v. Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.

The oral arguments will be held Monday at 10 a.m. via Zoom, according to an order and opening notice.

The document also specifies that a decision is expected to be made before noon on Tuesday.

According to documents from the Division of Elections, the state must start printing ballots at noon on the same day.

Advertisement

This comes after an Anchorage Superior Court Judge ordered Dan J. Sullivan on to the ballot Friday.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake

Published

on

Mat-Su Initial Attack Responding to Fire in Flat Lake


An engine and firefighters from the Division of Forestry & Fire Protection’s Mat-Su Area are responding to a fire near Flat Lake.

A caller reported a fire on an island in Flat Lake, with 2 foot flame lengths and structures near by.

The engine crew responding will be shuttled by boat to the fire. The fire is currently reported as .1 acre, creeping and smoldering.

Advertisement

Additional updates will be shared as they become available.

‹ Pioneer Peak Hotshots, Gannett Glacier Crew Join Fight Against 2 Fires Near Ruby

Categories: Active Wildland Fire

Tags: #FireYear2026 #2026AKFIRESEASON, 2026 Alaska Fire Season



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Opinion: Alaska’s $10,000 question: Leave or stay?

Published

on

Opinion: Alaska’s ,000 question: Leave or stay?


A new home under construction in Potter Valley in Anchorage. (Loren Holmes / ADN)

This June, two very different offers reach Alaska families, and both amount to the same thing: $10,000. The difference is everything.

Bill Walker, running for governor, would hand every eligible Alaskan a one-time $10,000 check and then end the Permanent Fund dividend for good. Ask one question: Where does his $10,000 come from?

It comes from the Permanent Fund, the people’s own money and the savings Alaskans built for their children. Walker would spend that endowment once to pay Alaskans to give up the yearly dividend forever.

Think about what that does. It cancels the annual check that gives a family a reason to keep an Alaska address and replaces it with a single payout. You hand people their own savings, call it a gift and cut the tie that held them here in the same motion. It is the oldest mistake in governing money: raid what you have saved to buy a moment’s applause and call the spending generosity.

Advertisement

A plan that spends the people’s savings to send the people away is not bold. It is foolish.

Now consider the other $10,000. Through Alaska Housing Finance Corp., the state offers families up to $10,000 to build a new, energy-efficient home. AHFC raids nothing. It earns its own way. Over the years, it has returned more than $2 billion to the state treasury, and it spends some of that income the way any good business does: to win a customer.

Here, the customer is an Alaskan who wants to own a home, put down roots and stay.

That is the oldest sound move in business: Invest a little of what you earn to bring in someone who stays. The homeowner remains, the community gains a family and the corporation keeps earning. The money spent comes back. A plan that puts earnings to work to bring people home is not charity. It is clever.

Same amount. Opposite source. Opposite wisdom. One spends savings; the other spends earnings. One pays Alaskans to leave; the other pays them to stay. One empties the state; the other fills it.

Advertisement

This Homeownership Month, the choice is the size of a single check, and the whole question is where the check comes from and what it asks of you. Ten thousand dollars of your own fund, to wave you goodbye. Or $10,000, earned and reinvested, to help you stay and build.

Evan Swensen is the publisher of Publication Consultants in Anchorage and the author of “What’s the Money For: A Permanent Fund Mortgage Proposal.”

• • •

The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending