Connect with us

Alaska

OPINION: Alaska state senators show the courage to lead

Published

on

OPINION: Alaska state senators show the courage to lead


On Feb. 2, the Alaska Senate acted in a manner that should inspire all Alaskans and tamp down the cynicism we often feel toward elected leaders when we believe they have ducked a hard conversation, a tough vote, or a difficult compromise for the greater good of our state. What did the Senate do? They passed Senate Bill 88, a public employee retirement bill that provides a modest pension to state employees. The matter is now before the House of Representatives.

Why is this legislation important? Alaska is no longer a competitive employer and is currently in a state of crisis trying to deliver critical public services by departments with ever-increasing vacancy rates. One in five state jobs are vacant. Nearly every leader in Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s administration stated in their fiscal year 2025 budget submittal to the Legislature that recruitment and retention of employees was their top concern.

How did we get into such a non-competitive position? Alaska’s government opted out of Social Security in 1955, so most public employees have no Social Security benefits. Neither do most have any other supplement savings plan. Before 2005, we were still able to be competitive because we had a pension, but in 2005 we gave that away as well. Does a pension matter? Let’s ask the governor.

Advertisement

Michael Dunleavy, a native of Scranton, Pennsylvania, was interviewed in the Oct. 10, 2009, edition of the Scranton-Times Tribune about his Alaska teaching experience. He was then superintendent of Northwest Arctic Borough School District. Dunleavy had unqualified praise for Alaska’s pension, saying, “The system has been very good to me. I could retire with a retirement income that many people would envy as a working income.” Today, this is no longer the experience of our school teachers or any public employee.

The daily headlines across Alaska tell the story — police departments not able to staff shifts; schools not opening for lack of teachers; snowplow trucks sitting idle for lack of operators; and entire communities suffering from lack of food and housing due to a public assistance division that is completely underwater. It would be foolish to disguise the gravity of the situation.

Our economists at the Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development, researchers at the Anchorage Economic Development Corporation, Gov. Dunleavy’s Teacher Recruitment and Retention Taskforce, and state agency Commissioners are all telling us the same thing. Alaska can no longer hold onto its workforce, our pay and benefits are not competitive with other states, and we can expect a continued decline in service delivery without dramatic and determined measures to turn the tide.

Is this just a public sector problem? No. It directly impacts the private sector. A slowdown in permitting for residential and commercial building projects, roads, and other economic development activities means project viability, timelines and financing all collapse. Businesses can’t open when their employees can’t work because the roads aren’t plowed, so schools are closed and last-minute day care for children is not an option. This public-private dynamic is a picture of the collective and individual duties we all share.

Senate Bill 88 is the culmination of 15 years of work by legislators, pension actuaries and employee groups to have a modest pension option for public employees. Alaska left pensions for 401k plans in 2005 due to bad actuarial advice that told the state to make zero employer contributions to the pension program two years in a row. This resulted in significant unfunded liability. The state won a civil judgment for $500 million against Mercer, the actuary, but the damage was done. Alaska abandoned its previously well-funded pension system which valued experience and skill for a “day labor” cash workforce. And today we are suffering the fallout of that decision.

Advertisement

Is there any risk to this new pension plan? Yes, there is with any retirement plan. I would add that many of our public employees daily face significant risk for you and me as they keep our communities safe, teach our children, and plow our roads. Is the pension plan risk mitigated? Absolutely. Pension actuaries Cheiron and Pension Trust Advisors, both of whom have been responsible for helping Alaska shore up its pension system, have testified to the Legislature about the soundness of the retirement plan offered in Senate Bill 88.

This legislation has withstood withering and fallacious criticism from out-of-state advocacy groups whose handlers make their fortunes selling annuities to Alaska’s current defined contribution system employees. These entities have zero interest in the future of Alaska, no personal stake in our well-being, no concern for our public safety, the education of our children, or the quality of our roads and infrastructure. Yet I have hope because Alaska has a quality that no one should overlook. We may have our differences, but they do not divide us as they do in most other states. We have a strong sense of taking care of our neighbor, our unique Alaskan identity, and our way of life. Bitterly cold winters, the vastness of our frontier state, a lack of roads and infrastructure, and concerns about safety and survival are common bonds that work to pull us together in times of difficulty.

Indeed, the solutions to our recruitment and retention crisis and our failed public employee retirement system will not be found in the conflict of governor vs. Legislature and Senate vs. House, but in the unity of governor and Legislature and Senate and House. The hardest problems always require tradeoffs to get the best result, and the best solutions are never partisan or the gift of a party but are produced only in the unity of Alaskans.

I am proud of Alaska’s state senators, and I believe we can all look with confidence to Gov. Dunleavy and the House of Representatives to find common cause and solutions that keep Alaska strong and our future bright.

Dominic Lozano is the president of the Alaska Professional Fire Fighters Association, which advocates for the health, safety and interests of career firefighters and paramedics throughout Alaska.

Advertisement

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Alaska

Sand Point teen found 3 days after going missing in lake

Published

on

Sand Point teen found 3 days after going missing in lake


SAND POINT, Alaska (KTUU) – A teenage boy who was last seen Monday when the canoe he was in tipped over has been found by a dive team in a lake near Sand Point, according to a person familiar with the situation.

Alaska’s News Source confirmed with the person, who is close to the search efforts, that the dive team found 15-year-old Kaipo Kaminanga deceased Thursday in Red Cove Lake, located a short drive from the town of Sand Point on the Aleutian Island chain.

Kaminanga was last seen canoeing with three other friends on Monday when the boat tipped over.

A search and rescue operation ensued shortly after.

Advertisement

Alaska Dive Search Rescue and Recovery Team posted on Facebook Thursday night that they were able to “locate and recover” Kaminanga at around 5 p.m. Thursday.

“We are glad we could bring closure to his family, friends and community,” the post said.

This is a breaking news story and will be updated when more details become available.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Opinion: Homework for Alaska: Sales tax or income tax?

Published

on

Opinion: Homework for Alaska: Sales tax or income tax?


iStock / Getty Images

This is a tax tutorial for gubernatorial candidates, for legislators who will report to work next year and for the Alaska public.

Think of it as homework, with more than eight months to complete the assignment that is not due until the November election. The homework is intended to inform, not settle the debate over a state sales tax or state income tax — or neither, which is the preferred option for many Alaskans.

But for those Alaskans willing to consider a tax as a personal responsibility to help fund schools, roads, public safety, child care, state troopers, prisons, foster care and everything else necessary for healthy and productive lives, someday they will need to decide on a state income tax or a state sales tax after they accept the checkbook reality that oil and Permanent Fund earnings are not enough.

This homework assignment is intended to get people thinking with facts, not emotions. Electing the right candidates will be the first test.

Advertisement

Alaskans have until the next election because nothing will change this year. It will take a new political alignment led by a reality-based governor to organize support in the Legislature and among the public.

But next year, maybe, with the right elected leadership, Alaskans can debate a state sales tax or personal income tax. Plus, of course, corporate taxes and oil production taxes, but those are for another school day.

One of the biggest arguments in favor of a state sales tax is that visitors would pay it. Yes, they would, but not as much as many Alaskans think.

Air travel is exempt from sales taxes. So are cruise ship tickets. That’s federal law, which means much of what tourists spend on their Alaska vacation is beyond the reach of a state sales tax.

Cutting further into potential revenues, state and federal law exempts flightseeing tours from sales tax, which is a particularly costly exemption when you think about how much visitors spend on airplane and helicopter tours.

Advertisement

That leaves sales tax supporters collecting from tourists on T-shirts, gifts for grandchildren, artwork, postcards, hotels, Airbnb, car rentals and restaurant meals. Still a substantial take for taxes, but far short of total tourism spending.

An argument against a state sales tax is that more than 100 cities and boroughs already depend on local sales taxes to pay for schools and other public services. Try to imagine what a state tax piled on top of a local tax would do to kill shopping in Homer, already at 7.85%, or Kodiak, Wrangell and Cordova, all at 7%, and all the other municipalities.

Supporters of an income tax say it would share the responsibility burden with nonresidents who earn income in Alaska and then return home to spend their money.

Almost one in four workers in Alaska in 2024 were nonresidents, as reported by the state Department of Labor in January. That doesn’t include federal employees, active-duty military or self-employed people.

Nonresidents earned roughly $3.8 billion, or about 17% of every dollar covered in the report.

Advertisement

However, many of those nonresident workers are lower-wage and seasonal, employed in the seafood processing and tourism industries, unlikely to pay much in income taxes. But a tax could be structured so that they pay something, which is fair.

Meanwhile, higher-wage workers in oil and gas, mining, construction and airlines (freight and passenger service) would pay taxes on their income earned in Alaska, which also is fair.

It comes down to what would direct more of the tax burden to nonresidents: a tax on income or on visitor spending. Wages or wasabi-crusted salmon dinners.

Larry Persily is a longtime Alaska journalist, with breaks for federal, state and municipal public policy work in Alaska and Washington, D.C. He lives in Anchorage and is publisher of the Wrangell Sentinel weekly newspaper.

• • •

Advertisement

The Anchorage Daily News welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Nome brothers summit Mt. Kilimanjaro, carry Alaska flag to third major peak

Published

on

Nome brothers summit Mt. Kilimanjaro, carry Alaska flag to third major peak


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Two brothers from Nome recently stood at the summit of Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa, planting an Alaska flag at 19,000 feet above the African plains.

The Hoogendorns completed the seven-day climb — five and a half days up and a day and a half down — trekking through rainforest, desert, and alpine terrain before reaching snow near the summit. The climb marks their third of the world’s seven summits.

Night hike to the top

The brothers began their final summit push at midnight, hiking through the night to reach the top by dawn.

“It was almost like a dream,” Oliver said. “Because we hiked through the night. We started the summit hike at midnight when you’re supposed to be sleeping. So, it was kind of like, not mind boggling, but disorienting. Because you’re hiking all night, but then you get to the top and you can finally see. It’s totally different from what you’d expect.”

Advertisement

At the summit, temperatures hovered around 10 degrees — a familiar range for the Nome brothers. Their guides repeatedly urged them to put on jackets, but the brothers declined.

“We got to the crater, and it was dark out and then it started getting brighter out,” Wilson said. “And then you could slowly see the crater like illuminating and it’s huge. It’s like 3 miles across or something. Like you could fly a plane down on the crater and be circles if you want to. Really dramatic view.”

A team of 17 for two climbers

Unlike their previous expeditions, the brothers were supported by a crew of 17 — including porters, a cook, guides, a summit assistant, and a tent setup crew.

The experience deviated from their earlier climbs, where they carried their own food, melted snow for water, and navigated routes independently.

“I felt spoiled,” Wilson said. “I was like, man, the next mountain’s gonna be kind of hard after being spoiled.”

Advertisement

Alaska flag on every summit

Oliver carried the same full-size Alaska flag on all three of his major summits, including in South America and Denali in North America, despite the added weight in his pack.

“I take it everywhere these days,” Oliver said. “It’s always cool to bring it out. And then people ask, you know, ‘where’s that flag from?’ Say Alaska.”

When asked about his motivation for the expeditions, Wilson said “I guess to like inspire other people. Because it seems like a lot of people think they can’t do something, but if you just try it, you probably won’t do good the first time, but second time you’ll do better. Because you just got to try it out. Believe in yourself.”

Background and next goals

The Hoogendorns won the reality competition series “Race to Survive: Alaska” in 2023. In 2019, they were the first to climb Mount McKinley and ski down that season. Oliver also started a biking trip from the tip of South America to Prudhoe Bay with hopes of still completing it.

Kilimanjaro is their third summit. The brothers said they hope to eventually complete all seven summits, with Mount Vinson in Antarctica among the peaks they are considering next… all while taking Alaska with them every step of the way.

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending