Connect with us

Alaska

Navigating the abortion extremes

Published

on

Navigating the abortion extremes


On a current journey to Washington, D.C. I used to be handled to quick speeches and interplay with various physicians serving in Congress. After one speech, a doctor within the viewers requested whether or not a doctor ought to ever be jailed for practising medication. The congressman regarded perplexed and requested, “Are you speaking about Ivermectin?”

The questioner responded, “No, I’m speaking about abortion.” He then went on to speak a few regulation in his state.

It was the proverbial urinating within the punch bowl. There was a hush over the room that had primarily been speaking about pre-authorization, colorectal most cancers screening, and advocacy. Later within the assembly, a former U.S. senator identified how a difficulty, particularly abortion, can disrupt virtually any political dialogue. He then lamented how divided the political panorama in D.C. has turn into.

Commercial. For details about buying adverts, please click on right here.

Advertisement

Even the phrase “abortion” has a adverse connotation. It’s why you will notice individuals run away from it in discourse. We’re advised the dialogue is about “reproductive rights” or “ladies’s well being.” The latter has been deserted these days as a result of no person needs to say a level in biology. Better of all we’re advised it’s about alternative as whether it is Coke or Pepsi.

On the opposite aspect the phrase “abortion” is at all times entrance and heart. The spin is at all times adverse so phrases like “child killer” and “infanticide” are thrown round. And it’s at all times framed within the “pro-life” rhetoric. Who needs to be accused of being towards life?

The elemental distinction in opinion facilities round whether or not a creating fetus is a human being. Whether it is, it has rights. If it isn’t, there are not any rights relative to the dialogue. If it does have rights, is it allowed to infringe on the rights of the mom?

We’re handled to common doses of the uncommon instances to drive arguments. Being pregnant termination advocates cling to rape and incest to color the opposition as extremists. In accordance with the abortion rights advocacy group, the Guttmacher Institute, these two indications make up lower than 1.5% of procedures. The argument is supposed to field of their opponents into an argument most discover offensive.

It really works the opposite method as properly. Many days I’m handled to photos of late time period being pregnant terminations by protesters close to my workplace. Facilities for Illness Management (CDC) information signifies that’s lower than 1% of all procedures.

What else is in that information? Virtually 93% of all being pregnant terminations happen earlier than week 13 of gestation, in keeping with the CDC. Over 40% of terminations are accomplished with pharmacology. And not less than three fourths of procedures are elective and as a consequence of issues about price or unpreparedness to have a baby.

Advertisement

The field tends to work on everybody besides essentially the most excessive. When offered with the acute instances activists will typically discuss how uncommon the conditions are and keep away from taking a place. Solely a monster would wish to drive a being pregnant on somebody who was raped or the sufferer of incest. And solely a monster would wish to terminate a viable human being late in being pregnant.

Commercial. For details about buying adverts, please click on right here.

Oxford

Polls replicate that there’s nuance in how individuals view the process. Most really feel that the proper to have a being pregnant terminated must be maintained. Solely about 20% really feel the process must be fully outlawed. And solely about 20% really feel it must be allowed within the third trimester with out limitation. In order that leaves the opposite 60% being pulled.

Being pregnant termination exemplifies the worst of how extremes drive the narrative in the USA. It’ll doubtless keep that method endlessly. It’s unimaginable to see how defining affordable limits on the process will ever be seen as acceptable to both excessive.

Discomfort abounds within the discussions.

Joe Biden, as vice chairman, stepped into controversy when he endorsed China’s one youngster coverage. Most individuals are conscious that Chinese language mother and father typically terminate pregnancies based mostly on gender. Effectively, not less than organic gender. This worldwide instance and the 19% of sufferers who’ve greater than two being pregnant terminations are likely to make individuals uncomfortable.

Advertisement

I’m responsible of utilizing the discomfort. I used that Joe Biden motion to color him as waging a “warfare on ladies.” The unborn ladies of China.

If one seems to be to Europe there are limitations on the process that embrace timing, ready intervals, and exceptions based mostly on maternal or fetal well being. There is no such thing as a single coherent view on managing the process.

This all presents a conundrum for the affordable. Personally, I’m not snug telling anybody they should carry a being pregnant. Nonetheless, there’s something ethically disturbing when that fetus has clearly turn into viable. It’s much more disturbing for individuals with strongly held spiritual beliefs. Is that sufficient to move legal guidelines prohibiting the process?

The regulation doesn’t should be moral. It’s a commonplace society units for itself. And in the USA these requirements are sometimes set at state and native ranges by design. Nonetheless, we’re a rustic constructed on defending the rights of the minority towards mob rule. Nothing says mob like individuals pushing their beliefs on a younger lady going through a disaster. That is when the federal authorities usually has to insert itself.

Leaving this determination as much as the states completely might have devastating penalties. States are more and more attempting to affect coverage in different states. There are already strikes to prosecute sufferers who cross state traces to get the process. Governor Gavin Newsome (D – California) has proposed paying for sufferers from elsewhere to have the process accomplished in California.

Advertisement

There are legal guidelines that permit habits outlined by many as unethical. It’s a charged situation when that unethical habits is considered as homicide by some. And it’s equally charged when that habits is a medical process being mentioned between a well being care supplier and a affected person. It will get extra sophisticated when that affected person is a minor and most different procedures universally mandate parental involvement. The passions on each side are comprehensible.

Commercial. For details about buying adverts, please click on right here.

ARE

As unimaginable as it might be, Congress has to outline what we as a society discover tolerable. When in being pregnant can a termination be thought of unacceptable? There may be nice divergence on that query with Texas on one finish and California and New York on the opposite. The structure is silent on when life begins. That has to alter. As soon as that occurs the remainder of the doc will probably be clear as how a person is outlined.

I do not need a solution. Roe v. Wade was not a solution. The correct reply is to put down the rhetoric and to not let this be one other situation that tears us aside. It takes empathy, which is in more and more quick provide on each side of the political spectrum. Guess what? These individuals you oppose are literally human beings and there’s no debate on that one. This situation doesn’t should be urine within the punch bowl.

Dr. Brian Sweeney has practiced gastroenterology in Anchorage for 21 years, with the primary three at JBER. The views offered listed here are his personal and usually are not made on behalf of any group.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

The polar bear and the bird scientist: George Divoky’s 50-year Arctic vigil

Published

on

The polar bear and the bird scientist: George Divoky’s 50-year Arctic vigil


COOPER ISLAND — On July 2, George Divoky woke with a polar bear right outside the cabin. He had dressed warmly for sleep in case of an emergency. He rose to grab a shotgun.

Divoky moves stiffly. He is 78. He lifts himself to standing with his arms. Every day of the summer he gets up and down like this dozens of times on the barren gravel of Cooper Island to inspect the nests of black guillemots, weigh chicks and band fledglings. He has worked here for decades, mostly alone, to document how the warming climate has affected these birds in Alaska’s Arctic.

A young bear had come into camp, up to Divoky’s weather-beaten plywood shack, which is no larger than a lawn shed. Another large young bear and the mother were out in the bird colony, among the nests.

Advertisement

Divoky raised his shotgun and fired cracker shells to scare the bears. They ran westward over the table-flat ground, away from the nests and camp.

Out in the colony area, the bears had systematically flipped nest boxes to get at the eggs. Divoky had put out the boxes, cutting holes in hard-shelled plastic suitcases, and for years they had kept the birds mostly safe from bears. But now the bears seemed to have figured them out, or they cared more.

Divoky came back in to make coffee and oatmeal on the camp stove. He warmed up. The temperature was in the 40s with an unrelenting, sharp wind, and it wasn’t much warmer inside. Two winters previously, bears had ripped off the back wall of the shack and destroyed the insulation.

When Divoky went out again, bears had been back at the nests. Motion-sensitive cameras showed them shaking the nest boxes until the birds emerged.

He found a guillemot’s severed leg, with one of his tiny dataloggers attached, a device for tracking birds during the winter. He recognized the bands on another leg, which he had attached to a fledgling many years earlier. Gray-green-green. And here were pieces of a bird he thought of as an old friend. He had checked its nest and measured its young every summer since 2002.

Advertisement

Divoky first came to Cooper Island in 1972, and this summer was his 50th consecutive field season. In total, he has logged more than 10 years on the rusty-red gravel.

But perhaps this summer would be his last extended stay. After surveying all the nests July 2, he found that the bears had destroyed half of them. Only 10 remained with eggs. And four adults had died out of only 40 still nesting.

At one time, there were so many guillemots here that Divoky could barely manage, even with his younger bones. Birds were so plentiful that they would try to build nests under the fly of his tent.

“You should have been here when there was 600 birds and you couldn’t walk,” he said. “There was a time when this cabin had birds all over the roof walking on it, and now I haven’t had one bird land on the cabin this year. I’ve experienced this thing and it was very unique. And I wish I hadn’t.

“But really,” he continued, “You could not look away from the train wreck. It was like, OK, what do you think is going to happen next year?”

Advertisement

He speaks rapidly, without breaks for air, and he isn’t easy to quote, because he jumps from idea to memory to theory and back to a new idea, rarely finishing a step. He’s charming and funny. But he likes to be alone. As a teen in a suburb of Cleveland, he was so anxious about speaking in school he would escape and go watch birds instead.

“There are birds out here that are over 25 years old that I’ve known since they were a nestling,” he said. “If I was in Seattle next June, and not up here — wondering what gray-yellow-green is doing and if it’s still with white-red-white. That’s my universe now. I’d have to satisfy my curiosity.”

• • •

Black guillemots spend their entire lives at sea except when they nest. They look much like the pigeon guillemots found in Southcentral Alaska — black and streamlined, with white patches on their wings — but they depend on sea ice, feeding on fish that live at the ice edge. They rarely nest in Arctic Alaska, where the shore is generally flat, because they need rocky cliffsides for protection from predators.

But when Divoky was in his mid-20s, he found a small flock on this island east of Barrow (the town now called Utqiagvik), nesting in wooden crates and ammo boxes left behind by the military. The relatively easy access created an opportunity to study the species.

Advertisement

As a young ornithologist, Divoky observed, banded and measured the birds, daily weighing chicks that look like balls of black down with tiny beaks and claws. Scientifically, he established basic facts.

Most such projects last five years or less. But even when he lost funding, in 1981, Divoky kept his study alive. Long-term data is critical for tracking change in the environment, and he was already seeing change.

The black guillemot colony was rapidly growing, increasing from a couple of dozen nests to 200 in a decade. There might have been more, but Divoky built only 200 wooden nesting boxes. He didn’t have time to study more than 200 pairs.

Divoky eventually matched the birds’ success to a lengthening summer period without snow. They laid eggs 14 days after snowmelt and needed the ground to remain free of snow until nestlings were ready to fledge. Before the mid-1970s, that period without snow had been iffy, but now it was growing.

Without funding, Divoky slept in a tent on hard, frozen gravel, bundled in layers of vests and parkas against frigid, foggy winds that rarely cease and produce constant noise. The barrier island is utterly flat and devoid of vegetation except for a few grassy patches where Iñupiaq hunters butchered whales long ago, perhaps in ancient times, leaving bones and blood that still fertilize the ground.

Advertisement

No one comes here. It takes more than an hour by boat from Utqiagvik. Some years in the 1980s, Divoky worked on the island for 13 weeks of summer without communications, resupply or human contact. Only his girlfriend in Seattle even knew he was there.

But Divoky said the offseason was harder than time on the island. He could only work jobs that would give him three months free for summer research.

“For the first 25 years of the study, I was in a series of relationships that I wasn’t that happy in, and so I didn’t really miss anything,” he said. “I mean, I did miss people, but they didn’t miss me, which is why they typically started a new relationship in my absence.”

Divoky jests that he created a database on human female mate fidelity at the same time he was learning similar facts about the guillemots. He always has a theory, and his theory is that his 13-week absence interfered with a hormonal bonding period. In 1999, he added, he was lucky to meet Catherine Smith in November, so there was time to complete that process before he left for the island.

But for all this scientific bravado, the love between Divoky and Smith runs deep. Last April, when he was giving a presentation at Seattle’s Town Hall, Divoky put up a picture of her, when they were first in the Arctic together. Suddenly, he couldn’t speak.

Advertisement

Smith, 70, is a successful appellate attorney in Seattle. Divoky is imaginative and scattered. She is practical and efficient. She goes to the island for visits — she was there when the polar bears came through on July 2 — gently organizing his chaotic space and managing his overlooked details. She follows along, thoroughly wrapped in winter clothes, as he checks the nests.

When they met, Divoky had funding again. His study was unmistakably tracking environmental change. The guillemot colony showed what was happening in the ocean — first as the longer summers had allowed more breeding, and then as the receding ice robbed the birds of food and their numbers began to decline.

Divoky had found one of the first clear biological examples of climate change.

He recalled, at 16, finding a blue jay on his family’s lawn, shivering and incapacitated, and feeling it die in his hands. The trees had just been sprayed with DDT for Dutch elm disease. He read Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” and saw how her book helped ban that poison and energized the 1960s environmental movement.

“Early on everyone was thinking, ‘What is going to be the “Silent Spring” book on climate change?’” Divoky said. “What is it that’s going to get people aware that this is a threat?”

Advertisement

And for a time, it looked like it might be his guillemots.

A journalist writing for The New York Times Sunday Magazine came to the island in 2001 and wrote a long article that appeared in January 2002. The piece suddenly made Divoky and his guillemots famous. It told the climate story, but it captured readers’ hearts with Divoky’s story, beginning with a hilarious description of his hapless efforts to protect the tents from polar bears with a sagging tripwire.

Days after the article ran, the David Letterman show called to book Divoky. He flew to New York for the afternoon taping. That evening, someone working for Robert Redford wanted to meet about making a movie. Woody Harrelson also sent word, asking Divoky to come to L.A. — begging him as if for a special favor.

“I’m thinking, if I could fly to L.A. and smoke dope in a hot tub with Woody Harrelson, then the whole reason for doing the study is clear,” Divoky joked.

That never happened, but a book deal for the Times writer did. Divoky appeared on network news shows and Alan Alda’s science show. Later someone wrote a play and Divoky saw himself portrayed walking around Cooper Island, conversing with his younger self, onstage at the Royal National Theatre in London.

Advertisement

But the play flopped and the book was never written, and there never was a movie deal. Cooper Island wasn’t like “Silent Spring.” Climate change isn’t like DDT.

Divoky kept doing his work, with Catherine Smith, who eventually became his wife. He documented the steady decline of the colony and published scientific papers showing climate change linkages. The publicity helped fund his studies through a small nonprofit in Seattle.

But the world largely moved on. As the decades progressed, hurricanes, droughts, wildfires, heat waves, floods and rising seas marked landscapes globally. The federal government listed polar bears as threatened as the sea ice withdrew.

The black guillemot might have been one of the earliest indicators, but Divoky realized that his little colony had become one of the least of all the victims of climate change.

• • •

Advertisement

The polar bears arrived in 2002, after the publicity.

The shorefast ice near Barrow had been weak. That May, 90 Iñupiaq whalers floated away on it, most of them rescued by helicopter. In August, Divoky and his research assistants were living on the island in tents when a storm swept the broken ice pack more than 200 miles from shore, stranding scores of polar bears on the beaches.

Polar bears, and their entire food web, depend on ice. Their huge bodies run on seal fat. They have no comparable source of food on land.

When the ice blew away, bears overran Cooper Island and raided the nests. Divoky and his team had no hard-sided shelter. They endured 36 scary hours before calling for a Barrow Search and Rescue helicopter. The next year was the first with the plywood cabin.

Over years, receding ice stranded more bears, which destroyed more nests. A climate shift brought horned puffins north, which killed guillemot chicks for nest space. And the guillemot’s diet became poorer, with fewer ice-associated Arctic cod and more hard-to-digest sculpin.

Advertisement

After 2009, when only one chick survived those threats, Divoky brought in the plastic cases to replace wooden nesting boxes. The cases defeated most of the bears. But the lack of food persisted. The colony continued to shrink.

Again, he held dying birds in his hands — chicks that starved.

Before the 2024 season, his 50th consecutive in the field, the nonprofit printed commemorative T-shirts. Divoky contacted journalists. The ADN decided to go in mid-August, when Divoky and Smith would be shutting down the camp.

Divoky considered leaving after the July 2 loss of nests. It didn’t make sense to spend another six weeks measuring chicks in just 10 nests. But the birds that had lost their nests started to lay eggs a second time, piquing his interest.

Since the permafrost melted on the island, sand has blown around its surface, sometimes blowing into the nesting boxes. In late July, a bear flipped another nest box. Divoky opened this box to find sand had suffocated one of the chicks.

Advertisement

“One of the chicks was not yet dead. One of the chicks was dying,” he said. “I pick up the bird and I thought, well, maybe it’s going to make it. It was gasping and it couldn’t hold itself upright. But I put it back in, thinking, you know, stranger things have happened.”

That afternoon the chick was dead.

“I experienced that death and that polar bear impact in a very different way. And that got me very depressed.”

He thought of the blue jay in his front yard. His work had not turned the tide of opinion on climate change, and here he was, watching the last birds go.

He wrote an email to discourage the journalists’ visit.

Advertisement

“I have found the conditions out here this summer to be among the worst, if not the worst, of any of the half-century of field seasons,” he wrote. “The weather has gotten cold and windy. The excursions to the colony to check nests and weigh chicks are the equivalent of ‘space walks.’ … Some of the recent nights have been too cold and noisy for me to sleep well and I am taking two or three naps during the day to catch up on sleep.”

In 10 days, however, when a boat carrying Smith and a journalist arrived, he had gone back to being cheerful, welcoming, eccentric George Divoky.

It was cold and intermittently foggy with wind and hard rain roaring. The ice was as far away as it had been during the polar bear invasion in 2002, although that was no longer unusual. Divoky seemed blasé about the bears now, relying on driveway motion detectors for warning.

Early morning on Aug. 12, three bears appeared 150 feet away from the cabin, disrupting bird nests.

Divoky and Smith watched from near the door. The bears had become experts. They knew how to turn the boxes to expel the eggs or force the birds out. A mother bear submerged one of the cases to get the bird out. Then she ate it.

Advertisement

The bears were eating as much as they could of these little birds — not playing with them or taking only certain parts, as they once did. They had been eating grass from the few patches on the island. They were hungry.

Divoky didn’t raise the shotgun. He just watched.

The bears went from box to box, and from one colony area to the next. They were thorough.

When Divoky and Smith surveyed the damage, nothing was left. Just wings, legs and eggshells. Every nest was destroyed, including those with eggs freshly laid after the first bear attack.

Back in the cabin, over breakfast, Divoky explained why he hadn’t fired to scare away the bears.

Advertisement

“They may be cubs of the year that came out of the snow den in the spring. It’s no fun to drive them away. They don’t really want to be here. They want to be on the ice, but the ice is melted. I don’t want them in theory to be here. But what am I? To the extent that apparently fewer and fewer people care what I do, or why I do it, or how I do it,” he said.

“Yes, we did put up bear-proof cases to keep the colony going,” he continued, “but it makes no sense to have a bear patrol that tries to stop any bear disturbance now, when bears on-shore are inevitable every year.”

Now, Divoky said, he and his camp were the interlopers. This harsh island belonged to the bears.

It was time to pack up the camp for the season. Suddenly undetermined were the timing, what mattered, and what to save. Divoky and Smith argued over something trivial. Then he offered her coffee and her voice cracked.

He said, “Come here, come here, come here. It’s going to be OK. OK?”

Advertisement

“Yeah,” she said.

“I mean, we should appreciate, and you should appreciate, since you were here when the bears first showed up, that this is kind of the, I mean, it’s kind of like the logical, if you will, ending.”

Speaking to the ADN journalist’s camera, Divoky explained that it was almost a relief that his summerlong work seasons on the island were over. Asked about that later, Smith said, “He’s trying to talk himself into it.”

“One of the most important things in life is knowing when to leave,” he said that morning. “What’s the day today? Twelfth of August, 2024. That was the day that we don’t have to keep doing this the same way, from now on. And unfortunately, it’s just a climate change signal. It’s possibly one of the least important in terms of the whole global climate change, but it’s been one that we know the arc of, from ‘72, when this colony was nothing, to ‘89, when it was the biggest colony in Alaska, to 2024, when the birds that were still left here, the two dozen pairs, couldn’t raise young because of polar bears, because of sea ice melt.

“And now I’m on the polar bears’ side,” he said. “I’ve become a polar bear advocate. I’m saying I want these polar bears to do well. They’re not going to have the ice much longer. Use the island any way you can, for resting or whatever. But you’re not going to get any guillemots here in the future. And you’ll be able to roam more freely because I won’t be here much at all.”

Advertisement

On his return to Seattle, Divoky felt a strange sense of re-entry — again. Throngs of people were rushing around in cars. People in speeding metal boxes. Where were they going? Didn’t they know the cost? Were they as heedless as the polar bears?

He blamed them more than the bears. The polar bears didn’t melt the ice.

For a time, he hid out at his co-working space to avoid showing his depression to Smith. He tried to work on his data, but lost heart.

But then, he started working with a young scientist interested in analyzing his data. He planned a trip to Toronto to view a new documentary, “The Birdman of Cooper Island.”

He began planning his trip back, next year, at least a brief one, to see what happens next.

Advertisement

Loren Holmes reported from Cooper Island.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Free pet vaccines attracts record crowd in Anchorage

Published

on

Free pet vaccines attracts record crowd in Anchorage


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Hundreds of Alaskans and their furry friends flocked to Mountain View on Saturday for free pet vaccinations and food.

The organization, Friends of Pets, teamed up with Anchorage Animal Care and Control to sponsor a vaccination clinic for cats and dogs. The Normandy Project also provided free pet food at the clinic and AACA was handing out spay and neuter coupons. In addition to pet services, several groups were providing food and water to those who are low-income and homeless.

“Last spring, we heard that there were a number of dogs that died in camps because they weren’t vaccinated for parvovirus,” said Michele Girault, board president for Friends of Pets. “We wanted to do something to outreach to our community. We had a clinic in May, and then we thought we’d do another one in the fall, and obviously word got out and lots of people are here.”

The clinic opened at 11 a.m. and went until vaccines ran out, which was scheduled for 3 p.m. Organizers had to order 150 vaccines during the event because of the demand. Friends of Pets and AACA held a similar clinic in May and after such a large turnout for Saturday’s clinic, organizers said they plan on holding the vaccination events more often, possibly four times per year.

Advertisement

“It’s super important to make sure your pets are vaccinated,” said Joel Jorgensen, AACA community outreach manager. “If they get outside and they end up at the shelter, I mean, they’re going to be in an environment that has a lot of animals, and environment like that does have disease, especially when animals come in that aren’t vaccinated, so events like this is to help prevent it from even entering our shelter, and then just on the total hole, making sure Anchorage is covered and safe.”

Several churches and homeless outreach organizations provided food and hygiene supplies to people in line. Some had waited as long as two hours for pet vaccines. Duke Russell, who says he’s been providing food for unhoused individuals for several years, says he was invited to join the event and was happy to serve the community.

“We coordinated with the Friends of pets and APD to kind of show our support to the community today,” said Russell. “Basically it’s just some citizens get together and cooperate in mutual aid for those who are unsheltered.”

Some people traveled from as far as Seward to get their pet vaccinated.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

1 dies in floatplane crash on lake near Big Lake

Published

on

1 dies in floatplane crash on lake near Big Lake


By Anchorage Daily News

Updated: 2 hours ago Published: 2 hours ago

PALMER — One person was killed Friday evening after a floatplane crashed into a lake about 10 miles west of Big Lake, authorities say.

The pilot’s wife was a passenger in the plane and was injured but able to swim to shore and get help after the plane went down in Butterfly Lake, Alaska State Troopers said in an online report posted Saturday morning. Emergency dispatchers received the report of the crash at about 7 p.m. Friday.

Advertisement

The woman “reported that her husband was the pilot and was believed to be deceased as he was still in the submerged cockpit long after the crash,” troopers said. No one else was in the plane, which couldn’t be immediately located, they said. Search efforts were halted overnight due to darkness.

Troopers said the woman was transported by LifeMed helicopter to the hospital for treatment of her injuries, which were described as not life-threatening. The search resumed at 6 a.m. Saturday and the partially submerged plane was discovered by a local on East Butterfly Lake, adjacent to Butterfly Lake, troopers said.

An Alaska Wildlife Troopers aircraft was assisting with recovery efforts and a troopers helicopter was en route to the area with dive team members to recover the pilot’s body, troopers said.

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating.

Ten people have now died in six plane or helicopter crashes in Alaska since the beginning of September, including two separate crashes in mid-September that killed six people.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending