Connect with us

Alaska

How selling Alaska in 1867 was a costly mistake for Russia | World News – The Times of India

Published

on

How selling Alaska in 1867 was a costly mistake for Russia | World News – The Times of India


In 1867, Russia’s decision to sell Alaska to America turned out to be a historic mistake that was to go unnoticed for years to come. The sum paid by the US was only $7,200,000. Although, in the light of the circumstances at the time, it appeared logical, retrospectively, the act looks extremely shortsighted. Russia found itself economically constrained, geographically far away from the region and fearful of its falling into the hands of the British without any compensation. In reality, however, the region had proved immensely valuable both strategically and naturally.

Why Russia agreed to the Alaska purchase

The choice of selling Alaska was based on economic and political reasons. By the middle of the 19th century, the Russian Empire experienced financial difficulties as a result of the expensive Crimean War. It had become increasingly hard for the country to manage such remote and thinly populated areas as Alaska.According to EBSCO, “the Russian-American Company was in decline, and the colony failed to yield any profit”. In addition to this, the lucrative fur trade had declined, making the territory much less economically valuable for the empire.At the same time, Russia was afraid that Britain might capture Alaska in case another war broke out between the two countries. Selling the colony to the friendly United States appeared as a logical step. As the Office of the Historian states, William H. Seward, U.S. Secretary of State, “it was a chance to expand its influence in North America and hinder further growth of Britain”.For Russia, the transaction was a chance to minimise the losses. However, it greatly undervalued the potential of Alaska.

The hidden wealth Russia gave away

Advertisement

Another thing that Russia did not expect was the amount of riches that Alaska possessed. Within several decades after the acquisition, the state saw discoveries of enormous deposits of gold, oil, and other minerals.“Alaska has produced more than 40 million ounces of gold,” according to the US Geological Survey. Furthermore, Alaska is home to some of the world’s most significant undeveloped mineral deposits, according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). But even more importantly, the state’s oil deposits turned out to be extremely valuable. The Prudhoe Bay oil field was discovered in 1968 and became one of North America’s biggest.In retrospect, the amount paid by the Americans, $7.2 million, or two cents per acre, was rather laughable. According to Howard I. Kushner, the deal “robbed Russia of an enormously rich territory, the true value of which would only be recognised in the twentieth century.”

Strategic and geopolitical consequences

In addition to resources, there is the question of strategy and how important Alaska is to the United States from a strategic standpoint. This is a very good place when it comes to defence strategy. It borders on the Arctic Ocean and also happens to be close to Russia.During the period of the Cold War, the Alaskan region became a frontier area for the United States, becoming home to military facilities and warning systems.According to Col. Michael J. Forsyth, U.S. Army, the closeness of Russia and Alaska, only about ninety kilometres apart across the Bering Strait, meant that this region became highly significant to the United States’ defence plans.From today’s point of view, the strategic location of Alaska makes the state very important to the policies of the U.S. related to the Arctic, energy security, and even environmental policies.Thinking back, what seems clear to us now is that the Russians sold Alaska due to immediate needs rather than future considerations. In order to solve the problem, they lost a valuable resource for Russia.Conclusively, the Alaska Purchase should not have been done as it has had a significant impact that will remain throughout history.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Williwaw Social to close after nearly a decade in Anchorage

Published

on

Williwaw Social to close after nearly a decade in Anchorage


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Williwaw Social, a downtown Anchorage entertainment venue that hosted concerts, parties and community events for nearly 10 years, announced on Facebook that it will close its doors on Friday.

In a post from the venue’s official account, Williwaw Social thanked Anchorage residents, artists, staff and guests for supporting the business over the past decade. The announcement described the venue as a gathering place for live music, celebrations, rooftop events and nightlife in downtown Anchorage.

The post did not state a reason for the closure.

Showdown Alaska, which has partnered with Williwaw Social for events, posted a separate statement saying the closure came as a surprise to its team. The organization clarified that Showdown Alaska and Williwaw Social are separate entities that operate independently.

Advertisement

Showdown Alaska said its Sundown Summer Concert Series will continue as scheduled on F Street. In the caption of its post, the organization said Drake Night and Showdown Throwdown will be rescheduled at new venues, and ticket holders will receive more information by email.

Williwaw Social’s announcement thanked Anchorage for its support and described the closure as the end of a chapter for the venue.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Copyright 2026 KTUU. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Southcentral Alaska’s chilly spring prompts avalanche alerts for hikers

Published

on

Southcentral Alaska’s chilly spring prompts avalanche alerts for hikers


An avalanche blocks Crow Pass Road in Girdwood on Thursday, May 21. (Photo provided by Friends of Chugach Avalanche Center)

Avalanche forecasters say spring’s slow-moving arrival in Southcentral Alaska has led to potentially dangerous conditions for hikers heading into the mountains for the Memorial Day holiday weekend.

The Friends of Chugach Avalanche Center posted an alert Thursday warning of a large slide blocking the road to the Crow Pass trailhead in Girdwood. Many popular trails within the Chugach National Forest, such as Byron Glacier and Crow Pass, continue to pose an avalanche hazard risk “as we can’t quite shake this cold, wet spring,” according to the alert from the nonprofit group affiliated with the Chugach National Forest Avalanche Center.

Avalanche forecasters last week warned hikers to be aware of numerous large avalanches releasing as spring conditions slowly arrived. Trails will continue to be dangerous as long as there’s snow covering higher terrain, they said.

“One of the biggest hazards during spring is not just traveling on steep slopes, but traveling below them,“ the avalanche center wrote in an alert last month. ”Many popular summer trails pass directly beneath avalanche paths. As temperatures warm, the snowpack weakens and avalanches can release naturally, running all the way to valley bottoms and across trails that appear dry and safe.“

Advertisement

The avalanches can carry heavy, wet snow “capable of burying a person, even far from where the slide started,” the alert said.

The forecast for the Anchorage area calls for continued cool, mostly cloudy and occasionally rainy weather with the potential for sun on Monday.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Opinion: Alaska’s win-win constitutional solution – Homer News

Published

on

Opinion: Alaska’s win-win constitutional solution – Homer News


Opinion: Alaska’s win-win constitutional solution

Published 1:30 am Thursday, May 21, 2026

Alaska’s Legislature just wrapped another budget cycle with the same tired script. Cut the Permanent Fund Dividend to fund government, or cut government to fund the dividend.

Every proposal forces Alaskans to lose so someone else can win.

Senator Robert Myers captured our fiscal crisis perfectly in a recent article: “Our constitution says we are supposed to manage our resources in such a way we maximize the benefits to all Alaskans. The problem is we have defined it in such a way as to mean only the maximum revenue to the state.”

Advertisement

The constitutional insight points toward something Alaska has never tried: a solution where everybody wins.

Ten percent of the Permanent Fund could provide Alaska families with home mortgages at 2% interest rates. The Fund would earn market returns through mortgage payments. Families would save $330,000 over the life of a typical loan. No losers. No trade-offs. No raids.

Alaska’s Permanent Fund holds more than $80 billion. Ten percent—$8 billion—could fund mortgages for 23,000 Alaska families. Current mortgage rates hover around 7%. The program would offer 2% rates to Alaska residents buying homes in Alaska.

The math favors everyone. A family borrowing $350,000 at 7% pays $2,300 per month and $830,000 in total over 30 years. The same loan at 2% costs $1,300 monthly and $470,000 total. The family saves $1,000 per month and $360,000 over the loan’s life.

Meanwhile, the Fund earns 2% annually on mortgage payments instead of hoping for higher returns in volatile markets. Stable, predictable income backed by Alaska real estate.

Advertisement

The program serves exactly the constitutional purpose Senator Myers described: maximum benefit to all Alaskans rather than maximum revenue to government. Jay Hammond designed the dividend as a “resource dividend” to connect Alaskans to their resource wealth. Home ownership extends the connection to where Alaskans live and build futures.

The political advantages matter more than the economics. Homeowners vote across party lines. A program saving families $330,000 on their largest expense creates a constituency defending it aggressively. Compare the Permanent Fund Dividend — legislators cut the PFD every budget cycle because families have no organized way to fight back.

The program also addresses Alaska’s most serious long-term challenge: keeping young families in the state. A $330,000 mortgage savings gives families a powerful reason to stay and build lives here rather than seeking affordable housing elsewhere.

Traditional housing programs fail because they require subsidies competing with other budget priorities. The mortgage program requires no state spending. The Fund provides the capital. The mortgages provide the returns.

Alaska’s current fiscal mess stems from treating Permanent Fund earnings as government revenue rather than people’s wealth. The mortgage program reverses the relationship. Instead of government spending Fund earnings on itself, the Fund serves Alaskans directly.

Advertisement

We can keep fighting over who loses, or we can try something where everybody wins.

Evan Swensen, an Alaska resident since 1957, is publisher of Publication Consultants and author of “What’s The Money For,” which examines constitutional solutions to Alaska’s fiscal crisis.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending