Connect with us

Alaska

From the golden beaches of Nome to Alyssa Milano: The story of prospector Frances Ella “Fizzy” Fitz

Published

on

From the golden beaches of Nome to Alyssa Milano: The story of prospector Frances Ella “Fizzy” Fitz


Part of a continuing weekly series on Alaska history by local historian David Reamer. Have a question about Anchorage or Alaska history or an idea for a future article? Go to the form at the bottom of this story.

“I came to Nome in the late spring of 1900, a New York stenographer lured by tales of Alaskan gold. Coincidence, circumstance and plain luck had brought me there, armed with only my typewriter. And several years passed before I could decide whether that luck had been good or bad. There were times when it looked very bad indeed.”

So begins the 1941 book “Lady Sourdough,” the assisted autobiography of Frances Ella Fitz (1866-1950), Fizzy to those who knew her. After her father died, she and her brother, Albert, supported the family. As Fitz wrote, “My mother had never worked — had never so much as washed a dish — and both Albert and I vowed she never would.” Albert was a composer and sold songs, though his income was understandably erratic. Fitz was the family bulwark, supporting them with bookkeeping and stenography work. In her free time, she sometimes played the banjo.

Advertisement

She was also a typist. Patents and prototype writing machines had existed for decades, but the first commercially successful typewriter entered production in 1873. This was the Sholes and Glidden Type-Writer, also known as the Remington No. 1. It not only established the “typewriter” as a term but featured a QWERTY layout, the direct ancestor of our keyboards today. By the 1890s, the typewriter was an increasingly common feature in American offices. However, the supply of people who could effectively use the machines lagged. In this gap, Fitz found steady employment.

Stenography, bookkeeping, typing and even the occasional banjo performance paid the bills but were dreary occupations. Fitz harbored a different, if familiar, dream. All she wanted was enough money to never do any of that again, to never do any work again. She declared, “I wanted to earn money in the business field — wanted fiercely to earn huge amounts, which I could enjoy while I was still young.”

The gold rushes of the frozen north captured her imagination as they did thousands upon thousands of others. In 1900, the favored destination was Nome, rumored to have beaches made of gold. The gold fever was a craze, a social disease, and Fitz caught it bad. In her defense, she had some slight familiarity with mining. As of the beginning of 1900, she worked for a mining company in Montana before the facility closed due to a fire, forcing her to return to New York. Yet, she worked there as a bookkeeper in an office, literally close but effectively distant from the mine itself. And she was ever so tired of it. “At heart, I wanted to pan gold,” she wrote, “to take my wealth right from the earth, not spend more weeks and months cooped up in a stuffy office.”

She lacked the funds for a solo adventure to Nome and so joined a company of like-minded fortune hunters, a common practice at the time. Every company member paid $400 to cover travel costs while outside backers financed the mining operations in Nome. Half the profits went to the company with the participants, including Fitz, splitting the rest.

The not-exactly-silent partner in the operation was Faust, Fitz’s small, brown water spaniel. Faust accompanied Fitz across the country, to Alaska, and throughout her adventures north. The steamer out from Seattle offered the first difficulty along the way. Per Fitz, “Dogs belonged in the hold, but I wanted Faust with me. At the height of the jam, I concealed him as best I could, hurried up the gangplank, and managed to sneak him into a storeroom on the hurricane deck, which had previously been fixed up as a place for some of our boys. Faust spent the entire trip in there.” In Alaska, Faust was an alarm, defender, companion, friend and relic from another world.

Advertisement

The little dog endured the transition from urban to frontier life better than most prospectors, surviving and thriving. When the spaniel died in 1906, the Seattle Daily Times ran an obituary. She was a part of gold rush lore well known by locals, the pampered pooch done good. Fitz buried her in a Seattle dog cemetery near Beacon Hill.

Fitz experienced many new, harsh realities on her trip north, but her dreamy vision of Nome held until she finally saw the ugly reality. “When we reached the shore, we realized how crowded conditions actually were,” she wrote. “Tents and freight jammed the beach. We had difficulty even to walk at high tide. Waves broke just short of the tents and the piled cargo. I saw one man pay another ten dollars simply to move his small boat a little nearer to the water. So the other would have room to pitch his tent.” The marvelous-sounding concept of scraping gold off a miraculous beach had appealed to many other fellows and ladies. Her first two days in Nome included a flooded tent, a resultant cold, and an attempted sexual assault by the doctor summoned to treat her cold.

While the mining operation struggled to find its footing, Fitz begrudgingly took work as a typist for a law firm. Unfortunately for her, the lawyers she worked for were at the center of a claim-jumping scheme given legal cover by the crooked Judge Arthur H. Noyes. The widespread corruption of early Nome is, apart from the gold itself, the defining aspect of that rush. It is a central plot element in every movie about the Nome Gold Rush, including “The Spoilers” (1914), “The Spoilers” (1923), “The Soilers” (not a typo, 1923), “The Spoilers” (1930), “The Spoilers” (1942), “The Spoilers” (1955), and “North to Alaska” (1960). Two of those movies starred John Wayne.

After resigning from the law firm, Fitz’s trials on the Seward Peninsula continued. She rejoined her original mining company. There were blizzards, accidents and food shortages but never any money. She partially financed a telephone line to Nome and bought a share in a newspaper, but neither of these investments paid off. She also had a log cabin in Council, northeast of Nome. No laborers were available when she realized she needed a cellar for winter stores. She told reporters, “So I did the work myself, and the only tools I had to excavate with were a tin spoon, a trowel, and a dust pan.” When Fitz wrote in the opening of her book, “And several years passed before I could decide whether that luck had been good or bad,” this is what she was talking about.

After a couple of years of such mixed fortune, she received a fateful tip. Unknown to all the mining companies in the district, a portion of the profitable Ophir Creek was unclaimed, what she would call the Hidden Treasure. She filed her paperwork and invested thousands of dollars into the operation. Buried in debt, she almost lost it all. The nadir came in August 1902: one week to pay off the debt, or the mine would be forfeited.

Advertisement

She wrote, “The week passed in a roar of water and a clatter of stones over the riffles of the sluice boxes and the clank of machinery. I was wet continually, but couldn’t even take time to dry myself.” After seven days, she had accumulated just enough gold to maintain ownership.

Other than an epilogue, the book ends here. It notes that she netted over $100,000 from the Hidden Treasure claim, very roughly $3.5 million in 2024 dollars after accounting for inflation. In 1906, she married John Sanger in Boston 17 days after meeting him. She made one last trip to Alaska with him, which did not meet to his tastes. With fortune obtained, marriage was her new adventure, and she sold her properties in Alaska. By the early 1910s, they were in the Phoenix area, where they opened the first dude ranch in Arizona. They subsequently moved around, a few years in California here, a few years in New York there, before Sanger died in 1930. After publishing “Lady Sourdough” in 1941, she wrote two novels before passing in 1950.

In 1998, Disney adapted her story for a television movie, initially broadcast as part of The Wonderful World of Disney. “Goldrush: A Real Life Alaskan Adventure” stars Alyssa Milano — of “Who’s the Boss?” and “Charmed” fame — as Fitz. Bruce Campbell — of his chin and “Evil Dead” fame — co-stars as the unscrupulous leader of the mining company she joined at the beginning of her adventure. In very broad terms, the movie is accurate. For a gentle Disney adaptation, the film does spotlight the general lawlessness and claim-jumping of early Nome. Fitz’s typing background, Faust, the Ophir Creek claim and other crucial details of her life are likewise showcased with something at least approaching historical accuracy.

In the little ways, the movie gets Alaska as wrong as possible. Though several sources claim the film was shot on location in Alaska, primary shooting took place north of Vancouver, in Canada. Anyone familiar with Alaska would not be fooled. Most notably, Nome is not a sheltered cove surrounded by hills and dense trees down to the waterline as depicted in the film. There is also a very clean, polite and historically inaccurate Wyatt Earp cameo, when he should have been drunk, gambling or fighting.

Advertisement

The funniest moment of the movie is unintentional. During an arduous trek across the Seward Peninsula, one group member chops wood while Milano works nearby. The noise triggers an avalanche, both a myth and well-established movie trope. As the tumbling snow accumulates, Milano tries to warn her companion. He can hear her, if not clearly, but has no clue about the rapidly approaching wall of snow, ice, rocks and trees. When he turns back around, the apparently silent avalanche hits him with the suddenness of a horror movie killer doing a jump scare. Darn sneaky avalanches.

Overall, it is a very positive and pleasing film, a tale of personal perseverance mostly backed by the historical record. And Fitz would have absolutely loved it. In New York, she lived with her mother in an apartment directly underneath the mother of Lillian Russell, one of the most famous actresses of the era. When Russell visited, Fitz and her mother would peek from behind curtains, drinking in the stage star’s elaborate clothing, gems and general presence. Fitz’s own desires were simple. She wrote, “I wanted plumes and jewels and ease like Lillian Russell.” In a way, Milano provided that glamour, if a century later.

• • •

Advertisement

• • •

Key sources:

Cheney, Diane Holloway. Arizona’s Historic & Unique Hotels. Columbus, OH: Gatekeeper Press, 2022.

“Faust, a Famous Dog, Passes Away.” Seattle Daily Times, May 3, 1906, 9.

Fitz, Frances Ella, and Jerome Odlum. Lady Sourdough. New York: Macmillan Company, 1941.

Advertisement

“Frances E. Fitz Is the Only Girl Mine Owner in Alaska.” St. Louis Republic, February 8, 1903, 11.

Murphy, Claire Rudolf, and Jane G. Haigh. Gold Rush Dogs. Fairbanks: Hillside Press, 2015.

Murphy, Claire Rudolf, and Jane G. Haigh. Gold Rush Women. Portland, OR: Alaska Northwest Books, 1997.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

America’s Coast Guard Marches North With A Big New Alaskan Base

Published

on

America’s Coast Guard Marches North With A Big New Alaskan Base


In a first hesitant step towards reinvigorating the U.S. government’s maritime presence off Alaska, the U.S. Coast Guard, in mid-August, quietly announced that the Alaskan port of Juneau will be upgraded to serve as an icebreaker homeport.

Given that this was America’s first announcement of a new “icebreaker homeport” in more than thirty years, the Coast Guard’s modest, four-paragraph news release was decidedly low-key. Coming just days after Russia announced that their second Project 235500 combat icebreaker, the Nikolay Zubov, will be launched by the end of the year, news that the U.S. Coast Guard was set to install a new, military-ready facility in Alaska merited a far bigger public roll-out.

Advertisement

In Washington, the announcement of Alaska’s new icebreaker homeport was dismissed as, basically, a reward for the Alaskan Congressional delegation’s unceasing efforts at expanding America’s moribund Polar power-and-presence projection capabilities.

But a big new Juneau homeport—an expansion and modernization of the Coast Guard’s busy District 17 Command Center—is no mere piece of pork. Preparations for the new homeport—improved mooring sites, crew facilities and other things—will pump millions into the waterfront and the local economy.

Homeports come with ships, as well. Once the new base facilities are operational, Juneau is slated to receive the interim icebreaker M/V Aiviq, “a U.S. registered ship originally built to serve as an Arctic oil-exploration support vessel.” An imperfect stop-gap, bought by the U.S. government as the Polar Security Cutter program continues to flounder, the Aiviq is doing good service by priming a wave of national investment in Alaskan harbor facilities, potentially readying Alaska to become a host for a range of new ice-ready presence platforms.

The newly-announced multinational Icebreaker Collaboration Effort, or “ICE Pact,” is ideally positioned as a future engine to pump newly-designed ice-breaking-ready “presence” platforms into America’s Arctic and Antarctic waters.

Advertisement

With Russia and China joining forces to try and grab control of lightly-held or internationally-regulated maritime territories, arctic presence, delivered by Alaskan-based vessels that are tailored for the rough polar environment, is becoming a critical unmet U.S. requirement. With Juneau and Kodiak now preparing to accept and support ever-larger Coast Guard cutters and military vessels, seasonal “presence-vessel-ready” facilities in Nome and the Aleutians can follow, along with more maintenance and shipbuilding production sites on America’s western coast.

The tension at the Poles is real. In 2023, the Navy dispatched four destroyers to watch 11 Russian and Chinese vessels operate off Alaska. The U.S. destroyers—USS John McCain, USS Benfold, USS John Finn and the USS Chung-Hoon—were likely pulled from other missions, arriving from every corner of the Pacific to monitor the encroaching and semi-hostile fleet.

This was not a trivial sortie. The distances are so vast that just getting to Alaska is tough. One of the four U.S. destroyers sent north was from San Diego, and a round-trip sortie from San Diego to the Bering Sea is a rough, often ship-breaking trip of over 4,000 miles.

Once the warships arrive on station, keeping America’s front-line destroyers in Alaskan waters poses an even tougher challenge.

As robust as America’s surface combatants are, America’s missile-loaded greyhounds don’t really like heavy weather. In 2007, according to the Navy Times, “more than a dozen Arleigh Burke-class destroyers” suffered “significant structural damage in rough seas because designers didn’t account for the effect of jarring “bow slams” on the ship’s hulls.” While the damage didn’t immediately compromise the damaged vessel’s war-fighting capabilities, the enhanced wear and tear threatened to reduce the life of the hull. And, with the Navy wanting to eke a maximum possible service life out of the destroyer fleet, accountant-admirals at the Navy will be loath to send their precious destroyers into the rough waters of the Bering Sea on a regular basis.

Advertisement

For the U.S. Navy, Alaska operations are a drag on overall readiness. Navy leaders, still struggling to get 75 ships of their 296-ship fleet “mission capable” and ready to deploy, simply cannot meet increased Polar presence demands. But with better shore facilities—and the promise of new, ice-ready, and potentially militarized Navy surveillance craft and non-militarized Coast Guard icebreakers on the way—America will be better positioned to handle future presence demands in Alaskan waters as well as to the south, off the increasingly contested continent of Antarctica.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Wayne & Wanda: I’m in Anchorage, my co-worker’s in Fairbanks. How can I tactfully ask her out?

Published

on

Wayne & Wanda: I’m in Anchorage, my co-worker’s in Fairbanks. How can I tactfully ask her out?


Dear Wayne and Wanda,

I work with “Michelle.” We’ve gotten to know each other pretty well over the past few months, and I’ve found myself really drawn to her. We are part of the same large team and peers — meaning, it’s not like she’s my supervisor, or vice versa. She’s smart, funny, and we get along great. I’m stoked every time we get to partner up on a project because her work is amazing, and it sounds cheesy but we really do inspire each other. I think there’s a possibility that she might be interested in me too, but here’s the catch: I’m in Anchorage, she’s in Fairbanks.

I’ve been going back and forth on how to approach this. On one hand, I don’t want to come off too strong or make things awkward by suggesting that I travel to see her when we’re not even dating. On the other hand, I don’t want to miss the chance to get to know her better outside of work.

What do you think is the best way to ask her out without making her feel pressured or uncomfortable? Should I suggest a virtual date first, like a video chat over coffee or drinks? Or do you think it would be better to keep it light and casual, maybe suggesting we meet up if she’s ever in town, or if I find myself in her city for work or another reason?

Advertisement

I guess what I’m really asking is: How do I move forward in a way that respects her boundaries (and I have no idea what those are), but also lets her know that I’m genuinely interested in getting to know her better? I appreciate any guidance you can offer. Navigating this new territory is a bit daunting, but I really don’t want to let this opportunity slip by without at least trying. I’m not the most experienced with dating. I’ve always put career first. So I’m looking forward to hearing your thoughts.

Wanda says:

Anchorage to Fairbanks, eh? What’s 359 miles between friends and potentially more-than-friends? To be specific, it’s a six-plus-hour drive or a chunk of Alaska Airlines miles and a few hours of combined airports and flight times. Heck, I rarely drive south of Tudor Road unless I’m leaving town, so I get it. Distance can be daunting, especially in navigating a potential new connection.

Let’s assume, though, that you’re reading the room accurately here, and Michelle likes you back. She’s probably wondering the same things you are. How to spend time with you when you live hundreds of miles apart? How to initiate a hangout without freaking you out or creeping in on work boundaries? And what are your work boundaries? And do you like her too? Someone has to make a move here. Tag, you’re it.

Personally, I think a virtual date sounds super awkward. Might as well make it an agenda item after a staff meeting, you know? Since you both apparently travel between cities for your jobs, target the next time you’re both in the same physical spot, and ask her to join you for drinks after work — or dinner, or coffee — just something that involves only the two of you.

Advertisement

You’re overthinking this simple first date because you don’t live in the same city. But it’s no different than asking out a co-worker who lives down the road. The only difference is, if it goes well, then you have the adventure of navigating a long-distance relationship.

Wayne says:

Ah, love in the Golden Heart City … makes me feel all tingly. Oh wait, that’s my freezing extremities! Dip me in the hot springs ASAP!

OK, this isn’t business, it’s personal, so stop sitting at your laptop and waiting for her to drop a heart emoji over a witty Teams chat pun and get your lovelorn butt up to the Far North for a long weekend to check the temperature — of her feelings about you and the Interior weather forecast so you can pack/dress appropriately.

Plan your trip as if she’s not going to be involved because she might not be. Rent a car and get a room, make a schedule of activities that fit your style and the season: the museum, hot springs, northern lights and skiing, Midnight Sun and hiking, downtown partying and floating the Chena, whatever. Then, when everything’s together, tell her that you’re coming to town in a few weeks and would love to get her advice on your itinerary and if anything critical is missing … and that you’d also love to take her out to dinner at a place of her choosing so you can catch up.

Advertisement

That’s an easy way to strike up a conversation that isn’t about work, and you’ll also likely get a very solid vibe check from her response. She might rewrite your entire trip and want to play tour guide; she might make up an excuse about having to run her dog team and shoot you down entirely; she might meet you somewhere in between and catch you for coffee or lunch. You won’t know until you act and ask. You’ll feel relief in finally shooting your shot, get some clarity on her interest, and have good times in the Land of the Midnight Fun no matter what she decides.

[Wayne and Wanda: The date was great, but was it business or pleasure?]

[Wayne and Wanda: My budding romance has been a fantasy. How do I bring it into reality?]

[Wayne and Wanda: My co-workers’ gossipy, flirty behavior is driving me up our cubicle walls]

[Ask Sahaj: I don’t want advice from my friend who’s never been in a relationship]

Advertisement

[Wayne and Wanda: The person I’m dating lets her out-of-control dog run wild off leash, and it drives me nuts]





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

If you look long and hard enough, you may just find some airfares that will boggle your mind

Published

on

If you look long and hard enough, you may just find some airfares that will boggle your mind


Because I love to travel, there are a couple of exercises I perform each day. First, I do a quick glance at some of my favorite destinations to see if rates are going up or down. Then, I check the mailbox to see if credit card companies are sending any bonus offers if I get a new card.

If you look long enough and dig deep enough, you’re likely to find some really crazy deals. Mind you, some of the deals are really good. Others are really weird. Last week, I uncovered a couple of doozies.

Fares from Anchorage to Guatemala are pretty inexpensive to begin with. As Alaska Airlines ramped up service from Los Angeles, more travelers started taking a closer look at the country, just south of Mexico. Alaska Airlines competes with Delta, United and American Airlines on the route, so it’s a competitive market.

Advertisement

Avianca, one of the largest airlines in Central America, doesn’t fly all the way to Anchorage. But they’re offering a $99.30 one-way fare from Anchorage to Guatemala City. Avianca is part of the Star Alliance along with United and Lufthansa. But in this case, Avianca uses Alaska Airlines to fly travelers first to Los Angeles before they continue to Guatemala City.

There’s no advance purchase required to get this rate. Last time I checked (on Friday), seats were available on Aug. 25 and 26, Sept. 1, 6, 20, 24 and 27. Reservations are available on Avianca’s website.

Although it’s a really inexpensive flight, there’s a long layover in L.A. Flying on Sept. 6, the layover is almost 16 hours.

While the $99.30 one-way fare is a Basic Economy fare on Avianca, it’s booked in the main cabin on Alaska’s nonstop between Anchorage and Los Angeles. That means travelers receive full mileage credit (2,340 miles) and can request an assigned seat. Because the reservation must be made on Avianca’s website, you may have to call Alaska to get your seat assignment in advance.

This itinerary is a perfect example of a Skiplagged moment. That is, where an itinerary to a point beyond Los Angeles is significantly less than a ticket just to LA. A short-notice ticket on Alaska’s nonstop flight can cost more than $500 one-way.

Advertisement

Getting back from Guatemala to Anchorage on short notice is more expensive, but still affordable: $250-$300 one-way on either United or Alaska Airlines.

Plan ahead for next winter and get a cheap rate in both directions. The $99.30 one-way fare is available between Jan. 10 and March 9, 2025. The return flight, also with a lengthy layover in L.A., is $148 one-way between Jan. 9 and March 3, 2025.

If this seems like a good deal for you, make your reservations promptly. I was corresponding with one traveler about these rates and she asked, “How long do these deals usually last?”

I answered, “Not long.”

In fact, last night the same $99 fare was available from Anchorage to El Salvador’s international airport in San Salvador. That’s the country just south of Guatemala. But today, that bargain is gone.

Advertisement

[Best practices for trouble-free travel to the Lower 48]

If you still want to visit Europe via one of the seasonal nonstop flights, there’s a last-minute deal on Condor.

Fly nonstop from Anchorage on Thursday, Sept 5, returning on either Sept. 12 or 14. The price for an economy ticket is $510 round-trip. Just last week it was $550 round-trip and I thought that was a deal! Since Condor is a mileage partner with Alaska Airlines, you can earn 50% of the actual miles flown with Condor. For the return flight on either Sept. 12 or 14, it’s $190 one-way to upgrade to Premium class. There’s more legroom, a bigger luggage limit and nicer seats. Book this reservation at Condor’s website.

If you would rather redeem Alaska Airlines miles for your Condor flight, it’s 27,500 miles for the outbound flight on Sept. 5 to Frankfurt, plus $49 in fees. For the return flight, it’s also 27,500 Alaska Air miles for economy, or 35,000 for Premium. Add on $197 in fees. Book your mileage tickets on Alaska Air’s website.

On the credit card front, Alaska Airlines really wants you to have one or two Visa cards! On my flight back from Portland the other day, the flyer in the seat-back pocket boasted a 65,000-mile bonus if you paid the $95 fee and made the minimum spend ($3,000 charged within the first 90 days). The bonus amount changes from time to time — I’ve seen it as high as 70,000 miles. That will get you to Frankfurt and back, as long as you pay the $246 in fees.

Advertisement

I carry a couple of credit cards from Chase, because of its Ultimate Rewards program. Once you get your points, you can shift them to several different airlines or hotel companies, including Hyatt, Bonvoy (Sheraton and Marriott) or IHG (Holiday Inn and Intercontinental).

In the mail, I received an offer for the Ink Business Preferred card from Chase. What caught my eye was the 120,000-point bonus. To get this boatload of points, which is worth between $1,200-$1,500, you have to pay the fee of $95 and charge at least $8,000 in the first three months. That’s a lot of free nights at Hyatt Hotels.

Honestly, I’m still pondering whether I could come up with $8,000 in charges — but I’m seriously considering this card just to get the bonus points!

In addition to shifting the points to any number of airlines, you also can redeem the points at Chase’s travel service at the rate of a penny a point. That’s not a great exchange rate, but you could use your points to buy tickets at Alaska Airlines — and earn miles on your ticket.

Remember: All fares are subject to change without notice. And they change all the time.

Advertisement

[Travel: Who gets the airline miles in the divorce?]





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending