Connect with us

Alaska

EDITORIAL: Alaska education commissioner’s AI blunder has lessons for us

Published

on

EDITORIAL: Alaska education commissioner’s AI blunder has lessons for us


It was a scenario worthy of a TV sitcom: In making a case to the state board of education for limits on cellphones in Alaska schools, state education commissioner and former Anchorage School District superintendent Deena Bishop leaned heavily on an AI text generator — and failed to remove the fabricated citations it added to support her arguments. If she were a high school student, Bishop would have received an F on the assignment and a stern lecture about doing her own work. Embarrassingly, our top education executive is undereducated on the proper use of AI, and we shouldn’t send our students into the world similarly unequipped.

The AI debacle was doubly unfortunate because it distracted from two more worthwhile discussions that we should be having around education and technology — first, the topic Bishop enlisted AI aid to tackle, limits on cellphones in schools. It’s ironic that the citations hallucinated by Bishop’s AI helper were bogus because there is ample real-world data indicating that limits on cellphones in schools are beneficial to student success and social-emotional well-being. Banning the use of cellphones on school grounds is strongly correlated with higher math scores and is broadly supported by teachers who witness the distracting effects of phones on their pupils. The state board of education shouldn’t let Bishop’s misstep distract it from the serious issue at hand — and the potential to reverse some of the distractions that have crept into the classroom.

The other unfortunate aspect of Bishop’s citation-fabrication faux pas is that it displays a lack of maturity in the ways we use artificial intelligence — even at the highest levels of our government. Although the temptation has been strong, particularly in schools, to levy a blanket ban on the use of AI in schoolwork, this is not a technology that is going away — on the contrary, we must expect it to become more deeply embedded in our day-to-day lives in the years to come.

Advertisement

With that in mind, the solution cannot be to impose some sort of monastic moratorium on the technology, but rather to integrate it thoughtfully into the curriculum and teach students how to use it in a responsible way. In the face of such a game-changing development, the impulse to panic is powerful, and — especially in schools — we’re wary of doing things differently than the way we ourselves were taught. But just as calculators didn’t give rise to students who couldn’t do math, the advent of language and image-generation tools, deployed wisely, won’t result in students being unable to think critically.

It’s incumbent on us, as parents and educators, to work out ways that AI can be a valuable teaching tool rather than a crutch used solely to save time and reduce effort. Consider, as just one example, how students enlisting a chatbot as a partner in a Socratic dialogue about a lesson topic could lead to insights that aren’t otherwise feasible given the constraints of a teacher’s time in a given class period.

The road between where we are now and the point at which AI will be seamlessly integrated into our society will surely be a bumpy one, but it will only be bumpier if we don’t focus on using our technological tools correctly. We should be thoughtful about the ways we employ AI to help us, ensuring that we’re not pawning off our work on it but rather using its abilities to expand our own horizons, synthesize data we might not have otherwise considered, and use its output as a springboard to solve our problems creatively — a valuable human skill.

And, whether the person using AI is a student creating an outline for an essay or an education commissioner looking to brief the state school board on policy, we would be wise to double-check what it tells us, lest we end up embarrassed by our naive reliance that the friendly machine spitting out suggestions would never lead us astray. After all, who among us has never been told by our GPS driving assistant to turn down a road that didn’t exist?





Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Alaska’s U.S. senators concur on some reform of immigration enforcement

Published

on

Alaska’s U.S. senators concur on some reform of immigration enforcement


WASHINGTON — The U.S. Senate may have found a way to avoid a prolonged federal shutdown over the harsh immigration enforcement tactics deployed in Minneapolis and other cities.

Senate Democrats held up funding for a large swath of the government this week, demanding reforms in the way federal agencies pursue enforcement. Their insistence follows widespread outrage over the death of a second American citizen in Minneapolis Saturday.

They reached an agreement with the White House and Republican leaders Thursday that could keep the government funded while the final bill is ironed out.

As news of the agreement broke, U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski said she didn’t know the specifics, but she agreed with many of the reforms Democrats have asked for, such as de-escalation training for enforcement officers and requiring them to get warrants to enter homes.

Advertisement

“This can’t just be kind of a fishing expedition, where you’re hoping you find somebody in the home but you haven’t been able to identify them,” she said.

(She didn’t specify whether they have to be judicial orders, as Democrats want, or whether administrative warrants will suffice.)

Likewise, she also wants to end roving patrols.

“We don’t just wander the street, hoping that you can find somebody that you think perhaps looks suspicious, and you grab and you ask questions later,” she said. “That is not what we do in this country.”

Sen. Dan Sullivan said that he, too, supports changes in enforcement operations. He mentioned body cameras and de-escalation training, which are in the funding bill the House has already passed.

Advertisement

“I think ICE needs to revise its tactics and techniques,” he said. “We don’t want, you know — my view is any civilians having the tragic deaths that we saw.”

He took a question about immigration enforcement during a press call on an unrelated subject. Sullivan didn’t say how he felt about ending roving patrols but said he’d look at the provisions in the negotiated bill.

“I’m always up for reforms that can make it safer for Americans and our law enforcement,” he said.

The Senate was expected to pass the funding bills Thursday night, but several Republican senators objected, so a vote is now expected Friday, at the earliest.

One of the bills, for the Department of Homeland Security, is a stop-gap, to keep the department going while the final bill with the enforcement reforms is prepared. The House has to pass the bills, too. The current funding expires on Saturday, so at least a short lapse in funding is likely.

Advertisement

This story has been updated to reflect that the expected Senate vote did not occur Thursday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Coast Guard eyes up to 4 new icebreakers for Alaska

Published

on

Coast Guard eyes up to 4 new icebreakers for Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – The U.S. Coast Guard is considering homeporting up to four additional icebreakers in Alaska as part of a major expansion of its Arctic presence, Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Kevin Lunday told lawmakers during a U.S. Senate hearing Thursday.

Lunday made the comments while testifying before the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Coast Guard, Maritime, and Fisheries, chaired by Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, who has pushed for increased federal investment in Arctic security and maritime infrastructure.

“One of the first ones that I want them to present, among a range of options for consideration [and] decision, [to] me in consultation with Secretary Noem is for homeporting up to four icebreakers in Alaska,” Lunday said, adding that the Coast Guard is developing options for consideration as part of its long-term planning.

The potential expansion would draw from a fleet of 11 Arctic Security Cutters announced under the U.S.-Finland Icebreaker Agreement and the ICE Pact, and international framework aimed at strengthening icebreaking capacity among allied nations.

Advertisement

Funding for at least three Arctic Security Cutters, along with the infrastructure to support them, was approved through the Working Families Tax Cut Act, a sweeping budget reconciliation measure that includes roughly $25 billion for Coast Guard modernization, the largest investment in the service’s history.

The funding package also includes money for the new cutters, aircraft and helicopters, as well as billions of dollars to repair and replace aging shore facilities nationwide.

Sullivan said the investments are critical as the Coast Guard faces growing demands across multiple regions while operating an aging fleet.

“The Coast Guard is being asked to do more across every theater,” Sullivan said, pointing to counter-drug operations enforcement against sanctioned vessels, Indo-Pacific missions, search-and-rescue operations, and efforts to combat illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing.

The Coast Guard currently operates a limited number of icebreakers, one of which has experienced prolonged mechanical issues. Sullivan cited a growing capability gap with other Arctic nations, including Russia, which operates dozens of ice-capable vessels.

Advertisement

In addition to potential new icebreakers, Alaska is set to receive a range of Coast Guard assets and infrastructure upgrades, including funding for cutters, helicopters, aircraft, housing and shore facilities. A new Coast Guard pier in Juneau is already under development to support expanded Arctic and Pacific operations, and the polar icebreaker Storis is expected to homeport there.

Lunday voiced support for expanding Alaska’s shipbuilding and maintenance capabilities, particularly in Southeast and Southcentral Alaska, saying partnerships with private industry could improve efficiency and readiness.

The Coast Guard’s expanded presence is intended to strengthen maritime safety, national security, maritime safety and environmental response capabilities across Alaska’s vast coastline, according to Sullivan.

No final decision has been made of the homeporting of additional icebreakers, but Lunday said Alaska is under active consideration as the Coast Guard evaluated its future Arctic posture and presence.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Judge green-lights ConocoPhillips Alaska oil drilling program

Published

on

Judge green-lights ConocoPhillips Alaska oil drilling program


A federal judge has allowed ConocoPhillips to proceed with its winter exploration program in Alaska’s North Slope, over the objections of environmental and Indigenous groups.

On Tuesday, Chief Judge Sharon Gleason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska said mitigation measures put in place by the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management were sufficient to address potential harms from the oil company’s exploration and seismic program in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A).

Gleason, an Obama appointee, found that BLM had done a “reasonably thorough analysis” of effects from the program, which includes four exploration wells and a seismic survey over 300 miles in the reserve.

Advertisement

She noted that the agency included measures such as prohibiting off-road travel when the soil isn’t sufficiently frozen and when there is less than 6 inches of snow. ConocoPhillips is also prohibited from bulldozing tundra mat and vegetation to make seismic lines.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending