Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska voters weigh a new system as first ranked choice election approaches

Published

on

Alaska voters weigh a new system as first ranked choice election approaches


Because the Alaska’s first ranked selection election attracts close to, voters and political strategists are questioning about the benefits of rating a couple of candidate.

On Aug. 16, voters will fill out a poll that lists Democrat Mary Peltola, Republican Sarah Palin and Republican Nick Begich, however quite than choosing only one candidate, they will rank them so as of desire. However some voters are saying they will’t carry themselves to decide on greater than one of many candidates who maintain such totally different views or have such totally different approaches to campaigning or governing.

“I refuse to vote for folks I don’t agree with,” Leslie Ridle, a former commissioner of the state Division of Administration below Gov. Invoice Walker, wrote on Twitter.

Advertisement

On the similar time, political observers are pointing to the downstream results of voting just for one candidate quite than rating all candidates — what they name “quick voting.” Within the particular U.S. Home race, the place two Republicans are dealing with one Democrat, quick voting may outcome within the Democrat profitable if the 2 Republicans cut up the conservative vote.

“Ranked selection voting permits voters to vote their conscience whereas guaranteeing their voice issues,” stated Amanda Moser, the chief technique officer for Alaskans for Higher Elections. That’s the group that advocated for Poll Measure 2, which handed in 2020, implementing a voting reform that included ranked selection voting and open primaries. “You select your best choice, however then you definitely even have the chance to observe up with a second selection and a 3rd selection, and also you’re not simply voting towards the lesser of two evils.”

[Register to vote by Sunday to participate in Alaska’s first ranked choice election]

College of Alaska Anchorage economist Kevin Berry, who applies sport idea to ranked selection voting, calls the brand new voting system “a non-cooperative sport.”

“If folks don’t observe the directions, you may get bizarre outcomes,” he stated. “My understanding of ranked selection voting working is that we’re imagined to get broadly consultant candidates.”

Advertisement

Ranked selection voting interprets to quick, computerized runoff elections if no candidate will get greater than 50% of the vote. “So after we vote in a single election right here, we’re actually voting in two to 3,” Berry stated. “And we’ve to ask ourselves, what number of occasions would you wish to have a voice?”

In a public opinion ballot performed by Alaska Survey Analysis, pollster Ivan Moore discovered that Democrat Peltola would probably not be eradicated within the first spherical of voting within the particular U.S. Home race, with conservative voters divided between Republicans Palin and Begich.

The likelihood of Peltola being eradicated within the first spherical “is like, zero,” Moore stated.

Berry says that signifies that within the coming election, voters throughout the political spectrum needs to be incentivized to rank a couple of candidate.

Advertisement

“If you happen to’re a conservative, you wish to ranked all people to ensure that a liberal candidate doesn’t win simply because conservatives couldn’t make good. If you happen to’re a liberal, you might have each incentive to rank each candidate as a result of after liberal candidates have probably misplaced, you don’t need the election to be decided by whoever appeals to the many of the conservative base,” he stated.

And there are various features voters ought to think about in rating their second and third decisions, together with whether or not they are going to be swayed by particular pursuits, what employees they may rent and who would be the incumbent within the subsequent election.

“You may need incentive to attempt to choose a weaker candidate to run towards sooner or later,” Berry stated. “When you get into the purpose of, ‘OK, I’m voting for individuals who I disagree with on coverage,’ different questions additionally pop up. No two people on this planet are the identical.”

“It’s not a debate, it’s a misunderstanding,” Jim Lottsfeldt stated concerning the query of whether or not to rank a couple of candidate. Lottsfeldt is a political advisor who has labored for the marketing campaign of reasonable Republican Tara Sweeney, who got here in fifth within the particular major and continues to be within the working for the two-year U.S. Home time period.

“Some folks wrongly assume there’s a drawback, however there isn’t. As a result of if it goes previous the primary spherical, you’re counted out,” Lottsfeldt stated.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Rural Alaska schools face funding shortfall after U.S. House fails to pass bipartisan bill • Alaska Beacon

Published

on

Rural Alaska schools face funding shortfall after U.S. House fails to pass bipartisan bill • Alaska Beacon


Rural schools, mostly in Southeast Alaska, are facing a major funding shortfall this year after the U.S. House of Representatives failed to reauthorize a bill aimed at funding communities alongside national forests and lands. 

The bipartisan Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act was first passed in 2000, and enacted to assist communities impacted by the declining timber industry. It provided funds for schools, as well as for roads, emergency services and wildfire prevention. The award varies each year depending on federal land use and revenues. The legislation is intended to help communities located near federal forests and lands pay for essential services. In 2023, the law awarded over $250 million nationwide, and over $12.6 million to Alaska.

But this year, the bill passed the Senate, but stalled in the House of Representatives amid partisan negotiations around the stopgap spending bill to keep the government open until March. House Republicans decided not to vote on the bill amid a dispute around health care funding, a spokesperson for the bill’s sponsor, Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, told the Oregon Capital Chronicle, which first reported the story. 

Eleven boroughs, as well as unincorporated areas, in the Tongass and Chugach national forests have typically received this funding, awarded through local municipalities. According to 2023 U.S. Forest Service data, some of the districts who received the largest awards, and now face that shortfall, include Ketchikan, Wrangell, Petersburg, Sitka and Yakutat, as well as the unincorporated areas. 

Advertisement

“We’re already at our bottom,” said Superintendent Carol Pate of the Yakutat School District, which received over $700,000 in funding, one of the largest budget sources for its 81 students. 

“We are already down to one administrator with six certified teachers,” Pate said in a phone interview Thursday. “We have a small CTE (career and technical education) program. We don’t have any art, we don’t have any music. We have limited travel. Anything that we lose means we lose instruction, and our goal is for the success of our students.”

Yakatat is facing a $126,000 deficit this year, a large sum for their $2.3 million budget, Pate said. “So that’s a pretty significant deficit for us. We do our best to be very conservative during the school year to make up that deficit. So wherever we can save money, we do.” 

The school has strong support from the borough, Pate said. However, last year they were forced to cut funding for one teacher and a significant blow for the school, she said. 

Advertisement

“We’re trying very hard to break the cycle, but it’s a continuing cycle,” she said. “Every time we lose something, we lose kids because of it, and the more kids we lose, the more programs we lose.”

In the southern Tongass National Forest community of Wrangell, the school district received over $1 million in funds last year, and Superintendent Bill Burr said the federal funding loss is dramatic. 

“It’s pretty devastating from a community standpoint,” Burr said in a phone interview. “Because that is very connected to the amount of local contribution that we get from our local borough, it has a dramatic effect on the school district, so I’m disappointed.”

“As these cuts continue to happen, there’s less and less that we’re able to do,” he said. “School districts are cut pretty much as thin as they can. So when these things happen, with no real explanation, the impact for districts that do receive secure schools funding is even more dramatic.”

Whether and how the funding loss will impact the district has yet to be determined, as budgets for next year are still in development, Burr said, but it could mean cuts to matching state grants, facilities projects, or staff salaries. He said most non-state money for the district comes from the federal program.

Advertisement

“Part of our funding does come from sales tax, but a majority of it comes from the secure rural schools (grant),” he said. “So without increases in other areas, the amount of money that can come to the schools is going to be injured.”

“We do have contracts, and a majority of our money is paid in personnel. So we would have those contracts to fill, regardless of the funding, until the end of the year. A major reduction really will affect our ability to provide school services and personnel, so it could have a massive impact on next year’s, the fiscal ‘26 year, budget,” he said. 

The district is facing an over $500,000 budget deficit this year, Burr said, and so the loss puts further pressure on the district.

“So we’re continuing to find areas that we can cut back but still provide the same service. But that’s getting harder and harder,” he said. 

The schools in unincorporated areas known as regional educational attendance areas, received over $6 million in funding through the program.  

Advertisement

Alaska Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan supported the bill through the Senate.

Murkowski was disappointed that the bill was not reauthorized, a spokesperson for the senator said. 

“As a longtime advocate for this program, she recognizes its critical role in funding schools and essential services in rural communities,” said Joe Plesha, in a text Friday. “She is actively working to ensure its renewal so that states like Alaska are not disadvantaged.”

Former Alaska Rep. Mary Peltola also supported the funding. 

Alaska’s school funding formula is complex, and takes into account the local tax base, municipalities’ ability to fund schools, and other factors. With the loss of funding for the local borough’s portion, whether the Legislature will increase funding on the state’s side is to be determined. 

Advertisement

The Department of Education and Early Development did not respond to requests for comment on Friday. 

Superintendents Burr and Pate described hope for the upcoming legislative session, and an increase in per-pupil spending. “The loss of secure rural schools funding makes it even more difficult to continue with the static funding that education in the state has received,” Burr said. 

“I really have high hopes for this legislative season. I think that the people that we’ve elected recognize the need to put funding towards education,” Pate said. 

The funding could be restored, if the legislation is reintroduced and passed by Congress. Both Oregon Democratic Sen. Wyden and Idaho Republican Sen. Mike Crapo have said they support passing the funding this year.

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Raised In Alaska Spotting Moose And Grizzly On Trail Cameras

Published

on

Raised In Alaska Spotting Moose And Grizzly On Trail Cameras


We’re sharing some of the Last Frontier adventures of the popular YouTube account Raised In Alaska. This week: Moose and grizzly trail camera shots.

YouTube screenshot/Raised In Alaska

Subscribe to Raised In Alaska on YouTube. Follow on X, formerly known as Twitter (@akkingon).

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Fatal vehicle collision left one dead, two injured at mile 91 of Seward Highway, APD says

Published

on

Fatal vehicle collision left one dead, two injured at mile 91 of Seward Highway, APD says


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – On Thursday, a vehicle collision at mile 91 of the Seward Highway left one dead and two injured, according to an update from APD.

The collision involved two vehicles — a semi-truck and a passenger vehicle.

The Girdwood Fire Department responded at about 8:41 p.m. and pronounced the male driver of the vehicle dead at the scene.

APD says a male and female were transported to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.

Advertisement

At the time of publication, the southbound and northbound lanes of the Seward Highway remain closed.

APD is currently investigating the circumstances of the collision and the victim’s identity will be released once they have completed next-of-kin procedures.

Original Story: An incident involving two vehicles at mile 91 of Seward Highway leaves two injured, according to Anchorage Police Department (APD).

APD is responding to the scene and travelers should expect closures at mile 91 for both northbound and southbound lanes of the Seward Highway for at least the next 3 to 4 hours.

Updates will be made as they become available.

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending