Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska Democrats stand by their man, bail on presidential preference poll, go with voice vote conducted mostly by Zoom

Published

on

Alaska Democrats stand by their man, bail on presidential preference poll, go with voice vote conducted mostly by Zoom


On Saturday, the Alaska Democratic Party held a voice vote, abandoning their party’s experiment with a paper-ballot “presidential preference poll” style caucus.

There was only one person on the ballot for president — Joe Biden, and a lackluster turnout would have been embarrassing and, regardless of turnout, a presidential preference poll is expensive to manage in a sparsely populated state the size of Alaska.

A voice vote makes it impossible for non-party officials to know how many actually participated. Biden won the party’s majority voice vote, but the vote was not announced by 7 p.m. Alaska time on Saturday. Two Democrats from Fairbanks — Sen. Scott Kawasaki and Rep. Maxine Dibert — were on a plane to Seattle early Saturday morning and it was unclear if they intended to participate in the party vote.

Alaska delegates to the Democratic National Convention will be picked at the Democrat Party’s state convention in Juneau on May 18. All Alaska Democrat delegates will be awarded to Biden.

Advertisement

In 2020, the Republican Party of Alaska also did not hold a caucus-by-ballot because it only had Trump on the ballot, and officers decided it was a waste of time and money.

However, at the 2024 Alaska Republican Presidential Preference Poll, held by ballots cast in person, over 10,000 Alaskans participated: Donald Trump received 9,243 Alaska votes, Nikki Haley received 1,266 votes and Vivek Ramaswamy received 45. Since then, Ramaswamy has dropped out and endorsed Trump and Haley, also no longer a candidate, has refused to endorse the presumed nominee, going back on the promise she had made to the Republican National Committee that she would support the nominee.

Fully one in seven Alaska Republicans took part in the March 5 Presidential Preference poll, which is a party function, rather than a state-run primary.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Woman struck and killed by train in Wasilla, Alaska Railroad says

Published

on

Woman struck and killed by train in Wasilla, Alaska Railroad says


By Anchorage Daily News

Updated: 1 hour ago Published: 2 hours ago

A woman was struck and killed by a freight train Friday night in Wasilla, according to the Alaska Railroad.

Just after 10 p.m., crew members on a northbound train traveling on the railroad’s main line spotted a woman lying in between the tracks as the train approached.

Advertisement

The crew was unable to stop the train in time to prevent the collision, according to a railroad spokeswoman.

After stopping the train, crew members notified emergency services about the collision, and Alaska Railroad Police and Alaska State Troopers responded to the scene, according to the railroad.

Further information about the identity of the woman and why she was lying in the tracks was not immediately available.

The 4,700-foot train was en route from Anchorage to Fairbanks when the strike occurred, the railroad spokesperson said.

An investigation by troopers, the Wasilla Police Department and the Alaska Railroad is ongoing.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska lawmakers advance substitute homeschool bill that preserves annual allotment

Published

on

Alaska lawmakers advance substitute homeschool bill that preserves annual allotment


After being flooded with letters, emails and public testimony urging them to defend and protect what many see as a key component to make homeschooling a viable option for thousands of Alaskan families, state lawmakers in the House Education Committee advanced a substitute bill on May 3, which would allow Alaska to continue reimbursing homeschool families for educational expenses incurred from tutors, classes, courses and workshops from various private vendors.

Those allotments are currently prohibited thanks to a sweeping opinion by Anchorage Superior Court Judge Adolf Zeman who ruled last month that the allotment program was unlawful because it allowed parents to use funds to help pay for instructional offerings at private and religious organizations and institutions. Zeman believes this violates the Alaska Constitution, which forbids the expenditure of public funds to “directly benefit” private or religious institutions.

While Zeman has issued a temporary stay on his ruling to let the Alaska Supreme Court weigh in, it has cast a dark shadow over the state’s rapidly growing publicly-funded homeschool community, which now stands at roughly 23,000 children, or roughly 18% of Alaska’s public-school enrollment.

Advertisement

In attempting to remedy the problem, and create an allotment program that doesn’t run afoul of Judge Zeman’s interpretation of the state constitution, Alaska lawmakers initially introduced House Bill 400.

This legislation proved highly controversial, however, and was ultimately rejected by the House Education Committee, because it would have vastly restricted how allotment funds are used by specifically limiting expenditures to tutoring that is not provided by a “private or religious educational institution,” and textbooks and curriculum that are not deemed to be “religious, partisan, sectarian, or denominational.”

The most current homeschool allotment bill is worded in such a way that it will allow the State of Alaska to appeal Judge Zeman’s decision to the Alaska Supreme Court without preemptively codifying new restrictions.

Additionally, the original HB 400 would have barred parents from spending allotments on any services or materials provided by a private or religious educational institution, even if it were to study subjects like math, foreign languages, vocational skills, and various other academic disciplines. Likewise, families would not have been able to pay for passes or family memberships to sports or recreation facilities for physical education or training. Nor could they have bought equipment such as basketballs, jump ropes or dumbbells. It would have also banned the purchase of animals, desks, chairs, parking fees or anything deemed “entertainment,” and prohibited payment for testing, other than assessments required by the school district. That might include any number of tests to show aptitude in various subjects.

Finally, the original bill would have prohibited expenditures on taxes on any otherwise approved item, while blocking the ability to buy “permanent items that adhere to or enhance the value of a non-school facility,” which could include chalkboards, bookshelves, greenhouses and any number of items that standard public-school students have access to at brick-and-mortar schools.

In rejecting this version of the bill, the House Education Committee advanced a much shorter and streamlined substitute bill that simply preserves the homeschool allotment program while granting the State Board of Education authority to iron out the details of how those funds can be used.

Advertisement

Moments before the committee voted to advance the bill, Alaska Education Commissioner Deena Bishop briefed committee members about what would happen if the new substitute bill passed out of the Legislature and was signed by the governor.

She said the Department of Education would issue emergency regulations this summer, which would then go to the Department of Law for review. The proposed regulations would then go before the State Board of Education and then out for public comment. After a final review by the Department of Law, the regulations would undergo another vote by the Board of Education before being implemented for the coming school year. Bishop said the process would likely be finish by August or September.

When asked by Juneau Rep. Andi Story whether any new regulations would specifically prohibit homeschool families from using allotment funds for services provided by religious or private educational institutions, Bishop said the state needed to sort out the difference between an “educational institution” and a “private organization.” She indicated that services and materials would likely be allowable if they came from “private organizations.” It is unclear whether that would allow families to pay for non-religious courses and materials from private “organizations” such as BYU or other entities that may have a religious underpinning.

Advertisement

Bishop added that the most current homeschool allotment bill is worded in such a way that it will allow the State of Alaska to appeal Judge Zeman’s decision to the Alaska Supreme Court without preemptively codifying new restrictions on allotment expenditures before the appeals process has gone through all its steps.

If the State Supreme Court were to uphold Zeman’s decision, Gov. Dunleavy has indicated that his administration is prepared to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, if necessary.

The bill advanced without objection and is now headed to the House Finance Committee. If it passes the House, it will then head to the Senate before going to the governor.

TAKING ACTION

— Click here to read the new substitute homeschool allotment bill.

Advertisement

— Click here to contact members of the House Finance Committee, where the bill is currently set for consideration. To email all members at once, use this address: House.Finance@akleg.gov.

Click here to support Alaska Watchman reporting.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

State lawmakers hear public testimony on possible legislative actions to ruling on homeschooling reimbursements

Published

on

State lawmakers hear public testimony on possible legislative actions to ruling on homeschooling reimbursements


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – As the State of Alaska appeals a ruling that would delay a decision on Alaska’s homeschool correspondence funding until the end of June, public testimony was heard Friday in Juneau on separate House and Senate bills that are viewed as possible, legislative actions to a judge’s ruling.

This is after a Superior Court judge struck down an Alaska law in April that allows parents of homeschooled students to use public dollars for private education purposes, ruling it unconstitutional. Thursday, a judge granted a delay and Friday the State of Alaska appealed Thursday’s delay as the House Education committee asked Alaska correspondence program leaders how their programs work during its invited testimony for for HB 400. Public testimony was also heard on SB 266.

On Thursday Superior Court Judge Adolf Zeman issued the short-term stay on his decision, that it is a violation of the state constitution for public funds to be used to reimburse homeschool families expenses at private and religious institutions, putting lawmakers back at work on Friday to explore options for a legislative fix.

With the end of session less than two weeks away, the chairs of House Education and Senate Education said Thursday they want to get legislation passed before the end of session to provide a level of security for Alaska’s correspondence programs. Interior Distance Education of Alaska Homeschool Director Dean O’Dell showed support for HB-400. The bill would adopt regulations for individual learning plans, monitor allotments and perform annual reports for accountability.

Advertisement

Unlike the Senate bill, the House bill allows for unused reimbursement funds to be rolled over. O’Dell said IDEA checks to make sure families are being reimbursed for expenses that were authorized by the students’ individual learning plans. O’Dell said travel reimbursements are prohibited by the school’s local board until it’s for something specific such as a competition. O’Dell was asked why that should be an allowed expense.

“Literature organizers, in-state travel to competitions and other items are commonly provided in schools,” O’Dell said. “Among those unintended consequences, a prohibition on many of these items, including PE equipment will negatively impact rural students for more than our urban students, creating serious equity issues.”

Brian Rozell, principal of Cyberlynx Homeschool and Correspondence program, was read a memo sent in 2022.

“I’ll just read you the line that’s concerning,” said House Education co-chair Rep. Justin Ruffridge, R-Soldotna. “It says, ‘and be reimbursed for their private school tuition to the amount of their student allotment. I think that might give the indication that someone would be using their allotment or tuition for what they could for their tuition.”

Rozell said the memo was written in the “very early days” of his school’s understanding of what is an allowable expense under the process, telling lawmakers tuition is no longer an allowable reimbursement under his school’s program, but he, like others who testified, doesn’t see anything wrong with a family being reimbursed for a student enrolling in a non-sectarian class at a private school.

Advertisement

Rep. Andi Story, D- Juneau, said she found that confusing.

“I would think as the correspondence program, you would see they’re enrolled in that private school, and you would think, “Oh, that is part of what they’re getting from being enrolled in tuition,’ so I would think it would be something that you would not approve.”

Lawmakers were going through amendments late into Friday as the bill remained in committee.

One of the amendments from Rep. Rebecca Himschoot, N/A Sitka, would prevent allotments to be used for services provided to a student from a family member.

Senate Version

Advertisement

The Senate homeschool funding bill would repeal the current language the judge cited in his initial decision that the funding uses are unconstitutional. The bill would also reinstate components of 2005 and 2008 correspondence study program regulatory packages promoted by the Alaska Department of Education and Early Development.

Changing the term “allotment” to “fund account,” the bill still authorizes correspondence programs to provide students with monies to pay for academic instruction and materials and stipulates that funds cannot be used for private and religious school education expenses. The bill also removes the blanket opt-out provisions of statewide assessment and prevents allotments of education funds from being rolled over.

Those in opposition spoke out about the bill removing rules allowing families the ability to opt-out of statewide assessments, the bill preventing any remaining reimbursement money from being rolled over and restrictive language related to allowable expenses and private tutoring.

“My son enrolled in 2015, and I have been saving up his allotment for him to take higher education classes, pilot training, whatever he wants. We have $15,000 saved up,” parent Maria Michalski said, Palmer.

Larry Sloan, Homer, spoke in support of the Senate bill.

Advertisement

“I do support this proposed bill because it does help to clarify a central, political social issue of our time, which is a so-called wall of separation between church and state,” Sloan said

There were more public testifiers who spoke in favor of the House bill versus the Senate bill.

SB-266 is is in the Senate Education committee where members have more amendments to introduce.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending