Connect with us

Alaska

A new crowdsourced map for dog owners shares trapline locations around Alaska

Published

on

A new crowdsourced map for dog owners shares trapline locations around Alaska


PALMER — A new interactive online map is designed to help trail users avoid encounters between their dogs and traplines set near popular trails around Alaska.

The map was developed by the Alaska Wildlife Alliance, an Anchorage-based conservation group that advocates for changes to state trapping regulations such as where traps can be set near trails.

Heavy traps or snares designed for wild animals can capture, kill or maim other animals, including family pets and search and rescue dogs. Shared trails around the state are the source of ongoing conflict between trappers who defend their right to legally trap and dog owners eager to let their animals run free.

Advertisement

The new interactive map, hosted on the Wildlife Alliance website at akwildlife.org/safetrails, is designed to give dog owners crowdsourced information on trap locations via user submissions of trap sightings. The map currently shows historic trap locations reported for 2005 through last year, with about a dozen shown throughout Southcentral Alaska, about 10 in the Interior and three in Southeast.

While a code of ethics published by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game asks trappers to “reduce the possibility of catching non-target animals,” there are no statewide rules for how close to trails traps can be set.

Anchorage toughened municipal trapping laws in 2019 to ban the activity within a quarter-mile of trailheads, campgrounds and homes and within 50 yards of most developed trails. Traps or snares must also be marked with a trapper identification number and the owner’s contact information.

Other cities, including Kenai and Juneau, have their own trapping regulations, while the Matanuska-Susitna Borough has banned trapping in certain borough parks and on school grounds. Trapping rules for state land vary by region and game management unit with closures and other restrictions listed on the Fish and Game website.

Trapping is in season from late fall through spring. About 32,000 state trapping licenses were issued in 2022, according to state data. It is illegal to disrupt trap lines.

Advertisement

The Alaska Wildlife Alliance’s executive director, Nicole Schmitt, called trapping the only recreational use on a multi-use trail system that can be dangerous to other users. Traps and snares kill or injure at least a dozen dogs each year, according to alliance officials.

“People are shocked when their dog is caught or killed in a trap because they just had no idea,” Schmitt said. “We want to get people aware of what the what the situation actually is, and then hopefully trappers can see that trapping next to multi-use areas really does have an impact.”

She said the map isn’t just for dog owners. The organization hopes trappers will also use it to proactively identify where they’ve set lines.

But Pete Buist, a Fairbanks-based spokesman for the Alaska Trappers Association who sat on the state game board under Gov. Frank Murkowski, said he doubts trappers will want to broadcast their trap locations to the world.

“For trappers voluntarily showing everybody where they put their traps, that’s just an invitation to get gear and fur animals stolen,” Buist said.

Advertisement

Programs asking trappers to disclose sets, as well as proposals for blanket setback rules, are unfair because they put the onus for dog protection on trappers operating legally, rather than on the dog owners who by law are required to control their animals, he said.

“I have never seen a dog caught in a trap if it was on a leash,” Buist said. “So if we really want to solve the problem, it would be to obey the leash laws.”

While leash laws vary across the state, most allow both physical tethers and electronic collars as acceptable forms of restraint.

[Column: Trapping season is upon us. Here’s a refresher course on the dos and don’ts.]

Buist said experienced trappers know to place lines well off the trail, a practice taught in the association’s trapping classes. The association also holds clinics throughout the state to teach dog owners how to release their animal if needed, he said.

Advertisement

Up at Archangel Road, a popular multi-use trail in Hatcher Pass groomed for cross-country skiing, dogs regularly run off leash both on the trail and up adjacent corridors used for backcountry skiing. A pink sign warning of nearby trap activity was posted early this winter at the trailhead after a pair of users encountered a trapper placing lines off a backcountry skiing route.

Alisha Germer, whose springer spaniel Hazel zipped along the trail off-leash as she cross-country skied Wednesday, said she’s interested in seeing the new user map, but wishes it wasn’t needed.

“I actually forgot about people putting traps here,” she said. “I like having my dog off leash, but I also don’t want my dog to die.”

• • •





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska’s voter roll transfer: Republicans bash hearing questioning if lieutenant governor broke the law

Published

on

Alaska’s voter roll transfer: Republicans bash hearing questioning if lieutenant governor broke the law


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – A legislative hearing into the legality of Alaska’s voter roll transfer to the federal government ended in partisan accusations Monday, with one Republican calling it a “set-up” and others saying it was unnecessary, while Democrats defended it as needed oversight.

“Andrew (Gray) and the committee has a bias. I mean, that much is obvious from watching it,” Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake, told Alaska’s News Source walking out of the hearing before it gaveled out. “Most of the testimony was slanted against the state and against the federal government.”

The House State Affairs and Judiciary committees met jointly Monday to hear testimony about whether Dahlstrom violated the law when she transferred the entirety of Alaska’s voter rolls to the federal government.

Rep. Steve St. Clair, R-Wasilla, agreed with his Big Lake counterpart that the hearing was unnecessary.

Advertisement

“I think we’re speculating on what the intent of the DOJ is and I believe we need to wait and see,” he said.

Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage and chair of the House Judiciary Committee, pushed back when told of his Republican colleagues’ reaction.

“I think that I went above and beyond to try to include everybody,” Gray said as he left the meeting. “If people are saying that if the Obama administration had asked for the unredacted voter rolls from Alaska, that all these Republicans around here would have just been like, ‘oh, take it all. Take all of our information.’

“That is not true. That is absolutely not true,” Gray added.

Rep. Ted Eischeid, D-Anchorage, backed his House majority colleague, questioning whether Republicans would have preferred if the topic not be addressed at all.

Advertisement

“The minority folks on the committee had a chance to ask questions,” he said. “I think this is a meeting we needed to have. Alaskans have asked for it. I think there’s still a lot of unanswered questions. So shedding light on the state’s actions, that’s bias?”

Dahlstrom did not attend the hearing. Gray said she was invited multiple times but cited scheduling conflicts. The lieutenant governor oversees the Alaska Division of Elections under state law.

In her most recent public statement — published Feb. 25 on her gubernatorial campaign website, not through her official office — Dahlstrom defended the voter roll transfer, saying the agreement with the DOJ was “lawful, limited” and that Alaska retains full authority over its voter rolls.

“The DOJ cannot remove a single voter from our rolls,” she wrote. “Its role is limited to identifying potential issues, such as duplicate registrations or individuals who may have moved or passed away.”

Representatives from the state’s Department of Law and Division of Elections both testified in defense of Dahlstrom’s decision. Rachel Witty, the Department of Law’s director of legal services, told the committee the state viewed the DOJ’s purview.

Advertisement

“The DOJ’s enforcement authority is quite broad,” Witty said. “And so, we interpreted their request as being used to evaluate and enforce HAVA compliance.”

HAVA — the Help America Vote Act — is a federal law that sets election administration standards for states.

Lawmakers also heard from an assortment of outside witnesses who largely questioned the legality of Dahlstrom’s actions, including former Lt. Gov. Loren Leman, who served under Republican Gov. Frank Murkowski, and former Attorney General Bruce Botelho, who served under Democratic Gov. Tony Knowles.

The Documents: A Months-Long Timeline

As part of the hearing, the committee released months’ worth of documents between the Department of Justice — led by Attorney General Pam Bondi — and Dahlstrom’s office, detailing the effort to transfer Alaska’s voter rolls over to Washington.

The DOJ first asked Dahlstrom to release the voter rolls in July of last year, citing the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, which requires states to allow federal inspection of “official lists of eligible voters.”

Advertisement

Dahlstrom agreed to release the records in August, providing a list of voters designated as “inactive” and “non-citizens,” along with their voting records and the statewide voter registration list — but it did not include what the DOJ wanted.

“As the Attorney General requested, the electronic copy of the statewide [voter registration list] must contain all fields,” reads an email sent 10 days after Dahlstrom agreed to release the data, “including the registrant’s full name, date of birth, residential address, his or her state driver’s license number or the last four digits of the registrant’s social security number.”

Dahlstrom agreed to provide the full details months later, in December, citing a state statute that permits sharing confidential information with a federal agency if it uses “the information only for governmental purposes authorized under law.” Those purposes, she wrote in the email, are to “test, analyze and assess the State’s compliance with federal laws.”

“I attach some significance to the fact that it took the State … nearly four months to respond to the Department of Justice’s demand,” former AG Botelho told the committee.

That same day, Dahlstrom, Alaska Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher and DOJ Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon signed a memorandum of understanding governing how the data could be accessed, used, and protected.

Advertisement

Dahlstrom’s office publicly announced the transfer nine days after the MOU was signed — nearly six months after the DOJ first made its request.

“Alaska is committed to the integrity of our elections and to complying with applicable law,” Dahlstrom said in the December statement. “Upon receiving the DOJ’s request, the Division of Elections, in consultation with the Department of Law, provided the voter registration list in accordance with federal requirements and state authority, while ensuring appropriate safeguards for sensitive information.”

A 10-page legal analysis from legislative counsel Andrew Dunmire, requested by House Majority Whip Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage, concluded that the DOJ’s demand defied legal bounds.

“The DOJ’s request for state voter data is unprecedented,” Dunmire’s analysis states, adding that the legal justification the DOJ used to demand access to the data has never been applied this way before.

“Multiple states refused DOJ’s request, which has resulted in litigation that is now working its way through federal courts across the country,” he adds.

Advertisement

The Senate holds an identical hearing Wednesday, when its State Affairs and Judiciary committees take up the same questions.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska Air National Guard rescues injured snowmachiner near Cooper Landing

Published

on

Alaska Air National Guard rescues injured snowmachiner near Cooper Landing


 

An Alaska Air National Guard HH-60W Jolly Green II helicopter, assigned to the 210th Rescue Squadron, 176th Wing, returns to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, after conducting a rescue mission for an injured snowmachiner, Feb. 21, 2026. The mission marked the first time the AKANG used the HH-60W for a rescue. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Staff Sgt. Joseph Moon)

Alaska Air National Guard personnel conducted a rescue mission Saturday, Feb. 21, after receiving a request for assistance from the Alaska State Troopers through the Alaska Rescue Coordination Center.

The mission was initiated to recover an injured snowmachiner in the Cooper Landing area, approximately 60 air miles south of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. The Alaska Air National Guard accepted the mission, located the individual, and transported them to Providence Alaska Medical Center in Anchorage for further medical care.

The mission marked the first search and rescue operation conducted by the 210th Rescue Squadron using the HH-60W Jolly Green II, the Air Force’s newest combat rescue helicopter, which is replacing the older HH-60G Pave Hawk. Guardian Angels assigned to the 212th Rescue Squadron were also aboard the aircraft and assisted in the recovery of the injured individual.

Advertisement

Good Samaritans, who were on the ground at the accident site, deployed a signal flare, that helped the helicopter crew visually locate the injured individual in the heavily wooded area.
Due to the mountainous terrain, dense tree cover, and deep snow in the area, the helicopter was unable to land near the patient. The aircrew conducted a hoist insertion and extraction of the Guardian Angels and the injured snowmachiner. The patient was extracted using a rescue strop and hoisted into the aircraft.

The Alaska Air National Guard routinely conducts search and rescue operations across the state in support of civil authorities, providing life-saving assistance in some of the most remote and challenging environments in the world.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska House advances bill to boost free legal aid for vulnerable Alaskans

Published

on

Alaska House advances bill to boost free legal aid for vulnerable Alaskans





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending