Connect with us

West

5 California taxes Kamala Harris could use to crush the middle class

Published

on

5 California taxes Kamala Harris could use to crush the middle class

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Vice President Kamala Harris laid out her economic plan in a speech Aug. 16, which included a press for Big Government by putting a ban on price gouging for groceries and food, the cancelation of medical debt (what’s next, credit card debt?), a child tax credit to provide $6,000 per child to families for the year of the baby’s life, and $25,000 subsidy for first-time homebuyers. 

Advertisement

The only problem for those homebuyers is that if you lived in Harris’ San Francisco, where the median home sale price has soared to an outlandish $1,300,000, you wouldn’t even make 2% of the down payment necessary to get into that home. Good luck. While we are giving away freebies how about we add in free school lunch, unlimited recess and no school on Friday?  

The challenge with all these populist ideas is how do you pay for them? Well, if Americans don’t vote on popularity but look at the policies, here is what you would learn is already going on in San Francisco which may foreshadow the policies we will see over the next four years. 

HARRIS PROPOSES MAJOR CORPORATE TAX HIKE, REVERSING TRUMP ERA CUTS

1. Forget about the Democrats wanting to raise corporate taxes, large businesses fund homelessness services in San Francisco

This tax, approved by voters in 2019, imposes an additional tax on large businesses to fund homelessness services. This rate is between 0.175% and .69% of gross receipts over $50 million, depending on the industry. Businesses or combined groups that pay the administrative office tax also pay an additional tax of 1.5% on their payroll expenses in San Francisco. 

Vice President Kamala Harris and President Joe Biden appeared together hours after a report came out that she was seeking “distance” from his policies (Getty Images)

Advertisement

2. Forget about the new commission rules on real estate agents, San Francisco imposes an additional Real Estate Transfer tax.

This tax is in addition to any commissions paid to real estate agents. San Francisco imposes a Real Estate Transfer tax on the sale of real property. The rate is graduated based on the sale price ranging from 0.5% for properties under $250,000 to 6% for properties over $25 million dollars. This is another clear example of redistribution of wealth and even for middle class folks who live in San Francisco (that median price of $1,300,000), it would cost them $10,500. 

3. If you don’t think federal income taxes and capital gains taxes won’t go up, California has the highest state tax rate in the country

If you live in California, you know one thing. You pay plenty of state taxes, particularly state income taxes which balloon to 13.3% at the highest level. But in January of this year, since California fell further and further into a deficit, the rates went up to an eye-popping 14.4%, which is the result of a no limit on California’s 1.1% employee payroll tax for State Disability Insurance.  

Follow the policies. Social Security under Kamala could have Americans paying 6.2% on all their income and the answer to solve all problems could be to just increase your taxes. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

4. If you don’t think Kamala is for Big Government with her price-gouging statements, San Francisco has a Sugary Drink Tax

The city imposes a one cent per fluid ounce excise tax on the initial distribution within San Francisco of sugar-sweetened beverages, syrups and powders. When you believe in Big Government, you just tax items to attempt to change behavior. 

Advertisement

5. If you can’t hit them with a high-income tax, San Francisco has one of the highest sales taxes in the country 

The state of California leads all states in the country with a 7.25% sales tax. But it gets even better for those middle-class folks in San Francisco where the sales tax is a whopping 8.63%. 

Does this mean that the United States will see a potential federal consumption tax on all Americans on top of the income taxes and payroll taxes we pay today? It is no wonder that San Francisco has completely lost the middle class, and it now pretends to benefit the ultra-rich and the ultra-poor?  

They say that past performance is no guarantee of future results, but it can give people tremendous insight on how the leader will make decisions in the future. The question is whether voters will pull the lever in November on popularity or on policy?  

If the polices enacted the last six years in San Francisco are a harbinger for the future, putting Kamala Harris in charge will give us all a steady dose of one thing. Getting taxed to death by a thousand paper cuts.  

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY TED JENKIN

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Mexico

What bills have been filed for New Mexico’s 2026 legislative session?

Published

on

What bills have been filed for New Mexico’s 2026 legislative session?


The governor sets the agenda for the session, including for the budget, so here is what they are looking at so far.

SANTA FE, N.M. — As the regular session of the New Mexico Legislature is set to begin Jan. 20, lawmakers have already filed dozens of bills.

Bills include prohibiting book bans at public libraries and protections against AI, specifically the distribution of sensitive and “Deepfake” images

Juvenile justice reform is, again, a hot topic. House Bill 25 would allow access to someone’s juvenile records during a background check if they’re trying to buy a gun.

Advertisement

Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham sets the agenda and puts forth the proposed budget lawmakers will address during the session. The governor is calling for lawmakers to take up an $11.3 billion budget for the 2027 fiscal year, which is up 4.6% from current spending levels.

Where would that money go? More than $600 million would go to universal free child care. Meanwhile, more than $200 million would go to health care and to protect against federal funding cuts.

There is also $65 million for statewide affordable housing initiatives and $19 million for public safety.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Indiana vs. Oregon prediction: Who wins the Peach Bowl, and why?

Published

on

Indiana vs. Oregon prediction: Who wins the Peach Bowl, and why?


It’s a family affair for the Big Ten with a spot in the national championship game on the line as No. 1 seed Indiana squares off against fifth-seed Oregon in the Peach Bowl semifinal.

Indiana has smashed up just about everything in sight, marching out to a 14-0 record with its first outright Big Ten title since 1945 by edging out reigning champ Ohio State and then pounding the bewildered SEC runner-up Alabama in the Rose Bowl quarterfinal.

If they go all the way, the Hoosiers would become the first 16-0 team in college football since Yale did it back in 1894. Not bad for a program that has the most losses all-time.

Advertisement

Oregon is a 13-1 team with that one loss coming courtesy of these Hoosiers back during the regular season, but is coming off a dominant 23-0 victory over Big 12 champion Texas Tech in the quarterfinal round.

Indiana vs. Oregon: Keys to the game

Advertisement

Steven Bisig-Imagn Images

1. Indiana’s Defensive Discipline vs. Dante Moore

Indiana’s biggest edge arguably remains a very disciplined defense that already solved Oregon’s scheme once, holding Dante Moore to 186 passing yards with two interceptions and six sacks in the October win at Eugene. 

The Hoosiers compress space, tackle cleanly, and rarely bust coverages, forcing Moore to sustain long drives instead of living on explosive downfield gainers. 

Advertisement

Key to this rematch is turning that discipline into disruption again: winning on early downs, disguising pressures, and closing throwing lanes so Oregon’s timing‑based pass game never finds a rhythm. 

Advertisement

If Indiana can keep Moore uncomfortable without giving up cheap shots in the deep field, it tilts the game back toward another grind that favors the unbeaten No. 1 seed.​

2. Oregon’s Early‑Down Efficiency and Protection

Oregon’s path back into the national title picture depends on staying ahead of the chains and protecting Moore far better than in the first meeting. 

Advertisement

This is not a max‑protect offense; the Ducks prefer to get the ball out quickly on first and second down to avoid Indiana dictating pressure looks on third and long. 

Advertisement

With top back Noah Whittington healthy and Jordon Davison sidelined, Oregon must manufacture run efficiency with motion, RPOs, and constraint plays rather than stubborn downhill calls into Indiana’s stout front. 

If that early‑down formula works, Moore’s accuracy, Oregon’s speed at receiver, and a more confident offensive line could finally stress a Hoosier defense that has thrived when opponents become predictable.​

Advertisement

3. Mendoza, Complementary Run Game, and Game Control

Heisman Trophy winner Fernando Mendoza has turned Indiana into a complete, ball‑control machine, pairing 36 touchdown passes with just six interceptions while adding some key rushing scores. 

Advertisement

The Hoosiers average over 220 rushing yards per game, using a deep backfield and a physical line to stay on schedule and keep their defense fresh. 

Against an Oregon defense coming off a 23–0 shutout of Texas Tech, Indiana’s key is balance: steady run success, efficient intermediate throws, and red‑zone poise that converts long, methodical drives into sevens instead of threes. 

If Mendoza controls tempo again, limits negative plays, and avoids the rare turnover, Indiana’s complementary profile again looks built to survive a tight matchup.

Indiana vs. Oregon prediction: Who wins?

Advertisement

Gary A. Vasquez-Imagn Images

Line: Indiana -3.5, 48.5, courtesy of FanDuel Sportsbook

Advertisement

If a team of destiny exists, it might be Indiana. Give them credit: they created that destiny themselves, playing a punishing brand of defense and riding an efficient offense behind a Heisman Trophy-winning quarterback.

Advertisement

Dante Moore had the worst game of his season against the Hoosiers’ defense, and his late interception, one of two on the day, helped seal the deal in what remains Oregon’s only loss this year.

Jordon Davison was the Ducks’ leading rusher in that first meeting, and his absence in the rematch makes it difficult to see this going another way, in particular after watching the Oregon offense fail to capitalize as much as it could have in the Orange Bowl.

Having their rushing output compromised to that degree will only put more pressure on Moore to win the game, and Indiana’s secondary coverage unit is a little too good to let that happen. The Hoosiers will play for the national championship.

College Football HQ picks…

Advertisement

  • Indiana wins 33-20
  • Covers the spread
  • And hits the over

How to watch the Peach Bowl Game

When: Fri., Jan. 9
Where: Atlanta

Advertisement

Time: 7:30 p.m. Eastern
TV: ESPN network

Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change.

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, please call 1-800-GAMBLER.

More college football from SI: Top 25 Rankings | Schedule | Teams

Advertisement

Follow College Football HQ: Bookmark | Rankings | Picks



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Utah

Penalties to be enforced if Trump’s face covered on national park passes, reports say

Published

on

Penalties to be enforced if Trump’s face covered on national park passes, reports say


SALT LAKE CITY — Those using a new national park pass who want to enjoy Utah’s “Mighty Five” better do so with President Donald Trump’s face perfectly intact, or you might pay a literal price.

The new annual park passes, which debuted on Jan. 1, feature Trump’s image alongside that of George Washington. At the same time as the release, the Department of the Interior reportedly updated its rules to ensure Trump’s face remains free and clear.

According to the Washington Post, the updated “Void if Altered” policy prohibits anyone from defacing the pass or covering up any images or information on the cards. Visitors found by rangers to have altered a pass by any means will be ordered to return it to its original condition or possibly be charged a regular entrance fee.

SFGate reported the policy originally prohibited any alteration of the signature portion of the pass, with the updated policy including the front of the card, with a warning that “writing on it or adding stickers or other coverings” is no longer allowed.

Advertisement

Anti-DEI mandates at national parks include Zion gift shop:

‘History deserves honesty,’ anti-DEI mandates at national parks include Zion gift shop

Many believe the updated policy is in direct response to the large pushback over the inclusion of Trump, leaving people to share creative ways to hide the president’s image from passes, including stickers and sleeves.

Advertisement

Along with the suggestions on how to hide Trump’s image, a nonprofit environmental group has filed a lawsuit claiming its design did not comply with legislation that requires public participation in the selection.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending