Connect with us

Sports

Naomi Osaka and the cruelty of tennis comebacks

Published

on

Naomi Osaka and the cruelty of tennis comebacks

Naomi Osaka’s Grand Slam comeback started a little after 9.30pm local time on Monday with a slow and purposeful stroll onto the court at Rod Laver Arena in a technicolor warm-up jacket that demanded attention, just as she always did.

Within two minutes of the start, she had two aces. A minute after that, she was smacking her left thigh with her left hand as she waited to get after the serve of her opponent, Caroline Garcia, just as she always had, especially on this court, where she has won two of her four Grand Slam titles. The woman who, for a time not very long ago, was the heartbeat of her sport, was giving it all once more, the biggest comeback in a tournament filled with them.

This Australian Open, the first week anyway, was always going to be about boldface-name comebacks. 

Osaka, back after more than a year of injury, pregnancy and looking after her six-month-old daughter, Shai. Rafael Nadal, whose comeback from hip surgery ended after three tune-up matches and never made it to Melbourne. Angelique Kerber, like Osaka, a former world No 1 and new mother. Caroline Wozniacki, taking the next step after coming out of retirement last summer following more than three years away and giving birth to two kids.

Denis Shapovalov, so recently a young and rising star from Canada, was here, no longer quite so young at 24 and certainly not rising after six months of recovery from a tear in his patellar tendon. Amanda Anisimova of the United States returning after a year of tending to her mental health. Emma Raducanu of Great Britain, the 2021 U.S. Open champion, is back after surgery on two wrists and one ankle. She plays on Tuesday against the American veteran Shelby Rogers, who is not such a well-known name but is coming back after six months on the sidelines with an abdominal injury.

Advertisement

On Day 1, Anisimova showed the promise and power that once made her seem destined for deep runs at a lot of Grand Slams. Wozniacki, the former world No 1, claimed the kind of surehanded win that made it seem like all things were possible.  

And then on Day 2 came reminders of just how challenging comebacks can be in this heartless game.

Andy Murray showed they can be cautionary tales, hobbling and wincing through the last games of what may have been his final match at the Australian Open following five frustrating years spent trying to rediscover his former greatness after hip resurfacing surgery.

After a dispiriting and decisive 6-4, 6-2, 6-2 loss to Tomas Martin Etcheverry of Argentina, Murray, another former world No 1, had some words of warning about the emotional toll of a comeback for anyone trying to return from an extended time away from the game, especially the very best.  

“It is really hard,” said Murray, who also came back from back surgery earlier in his career. “It’s not usual for players to come back from eight, nine months away from the game, a year away from the game, and start feeling amazing immediately. It does take time.

Advertisement

“For me, this time, it’s never really come back so it’s difficult when you played at the top of the game to change your perspective on how you should be performing and how you should be doing. I would have the highest expectations, and a lot of the players coming back, like Osaka and Wozniacki, Kerber, Rafa… all of them have played right at the top of the game. It’s difficult if you come back and you’re not at that same level.”


Murray shows his frustration in his first-round defeat (Julian Finney/Getty Images)

There is nothing quite like a comeback in tennis, a game that essentially punishes players for time away. 

Ranking points disappear. There is no job protection the way there might be for an athlete in a team sport, with an organization committed to managing a rehabilitation, if only to salvage value from a contract. There are no practice starts without consequences in the minor leagues to ease the transition back to top-tier competition.

For older players, the game, the practice sessions, the matches, they all hurt more.

“I’ve played for so many years, been able to push my body to the brink almost every day for that whole time,” Wozniacki said. “Now I just really have got to be more careful with what I do and how I do things.” 

Advertisement

Mostly, there is suffering, through long months of more losses than wins and trying to rediscover touch and timing and the freedom to play once more without worrying if the next shot will end up being the last. 

You see so many guys struggling when they come back,” Shapovalov said on Monday after his loss in straight sets to Jakub Mensik of the Czech Republic, an 18-year-old ranked 142nd in the world. 

Shapovalov said he had been through some dark moments over the past months, moments when he felt like he might have played his last tennis match, then finally he began to feel healthy enough to compete toward the end of last year. Now he had come to the Southern Hemisphere and lost two matches out of two.


Shapovalov’s comeback also ended in the first round (Phil Walter/Getty Images)

His friend James Blake, himself a former top 10 player, said it might take eight or nine matches for Shapovalov to begin feeling like himself. Sebastian Korda, the American who is several months into his comeback from a serious wrist injury that he first suffered in the quarter-finals here last year, said on Monday he was still in the process of relearning how to play.

“Every practice you were hesitant and always thinking about it,” Korda said after eking out a five-set win against Vit Kopriva. “There’s still a lot that hasn’t really come back.”

Advertisement

Shapovalov didn’t want to consider that scenario. 

“I don’t feel like I’m a guy that strives for mediocre tennis or strives for mediocre results,” he said. “It’s definitely something I consider if I’m not able to get 100 per cent back that I wouldn’t play again.”

Osaka and her coach, Wim Fissette, said in December that they were not concerned about her results in Australia. Osaka began practising in October, only three months after giving birth. These first tournaments would give them information about how far along she had come and how far she needed to go. The goal, Fissette said, is for her to be in top form this summer, during the hard court swing in North America that climaxes with the U.S. Open, a tournament she has won twice.

Now they know she has some way to go, at least to get to the top echelon. 


Osaka lost her opening match of an Australian Open for the first time (Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

On the way to the court, she tapped her name on the wall that signifies her championships, an old ritual. But in Garcia, Osaka faced the No 16 seed who has been a mainstay of the top 10 for most of the last year and a half, is a big hitter and is not a player anyone would choose to face in their first Grand Slam match in 15 months. For most of the match, she did to Osaka what Osaka used to do to everyone else, taking the initiative, stepping into the court and making them deal with the kind of power and pace that forced players back onto their heels and struggling to get their strings on the ball before it passed them by.

Advertisement

There were moments when Osaka was up to the test, standing on the baseline and matching the power, but not enough, not yet. Comebacks are hard and tennis rarely does sentimentality. 

She served 11 aces, but Garcia had 13. She won 78 per cent of the points on her first serve; Garcia won 89 per cent. She lost her serve just once, and faced only three break points; Garcia never lost her serve, and she never faced a break point.

She pushed Garcia to a tiebreaker in the second set, but lost five straight points to end the match, unable to chase down Garcia’s rocketing serves, and her night ended when a backhand clipped the top of the net and didn’t skip over.

Garcia skipped and jumped across the court when it was finished, knowing how well she had needed to play to survive a tough test to start the year’s first Grand Slam. 

“She’s been through a lot, I’m just very glad to see her back,” Garcia said of Osaka. “Six months after giving birth she is playing quite amazing.”

Advertisement

Osaka said she was grateful for the past weeks and to have played three tough matches that assured her she could compete with top competition, but a little sad with the results.

“I’m delusional enough to think I could have won the tournament,” she said. That delusion “is what allows me to win tournaments”.

Not this time. Maybe down the road. Comebacks are hard.

(Top photo: Robert Prange/Getty Images)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sports

Booger McFarland points finger at Clemson's 'same stale offense' amid program's streak of disappointments

Published

on

Booger McFarland points finger at Clemson's 'same stale offense' amid program's streak of disappointments

The Clemson Tigers faced a tough test in their season opener.

Head coach Dabo Swiney and the Tigers traveled to Atlanta for Saturday’s matchup with the Georgia Bulldogs — a team that’s won two of the past three College Football Playoff National Championships.

Clemson’s 34-3 loss to the Bulldogs was one of the most lopsided defeats of Swiney’s tenure. The loss sparked numerous questions about the direction of the program, but ESPN college football analyst Booger McFarland shared his thoughts on what he believed has contributed to the Tigers’ shortcomings in recent years.

Former NFL player and current NFL analyst Booger McFarland looks on before the game between the Philadelphia Eagles and the Washington Commanders at Lincoln Financial Field on November 14, 2022 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Scott Taetsch/Getty Images)

Advertisement

From McFarland’s point of view, a lack of creativity on the offensive side of the ball has held Clemson back. The Tigers only managed to produce 188 total yards of offense on Saturday.

NICK SABAN DISHES HILARIOUS COMMENT REGARDING OHIO STATE’S $20 MILLION NIL FOOTBALL ROSTER

“I’m afraid to say it’s the same old thing,” McFarland during Saturday’s broadcast. “[There is] no creativity on offense. It’s been the same stale offense for four or five years. … If you’re a Clemson fan, you have to ask yourself, when are we going to change?”

Swiney’s approach to the transfer portal has been widely criticized. McFarland suggested that Swiney’s roster building philosophy would need to change in order for Clemson to have the most competitive roster possible.

Dabo Swinney looks on field

Clemson Tigers head coach Dabo Swinney on the field before a game against the Georgia Bulldogs at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. (Brett Davis-USA TODAY Sports)

“Dabo chooses not to [use the portal], therefore, you’re going to have those lulls in the program,” McFarland said. “And I’m afraid, right now, they have a little bit of a lull.”

Advertisement
Cade Klubnik throws a pass

Aug 31, 2024; Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Clemson Tigers quarterback Cade Klubnik (2) throws a pass against the Georgia Bulldogs in the first quarter at Mercedes-Benz Stadium. (Brett Davis-USA TODAY Sports)

Swiney was asked about the transfer portal after the blowout loss.

“People are going to say whatever they want to say,” Swinney said, via ClemsonWire. “It doesn’t matter what I say. People are going to say whatever they’re going to say. And when you lose like this, they’ve got every right to say whatever they want to say. So, say whatever you want to say, write whatever you want to write. That comes with it. That’s just part of it.”

Swiney and the Tigers will have an opportunity to get back on the winning track on Sept. 7 when they host Appalachian State.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Sports

San Francisco 49ers rookie receiver Ricky Pearsall shot during attempted robbery in Union Square

Published

on

San Francisco 49ers rookie receiver Ricky Pearsall shot during attempted robbery in Union Square

Ricky Pearsall, the San Francisco 49ers’ rookie wide receiver and first-round draft pick, was shot during an attempted robbery in the city’s Union Square on Saturday afternoon.

Pearsall was stable, according to Supervisor Aaron Peskin’s office, which has been in communication with the San Francisco Police Department, and a suspect has been taken into custody. Peskin represents Union Square, a downtown district known for its high-end shopping, hotels and restaurants.

Mayor London Breed’s office said she was en route to San Francisco General Hospital, where Pearsall was taken for treatment.

“This afternoon, there was an attempted robbery in Union Square involving San Francisco 49ers wide receiver Ricky Pearsall and he was shot,” Breed wrote on social media. “SFPD was on scene immediately and an arrest of the shooter was made. My thoughts are with Ricky and his family at this time.”

Advertisement

San Francisco police officials issued a statement saying officers responded to a shooting at approximately 3:37 p.m. near the intersection of Geary Street and Grant Avenue, close to boutique shops such as Dolce & Gabbana and Saint Laurent.

“Upon arrival, officers located two male subjects suffering from injuries. Officers rendered aid and medics transported both subjects to a local hospital for further medical evaluation,” the statement said. “The suspect is in custody, and charges are pending at this time.”

Peskin said police told him the suspect tried to rob Pearsall of his Rolex watch, and that “Ricky wasn’t having any of it.”

A struggle ensued, Peskin said, and both Pearsall and the suspect “managed to get shot.”

Peskin said he was assured that Pearsall “does not have any life-threatening injuries.” He was shot in the chest, but the bullet did not hit any major organs.

Advertisement

The suspect was shot in the wrist, Peskin said.

Pearsall played for Arizona State and the University of Florida in college. The 49ers drafted him in the first round of the 2024 NFL draft. He was sidelined with a shoulder injury during much of the NFL preseason.

The 49ers are scheduled to open their season against the New York Jets on Sept. 9.

“He’s good,” 49ers teammate Deebo Samuel wrote on social media after the shooting. “Thank god!!!!”

This is a developing story.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

White Sox might break record for losses. How should the 1962 Mets feel about it?

Published

on

White Sox might break record for losses. How should the 1962 Mets feel about it?

NEW YORK — Craig Anderson pauses the phone call. He’s got to get his notes.

He returns with a sheet of paper he’s had for 62 years — the day-by-day performance of the 1962 New York Mets.

“Somebody gave this to me at the end of the ’62 season,” he says. “I’ve kept it all these years.”

The ledger documents the misfortunes of the losingest team in baseball history — a team on the cusp of one more loss: its place in history. 

While nine members of ’62 are still alive, Anderson and fellow pitcher Jay Hook are the only two who spent the entire season with the big-league club. Few people know the burden of history, the burden of ignominious history, like Anderson. The high point of the rookie reliever’s season came May 12, when he earned the win in both games of a doubleheader sweep.

Advertisement

Those would be the last wins he’d ever record in the major leagues, and he set a record by dropping his next 19 decisions. It stood for 29 years, until another Met, Anthony Young, broke it in 1993.

“I didn’t want him to break my record. I didn’t want to wish it on him or anyone,” Anderson says. “That’s the way I felt then and that’s the way I feel now.”

On the phone now, he is matching up the current date — “the Mets started a 13-game losing streak right now,” he notes — while comparing it to the current record for the White Sox.

“I don’t want them to break it,” he says. “I want them to win at least 12 more games. I hope they do, for their sake.”


The Mets visit the south side of Chicago this weekend in the midst of a playoff chase. The White Sox enter the series chasing something grander: history.

Advertisement

The 1962 Mets set the modern-era record for losses in a season with 120. With an even month left in the season, Chicago has lost 104 games, three losses ahead even of the ’62 Mets’ pace for the season. It is easily the most sustained challenge to that team’s record since the 2003 Detroit Tigers needed five wins in their last six games to avoid it.

The White Sox need to go 12-15 to avoid tying the record. They haven’t done that over a 27-game stretch since May. At the moment, they’ve lost 37 of their past 41 contests.

There are not many players who can relate to what that kind of season feels like. Anderson and Hook are two of them.

“It’s shattering when it’s happening to you,” Hook said, his matter-of-fact tone over the phone belying that choice of adjective, “and I’m sure the White Sox are feeling that right now. I wouldn’t wish that on anybody. You don’t like to go through life thinking you were part of the worst team of whatever you did.”

Advertisement

To understand the ’62 Mets, you have to understand Marv Throneberry. Excuse me, Marvelous Marv Throneberry.

The Mets acquired Throneberry, a 28-year-old first baseman, from the Orioles in early May for a player to be named later. (A month later, that player was named as Hobie Landrith, who’d been New York’s first selection in the expansion draft. Landrith had played for the Mets between the trade and the announcement, meaning the two players traded for one another played together for a month.)

Throneberry acquired his ironic moniker with a penchant for misadventure. He mucked up rundowns. He faceplanted racing for the bag. He missed first base — and maybe second, too, the story goes — on a triple. He won a boat he didn’t want in a season-long contest — not much use for a boat in southwest Tennessee, he said — and had to declare it on his taxes.

“Things just sort of keep on happening to me,” he said at one point.

“Marvelous Marv does more than just play first base for the Mets,” wrote Jimmy Breslin in “Can’t Anybody Here Play This Game?: The Improbable Saga of the New York Mets’ First Year.” “He is the Mets.”

Advertisement

Marv Throneberry made 17 errors in 97 games at first base for the Mets in 1962. (Associated Press)

Throneberry, who retained his sense of humor throughout that disastrous season, serves as the stand-in for the Mets’ status as lovable losers. They balked in runs. They misplayed fly balls. They allowed nearly one unearned run per game — to go along with more than five earned runs per contest. On average, their games took 15 minutes longer than everyone else’s, which caused one to be declared a tie because it went past curfew. (“Curfew” here was dictated by the Mets’ flight back to New York from Houston.)

Thing is, Anderson and Hook thought the team could be pretty good. A year earlier, the expansion Angels had won 70 games, and the Mets had brought in some big names — Gil Hodges and Roger Craig in the expansion draft, Richie Ashburn in a deal with the Cubs.

“I looked at the roster and thought, ‘Man, that’s a pretty dynamic list,’” said Hook, who was drafted away from the reigning pennant-winner in Cincinnati. “Casey Stengel is the manager and he’d had great success. I really looked at it optimistically. I thought we could be a decent team.”

“I thought we were going to at least be competitive,” Anderson said.

The nine-game losing streak to start the season quelled that optimism. When a 9-3 mark over two weeks in May threatened to restore it, the Mets responded by losing those 17 in a row.

Advertisement

“That was where I started to think that maybe we had some problems,” said Anderson.

One player after the season told Breslin, “Forty games is about all we could win. After all, we were playing against teams that had all major leaguers on them.”

The Mets were still beloved. They drew nearly a million fans to the Polo Grounds, finishing in the middle of the league in attendance — more than Red Sox and Phillies teams around .500.

“The New York fans are true baseball fans,” Anderson said. “I won’t say they forgave us, but they never gave up on us.”

“You see,” Breslin wrote of the city’s affection for the team, “the Mets are losers, just like nearly everybody else in life. This is a team for the cab driver who gets held up and the guy who loses out on a promotion because he didn’t maneuver himself to lunch with the boss enough. It is the team for every guy who has to get out of bed in the morning and go to work for short money on a job he does not like. And it is the team for every woman who looks up ten years later and sees her husband eating dinner in a T-shirt and wonders how the hell she ever let this guy talk her into getting married. The Yankees? Who does well enough to root for them, Laurance Rockefeller?”

Advertisement

It’s perhaps no surprise, then, that a certain feeling gets expressed a lot by those invested in the Mets’ history.

The 2024 White Sox are not worthy of breaking the Mets’ record.

The Mets had no choice but to be bad. Stricter rules in the expansion draft — because the AL’s expansion teams had done better in 1961 — left New York with little to choose from. The amateur draft wasn’t around yet, let alone free agency. The Mets had to build through scouting and trading. The White Sox, on the other hand, are three years removed from consecutive playoff appearances that were supposed to herald a stretch of sustained contention. It’s all collapsed since.

Evan Roberts is the drivetime cohost for WFAN and author of “My Mets Bible: Scoring 30 Years of Baseball Fandom.”

“It’s not life and death, BUT I’d prefer they not break it,” he said via direct message. “I grew up with legendary stories about how bad and hilarious the 1962 Mets were, and I would ideally not want to see a team pass the 120 losses.”

Advertisement

Devin Gordon is the author of “So Many Ways to Lose: The Amazing True Story of the New York Mets — the Best Worst Team in Sports.”

“I suppose I should feel like it’s some kind of albatross around the franchise’s neck and that I should be relieved at the prospect of it finally getting lifted. But I don’t,” he wrote in an email. “That team was a storybook team in its own unique way, and I like that it’s enshrined in history. It’s also the perfect narrative bookend for what happened seven years later with the World Series win in 1969. It’s part of a much larger, more cinematic story for us in a way that one random catastrophic season by another team will never be.”

Indeed, the Mets’ championship in 1969 has retroactively uplifted that ’62 team as well.

“To have won a world championship seven years later provides the perfect bookend with the historic futility,” said Mets broadcaster Howie Rose, who was eight years old watching the Mets’ debut season. “It all ties together. It’s all part of the heritage. ’69 is sweeter because of ’62. It’s just a nice piece of perverse symmetry.”

“To never have finished above ninth place and then to win it all in 1969, that narrative is a very heroic and comforting one for Mets fans,” said Gary Cohen, New York’s television broadcaster. “The White Sox breaking that record wouldn’t change that. However, I don’t want to see anybody lose 121 games because that’s a horrible thing for their franchise.”

Advertisement

Dave Bagdade wrote “A Year in Mudville: The Full Story of Casey Stengel and the Original Mets” about the ’62 Mets. He also happens to be a lifelong White Sox fan.

“I don’t want to see their record eclipsed,” Bagdade wrote in an email. “I love the idea that they were the worst baseball team of the modern era, but that they lost with personality and humor and that they remain one of the most loved teams of any era despite (or possibly because of) their record. The ’24 Sox are just a steaming pile of baseball ineptitude. They don’t lose with personality and humor. They just lose. I don’t want anything about this Sox team to be enshrined in baseball immortality.”

In response to an informal poll on X, which obviously skews younger, about three in four Mets fans did want the White Sox to break the record. Younger fans feel little pride in 120 losses.

Greg Prince, who pens the popular blog “Faith and Fear in Flushing” and has written four books about the Mets, ultimately agrees with the majority.

Advertisement

“I’ve been charmed by all that went into creating 40-120 my entire rooting life,” Prince wrote in an email. “The legend of the 1962 club will endure no matter who holds the record. All that being said, hell yes, let somebody else lose more than my team. Plus, you know, history. Somebody setting a mark like this while we’re here to witness it is worth a dozen Danny Jansens facing off against another dozen Danny Jansens.”



Jay Hook, shown here on June 2, 1962, recalls looking at the roster and thinking, “Man, that’s a pretty dynamic list.” (Harry Harris / Associated Press)

There’s one other reason Hook and Anderson don’t want the record to be broken. Playing for the 1962 Mets is a part — a significant part — of their personal legacies in baseball.

Hook recorded the first win in Mets history; there’s a ball displayed prominently at Citi Field with his name written on it in large letters. Anderson signs almost all his autographs with “Original Met.”

“If you’d asked me this back in the mid-60s, I would have said I was so happy to get it over with and get out of there,” Anderson said. “But after 62 years now …”

Hook thought back to the Old Timers’ Day the Mets held in 2022. The club had asked him if he wanted to pitch, and the then-85-year-old suggested a first pitch instead. He worked out for weeks to get himself in shape, and then, in front of more than two dozen members of his family, he fired it to Mike Piazza on the fly.

Advertisement

“They had the best weekend going to New York and being at Citi Field,” he said of his family. “I’ve had more publicity because I was on that team. That’s survived.”

It will survive even if the White Sox fail to win 12 games over the final month of the season. If the ’62 Mets cede their long-held pedestal in the sport, their legacy, one that’s grown in fondness with each passing year, is secure.

“With the passage of time, it has become increasingly difficult to accurately portray who and what those Mets were and what they represented,” Rose said. “For those not of age when the Mets came about, they could not possibly understand what their impact was not only on baseball fans in New York but around the country.”

(Top photo from the Polo Grounds on June 20, 1962: Associated Press file)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending