Connect with us

Sports

Marcus Rashford at Manchester United. What’s going on?

Published

on

Marcus Rashford at Manchester United. What’s going on?

It was a conversation with Ruben Amorim at the start of December that goes some way to explaining why Marcus Rashford has been absent from the Manchester United side for the past five matches.

United had just beaten Everton 4-0, with Rashford scoring two of the goals in a vibrant display on Sunday, December 1. But after that game, Amorim heard the forward had been out in Manchester on the Friday night, November 29, less than 48 hours before Everton’s visit to Old Trafford.

The United head coach does not want his players in bars so close to games and asked Rashford about his movements. The England international assured Amorim he had been misinformed about a late night.

Three days later, however, Rashford was left out of the starting line-up for the trip to Arsenal. While rotation was at play, those questions over his social life were also a factor in Amorim’s decision.

Since then, Rashford’s only start has come at Viktoria Plzen in the Europa League, a 2-1 win for United on December 12. After that, he was left out of four successive matchday squads.

Advertisement

The 27-year-old did return to the bench for the visit of Newcastle on December 30, a match for which team-mates Bruno Fernandes and Manuel Ugarte were suspended. “We have a lot of players outside,” Amorim said. “Every week I choose my players, he was there to be chosen, and this time he is here.”

That emphasis on “this time” implied there was no guarantee Rashford would be included “next time”, and Amorim declined to introduce him despite United trailing Newcastle 2-0 from the 19th minute, in what could be interpreted as a bigger statement than leaving him out entirely.

Amorim said: “I’m not making a point. I just want to win the game.”


Rashford reacts after United’s 2-0 defeat by Newcastle last Monday (Carl Recine/Getty Images)

That Amorim appeared to believe United had a better chance of staging a comeback victory with Rashford in a seat in the dugout rather than on the pitch speaks to the wider issues at play.

On Friday, Amorim confirmed Rashford had not trained this week due to illness and would likely be missing from the trip to Liverpool tomorrow. The striker’s future has now become one of the biggest issues confronting United in this transfer window.

Advertisement

“It depends more on him than me,” the head coach told Sky Sports on Friday in regards to Rashford. “He has to want it really, really bad. He’s here. He’s ready to play if I decide.”

The Athletic has spoken to multiple sources with knowledge of Rashford’s situation, who did so anonymously to protect relationships, to understand how a player with the best scoring record in United’s squad, a much-praised and decorated individual owing to his record of charity work, who earns one of the top salaries on a basic £325,000 per week when the club are in the Champions League, can be left out during a crucial period of the season.

It is a complicated situation, but one thing seems clear: Rashford’s prospects of an imminent return to favour under Amorim look bleak.


Since their talk after the Everton game, Amorim has given Rashford 118 minutes of football out of a possible 720.

He played the final half-hour both at Arsenal and in the following match at home to Nottingham Forest, then started against Viktoria Plzen, although Amorim substituted him on 56 minutes after a poor performance.

Advertisement

Two days later, on Saturday, December 14, in the final training session before facing Manchester City the following afternoon, Rashford put in a lacklustre display at United’s Carrington base, according to multiple sources, some of whom said he appeared fatigued.

Claims circulated Rashford had gone out the night before — on the Friday, 48 hours before the game with accounts reaching people at United. This, however, is strenuously denied by people close to the player. Rashford is also known to feel he does not behave differently from other Premier League footballers but faces much more scrutiny over his social life.

Amorim makes his decisions based on what he sees with his own eyes, in complete consideration of all aspects, and when United’s line-up and squad for the derby at the Etihad Stadium was posted in the team WhatsApp group that Saturday evening, it was clear to the players that their new head coach had taken strong action in a bid to jolt Rashford.


Rashford prepares to come on against Bodo/Glimt on November 28 (Justin Setterfield/Getty Images)

Amorim’s treatment of Rashford is aligned with those above him at United, namely INEOS director of sport Sir Dave Brailsford, chief executive Omar Berrada and technical director Jason Wilcox.

In the aftermath of United’s 2-1 win in the Manchester derby, Amorim indicated he had held talks with executives on how to handle Rashford. “For so long, for example with Rash, you try a thing, it doesn’t work,” he said. “Let’s continue to do the same thing? Or something different?”

Advertisement

Perhaps prime in his mind and theirs was the Belfast episode from last January, when Rashford went partying for two evenings in a row, a Wednesday and a Thursday, and was pictured entering a nightclub hours before being due to attend the Friday’s training at Carrington. He reported ill for that session, and initially told United he had only gone out on the Wednesday.

Rashford’s offer to play in that Sunday’s FA Cup tie away to Newport County was turned down by Erik ten Hag, the manager at the time, with United subsequently saying the forward had “taken responsibility for his actions” and the matter had been dealt with internally. Ten Hag restored Rashford to the starting line-up at Wolves in the league four days later, and he scored in a 4-3 win.

Amorim, though, is opting for a harder approach now.

How to best tap into Rashford’s mindset has been a topic of conversation at United for years and an incident during a session a short time before he went to Belfast provided a trigger for renewed internal discussion.

Steve McClaren, one of Ten Hag’s assistants at the time, was overseeing a small-sided tournament among United’s squad at Carrington. Rashford’s team made the final, which was close in score. As the game went on, McClaren, in his jocular manner, said he believed the contest was Rashford’s to win. In response, the player questioned why additional pressure was being put on him.

Advertisement

Sources say McClaren recognised in that exchange how Rashford required extra attention and, with Ten Hag already across the matter, he shared his thoughts with Brailsford.

The day after the Newport game, a Monday, Brailsford addressed United’s squad for the first time to outline the INEOS strategy, particularly in terms of raising standards across the club. Brailsford’s talk was in the diary rather than a reaction to Rashford’s indiscipline in Belfast, but it seemed to strike a chord with the player. He requested a one-on-one meeting with Brailsford and the pair spoke for 90 minutes.


Locally-born academy graduate Rashford has shouldered much of the focus and expectation at United for several seasons, under a variety of managers, and trying to fulfil instructions for those different approaches would be a challenge for any player. Including caretaker spells, he has played for eight managers/head coaches since his senior debut as an 18-year-old in February 2016. Conversely, he too has proved something of a conundrum for those in charge.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Marcus Rashford – what happened?

Advertisement

Ralf Rangnick felt Rashford trained brilliantly but was unable to replicate that level in matches. It perplexed Rangnick, who wondered what might be going on in the player’s life to cause the disconnect between ability and output.

The only clarity came on Rashford’s preference to play on the left. Rangnick needed him to occasionally operate on the right, once Mason Greenwood was no longer available, and explained he could drift inside from there to good effect. But Rashford told him he wished to start on the opposite flank, where he has done the best work in his career.

Ole Gunnar Solskjaer had wrestled with the same dilemma after the summer 2021 signing of Jadon Sancho, who also liked the left more than the right. In Solskjaer’s last game in charge, the 4-1 loss at Watford that November, Rashford was one of two half-time substitutes, with Scott McTominay the other player going off.

Ten Hag felt he had a good relationship with Rashford, working together in his career-best season of 30 goals in 2022-23, although things soured by the end, with a difference of opinion over the coaching approach. Rashford’s final goal for Ten Hag came in a Europa League game at Porto in early October, where he appeared at his most dangerous in an attacking sense. But the manager took him off at the break due to defensive lapses.


Rashford and Ten Hag at Aston Villa  in October (James Gill/Danehouse/Getty Images)

Last summer, new United co-owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe wanted to get Rashford firing. His salary, which runs until 2028, places him among the highest earners, and Ratcliffe wants value for money. But little appears to have changed in the past six months and so United have changed tack, endorsing Amorim’s decision to leave Rashford out.

Advertisement

With the winter transfer window now open, talks are expected to take place about a potential exit. Rashford has said he is now ready for a “new challenge”, although this came in response to stories that he was available for sale and it could be argued was an acceptance by him that United may have decided his future lies elsewhere. “When I leave, it’s going to be ‘no hard feelings’. You’re not going to have any negative comments from me about Manchester United,” he added in the same interview, posted on X on December 17.

Finding a club willing to match his current wages and part with a transfer fee appears implausible, unless he moves to Saudi Arabia’s Pro League. Such a proposition is not thought to appeal to Rashford at this stage of his career, which is looked after by his brothers and representatives Dwaine Maynard and Dane Rashford. He also has assistance from a personal PR assistant. On New Year’s Day, Rashford posted on Instagram to deny a story linking the agency Stellar with facilitating a potential transfer.

There was further intrigue at Companies House, the UK’s register of companies, where Rashford’s MUCS Investments Limited was issued with a striking-off notice for being two months late to file accounts for 2023-24. The notice states that if the company is dissolved, all properties and rights held are deemed to be bona vacantia and will belong to the Crown. Typically, the action of issuing the notice results in the accounts being filed. Sources close to Rashford say the company is dormant and his accountants are in the process of closing it as he was not using it.

Rashford’s view on possibly leaving United comes after two of his best friends in the dressing room departed during the summer, as Sancho and Aaron Wan-Bissaka signed for Chelsea and West Ham United respectively. He is close with Tyrell Malacia, but has tested the patience of other team-mates at times.

The sale of an academy-produced player would especially aid United’s profitability and sustainability (PSR) calculations and Amorim is on record as saying he can only make January additions to the squad with any money that comes into the club.

Advertisement

Amorim has said he wants to see a change in Rashford, but the forward is waiting for his return to the team, which has now stretched to five games.

Sources report his training levels have been mixed, with some good days and occasional bouts of illness. He was unwell and off work on the Monday after the derby, before attending Button Lane, the primary school he went to, to give out gifts to children and speak in an interview about his position at United. Rashford has also been absent from training for the past two days, which United say was sanctioned owing to illness.

There was a time when Rashford would have been a certainty to start against Liverpool, given he enjoyed some of his best games up against Trent Alexander-Arnold, and he remains one of United’s most potent attackers, even if that is not saying a great deal this season. He has seven goals and three assists, behind only Fernandes (16 goal contributions), Alejandro Garnacho and Amad (both 12).


(Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

His running statistics are slightly up on his career norms. Rashford is covering 10.2km on average per 90 minutes in the 2024-25 Premier League, compared to 9.97km and 9.57km in the previous two seasons, according to Opta. His top speed of 35.35km/h is similar to his past best, while he is making 21.33 sprints per 90, compared to 19.28 and 20.26 in 2023-24 and 2022-23 respectively.

Overall, Rashford has 138 goals in 426 matches for United, placing him 13th in the all-time list, seven behind Cristiano Ronaldo in 12th.

Advertisement

There can be no doubting his quality, but people at United talk about Rashford’s attitude needing to shift to meet the standards required and how, having turned 27 in late October, he should be setting an example for the younger players.

Are his off-field choices impacting the level he can reach when the whistle blows on matchday? Until Amorim and his team sense a meaningful improvement, the prospect of a continued absence, or a departure, will remain.

(Top photos: Getty Images; design: Eamonn Dalton)

Sports

Keith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death

Published

on

Keith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Former ESPN broadcaster Keith Olbermann once again incited backlash on social media Wednesday after he called late legendary college football coach Lou Holtz a “legendary scumbag” in an X post on the day Holtz was announced dead. 

“Legendary scumbag, yes,” Olbermann wrote in response to a clip of Holtz criticizing former President Joe Biden in 2020 for supporting abortion rights. 

Olbermann received scathing criticism in response to his post on X.

 

Advertisement

“You’re a scumbag that needs mental help,” one X user wrote to Olbermann. 

One user echoed that sentiment, writing to Olbermann, “You’re the real scumbag here. Lou Holtz had more class, integrity, and genuine decency in his pinky finger than you’ll ever show in your lifetime.”

Another user wrote, “You’re a grumpy, lonely, Godless man. All the things Lou Holtz was not.”

Keith Olbermann speaks onstage during the Olbermann panel at the ESPN portion of the 2013 Summer Television Critics Association tour at the Beverly Hilton Hotel July 24, 2013, in Beverly Hills, Calif.  (Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images)

Olbermann has made it a pattern of sharing politically charged far-left statements that are often combative and ridiculed on social media, typically resulting in immense backlash.

Advertisement

After the U.S. men’s hockey team’s gold medal win, Olbermann heavily criticized the team for accepting an invitation from President Trump to the State of the Union address. Olbermann wrote on X that any members of the men’s team who attended the event were “declaring their indelible stupidity and misogyny,” while praising the women’s team for declining the invitation.

In January, Olbermann attacked former University of Kentucky women’s swimmer Kaitlynn Wheeler for celebrating a women’s rights rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments for two cases focused on the legality of biological male trans athletes in women’s sports.

Former Notre Dame football coach Lou Holtz listens before being presented with the Presidential Medal of Freedom at the White House in Washington, D.C., Dec, 3, 2020.  (Doug Mills/The New York Times/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“It’s still about you trying to find an excuse for a lifetime wasted trying to succeed in sports without talent,” Olbermann wrote in response to Wheeler’s post. 

In 2025, Olbermann faced significant backlash after posting (and later deleting) a message on X aimed at CNN contributor Scott Jennings, that said, “You’re next motherf—–,” shortly after the assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk. 

Advertisement

Holtz was a stern supporter of President Donald Trump, even saying in February 2024 that Trump needed to “coach America back to greatness!”

Near the end of Trump’s first term, shortly after former President Joe Biden defeated him in the 2020 election, Trump awarded Holtz with the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian award of the United States. 

After Holtz’s death was announced Wednesday, several top GOP figures paid tribute to the coach on social media. 

Those GOP lawmakers included senators Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala.; Todd Young, R-Ind.; Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; representatives Greg Murphy, R-N.C.; David Rouzer, R-N.C.; Erin Houchin, R-Ind.; and Steve Womack, R-Ark.; and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis; Indiana Gov. Mike Braun; U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon; and Rudy Giuliani.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Lou Holtz, former Notre Dame football coach, addresses the America First Policy Institute’s America First Agenda Summit at the Marriott Marquis July 26, 2022. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc)

At the time of publication, prominent Democrat leaders have appeared silent on Holtz’s passing, including prominent Democrats with a football background. 

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, who worked as an assistant high school football coach; Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., who was a recruiting target for Holtz in 1986 as a college prospect; Rep. Colin Allred, D-Texas, who played in the NFL; and Rep. Kam Buckner, D-Ill., who played football for the University of Illinois, have not posted acknowledging Holtz’s death. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement

Related Article

GOP lawmakers mourn legendary football coach Lou Holtz

Continue Reading

Sports

Stephen A. Smith called Zion Williamson a ‘food addict,’ is now feuding with the Pelicans on social

Published

on

Stephen A. Smith called Zion Williamson a ‘food addict,’ is now feuding with the Pelicans on social
p]:text-cms-story-body-color-text clearfix”>

Williamson has been listed as 6-foot-6, 284 pounds since New Orleans selected him out of Duke with the No. 1 overall pick in the 2019 draft. His weight and fitness level have been regularly criticized, and the amount of time Williamson has missed because of injuries hasn’t helped (including all of the 2021-22 season following offseason right foot surgery).

After playing only 30 games last season because of a left hamstring strain and a lower back injury, Williamson reported for 2025-26 looking trim and in shape. He told reporters that he and Pelicans trainer Daniel Bove had come up with a strategy to address his fitness while rehabbing his hamstring and that he stuck to it.

“I haven’t felt like this since college, high school,” Williamson said at the time, “where I can walk in the gym and I’m like just, ‘I feel good.’”

Williamson has played in 46 of the Pelicans’ 63 games this season, already the third-most games he has played in his seven NBA seasons. In a recent interview with ESPN’s Malika Andrews, Williamson addressed how the past criticism affected him mentally.

Advertisement

“I would say the most difficult point was when I missed my third year with a broken foot, and there was a lot of criticism on my weight, my care for the game, etc.,” Williamson said. “But … while people were saying what they’re saying — and everybody’s entitled to their own opinion, it is what it is — I’m in Portland rehabbing, not knowing if my foot’s gonna heal, and it was frustrating. It was very frustrating.

“I was low. I was really low because I just wanted to play basketball. I just wanted to play the game I love, but every time you turn the TV on, every time I check my phone, it was nothing but negative criticism, man. At the time, it did a lot, like I said, it did a lot, but it was a blessing in disguise, and I learned from it and I grew from it.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Sports

ESPN analyst Paul Finebaum questions Trump’s college sports reform meeting as potential ‘circus’

Published

on

ESPN analyst Paul Finebaum questions Trump’s college sports reform meeting as potential ‘circus’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump will host a White House roundtable regarding college athletics reform later this week.

The panel is expected to include prominent coaches, college sports and pro sports league commissioners, and other professional athletes, according to OutKick.

The group will meet March 6 to examine solutions to key challenges, including NCAA authority; name, image and likeness issues (NIL); collective bargaining; and governance concerns. 

 

Advertisement

President Donald Trump holds a football presented to him during a ceremony to present the Commander-in-Chief’s Trophy to the US Naval Academy football team, the Navy Midshipmen, in the East Room of the White House on April 15, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

The meeting Friday will include big names like Nick Saban, Urban Meyer, Adam Silver and Tiger Woods. Trump has been adamant about “saving college sports,” even signing an executive order setting new restrictions on payments to college athletes back in July.

However, ESPN college analyst Paul Finebaum, who has previously hinted at a congressional run as a Republican, remains a bit skeptical.

“The easiest thing, guys, is just to say this is ridiculous,” Finebaum said to Greg McElroy and Cole Cubelic on WJOX. “And I read the other day, ‘Why is Nick Saban going?’ Why is anybody going? The bottom line is this. If something doesn’t happen very quickly, and I mean in the next short period of time, we’re talking about weeks, not years, then this thing could blow up.

“However it came about, I’m in favor of. The question now becomes, with some of the most powerful people in Washington in the same room, including the most powerful person in the country, can anything get done, or will it be a circus? Will it be just another show?”

Advertisement

U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with former Alabama Crimson Tide football coach Nick Saban as Trump takes the stage to address graduating students at Coleman Coliseum at the University of Alabama on May 01, 2025 in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Trump’s order prohibits athletes from receiving pay-to-play payments from third-party sources. However, the order did not impose any restrictions on NIL payments to college athletes by third-party sources.

A House vote on the SCORE Act (Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements), which would regulate name, image, and likeness deals, was canceled shortly before it was set to be brought to the floor in December.

The White House endorsed the act, but three Republicans, Byron Donalds, Fla., Scott Perry, Pa., and Chip Roy, Texas, voted with Democrats not to bring the act to the floor. Democrats have largely opposed the bill, urging members of the House to vote “no.”

President Donald Trump looks on before the college football game between the US Army and Navy at the M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore, Maryland, on Dec. 13, 2025.  (Alex WROBLEWSKI / AFP via Getty Images)

Advertisement

The SCORE Act would give the NCAA a limited antitrust exemption in hopes of protecting the NCAA from potential lawsuits over eligibility rules and would prohibit athletes from becoming employees of their schools. It prohibits schools from using student fees to fund NIL payments.

Fox News’ Chantz Martin and Ryan Gaydos contributed to this report.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter

Advertisement

Related Article

GOP senator calls for revision to federal law as sports fans pay big on outrageous streaming prices

Continue Reading

Trending