Connect with us

Southeast

Disney’s gender controversy: here’s what’s really behind the corporate politicking

Published

on

NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

It’s no conceitedness on my half once I say that you could possibly drop me within the middle of any metropolis on Earth and I’d determine it out rapidly. With concrete below my ft I can instantly glean the way it works, the way it operates. However not right here. Not at Disney World. No.

Right here there is no such thing as a little stroll to the bodega or the pizza place. Carry loads of cigarettes with you for those who come, belief me. I half count on them to be like jail foreign money, and abruptly that type of economic system makes all types of sense. It’s easy, you already know what you’re getting. 

I got here to Disney World as a result of for some purpose its company honchos, the women and men – if I could name them that – have determined that this firm and this place must be a tip of the spear of our new gender ideologies. At first blush it is mindless. Isn’t this the place that folks come to flee the grind of politics and tradition wars? 

I’M A MOM AND I’M SAYING GOODBYE TO DISNEY

Advertisement

Right here within the land of polo shirts and shorts, dad and mom with bizarre worry of their eyes as a result of they only can’t sustain with their hysterically excited youngsters, have heads on swivels. However this doesn’t seem to be a progressive demographic. So why doesn’t Disney simply preserve its mouth shut? Why does it insist on choosing a combat over Florida’s new, wildly widespread, training regulation meant to guard our youngest youngsters from grownup conversations about intercourse and gender?

I’ve a idea. To name Disney World a managed surroundings is inadequate. Nuclear energy vegetation, or prime secret navy  labs, are managed environments. That is one thing extra. And it offers a visceral perception into why firms are so wanting to bow to progressive trans ideology. 

Companies crave guidelines. Effectivity requires them. There must be one reply, recognized to all of the 1000’s and 1000’s of workers – or forged members as they’re cloyingly referred to as right here. Nuance relating to gender doesn’t match into that scheme. 

In at the moment’s world through which individuals born as males reside as ladies, and vice versa, Disney wants a easy maxim. 

In at the moment’s world through which individuals born as males reside as ladies, and vice versa, Disney wants a easy maxim. Ideally one which generates little warmth, one that each one the visitors – or no matter we’re referred to as right here – can merely nod alongside to. The company management at Disney assumes that the maxim they require is one which accepts gender fluidity and opposes Florida’s regulation. However not so quick.

Advertisement

When a tiny fraction of Disney workers demanded that their bosses throw sticks and stones at Gov. Ron DeSantis for this new regulation, I can see how they noticed it as a slam dunk. I can perceive why they didn’t count on a backlash. However the backlash got here. Perhaps not for his or her backside line, however for his or her status.

I talked to a man and his spouse over a slice of one thing like pizza. The longtime Disney customer was right here along with his spouse, 21-year-old son and the son’s girlfriend. I talked with him about New Yorkers transferring to Florida. He mentioned, “I don’t need them New Yorking my Florida.” Truthful sufficient, Jack. However Brooklyn isn’t the issue right here. Disney is.

I defined that the squeaky wheel will get the oil and that removed from being squeaky he was consuming $25 faux pizza. And he obtained it. Everybody does. I gathered that this man no extra believes that males can develop into ladies than that his son can have a considerable job within the close to future. In each the circumstances he – admirably, I’d add – retains his mouth largely shut.

And therein lies the rub. The executives at Disney don’t give a mouse’s ear about trans ideology. They simply don’t need bother. Who does? And if the visitors, or patrons, or no matter corpo jargon is used, share that feeling, as they in all probability ought to, then in fact Disney will dive full on into gender nonsense simply to maintain the squeaky wheels at bay. 

Advertisement

And thus, Disney turns into the magical kingdom of gender fluidity, even when the hordes of blissful households don’t actually purchase it. It is extra vital that they purchase the sweatshirt and Mickey hat. And purchase them they do. 

Till that adjustments, don’t count on Disney to dismount their progressive excessive horse. It’s the perfect of each worlds for firms. And simply in the mean time, that doesn’t appear more likely to change. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

Learn the total article from Here

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Southeast

Young girl dies after mother leaves her in hot car to go to work: police

Published

on

A mother was recently arrested after she allegedly left her young daughter in a hot car before clocking into work.

The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department (CMPD) announced the arrest of Ashlee Stallings, 36, on Thursday. The mother has been charged with involuntary manslaughter and child abuse by willful act causing serious injury related to the death of her 8-year-old daughter.

In a press release, police explained that Stallings’ daughter was found in critical condition in a hot car in Charlotte on Wednesday. Officers were alerted to the situation around 6:30 p.m.

“Upon arrival, officers located an 8-year-old female in critical condition inside of a vehicle,” the police’s statement read. “The victim was transported to the hospital and was later pronounced deceased.”

NATIONAL PARK TOURIST DIES AFTER BEING SWEPT OVER WATERFALL: OFFICIALS

Advertisement

Ashlee Stallings, 36, has been criminally charged in relation to the death of her daughter. (Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department / Google Maps)

“Upon further investigation it was determined that the victim was left in a vehicle in hot weather conditions and suffered a medical emergency.”

The girl’s cause of death was listed as a brain herniation due to hyperthermia, according to an arrest affidavit obtained by WTVD. In the affidavit, police reported that Stalling returned to her car and found her daughter breathing shallowly and foaming at the mouth. 

The mother then used a hammer to break open the back window and attempted to drive to a hospital before stopping and asking a local business for help. The suspect told police that she was aware of the fact that her daughter was in the car, but that she left air conditioning on. 

WOMAN IMPALED BY UMBRELLA WHILE SUNBATHING AT FLORIDA BEACH: POLICE

Advertisement
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department exteriors

The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department responded to the report of the young child in distress.

Stallings “believed the victim turned the car off because she was cold,” the affidavit said.

“She admitted she knew the temperature was 94 degrees outside and that she should not have left the victim inside the car alone,” police added.

Stallings was transferred to the custody of the Mecklenburg County Sheriff’s Office after her arrest. 

Fox News Digital reached out to the CMPD for more information, but has not heard back.

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

Southeast

Florida homeowners fight squatters with new law that ends 'scam,' governor says

Published

on

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

A new bill granting state law enforcement officials more power to remove squatters and raising criminal penalties for offenders went into effect Monday, potentially giving Florida homeowners the tools to protect their property while circumventing lengthy court processes.

In a video posted to X, Gov. Ron DeSantis said his state is “ending this squatter scam once and for all” with HB 621.

Advertisement

“While other states are siding with the squatters, we are protecting property owners and punishing criminals looking to game the system,” DeSantis said at a press conference at the Orange County State Attorney’s Office after signing the bill in March. 

HERE’S HOW HOMEOWNERS CAN FIGHT AGAINST SQUATTER INSANITY

Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill addressing squatters into law in March – it goes into effect on Monday. (Gov. Ron DeSantis/FB)

“We’ve got people that will be here for seven months of the year, and then they’ll go to Michigan or New York or even Canada. You come back after the summer and someone’s in your house, and then they just get to stay there for six months. Now in Florida, you call up, you fill out a form, the sheriff comes, and the sheriff kicks him out of your property,” DeSantis previously told Sean Hannity of the law.

“If we don’t have private property rights, we will not have a free society, so it is the bedrock Florida stands by, and we’re proud to do it,” he continued.

Advertisement

Attorney Kevin Fabrikant, supervisor of Florida’s Eviction Law Firm, told Fox News Digital that Florida’s legal process for removing a squatter from a property was among the fastest in the country even before the bill’s passage, typically taking about a month.

Comparatively, squatters in states like New York and California have become a months-long headache for some homeowners.

SQUATTING IN THE US: A HISTORY OF UNLAWFULLY OCCUPYING BUILDINGS, LAND THAT DATES BACK TO BEFORE WWII

But it can be costly for homeowners, Fabrikant said, starting with a $300 filing fee and then, generally, expensive legal representation.

But under the new law, law enforcement officers whose hands were previously tied will be able to circumvent the court process and carry out evictions, so long as the homeowner files an affidavit and the intruder meets several criterion:

Advertisement

“If you’re a squatter, I wouldn’t come to Florida to live.”

— Attorney Kevin Fabrikant

The squatter must have unlawfully entered the property, must have already been asked to leave by the homeowner, cannot be a current or former tenant of the home, and cannot be an immediate relative of the homeowner looking to get them off their property.

“It’s designed for a very narrow situation – if you let somebody into your property and you want them out, it likely may not apply,” Fabrikant said.

RED STATE GOVERNOR SIGNS BILL CRACKING DOWN ON SQUATTERS: ‘BEST DWELLING’ FOR THEM ‘IS A JAIL CELL’

Atlanta squatter crisis

An Atlanta property owner says squatters ripped wires out of the walls and caused tens of thousands of dollars worth of damage. (Fox News)

A standard removal fee with an area sheriff’s department would cost $90 in most Florida counties and $115 in Miami, Fabrikant said.

Advertisement

“If you’re a squatter, I wouldn’t come to Florida to live,” Fabrikant said. 

Once officials verify ownership and deem the complainant eligible, the sheriff must remove the squatter, according to the new legislation.

Those who “encourage or engage in squatting” will face increased penalties under the law, the bill reads. 

Squatters who forge leases or other proof of residence will face a first-degree misdemeanor for false written statements or falsifying documents. 

Anyone who causes $1,000 or more in damages while occupying a property can now face a second-degree misdemeanor.

Advertisement

“Somebody breaks into the house, destroys the house, that’s [the type of person] the governor intended [to police with this law],” Fabrikant said. “Those people cause immeasurable damages to have handymen or contractors fix what these squatters are doing to a property.”

Anyone who knowingly advertises the sale or rent of residential property without permission from the owner will now be subject to a first-degree felony.

“Sometimes, Bob Squatter turns around and finds some people,” Fabrikant said. “Now you have to remove Bob Squatter and all these random people who [may not be aware that they’re illegally living on the property].”

It is unclear how law enforcement in Florida will operate under the new law. 

“They’re on the spot having to make a decision about whether a person qualifies under these scenarios,” Fabrikant said.

Advertisement

“There are times when the sheriffs are put in a tough spot because of the language and the claims that the occupant might make,” Fabrikant said. “In all likelihood, the sheriff’s office will be liable to a civil suit… if they remove someone wrongfully they would tend to get sued.”

Martin County Sheriff William Snyder previously told “Fox & Friends First” that he believes the law will “absolutely” alleviate the situation.

“There’s a real technicality when you go out to a home and somebody proffers that they live there, then the legitimate owner has proved that it’s their house,” he said in March.

“It gives us teeth to enforce the law and to return the home to the rightful owner,” he said. “We’ll go right out there, and it’s our intention here in Martin County to get that home back into the hands of the rightful owner and get the trespasser out… and then I will provide them [the squatter] housing. They will not be unhoused. I’m putting them straight into my jail.”

Advertisement

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

Southeast

Chinese military AI in focus as lawmaker sounds alarm on threat from rifle-wielding 'robot-dogs'

Published

on

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

A Republican lawmaker is sounding the alarm on the latest threat from China – rifle-toting AI robot dogs.

A Chinese state media video, screenshots of which were published by the Military Times, showed that country’s military displaying dog-like robots toting rifles during joint drills in Cambodia.

Advertisement

The AI dogs weigh 110 pounds and can carry and fire automatic rifles autonomously, according to the outlet. 

While drone warfare is not a novel concept, some believe the rise of these new armed automatons should cause concern stateside.

IN THE ONLY STATE BORDERING RUSSIA, ALASKA GOVERNOR SAYS ITS DEFENSES ARE STRONG

Visitors view a fighting robot dog during the 9th China (Beijing) Military Intelligent Technology Expo at the China National Convention Center in Beijing. (Guo Haipeng/VCG via Getty Images)

Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., told Fox News Digital that advanced AI is the next major economic and military frontier for both the U.S. and its adversaries like China.

Advertisement

Of 18 amendments he authored and successfully saw passed via the House draft of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), one drew attention to the potentially game-changing threat.

Buchanan’s legislation added a provision that would direct the secretary of defense to report on the threat of China’s use of AI in the military, including such robot-dogs, and their national security threat to the U.S.

“If we don’t pay attention to what other countries around the world are doing on the AI front, we risk losing our standing on the global stage and position as the world’s preeminent fighting force,” Buchanan said.

“Anyone that tells you that China will only be using these for purely peaceful purposes has their head in the sand.”

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But, according to a May report from The Warzone, the Marine Corps’ Special Forces Operation Command – or MARSOC – has two similar robotic quadrupeds that it is currently using for perimeter security in unspecified locations.

Advertisement

LANDMARK BILL TARGETS HIDDEN FOREIGN FUNDS IN SCHOOLS AS OFFICIALS WARN OF CCP INFLUENCE

Robot dog

Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces and commander of the Royal Cambodian Army, General Mao Sophan, inspects drones and a machine gun equipped robot battle dog displayed in front of Chinese soldiers at a military police base in Kampong Chhnang province. (TANG CHHIN SOTHYTANG CHHIN SOTHY/AFP via Getty)

Buchanan said the U.S. has experimented with such similar robotic dogs in the past, but China affixing weapons to them and showing them off via military exercises is worrisome.

“[This] should make everyone take notice and ensure our military is staying one step ahead of them at every turn,” he said.

When asked whether the Democratic-led Senate is likely to strip the provision from its draft for the final compromise legislation, Buchanan said he had no reason to believe so. 

He suggested the “common-sense” reporting requirement should be noncontroversial as a matter of national security.

Advertisement

“We’ve received a lot of positive feedback about our amendment. The fact that it passed without opposition from a single member of Congress on either side of the aisle should tell you everything you need to know,” he added.

Then-Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., listens as Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., speaks. (Getty)

Then-Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., listens as Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., speaks. (Getty)

While he alone drafted the amendment to the NDAA, Buchanan said that many other lawmakers are extremely concerned about AI-related threats from China and other adversaries.

Asked about the robot dogs and the reporting amendment, Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee who chief-sponsored the NDAA, suggested that such concerns are valid.

“Prioritizing innovation is vital if we want to stay ahead of China,” Rogers said.

“The FY25 NDAA continues to make investments in innovative emerging technologies, like AI, to ensure that our military remains the most capable and lethal force in the world.”

Advertisement

The Senate is due to take up debate on the NDAA in the near term, after House passage of its version fell largely along party lines at 217-199.

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading

Trending