Washington, D.C
Washington, DC Tops List Of 'America's Hardest-Working Cities'
In a nation known for its strong work ethic, some cities stand out as shining examples of the American spirit. After all, work is the backbone of the American dream. A recent study by WalletHub set out to identify the hardest-working cities in the United States, comparing 116 of the most populated cities across 11 key metrics. Who came out on top? Results point to our nation’s capital, Washington, DC!
The study offers a fascinating insight into the work habits of Americans and the factors that contribute to a city’s overall work ethic. Conducted in February 2024, researchers looked at two main dimensions: “Direct Work Factors” and “Indirect Work Factors.” Direct Work Factors, which accounted for 80% of the total score, included metrics such as average workweek hours, employment rate, and the share of households where no adults work. Indirect Work Factors, which made up the remaining 20%, considered aspects like average commute time, the share of workers with multiple jobs, and annual volunteer hours per resident.
With that said, let’s take a look at the full list!
Hardest-Working Cities in the U.S.
| Overall Rank* | City | Total Score | Direct Work Factors Rank | Indirect Work Factors Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington, DC | 76.97 | 4 | 9 |
| 2 | Irving, TX | 76.39 | 1 | 46 |
| 3 | Cheyenne, WY | 76.15 | 7 | 27 |
| 4 | Virginia Beach, VA | 75.79 | 8 | 11 |
| 5 | Anchorage, AK | 75.55 | 3 | 85 |
| 6 | Norfolk, VA | 75.27 | 9 | 14 |
| 7 | Dallas, TX | 75.21 | 5 | 32 |
| 8 | San Francisco, CA | 74.67 | 6 | 40 |
| 9 | Denver, CO | 73.93 | 12 | 22 |
| 10 | Austin, TX | 73.82 | 2 | 79 |
| 11 | Sioux Falls, SD | 73.56 | 11 | 74 |
| 12 | Corpus Christi, TX | 73.44 | 10 | 76 |
| 13 | Plano, TX | 72.84 | 14 | 38 |
| 14 | Fort Worth, TX | 72.14 | 16 | 30 |
| 15 | Arlington, TX | 72.12 | 15 | 31 |
| 16 | Chesapeake, VA | 71.85 | 30 | 7 |
| 17 | Aurora, CO | 71.68 | 24 | 16 |
| 18 | Laredo, TX | 70.98 | 23 | 62 |
| 19 | Garland, TX | 70.90 | 25 | 21 |
| 20 | Nashville, TN | 70.52 | 13 | 77 |
| 21 | Manchester, NH | 70.24 | 34 | 35 |
| 22 | Omaha, NE | 70.00 | 36 | 25 |
| 23 | Raleigh, NC | 69.92 | 29 | 29 |
| 24 | Charlotte, NC | 69.89 | 33 | 24 |
| 25 | Chandler, AZ | 69.74 | 20 | 64 |
| 26 | Scottsdale, AZ | 69.70 | 17 | 78 |
| 27 | Houston, TX | 69.24 | 26 | 51 |
| 28 | Gilbert, AZ | 68.75 | 31 | 50 |
| 29 | Tampa, FL | 68.55 | 19 | 97 |
| 30 | Boston, MA | 68.45 | 49 | 3 |
| 31 | Fremont, CA | 68.22 | 37 | 33 |
| 32 | Seattle, WA | 68.05 | 51 | 6 |
| 33 | Atlanta, GA | 67.86 | 32 | 69 |
| 34 | Portland, ME | 67.72 | 40 | 57 |
| 35 | Colorado Springs, CO | 67.43 | 52 | 17 |
| 36 | Oklahoma City, OK | 66.95 | 22 | 101 |
| 37 | Indianapolis, IN | 66.91 | 47 | 18 |
| 38 | St. Petersburg, FL | 66.78 | 28 | 100 |
| 39 | Orlando, FL | 66.71 | 21 | 107 |
| 40 | Jacksonville, FL | 66.42 | 18 | 109 |
| 41 | Lubbock, TX | 66.40 | 39 | 98 |
| 42 | Baltimore, MD | 66.38 | 71 | 2 |
| 43 | San Antonio, TX | 66.14 | 35 | 86 |
| 44 | Salt Lake City, UT | 66.02 | 66 | 5 |
| 45 | Phoenix, AZ | 65.90 | 41 | 54 |
| 46 | Durham, NC | 65.80 | 43 | 88 |
| 47 | Fargo, ND | 65.52 | 48 | 63 |
| 48 | Little Rock, AR | 65.32 | 38 | 115 |
| 49 | Kansas City, MO | 65.25 | 50 | 41 |
| 50 | San Jose, CA | 65.19 | 42 | 55 |
| 51 | Miami, FL | 64.91 | 27 | 114 |
| 52 | Oakland, CA | 64.67 | 53 | 42 |
| 53 | Boise, ID | 64.18 | 63 | 48 |
| 54 | Portland, OR | 64.17 | 83 | 1 |
| 55 | El Paso, TX | 64.13 | 64 | 43 |
| 56 | Jersey City, NJ | 63.89 | 58 | 37 |
| 57 | Louisville, KY | 63.82 | 57 | 34 |
| 58 | Honolulu, HI | 63.72 | 46 | 110 |
| 59 | Tulsa, OK | 63.57 | 45 | 111 |
| 60 | Billings, MT | 63.48 | 62 | 66 |
| 61 | Minneapolis, MN | 62.77 | 77 | 13 |
| 62 | Des Moines, IA | 62.75 | 69 | 67 |
| 63 | Lexington-Fayette, KY | 62.52 | 54 | 102 |
| 64 | Wichita, KS | 62.36 | 56 | 105 |
| 65 | Glendale, AZ | 62.34 | 70 | 47 |
| 66 | Jackson, MS | 62.11 | 60 | 106 |
| 67 | San Diego, CA | 61.95 | 59 | 80 |
| 68 | Columbus, OH | 61.94 | 65 | 59 |
| 69 | Irvine, CA | 61.62 | 55 | 89 |
| 70 | Fort Wayne, IN | 61.56 | 68 | 93 |
| 71 | Hialeah, FL | 61.44 | 44 | 112 |
| 72 | Santa Ana, CA | 61.29 | 61 | 87 |
| 73 | Lincoln, NE | 61.25 | 82 | 28 |
| 74 | Mesa, AZ | 61.13 | 72 | 61 |
| 75 | Long Beach, CA | 60.69 | 74 | 65 |
| 76 | St. Louis, MO | 60.65 | 81 | 36 |
| 77 | St. Paul, MN | 60.56 | 85 | 12 |
| 78 | Anaheim, CA | 60.49 | 73 | 75 |
| 79 | Reno, NV | 60.45 | 75 | 90 |
| 80 | Los Angeles, CA | 60.14 | 76 | 60 |
| 81 | Chula Vista, CA | 60.11 | 78 | 53 |
| 82 | Winston-Salem, NC | 59.59 | 79 | 92 |
| 83 | Henderson, NV | 59.19 | 80 | 71 |
| 84 | Philadelphia, PA | 58.52 | 98 | 8 |
| 85 | Birmingham, AL | 58.29 | 67 | 108 |
| 86 | North Las Vegas, NV | 58.14 | 84 | 49 |
| 87 | Chicago, IL | 57.71 | 89 | 39 |
| 88 | Las Vegas, NV | 57.28 | 88 | 58 |
| 89 | Cincinnati, OH | 57.23 | 97 | 20 |
| 90 | Bakersfield, CA | 56.29 | 93 | 72 |
| 91 | Albuquerque, NM | 56.16 | 92 | 84 |
| 92 | Memphis, TN | 55.91 | 91 | 73 |
| 93 | Riverside, CA | 55.36 | 94 | 68 |
| 94 | New Orleans, LA | 55.26 | 87 | 96 |
| 95 | Greensboro, NC | 55.08 | 96 | 94 |
| 96 | Sacramento, CA | 54.96 | 90 | 95 |
| 97 | Wilmington, DE | 54.60 | 95 | 81 |
| 98 | Pittsburgh, PA | 54.41 | 104 | 19 |
| 99 | New York, NY | 53.70 | 101 | 44 |
| 100 | Baton Rouge, LA | 53.43 | 100 | 91 |
| 101 | Madison, WI | 52.98 | 99 | 104 |
| 102 | Milwaukee, WI | 52.85 | 108 | 10 |
| 103 | Charleston, WV | 52.61 | 86 | 116 |
| 104 | Stockton, CA | 52.28 | 106 | 15 |
| 105 | Tucson, AZ | 51.94 | 102 | 99 |
| 106 | Providence, RI | 51.60 | 107 | 26 |
| 107 | San Bernardino, CA | 50.62 | 105 | 83 |
| 108 | Columbia, SC | 50.33 | 103 | 113 |
| 109 | Cleveland, OH | 50.00 | 110 | 23 |
| 110 | Fresno, CA | 48.86 | 109 | 82 |
| 111 | Bridgeport, CT | 48.31 | 112 | 4 |
| 112 | Toledo, OH | 47.50 | 111 | 52 |
| 113 | Newark, NJ | 43.19 | 113 | 45 |
| 114 | Buffalo, NY | 39.22 | 114 | 103 |
| 115 | Detroit, MI | 39.08 | 115 | 70 |
| 116 | Burlington, VT | 34.43 | 116 | 56 |
With the exception of “Total Score,” all of the columns in the table above depict the relative rank of that city, where a rank of 1 represents the best conditions for that metric category.
A Closer Look At The Top 3
So why did Washington, D.C. emerge as the hardest-working city? This is due, in part, to the city having the highest share of workers who leave vacation time unused at 64%. Residents of D.C. also work the third-most hours per week on average and are willing to take relatively long commutes to work, adding over 30 minutes to their workday. Additionally, more than 30% of the District’s residents are members of local volunteer groups or organizations, showcasing their dedication to their community.
Irving, TX, secured the second spot on the list, largely because it has the lowest share of households where no adults work, at only 11%. Irving also ranks ninth in the country for the mean number of hours worked per week. However, this hard work comes at a cost, with Irving residents having significantly less leisure time compared to people in most other cities.
Cheyenne, WY, rounded out the top three, with residents putting in the third-most hours per week, on average. The city boasts one of the highest employment rates in the country, at over 97%, meaning nearly all working-age residents are employed. Cheyenne also has the seventh-highest rate of workers with multiple jobs, at nearly 7%. As a result, people in Cheyenne have the third-lowest amount of leisure time, on average.
Methodology
The WalletHub study employed a comprehensive methodology to determine the hardest-working cities in America. The research team evaluated 116 of the most populated cities using two key dimensions: “Direct Work Factors” and “Indirect Work Factors.” These dimensions were assessed using 11 key metrics, each graded on a 100-point scale, with a score of 100 representing the “hardest-working.”
The Direct Work Factors dimension, which accounted for 80% of the total score, included six metrics. The average workweek hours were given the highest weight (triple weight, ~36.92 points), as this metric directly measures the time spent working. The employment rate and the share of households where no adults work were both given full weight (~12.31 points each), as they provide insight into the overall employment situation in each city. The share of workers leaving vacation time unused and the share of engaged workers (a state-level metric) were assigned half weight (~6.15 points each), as they relate to work dedication and engagement. Finally, the idle youth (16-24) rate was also given half weight, as it indicates the proportion of young people not engaged in work or education.
The Indirect Work Factors dimension, which made up the remaining 20% of the total score, included five metrics, each given full weight (~4.00 points). The average commute time was included as it can significantly impact the total time spent on work-related activities. The share of workers with multiple jobs (a state-level metric) was considered as it reflects the need for some individuals to work more than one job. Annual volunteer hours per resident and the share of residents who participate in local groups or organizations were included to account for community engagement and additional time commitments outside of paid work. Lastly, the average leisure time spent per day (a state-level metric) was considered as it relates to work-life balance.
To calculate the overall score for each city, the researchers determined the weighted average across all 11 metrics. The resulting scores were then used to rank-order the cities from hardest-working to least hard-working. To ensure a geographically diverse sample, the study included at least one city from each of the 50 states. It is important to note that the term “city” in this study refers specifically to the city proper and does not include the surrounding metropolitan area.
By employing this multi-faceted approach, the WalletHub study aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of the work ethic in American cities. The methodology takes into account both direct measures of work, such as hours worked and employment rates, as well as indirect factors that can impact work-life balance and overall quality of life. This detailed analysis allows for a nuanced understanding of the factors contributing to a city’s overall work ethic and provides valuable insights for policymakers, employers, and residents alike.
Washington, D.C
DC leaders considering transit options for new RFK Stadium
The Commanders are set to build a new stadium in D.C., and the debate over how fans will get to and from games is happening right now. On Wednesday, city leaders will join Metro and the Washington Commanders to talk stadium transit.
Washington, D.C
D.C. Police Chief manipulated crime data; new House Oversight report
TNND — A new report from the House Oversight Committee alleges former D.C. Police Chief Pamela Smith pressured officers to manipulate crime data. The committee released the report on Sunday, less than a week after Smith announced she was stepping down.
You’re lulling people into this false sense of security. They might go places they wouldn’t ordinarily go. They might do things they wouldn’t ordinarily do,” said Betsy Brantner Smith, spokesperson for the National Police Association.
Included in the report were transcribed interviews with the commanders of all seven D.C. patrol districts and the former commander currently on suspended leave. One was asked, “Over the last few years, has there been any internal pressure to simply bring down crime statistics?” Their response, “Yes, I mean extremethere’s always been pressure to keep crime down, but the focus on statistics… has come in with this current administration.”
Every single person who lives, works, or visits the District of Columbia deserves a safe city, yet it’s now clear the American people were deliberately kept in the dark about the true crime rates in our nation’s capital,” House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (R-KY) said in a statement.
“They are going to have to regain the public trust. Again, this is a huge integrity issue,” Brantner Smith said.
Among the reports findings, Smith’s alleged pressured campaign against staff led to inaccurate crime data. Smith punished or removed officers for reporting accurate crime numbers. Smith fostered a toxic culture and President Trump’s federal law enforcement surge in D.C. is working.
While Smith has not yet publicly responded to the report, she’s previously denied allegations of manipulating crime data, saying the investigation did not play a factor into her decision to step down at the end of the year.
My decision was not factored into anything with respect to, other than the fact that it’s time. I’ve had 28 years in law enforcement. I’ve had some time to think with my family,” Smith said earlier this month.
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser also released a statement Monday, writing in part that “the interim report betrays its bias from the outset, admitting that it was rushed to release.”
According to crime stats from the Metropolitan Police Department, since the federal law enforcement surge started in August, total violent crime is down 26%. Homicides are down 12% and carjackings 37%.
Washington, D.C
National Menorah Lighting in DC dedicated to Bondi Beach victims
The first candle lit on the National Menorah near the White House in Washington, D.C., marked the first night of Hanukkah — and solemnly honored victims of the Bondi Beach shooting.
The National Menorah Lighting was held Sunday night, hours after gunmen opened fire on a crowd celebrating the beginning of Hanukkah at Australia’s iconic Bondi Beach. Fifteen people were killed, including a 10-year-old girl, a rabbi and a Holocaust survivor, and over three dozen others were being treated at hospitals.
Authorities in Australia said it was a terrorist attack targeting Jewish people.
Organizers behind the National Menorah Lighting said the news from Australia, along with the bitter cold, forced them to consider whether or not to hold the annual event.
After consulting with local law enforcement, National Menorah Lighting organizers decided to hold the event and honor the victims.
Several D.C.-area police departments issued statements confirming there are no known threats to local communities, but are monitoring just in case.
Montgomery County Executive Mark Elrich condemned the attack and said community safety is a priority.
“Acts of antisemitism, especially those meant to intimidate families and communities during moments of gathering and celebration, must be called out clearly and condemned without hesitation,” Elrich said. “I have heard directly from members of Montgomery County’s Jewish community who are shaken and concerned, and I want them to know that their safety is a priority.”
-
Iowa2 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Iowa4 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans
-
Maine17 hours agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Technology6 days agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster