Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Local Washington officials brace for four years of playing defense against Trump

Published

on

Local Washington officials brace for four years of playing defense against Trump


WASHINGTON (AP) — Donald Trump’s first stint in the White House proved to be a chaotic ride for the District of Columbia.

Now with Trump set to return to power — backed by a Republican-controlled Congress and the momentum of a sweeping electoral win — local officials in the nation’s capital are trying to sound conciliatory while preparing for the worst.

“We have been discussing and planning for many months in the case that the District has to defend itself and its values,” said Mayor Muriel Bowser. Her office had “communicated with (Trump’s) team and indicated we would like to speak,” she said on Nov. 12, but hadn’t heard back.

Bowser downplayed the myriad differences between the two sides and emphasized a search for common ground. But those commonalities may be hard to come by, given open mutual animosity that has defined Trump’s relationship with the district.

Advertisement

During Trump’s turbulent first four years in office, he and the local government publicly sparred multiple times — in tones ranging from playful to deeply personal. When Trump floated the idea of a massive July 4 military parade complete with tanks rolling through the streets, the D.C. Council publicly mocked him.

When mass protests broke out in the summer of 2020 over the death of George Floyd and wider police brutality and racial issues, Trump accused Bowser of losing control of her city. he eventually declared his own multi-agency lockdown that included low-flying helicopters buzzing protesters. Bowser responded by having “Black Lives Matter” painted on the street in giant letters one block from the White House.

What to know about Trump’s second term:

Follow all of our coverage as Donald Trump assembles his second administration.

During the last four years, with Trump as an aggrieved private citizen, his feelings toward Washington have remained intense. On the campaign trail, he repeatedly vowed to “take over” the city and usurp the authority of the local government. In August 2023, when he briefly came to town to plead not guilty on charges of trying to overturn his 2020 electoral loss to President Joe Biden, Trump blasted the capital city on social media, calling it a “filthy and crime ridden embarrassment to our nation.”

Advertisement

Now Bowser and the D.C. Council are bracing for what could be several years of playing defense against opponents who wield significant power over Washington’s affairs.

“We just have to do our best and hold on for another few years. We have to figure out how to make it work,” said Councilmember Christina Henderson. “Unlike millions of voters around the country, I actually believe the man when he speaks. He said what he’s going to do.”

Henderson, a former staffer for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., points out that Trump has already experienced what she called “the trifecta” — Republican control of the White House and both houses of Congress — during his first two years in office and the district managed to get through it. She also notes that Republican control of the House of Representatives will be up for grabs again in just two more years.

“I can’t predict what they’re going to try to do to us,” she said. “I can just prepare to respond.”

But responding to the intentions of an antagonistic White House and Congress is difficult, given the nature of the District’s limited autonomy. Under terms of the city’s Home Rule authority, Congress essentially vets all D.C. laws and can outright overturn them.

Advertisement

Even when Trump was out of the White House, activist Republicans on the House Oversight Committee repeatedly summoned Bowser and members of the D.C. Council — often to publicly grill them about local crime rates.

And by far the most extensive modern congressional encroachment on the District’s authority came with Democrats controlling both the Senate and the White House. In 2023, a sweeping rewrite of the D.C. criminal code was branded as soft on crime by House Republicans; in a major setback for the council, both Senate Democrats and President Biden agreed and the law was effectively canceled.

“We know that the district can always be a convenient foil to some of these folks,” said Councilmember Charles Allen. “Without statehood, without autonomy, our laws are always more at risk than any other Americans.”

Both councilmembers predict a wave of budget riders on the annual appropriations bill — designed to alter district laws in ways big and small. These riders have been a longtime source of resentment for local lawmakers, who charge Congress members with tinkering with the district in a manner they could never get away with at home.

“They want to do something to the district because they feel they can. They would never do that to their own state,” Allen said.

Advertisement

He highlights the infamous “Harris rider” named for Maryland Rep. Andy Harris. A staunch opponent of legalized marijuana, Harris has for years used a budget rider to prevent the local government from creating any sort of regulatory framework for taxing or controlling sales. Meanwhile, Maryland has since legalized recreational marijuana use.

“He can’t implement it in his home state, but he can do it to us,” Allen said.

Last year’s appropriations bill initially included riders that would have banned all traffic speed cameras in the nation’s capital and prevented the district government from banning right turns on red lights. Those proposals eventually faded during the negotiation process, but Allen feels that the coming Congress “won’t have Democrats in the same position to help negotiate away many of the most objectionable budget riders.”

Other congressional Republicans have sought to make more fundamental changes to the way Washington operates. Rep. Andrew Clyde of Georgia has proposed completely repealing the Home Rule Act, while Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee has talked publicly of abolishing the office of D.C. mayor. Neither Ogles’ nor Clyde’s office responded to Associated Press requests for comment on their future intentions.

Despite the looming battles, Bowser’s search for common ground with Trump and congressional Republicans may not be completely hopeless. Bowser actually vetoed the criminal code rewrite but was overridden by the D.C. Council; her opposition was frequently cited by congressional Republicans as proof of how far the council had strayed from mainstream Democratic policy.

Advertisement

And Bowser, Trump and Republicans in Congress have all agreed for years on one particular issue: the need to end post-pandemic teleworking and bring all federal employees back to their offices five days a week. She said she looked forward to discussing that with Trump.





Source link

Washington, D.C

D.C. man sues after arrest for playing ‘Star Wars’ music to protest National Guard troops

Published

on

D.C. man sues after arrest for playing ‘Star Wars’ music to protest National Guard troops


A Washington, D.C., resident who drew attention to the deployment of the National Guard in the district by playing “The Imperial March” from “Star Wars” is now suing after he was detained in what he argues was a violation of his rights while protesting.

“The law might have tolerated government conduct of this sort a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away,” Sam O’Hara’s lawyers with the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in a civil complaint filed Thursday, playing on the “Star Wars” theme. “But in the here and now, the First Amendment bars government officials from shutting down peaceful protests, and the Fourth Amendment (along with the District’s prohibition on false arrest) bars groundless seizures,” they wrote.

The complaint, filed in federal district court in Washington, D.C., gave O’Hara’s account of his detention last month. It followed one of the times he recorded and protested the deployment by playing the theme associated with “Star Wars” villain Darth Vader, while walking behind Guard members on public streets.

The incident leading to the lawsuit arose when the 35-year-old was coming home from work on Sept. 11, and he began walking behind a group of Guard members while playing the march on his phone and recording them. He said he didn’t speak to them, touch them or interfere with their activities, and he said he played the music loudly but not at a “blaring level.”

Advertisement

O’Hara’s complaint said that most Guard members he encountered during his protests ignored him and that “a few smiled or laughed.” But he said that on Sept. 11, Sgt. Devon Beck of the Ohio National Guard “was not amused by this satire,” and that Beck contacted D.C. police officers, who handcuffed the plaintiff and blocked him from “continuing his peaceful protest.” He was released without charge.

O’Hara’s suit names Beck, several D.C. officers and the District of Columbia as civil defendants. He claims violations of the First and Fourth Amendments, as well as false arrest and battery. He said officers refused to loosen his tight handcuffs, which caused him pain. The defendants will have an opportunity to respond in court before a judge weighs in on how the case will proceed.

The suit comes as litigation unfolds over the Trump administration’s attempted deployments in Los Angeles; Portland, Oregon; and Chicago, with the last pending before the Supreme Court in a case that could be decided any moment.

Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration’s legal cases.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

‘Hey, Meta. What’s in front of me?’ How AI glasses are changing a blind DC woman’s life

Published

on

‘Hey, Meta. What’s in front of me?’ How AI glasses are changing a blind DC woman’s life


AI glasses let users take videos, stream music and capture everyday moments. For people who are blind and visually impaired, they can be a lifeline.

A native Washingtonian declared legally blind at birth showed News4 how the glasses are changing her life.

Chrichelle Brown is fiercely independent. She rides Metro, takes the bus and shops for groceries. On her own, she can see people and objects but not details. Using AI glasses, she has access to a lot more.

Originally designed for streaming and capturing video, members of the blind community quickly discovered another use. With a simple voice command, the glasses’ built-in camera, microphone and speakers let users talk with an AI assistant that can identify objects, read text and describe surroundings.

Advertisement

“It changes a lot. I’m even able to get descriptions. As I mentioned, I don’t see detail, so being able to ask, ‘Hey Meta, what’s in front of me?’ —it can give me extreme detail, up to what someone’s design is on their shirt,” Brown explained.

Without the glasses, she could see a News4 reporter’s shadow. With them, she knew she was wearing a white sweater and light-colored pants and has blonde hair and light eyes.

Brown teaches others how to use AI glasses at Columbia Lighthouse for the Blind in Silver Spring. Her three-day monthly seminar is free to the community.

On the day News4 met with her, she invited us along as she and a student, Rose, headed to Starbucks. Brown showed Rose how to ask Meta to read the menu. The glasses instantly described the options out loud. It was a small moment that symbolized something much bigger: independence as she often had to rely on others for help.

The glasses connect to a free app called Be My Eyes, which recently partnered with Meta. It links users to millions of volunteers around the world who can see what they can’t, providing real-time, audible feedback.

Advertisement

“I use them for a lot of things. I use them to sometimes help me pick out certain clothes if I think I want them to match a certain way,” Brown said. “If I’m at the store and they can’t find a representative, I will use Be My Eyes to get a volunteer to help me find the specific items at a grocery store.”

She said she’s careful not to rely on AI alone.

“Hey, Meta: How many steps?” Rose asked Brown. “What if this thing tells me there are no steps but there is steps?”

Brown told her to hold on to the railing.

“I always tell people that, you know, when I’m teaching a class, that these glasses are meant to enhance your independence but not replace the services and the knowledge that you have gained from taking the other classes,” she said.

Advertisement

Meta said its goal is to make the glasses more accessible. As the technology improves, advocates hope they’ll continue breaking barriers for people who are blind or visually impaired.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

National Guard could remain in DC through 2026

Published

on

National Guard could remain in DC through 2026


District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb says National Guard troops may be staying far longer than expected, possibly through the summer of 2026, when the nation celebrates its 250th anniversary.

Advertisement

FOX 5’s Maureen Umeh reports the National Guard first arrived in August after President Trump declared a crime emergency in the city.

 Two months later, roughly 2,500 troops remain on duty as part of the “Safe and Beautiful” mission, working alongside local police and federal agencies.

READ MORE: National Guard deployment in DC extended to November, per Army memo

Advertisement

Troops may stay longer

In new court filings submitted Friday, Schwalb argues the deployment has shifted from a temporary assignment to a long-term military presence. He cites a recently released email from the Guard’s commanding general instructing troops to “winterize” and prepare for a “long-term persistent presence.”

Schwalb argues the mission violates federal law prohibiting military forces from performing domestic law enforcement. The White House disagrees, saying the president has full authority to deploy the Guard to protect federal assets and support police operations.

Advertisement

Public reaction mixed

Public reaction remains mixed, but many residents FOX 5 spoke with expressed concern about the extended stay in the city.

READ MORE: National Guard remains in DC following Trump’s federal takeover

Advertisement

The Source: Information in this article comes from District Attorney General Brian Schwalb and previous FOX 5 reporting.

NewsWashington, D.C.Donald J. TrumpTop Stories



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending