Connect with us

Washington, D.C

House passes bipartisan bill to let D.C. redevelop RFK Stadium site

Published

on

House passes bipartisan bill to let D.C. redevelop RFK Stadium site


After a rare bipartisan push to help D.C., a bill that would allow the city to redevelop the eyesore that is the defunct RFK Stadium cleared the House Wednesday with overwhelming support.

The bill, the D.C. RFK Memorial Stadium Campus Revitalization Act, passed by a vote of 348-55. Should it pass the Senate, the legislation would allow D.C. to turn the federally owned riverfront plot into an attractive mixed use development that could include commercial and residential uses — and, possibly, a new stadium for the Washington Commanders, which D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) is pursuing.

The mayor has long seen the RFK legislation as the first step to launching more serious talks with Commanders owner Josh Harris to lure the team back to its former home, and Wednesday’s passage puts Bowser closer to that goal — although it remains far from guaranteed.

“Tonight’s vote was a significant step forward in our efforts to unlock the full potential of the RFK Campus — for our residents and visitors, the community, and DC’s Comeback,” Bowser said in a statement.

Advertisement

The legislation was championed by Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Oversight Committee, which more typically has targeted D.C. on crime and policing issues. His leadership and partnership with Bowser and D.C. Del Eleanor Holmes Norton (D), the lead co-sponsor of the bill, became one of the most intriguing political developments last year and ultimately served as a powerful bipartisan combo that helped motor the bill over the House finish line.

Comer has said that he decided to introduce the legislation after conversations with Bowser about how redeveloping RFK could serve as a major economic boost for the city and could return the crumbling stadium into an asset for D.C., stadium or no.

On the floor Wednesday, Comer touted Congress’s intense oversight of the city — including its bipartisan swat-down of the city’s revised criminal code last year — and said this bill was an extension of that “constitutional duty.”

The bill “represents Congress doing its job to oversee the District by authorizing the best utilization of area land to help the city thrive,” Comer said. “We should want this for the nation’s capital city, a home to the taxpayers’ federal workforce and a city that hosts millions of American visitors and global tourists each year.”

The legislation would transfer administrative control of the 174-acre riverfront parcel from the federal government to D.C., for a term of 99 years with no rent costs, enabling a range of development possibilities from a football stadium to restaurants, shops and housing. The city would pay any costs associated with remediation or environmental assessments of the land, along with demolition of the vacant stadium and future development and maintenance of the site. Norton and Comer described the arrangement as a “win-win” for D.C. and the National Park Service, which would no longer bear the costs of maintaining the land. The bill would also set aside 30 percent of the land for park and open space and require maintaining access to the Anacostia River.

Advertisement

“We can’t allow the largest unused tract of land in DC to continue crumbling when it could be put to productive use,” Norton said on X, formerly Twitter.

Bowser and Council Chairman Phil Mendelson (D) sent a letter to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) with a similar message Wednesday morning. They urged support for the bill so the District could pursue a new development that could “create thousands of new jobs” and become “an attractive destination, not only for the enjoyment of District residents, but also for the 21 million visitors who travel to the nation’s capital annually.”

Perhaps strategically, they made no mention of a possible football stadium — which Mendelson has not been warm to in any case, and which was also an issue for some members of Congress who oppose the idea of using public funds or public land for a stadium. The legislation bars the use of federal funds for a stadium — but not local funds.

As the RFK bill wound its way through the House, the regional competition to host the Commanders at a new stadium hung prominently in the backdrop. Harris has talked with Bowser, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore (D) and Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin (R) about the possibility of a new stadium in one of the three jurisdictions — and in D.C., any more serious discussions are entirely reliant on Congress passing the RFK legislation.

The bill passed Wednesday despite unified opposition from the Maryland delegation, as Moore vies to keep the Commanders at their current home — which will soon no longer be called FedEx Field.

Advertisement

“Like other members of the Maryland delegation, I believe Prince George’s County in Maryland should be able to compete on a level playing field to keep the Washington Commanders,” Ivey said. “But this bill gives an unfair advantage to D.C. It’s most certainly not a level playing field when one interested jurisdiction receives a free transfer of federal government subsidized land.”

Raskin’s vote was not recorded, but when asked by a reporter why he did not vote, Raskin ran back into the House chamber to try to remedy that. He said he intended to vote no.

Raskin, typically one of D.C.’s staunchest home rule allies, said he did not view this bill as a home rule issue since it concerned federal land — which he said made restrictions on the land appropriate, such as not aiding multi-million-dollar sports franchises with local or federal public money.

Asked if he would oppose public funds for upgrades to FedEx Field, Raskin said it would depend. He said if D.C. got the gift of federal land and also put up public funds to lure the Commanders, he argued Maryland would struggle to compete and it would become unfair.

“It creates a very different scenario. It’s creating the problem I want to avoid. The problem I want to avoid is the federal government participating in a huge bonanza for a private franchise,” Raskin said.

Advertisement

Moore told reporters Wednesday he remained in “very, very close contact with the team.”

“My insistence and our insistence that the Commanders stay in Prince George’s County, it is not waning at all,” he said.

FedEx ends naming-rights deal for Commanders’ stadium two years early

Virginians, meanwhile, have since been more focused on the potential of a new basketball and hockey arena for the Washington Wizards and Capitals after their billionaire owner Ted Leonsis announced a handshake deal with Youngkin to move the teams from D.C.’s Capital One Arena to a future home in Potomac Yard. That major loss for D.C. — and its downtown recovery — only raised the stakes for Bowser as she continues to pursue the Commanders.

Still, even with the bill’s House passage, a new football stadium at RFK — or any development there — remains a long way off.

Advertisement

First the bill will head to the Senate, where at the moment there is no obvious mantle-carrier to advocate for it. D.C. bills rarely get stand-alone consideration on the Senate floor, and the RFK bill would be subject to the filibuster, requiring the support of 60 senators to advance. Some noncontroversial bills can go up for a unanimous consent vote — though that would also be highly unlikely because of a certain pair of Marylanders who also want the Commanders to stay in their state.

Should the bill pass Congress, and get President Biden’s signature, D.C. would more formally enter the competition for the Commanders. The decision would be up to Harris. Moore has previously expressed openness to using public funds to upgrade their current stadium, and the state has already invested $400 million in the Blue Line corridor revitalization project in the surrounding area. Bowser and Mendelson had put up a $500 million offer to Leonsis to upgrade Capital One Arena to try to keep the teams, leading some observers to wonder if that could end up as a floor in possible Commanders talks.

Further still, Bowser would need support from the D.C. Council, which, while united on using public funds to keep the Capitals and Wizards, is divided on using public money to build a new football stadium. And surrounding neighbors have already shown skepticism to the plan, too.

Many have advocated to use the parcel for more affordable housing, something Bowser said should be included in any development there. She has said she envisions a vibrant mixed-use space with dining, park space and recreational opportunities — not a “a lot of asphalt parking and only one use.”

A few longtime members of Congress who spoke in support of the bill expressed nostalgia for the days RFK used to be a “cornerstone of our nation’s capital’s sporting legacy,” as Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) put it.

Advertisement

“Just two miles from Capitol Hill, the RFK Stadium was a prime sports and entertainment venue for almost 50 years,” said Rep. James E. Clyburn (D-S.C.). “Today the stadium and the land that surrounds it sit vacant on the shore of the Anacostia River.”

The legislation, they urged, could finally change that.

Erin Cox contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement

Washington, D.C

Senators Seek to Change Bill That Allows Military to Operate Just Like Before the DC Plane Crash

Published

on

Senators Seek to Change Bill That Allows Military to Operate Just Like Before the DC Plane Crash


Senators from both parties pushed Thursday for changes to a massive defense bill after crash investigators and victims’ families warned the legislation would undo key safety reforms stemming from a collision between an airliner and Army helicopter over Washington, D.C., that killed 67 people.

The head of the National Transportation Safety Board investigating the crash, a group of the victims’ family members and senators on the Commerce Committee all said the bill the House advanced Wednesday would make America’s skies less safe. It would allow the military to operate essentially the same way as it did before the January crash, which was the deadliest in more than two decades, they said.

Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell and Republican Committee Chairman Sen. Ted Cruz filed two amendments Thursday to strip out the worrisome helicopter safety provisions and replace them with a bill they introduced last summer to strengthen requirements, but it’s not clear if Republican leadership will allow the National Defense Authorization Act to be changed at this stage because that would delay its passage.

“We owe it to the families to put into law actual safety improvements, not give the Department of Defense bigger loopholes to exploit,” the senators said.

Advertisement

Right now, the bill includes exceptions that would allow military helicopters to fly through the crowded airspace around the nation’s capital without using a key system called ADS-B to broadcast their locations just like they did before the January collision. The Federal Aviation Administration began requiring that in March. NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy called the bill a “significant safety setback” that is inviting a repeat of that disaster.

“It represents an unacceptable risk to the flying public, to commercial and military aircraft, crews and to the residents in the region,” Homendy said. “It’s also an unthinkable dismissal of our investigation and of 67 families … who lost loved ones in a tragedy that was entirely preventable. This is shameful.”

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he is looking into the concerns but thinks they can be addressed by quickly passing the aviation safety bill that Cruz and Cantwell proposed last summer.

“I think that would resolve the concerns that people have about that provision, and hoping — we’ll see if we can find a pathway forward to get that bill done,” said Thune, a South Dakota Republican.

The military used national security waivers before the crash to skirt FAA safety requirements on the grounds that they worried about the security risks of disclosing their helicopters’ locations. Tim and Sheri Lilley, whose son Sam was the first officer on the American Airlines jet, said this bill only adds “a window dressing fix that would continue to allow for the setting aside of requirements with nothing more than a cursory risk assessment.”

Advertisement

Homendy said it would be ridiculous to entrust the military with assessing the safety risks when they aren’t the experts, and neither the Army nor the FAA noticed 85 close calls around Ronald Reagan National Airport in the years before the crash. She said the military doesn’t know how to do that kind of risk assessment, adding that no one writing the bill bothered to consult the experts at the NTSB who do know.

The White House and military didn’t immediately respond Thursday to questions about these safety concerns. But earlier this week Trump made it clear that he wants to sign the National Defense Authorization Act because it advances a number of his priorities and provides a 3.8% pay raise for many military members.

The Senate is expected to take up the bill next week, and it appears unlikely that any final changes will be made. But Congress is leaving for a holiday break at the end of the week, and the defense bill is considered something that must pass by the end of the year.

Story Continues

© Copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Bill would rename former Black Lives Matter Plaza for slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk – WTOP News

Published

on

Bill would rename former Black Lives Matter Plaza for slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk – WTOP News


A South Carolina Republican Congresswoman wants to rename a well-known stretch of 16th Street NW in D.C. after slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

A South Carolina Republican Congresswoman wants to rename a well-known stretch of 16th Street NW in D.C. after slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

Rep. Nancy Mace introduced legislation Wednesday to designate the area once known as “Black Lives Matter Plaza” as the “Charlie Kirk Freedom of Speech Plaza.” The proposal comes three months after Kirk was killed while speaking at a free-speech event at a Utah college.

Mace said the change would honor Kirk’s commitment to the First Amendment, calling him “a champion of free speech and a voice for millions of young Americans.” Her bill would require official signs to be placed in the plaza and updates made to federal maps and records.

Advertisement

In a statement, Mace contrasted the unrest that followed George Floyd’s killing in 2020, when the plaza was created, with the response to Kirk’s death, saying the earlier period was marked by “chaos and destruction,” while Kirk’s killing brought “prayer, peace and unity.”

She argued that after Floyd’s death, “America watched criminals burn cities while police officers were ordered to stand down,” adding that officers were “vilified and abandoned by leaders who should have supported them.”

But D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton pushed back, saying Congress should not override local control.

“D.C. deserves to decide what its own streets are named since over 700,000 people live in the city,” Norton wrote on X. “D.C. is not a blank slate for Congress to fill in as it pleases.”

The stretch of 16th Street was originally dedicated as Black Lives Matter Plaza in 2020 following nationwide protests over Floyd’s death. Earlier this year, the city removed the mural.

Advertisement

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser’s office declined to comment on the bill, as did several members of the D.C. Council.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Chicago woman testifies about being dragged out of car, detained by federal agents in viral video

Published

on

Chicago woman testifies about being dragged out of car, detained by federal agents in viral video


ByABC7 Chicago Digital Team

Wednesday, December 10, 2025 2:09AM

Woman testifies about being dragged out of car by feds in viral video

Chicago woman Dayanne Figueroa testified in Washington, DC about being dragged out of a car by federal agents in a viral YouTube video.

CHICAGO (WLS) — A Chicago woman, who is a U.S. citizen, testified in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday about her experience being dragged out of her car and taken into custody by federal agents.

Dayanne Figueroa told a group of senators that on Oct. 10, she had just dropped off her son at school when an SUV rammed into hers.

ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

Once she was stopped, she says masked men dragged her out of her car.

Advertisement

A video posted on YouTube that has been seen more than 42,000 times shows what happened.

Figueroa was one of five U.S. citizens who testified.

Figueroa said she suffered severe bruising, nerve damage and aggravated injuries to her leg.

Copyright © 2025 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending