Connect with us

Washington, D.C

House leaves Washington without approving radiation exposure compensation act

Published

on

House leaves Washington without approving radiation exposure compensation act


With the House not set to return to Washington until next week, the clock has run out on time to extend and expand the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act.

“It is sitting in the House, the House needs to act,” said Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., in an interview with Spectrum News. “If the House doesn’t act, it’s going to be on the House. They’re going to have to explain to the American people why they don’t want to help our veterans, they don’t want to help folks exposed to radiation — they’re going to deny compensation to people who are dependent on it all their lives. I mean, this is crazy.” 


What You Need To Know

  • The Radiation Exposure Compensation Act will sunset at the end of the week after the House failed to vote on the Senate bill to expand and extend the program
  • According to the Justice Department, which facilitates the claim program, the 1992 law has helped over 41,000 individuals access approximately $2.6 billion in funds to help pay for their medical bills for treating cancer and other illnesses traced to exposure to radiation waste
  • Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., says he is not giving on the bill, saying “I will not stop until this is made right”
  • We reached out to Speaker Mike Johnson’s team for comment, but our inquiries went unanswered

Hawley, who has been leading the charge for RECA expansion in the Senate alongside Sen. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., has expressed frustration over recent weeks by the lack of commitment from House leadership to bring up the bill for a vote, considering it passed the Senate by an overwhelming bipartisan measure not once, but twice. 

Under the proposed RECA expansion, coverage would be included for uranium miners and individuals who were “downwinders” from the testing and mining sites, including New Mexico, Idaho, Montana, Guam, Colorado, Tennessee, Kentucky and Alaska. In Missouri, it would cover people tied to almost two dozen ZIP codes who may have been sickened by contamination from uranium enrichment in the St. Louis dating back to the Manhattan Project. The bill would cost $50 billion over five years and add as many as 600,000 new claimants. 

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers confirmed Wednesday that work to remediate a small portion of a contaminated waterway where nuclear waste was dumped in North St. Louis County resulted in removing more than 7,000 cubic yards of soil–enough to fill eight Olympic-sized swimming pools. The entire Coldwater Creek corridor may not be fully remediated until the late 2030s.

Advertisement

According to the Department of Justice, which facilitates the claim program, the 1992 law has helped over 41,000 individuals access approximately $2.6 billion in funds to help pay for their medical bills for treating cancer and other illnesses traced to exposure to radiation waste.

Claims need to be postmarked by June 10 to be considered to receive compensation.

“If you’ve been poisoned by the federal government, if the government has exposed you to nuclear radiation, and that is so many people in Missouri, the government ought to make it right. They ought to help at the least with your medical bills — pay em. And that’s what my bill would do,” said Hawley.

“The state of Missouri has been lied to for 50 and 60 years. They’ve told us — the federal government — there was no radiation exposure in Missouri. That was a lie. They said it’s all cleaned up. That was a lie. They said we couldn’t get sick because of it. That was a lie. Now our schools are closed, we’ve got the highest rates of breast cancer in the nation, some of the highest rates of childhood cancers and other diseases associated with radiation. This needs to be fixed. It should have been fixed 50 years ago.”

“We shouldn’t have to beg for people to be taken care of because they were exposed to radioactive waste,” Rep. Cori Bush, D-Mo. said bluntly Wednesday. “World War II is still killing people right now.”

Advertisement

Bush and other advocates are claiming a small victory in that a bill that would have only extended the existing program did not make it to the floor. They believe an extension would have killed momentum for expansion. 

But past experience with other pieces of legislation may not back that theory up. 

“History has shown that there’s been a number of things, such as the assault weapons ban and, others — such as the Patriot Act — that become much more difficult to reauthorize if you don’t give them the automatic extension,” said Todd Belt, a professor and Political Management program director at the George Washington University, 

“Generally, when the government has done something that has caused harm to people, you think of the burn pits legislation that was recently passed, you usually get real big bipartisan support for it. So it’s somewhat unusual that you would see some recalcitrance from the House to move on this Senate bill.” 

Advocates for expansion traveled to a political event featuring House Speaker Mike Johnson in Peoria, Illinois last weekend hoping to land a meeting in Washington this week. Once it became clear that no legislation was going to move in time to beat Friday’s deadline, those plans changed and they will instead be back at the Capitol next week.

Advertisement

Johnson’s staff did not respond to new questions about the possibility of a vote on the expansion bill this week.

Hawley said the fight is far from over.

“If it takes as long as I’m in the Senate, I will not stop until this is made right.”

Spectrum News’ Angi Gonzalez contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Washington, D.C

Whistleblower claims Special Police Officers are working in DC without licenses

Published

on

Whistleblower claims Special Police Officers are working in DC without licenses


Are there fake Special Police Officers working in Washington, D.C.? 

Advertisement

FOX 5 has been checking with various officials on the matter after multiple whistleblowers and concerned community members raised these concerns with FOX 5.   

One whistleblower who asked not to be identified, spoke on camera, alleging they were hired to work security at the Columbia Heights Village apartment complex, and named two companies that are not legally licensed to operate in the District. 

The whistleblower named one company as “Off Duty Protection,” claiming this company was an alleged subsidiary of “USEA Protective Services, LLC.” The whistleblower says they left after learning of alleged legal issues.  

Advertisement

This whistleblower is an actual licensed SPO, who claims one of the owners was working as an armed SPO at the Columbia Height Village apartment complex and others without a legal SPO license.

“I saw a lot of unethical processes or procedures such as the use of excessive force – essentially kidnapping. Because if someone is not a law enforcement officer, and they’re processing arresting people, that is kidnapping,” the whistleblower said.

Advertisement

 Columbia Heights Village apartment complex in Washington, D.C.

In the District, special police officers are essentially private officers hired to work security. They have similar powers to D.C. police, but those powers normally only extend to the property they’re protecting.

When FOX 5 reached out to management offices for the Columbia Heights Village apartment complex regarding the claims against both companies, we received this response from Spokesperson Ed Cafasso via email: 

Advertisement

“Columbia Heights Village became aware of the company’s licensing issues on April 23, 2024. Their contract to provide security to the community was terminated the next day, on April 24, 2024. Their contract to provide security on the property began November 20, 2023.”

Cafasso would not name the company Columbia Heights Village held the contract with. He did confirm that a fake insurance certificate was used to obtain the contract and that they are currently working with a new security company, now identified as, PChange Protective Services.

Advertisement

The whistleblower who went on record told FOX 5 they filed claims with the DC Office of the Attorney General, the FTC, and the Department of Labor – also alleging that more than one SPO performed the security work but was not paid for their services.

D.C. police tell FOX 5 they are still investigating serious allegations made.

USEA Protective Services, LLC last held a license with D.C. in 2017, according to a city license search.

Advertisement

The city’s Department of Licensing and Consumer Protection Spokesperson Charles Basham III wrote in one of multiple emails previously sent to FOX 5:  

“The Department of Licensing and Consumer Protection (DLCP) aims to ensure all business entities in the District maintain accurate and up-to-date licenses. Off Duty Protection is currently not a registered or licensed agency in the District. On June 6, 2024, a complaint concerning Off Duty Protection was lodged with our agency; our policy is not to comment on matters under review.”

Advertisement

Since airing a September 27th report, FOX 5 was contacted by the man who claims to be the owner of “Off Duty Protection.” He says his company was never affiliated with USEA’s contract and is denying having any part with any of the allegations made involving Columbia Heights Village or their security contact.  

John Ayala, owner of Archangel Security and Training.

Separately, FOX 5 asked John Ayala, a long-time licensed D.C. SPO license and conceal carry instructor for the city, about the matter regarding concerns raised. 

Advertisement

Ayala responded that he was not surprised.

Ayala owns his own security company, Archangel Security and Training. 

Advertisement

He said there are likely more SPOs than current police officers working in D.C. and that he feels there needs to be more individual responsibility.

 “That’s concerning because if they go out here and make an arrest and hurt somebody, then the city might even get sued, besides that person. So we have to, the companies themselves have to make sure if they’re going to hire people, they have to make sure they’re fully licensed. You can’t just bring them in because they want a body – and that’s what happens a lot of time,” Ayala said in part of his conversation with FOX 5. 

Ayala says he warns his students to stay away from any security companies that require the SPO to have their own (personal) firearm because that’s not allowed in D.C.

Advertisement

Anyone can look up a license status on the District’s professional license search page here.

Whether there are any safeguards to prevent non-licensed contracts or non-licensed SPOs from operating, FOX 5 learned MPD has a very small branch that responds to SPO matters, when requested to do so. That branch is called the Security Officers Management Branch or SOMB.

Advertisement

D.C. police told FOX 5 there’s no real entity that patrols these issues – and that this is something they’re now working on with the city’s licensing department as the investigation into what happened at the Columbia Heights Village apartment complex continues.  

This is a developing story. Check back with FOX 5 for updates. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

‘This agency is not in crisis': DC 911 director cites improvements

Published

on

‘This agency is not in crisis': DC 911 director cites improvements


Numerous computer dispatch outages, major staffing shortages and a criminal probe are hanging over D.C.’s 911 call center.

The agency has come under fire for at least the past year for several responses, including to the deadly flooding at District Dogs. More recently, questions have been raised after a 5-month-old baby died during a system outage.

The director of D.C.’s Office of Unified Communications told News4 on Friday the agency is making improvements to address and prevent failures.

The call center set a record for call volume last year, handling 1.8 million calls, up roughly a half-million from typical years. In that period, the 911 system has had 18 disruptions since December.

Advertisement

Local leaders and D.C. Council members have raised questions about whether the office is up to the challenge. Council member Brooke Pinto introduced legislation aimed at holding the agency more accountable, while Council member Charles Allen said the center was in crisis.

“This agency is not in crisis. This agency has been outpaced and is overtaxed, and we are trying to find ways to make improvements to keep up with that change, to make improvements to make the caller experience better. And it’s a holistic change. It’s about addressing staffing. It’s about addressing technology. It’s about addressing training,” Director Heather McGaffin said.

McGaffin told News4 when she took over the agency last year, they had 57 vacancies for call takers. That number is now down to 10.

“My goal is by January 2025 to have all of our positions filled, understanding that things happen and that might not be the case, but that remains my goal, especially for the call-taking side,” she said.

McGaffin pointed to another problem: Too many people are calling 911 when it’s not an emergency. She said hundreds of thousands of calls last year could have been handled by calling 311 or going online.

Advertisement

News4 asked what people should consider before dialing 911. McGaffin said to ask: “Is this life or death? Is this something that I need a police officer, a firefighter or a paramedic right in this moment for?”

Last month, the agency began giving call takers and dispatchers $800 bonuses if they show up for all assigned shifts. So far, 94 employees have received the bonus.

Despite the bonus and increased hiring, OUC’s data shows it’s still understaffed. According to data obtained by the News4 I-Team, 49% of shifts in early September had less than ideal staffing.

The News4 I-Team confirmed a D.C. family says they called 911 Friday after discovering their 5-month-old wouldn’t wake up from a nap but told police they could not get through to 911. Investigative Reporter Ted Oberg has the latest on Friday’s outage.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Orchestra goes on strike in Washington DC – Slippedisc

Published

on

Orchestra goes on strike in Washington DC – Slippedisc


norman lebrecht

September 27, 2024

The National Symphony Orchestra has erased the start of its season.

Advertisement

Statement from the Kennedy Center:
After months of largely collaborative and constructive labor negotiations, the Kennedy Center and the National Symphony Orchestra (NSO) are disappointed to share that the NSO musicians, AFM Local 161-710, have decided to go on strike, effective today, Friday, September 27, thereby canceling the NSO 2024–2025 Season Opening Gala concert on Saturday, September 28.

That’s San Fran and DC on the picket line. Who’s next?



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending