Connect with us

Washington, D.C

Debate over potential bike lanes on Connecticut Avenue in DC continues

Published

on

Debate over potential bike lanes on Connecticut Avenue in DC continues


Connecticut Avenue is considered one of the busiest channels to get through D.C.

“It is dangerous, it’s fast, and it’s deadly,” said Elizabeth Kiker, the Executive Director of the Washington Area Bicyclist Association (WABA).

The future of the thoroughfare is up for debate with the possibility of adding bike lanes back on the table.

Last year, the mayor reversed course, and the plan was postponed by the D.C. Department of Transportation.

Advertisement

The move stunned WABA members.

READ MORE | DC pauses proposal to put bicycle lanes on Connecticut Ave. after major pushback

“This process happened,” Kiker said. “This process included ANCs. It included community members. It included businesses, and it was voted on and it was done, and it was budgeted, and then it was stopped. That’s not fair. That’s not how you run a city.”

However, the chance for barrier-protected bike lanes going in on Connecticut Avenue was given a new life when new language was approved by the Committee on Transportation and the Environment.

“The chairman of the transportation committee, Charles Allen, and Matt Frumin slipped in language in the budget recommendation report that requires any safety improvement on not just Connecticut Ave. but any road to have protected bike lanes or else they withhold all the funds for safety improvements,” said Lee Mayer, President of Save Connecticut Avenue.

Advertisement

He said this could mean that the D.C. Council’s transportation committee could block all capital improvements to Connecticut Avenue and any street if bike lanes are not included.

7News reached out to Committee Chair Allen’s office.

They said the language has been misinterpreted.

In a statement, Allen’s office wrote:

“The language approved by the Committee on Transportation and the Environment preserves full funding for the project, including 5% to create an alternative design. It does restrict construction from advancing on Conn Ave that does not include protected bike lanes (option C from the many years of discussion includes protected bike lanes). The clause “or any other capital project for the same or similar purpose” was inserted to prevent DDOT from simply renaming or attempting to skirt the law and advance construction. This language clearly applies only to the Conn Ave Street Safety Project and does not apply to other safe streets projects around the District.”

Advertisement

Still, both sides of the debate remain uncertain of the future and tell 7News they’ll work to plead their case with councilmembers ahead of the vote.

“This is going to hurt the mayor’s plan for revitalization for downtown,” said Mayer.

“It’s going to be massive congestion up and down Connecticut Ave. and people are not going to want to go there,” he added.

“We don’t know what they’re going to say, but we hope they say this is back on the way they said it would be,” said Kiker.

The DC Council will vote on the matter twice. The first vote is set for Wednesday, May 29. The second vote will happen on July 12.

Advertisement

Between those votes, the public can ask questions during a virtual meeting on June 3.



Source link

Washington, D.C

How Lawmakers Are Responding to the Shutdown

Published

on

How Lawmakers Are Responding to the Shutdown


The government shutdown is now the longest in history. Panelists joined Washington Week With The Atlantic to discuss how voters and lawmakers are responding, and more.

Three weeks before Thanksgiving, “the administration has chosen to not find money to fund the food-assistance program for some 42 million Americans,” Jeff Zeleny, the chief national-affairs correspondent at CNN, said last night. “But they have found money for military payments and ICE officers and others. That choice, he added, “is beginning to catch up with the administration and Republicans.”

Meanwhile, “Democrats seem to be much more dug in than they were before Tuesday,” Atlantic staff writer Mark Leibovich noted. “I think they seem emboldened by Tuesday’s elections.”

Joining the editor in chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, to discuss this and more: Leigh Ann Caldwell, the chief Washington correspondent at Puck; David Ignatius, a foreign-affairs columnist at The Washington Post; Mark Leibovich, a staff writer at The Atlantic; and Jeff Zeleny, the chief national-affairs correspondent at CNN.

Advertisement

Watch the full episode here.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

DC Mayor Bowser is not the target of Justice Department investigation, officials say

Published

on

DC Mayor Bowser is not the target of Justice Department investigation, officials say


WASHINGTON — The Justice Department is scrutinizing a trip that Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser took to Qatar, but the mayor is not a target of the investigation, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press on Friday.

The probe into a trip Bowser took with staff in 2023 is focused on a lobbyist tied to the Democratic mayor, according to the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the investigation.

The New York Times reported Thursday that federal prosecutors in Washington had opened a corruption investigation into Bowser and were looking into potential violations of bribery or campaign finance laws related to the trip.

But Washington’s top federal prosecutor, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, said in a statement Friday that the mayor is “not under investigation, nor is she the target of any investigation.” A spokesperson for Pirro declined to further comment.

Advertisement

Asked about the investigation at a press conference Friday, Bowser said she had not been contacted by any federal officials and had not received any subpoenas, nor a target letter.

“I have checked our lawyers, and we have a regular kind of chain of who talks to who and we have not been contacted, not related to me or to anybody else as I’m aware,” Bowser said.

The trip in question included a stop in Doha, where the mayor met with international leaders on the issues of infrastructure, sports and education. She also promoted Washington as a destination for investment and tourism. Qatar donated $60,000 to help cover the cost of the trip for the mayor and members of her party.

Bowser told reporters Friday that it was “a business trip, a publicly noticed trip to promote Washington, D.C., in Qatar.”

“That’s what we did and we don’t have any bones about saying it,” she said. The mayor credited the trip with helping the city to keep two of its professional sports teams in the downtown area.

Advertisement

The scrutiny of the trip comes a time when the mayor is deciding whether to seek a fourth term.

It also comes at a critical moment when the city is responding to a government shutdown that has impacted businesses and a federal workforce as well as a continuing deployment of National Guard troops on the street through at least February 2026.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Conflicting reports about DOJ investigating Mayor Bowser’s foreign trip

Published

on

Conflicting reports about DOJ investigating Mayor Bowser’s foreign trip


The New York Times reported Thursday evening that the Department of Justice is investigating D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser over a foreign trip she took that was at least partially paid for by Qatar, but a report from Axios later disputed the New York Times report.

Axios first reported a senior Trump administration official says Bowser’s “name was mentioned in something,” but that she is not under federal investigation. Axios says the unnamed official blamed the rumor of the investigation on a disgruntled fired FBI agent.

A Trump administration official later told News4 Investigative Reporter Ted Oberg that Bowser is not the target of a federal investigation.

The mayor’s office said Bowser did not have anything to say about the Times report Thursday night but will be taking questions Friday at an event already on her calendar.

Advertisement

Bowser went to Dubai in late 2023 with four executive staff members for a United Nations conference on climate change, the Times reported.

The investigation started after the mayor’s office incorrectly told reporters the Chamber of Conference paid for the trip.

Her office told News4 that after the trip they became aware of a “staff error,” which led to the lack of a standard donation agreement for travel expenses. That paperwork has since been correctly submitted, Bowser’s office said. They said they have a letter from Qatar confirming they paid tens of thousands of dollars for the trip for Bowser and her staffers.

It’s not unusual for outside organizations or governments to pay for such trips, but it appears the mayor’s office didn’t handle the reporting properly in the beginning.

D.C. Code requires city officials to file proper reporting paperwork for gifts and donations such as a trip.

Advertisement

The mayor’s office said they heard about an investigation when the Times called Thursday afternoon for comment.

“We have checked with our lawyers, and the District has not been notified of any investigation,” the mayor’s office said in a statement. “This was a business trip; DC representatives regularly travel to promote Washington as a destination for investment and growth.”

“In some cases, economic development funds are used for the business travel; in other cases, the host or organizer cover the expenses,” the statement said. “All proper paperwork for this standard donation is on file.”

Bowser previously has been asked about who paid for a trip to the Masters golf tournament – questions that have never fully been answered.

The investigation comes after the federal takeover of D.C. — and looming threat of another one — and as Bowser considers running for a fourth term.

Advertisement

Bowser was scheduled to attend a gala Thursday night where she was to receive an award for her work in the redevelopment of the RFK Stadium site.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending