Connect with us

Washington, D.C

As downtown D.C. seeks rebound, empty offices, fear of crime cast shadow

Published

on

As downtown D.C. seeks rebound, empty offices, fear of crime cast shadow


Gary Cohen knows it may seem absurd to think people would move to a neighborhood dominated by offices that are often more empty than occupied. But hear him out: Downtown Washington — still reeling from the ravages of the pandemic — could be a cool place to live.

“We just need to give them a reason,” the developer said as he walked through an office building he’s turning into a 10-story apartment house at the corner of 20th and L streets NW. His reasons include sleek apartments, an outdoor swimming pool, a communal terrace, a health club, a yoga studio, a pet spa and a ninth-floor, AstroTurf-lined dog run.

Cohen is less certain about the vacant 8,000-square-foot storefront on the ground floor. For the past year, he has sought a buzzworthy restaurant to lease the space for $33,000 a month. One deal fell through. Another may be coming together. His search, he worries, has been made more difficult by persistent reports of crime, vacant offices and A-list companies seeking to leave downtown. “That’s what keeps me up at night,” he said.

A year after Mayor Muriel E. Bowser launched a campaign to rescue downtown, her quest faces a slew of hurdles, not the least of which is uncertainty over whether Ted Leonsis’s Washington Capitals and Wizards will remain at Capital One Arena. Office attendance is at 48 percent of pre-pandemic levels, as a preponderance of federal workers still work from home. More than 20 percent of downtown storefronts and offices are vacant, driving down the value of commercial real estate — a key source of tax revenue for city services.

Advertisement

And while crime has dipped since the beginning of the year, a couple of recent incidents — a late-afternoon homicide during a downtown carjacking and a brazen midday robbery at a jewelry store — feed worries that the area is dangerous.

The mayor likes to cite data showing signs of progress. Hotel room occupancy has reached nearly 95 percent of pre-pandemic levels. Metro ridership is rising. Bowser (D) also touts a $400 million plan, proposed by downtown business leaders last month, to attract visitors and new employers and retailers, as well as help create housing units for 15,000 new residents by 2028.

“I love it, I love it,” the mayor said as she toured a one-bedroom apartment at Cohen’s building Monday, using the visit to announce a 20-year tax abatement program to spur residential development downtown.

In February 2020, the month before the pandemic began, downtown office attendance averaged 98 percent, a daytime population that spilled into neighborhood restaurants, bars and shops — activity that soon vanished, as it did in cities across the country.

Gerren Price, president of the DowntownDC Business Improvement District, said that the city’s core faces post-pandemic challenges that are not unique to Washington and that reviving the area is a long-term process. “If there’s a silver lining in the cloud we’re in, it’s that there’s a potential path to a future that looks different,” Price said. “There are good things happening. I do think we can begin to turn that tide. Everything is going to take time.”

Advertisement

In the meantime, the stark financial consequences of downtown’s decline are taking shape. In recent months, at least five office buildings have traded hands at prices far below what they cost in recent years, records show. At 13th and I streets NW, across from Franklin Park, for example, a building that cost $100 million in 2018 sold in December for $36 million — a loss of $64 million. Another building, a renovated high-rise on 14th Street NW, sold in January for $18.2 million. The seller had paid $62 million for the property in 2017.

The sales add to the growing anxiety among civic leaders, business owners and real estate executives about whether downtown, long considered the city’s economic engine, can reclaim a semblance of its former verve.

Bo Blair, a veteran Washington restaurateur who owns Surfside Taco Stand south of Dupont Circle, said he was on downtown’s east end on a recent weekday afternoon and found himself walking several blocks “without seeing one person. I couldn’t believe it.” An upper Northwest resident, he said that within his social circle “where I live, nobody’s going downtown to eat at night that I know of. It’s purely about safety.”

“The situation is embarrassing,” said Blair, whose restaurants also include Due South, at the Navy Yard, and The Bullpen, a popular bar outside Nationals Park. “That this is the nation’s capital, with all the people here, with all the security here and all the smart and important people here, and they can’t figure out a way to fix this.”

The ‘real story’ of downtown

Advertisement

In early February, Bowser traveled to a new cafe near Farragut Square to promote coffee giveaways and restaurant specials downtown. She told reporters that she wanted to “tell the real story of downtown” — that “businesses are opening” and that Washingtonians “are working here.”

But the challenge of communicating that message became evident when the mayor took reporters’ questions. The first three focused on downtown’s image and criticism of the city from former president Donald Trump and onetime House speaker Newt Gingrich over the death of Mike Gill, a former federal official who had been shot during a carjacking on K Street a few days before. “Frequently when I hear about downtown, it’s something negative,” the mayor acknowledged at one point. “‘People aren’t coming in.’ Well, people are coming in.”

Since the beginning of the year, the total number of crimes committed downtown has decreased compared with the same time frame last year, according to police data. There were 26 robberies downtown by this time last year, for example. As of Monday, five robberies had been reported this year.

Yet, from 2022 to 2023, the data shows that downtown crime increased 10 percent, from 1,395 incidents to 1,534. The number of violent crimes soared 59 percent, from 99 to 157; robberies more than doubled from 54 to 118, and car thefts rose 16 percent, from 116 to 135.

The crime surge prompted civic groups across the city to demand more policing. A coalition of business groups, many of them based downtown, wrote to the mayor and council in February expressing worry that the city is in danger of reverting to the days when it was known as America’s “Murder Capital.”

Advertisement

On Monday Bowser signed legislation intended to curtail illegal gun possession, retail theft and drug-related loitering in the city. As a result of the new law, police on Thursday established several drug free zones, including in Chinatown, where residents and business owners have long complained about drug peddlers and vagrants congregating in the area around Capital One Arena.

Concerns about crime are prompting businesses, office workers and visitors to take precautions. At Surfside Taco, for example, Blair hired two security guards to work from 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. for $8,000 a month. In Chinatown, an office building retained a van service to drive workers to two nearby Metro stations three afternoons a week (the van’s driver, parked outside the building one afternoon, told The Washington Post he has had few requests for rides).

Benda Bushell, 78, a K Street accountant, said she stopped driving her Volvo into work a year ago because she’s afraid of being carjacked. Now she commutes an hour by bus from her home near Columbia, Md., and makes a point of leaving work before dark. “It doesn’t feel the same here,” Bushell said as she walked near 16th Street NW one afternoon. “I just feel scared.”

A couple of blocks away, Stephen Jackson, 38, works as the policy director at a Republican think tank, commuting by car from his home near Union Market several days a week. He and his wife decided to “slow-walk” buying a new car because they thought their 2006 Prius would be a less-inviting target for thieves. His precautions also include researching how to recover content from an iPhone if it’s stolen and not wearing his deceased father’s wristwatch in case he’s robbed.

“I asked myself, ‘Would I be okay losing that?’ and the answer is no,” he said. “The risk of robbery feels so much higher and makes you think about these things.”

Advertisement

Barbara Lang, a business consultant and former head of the D.C. Chamber of Commerce, said she has cut back on attending evening events that require her to drive into or through downtown because she doesn’t feel safe. Lang, who moved from Northwest to Maryland last year, also has stopped carrying a purse when she’s in D.C., thinking it reduces her chances of being mugged. “It hurts me in my heart not to come into the city,” she said. “I was a cheerleader for the city. I can’t say that anymore.”

Matthew Rosenheim, owner of Tiny Jewel Box near Farragut Square, considers himself a downtown booster. He said that he commutes from his house in Montgomery County, Md., without worry and that he often goes out for dinner downtown before heading home.

“I feel comfortable, I feel safe,” said Rosenheim, 53, as he walked back to his Connecticut Avenue shop on a recent afternoon. His only wish, he said, is that more workers would return to their offices so that downtown could recover its former energy.

Three days later, on a Friday, a trio of thieves drove up to Rosenheim’s shop and used a sledgehammer to smash holes in an exterior display window. Before fleeing, they stole nine Rolexes with a collective worth of nearly $215,000.

It was just before 1 p.m.

Advertisement

Toward the end of last year, Alex Walker, a veteran D.C. real estate broker who specializes in retail, was close to signing two restaurants to long-term leases near Capital One Arena. The restaurants pulled out when Leonsis announced in December that he wanted to move the Capitals and Wizards to Virginia, a plan that has stalled, at least for the moment, after Virginia legislative leaders last week did not include it in the state budget.

Even before the drama over the teams began, Walker said, D.C.’s suburbs and residential neighborhoods were “getting more traction with groups of restaurants that, pre-pandemic, wouldn’t have thought to look there.” The reasons, he said, are a “perfect storm” of factors, including downtown crime and office workers staying home.

“The good news is that people still want to go out and spend money,” he said. “What has changed is where they want to do it.”

That’s not to say there are no new bars and restaurants downtown. Balos, a purveyor of high-end Greek fare, recently opened on N Street NW, for example. There are also restaurants that have closed, including District Chophouse, a Seventh Street NW staple that shuttered last week after 25 years.

Several restaurateurs who own downtown establishments said in interviews that D.C.’s core is not where they want to invest these days. “It’s never going to be 2019 again, the way the office habits have changed, it’s never coming back,” said Ian Hilton, whose company runs the food and beverage service at the Hotel Motto in Chinatown. Although he sees “more opportunity in Virginia” at the moment, Hilton said he can imagine opening a new place downtown in the future if the economics make sense.

Advertisement

“It has to come back, it’s the center of the city,” he said. “I’m a believer in the cycle, and the tide will come back at some point.”

Geoff Dawson, whose downtown bars include Astro Beer Hall at Metro Center and Jackpot across from the arena, said he thought business would pick up when the pandemic ended.

“We don’t have a happy hour to speak of,” he said, estimating that business is down 25 percent. “For a bar, that’s devastating.”

The place he’s most excited about these days is the Astro Beer Hall he recently opened in Shirlington in Arlington County, Va. He’s planning to add a 1969-themed room in the basement. “We’re doing great out there,” he said. “We’re surrounded by other restaurants, and we’re expanding.”

Overall, downtown’s retail vacancy rate is 22 percent, a bit more than double what it was in 2019, the year before the pandemic, according to the DowntownDC BID. As for office space, the downtown vacancy rate is just over 21 percent, though one forecast estimates it could reach 27 percent in three years, potentially costing the city hundreds of millions in tax revenue.

Advertisement

“It’s like you wake up one morning and there’s no more oil — that’s the state of downtown,” said Yesim Sayin, executive director of the DC Policy Center, a nonpartisan research group. “Things that were valuable are not worth what they were.”

The office buildings expected to survive are the most modern, though even those are not immune from unsettling news. The CoStar Group, a real estate company, is abandoning its L Street headquarters for Arlington. And Fannie Mae said it would exercise its option to leave the Midtown Center, a trophy building on 15th Street, in 2029, five years before its lease is set to expire.

Oliver Carr, whose company owns the Midtown Center, said he’s confident he can fill the space because “it’s one of the best buildings in the city.”

“The best buildings will be fine,” he said.

His optimism may be well-grounded, though Anthony Lanier, while talking to a prospective tenant, still hasn’t replaced the law firm that a year ago emptied his glass high-rise on Pennsylvania Avenue, two blocks from the White House. “The big picture was there was lot of uncertainty a year ago,” Lanier said. “Now there is certainty — certainty that there’s less demand for office space.”

Advertisement

The building that Cohen is turning into apartments — constructed in 1962 and the Peace Corps’ former home — was past its prime when the pandemic hit and faced an unclear future in the new world of work-from-home.

Cohen decided to turn the building into 163 apartments, mostly studios and one- and two-bedroom units with rents from $2,300 to $6,000. His project is among four conversions currently under construction downtown, with a fifth slated to begin north of Dupont Circle this summer and 11 more planned, though high interest rates could affect the timing of those. “People may not want to come downtown to work, but they want to be here,” Cohen said as he showed off the rooftop pool, surrounded by a vista of office buildings.

Cohen is targeting young people — students at nearby George Washington University, doctors and nurses, and lawyers working close by who want urban life. He knows it could take time to fill the apartments, but he’s okay with that. “We’re in it for the long haul,” he said.

If demand is slack, he said, he could offer a portion of the apartments as short-term rentals or de facto hotel rooms.

“Hedging our bets,” the developer said. “Just in case.”

Advertisement



Source link

Washington, D.C

CHERRY BLOSSOM COUNTDOWN: Peak Bloom prediction drops Thursday

Published

on

CHERRY BLOSSOM COUNTDOWN: Peak Bloom prediction drops Thursday


The nation’s capital is just about ready to be transformed into a breathtaking pastel landscape of cherry trees in bloom. The famed blossoms around the Tidal Basin are not only a symbol of spring’s arrival, but also of a long-standing friendship — a gift of more than 3,000 trees from Tokyo, Japan, to the United States in 1912.

So what is considered “Peak Bloom”?

The National Park Service (NPS) defines peak bloom as the time when at least 70% of the Yoshino cherry trees around the Tidal Basin have opened their blossoms. This is the period when the blossoms appear most full and spectacular and most ideal for photos, and soaking up spring’s beauty here in DC.

Because cherry trees respond to the cumulative effects of winter and spring weather, especially daily temperatures, it’s very difficult to predict peak bloom more than about 10 days in advance. Warm spells accelerate blooming; cold snaps slow it down.

Average Timing — What History Shows

Since 1921 overall, national data indicate peak bloom typically fell around early April (April 4), based on historical averages.

Advertisement
Average date peak bloom – cherry blossom trees Washington DC Tidal Basin

Since 1990, the average has kept shifting earlier and earlier. In fact, the last 6 years our peak has occurred in late March.

These shifts reflect how warmer springs have nudged peak bloom earlier over the decades.

Earliest & Latest Blooms on Record

Earliest peak bloom: March 15 — recorded in 1990.

Latest peak bloom: April 18 — recorded in 1958.

Of course, most years fall between those dates, with the last week of March to the first week of April historically being the most consistent window for peak bloom.

Advertisement
Earliest Peak Bloom Washington DC

Earliest Peak Bloom Washington DC

Recent peak blooms show how variable and climate-dependent the timing can be:

2025: The National Park Service predicted peak bloom between March 28–31 (and confirmed the official peak around March 28).

2024: Peak bloom arrived very early, on March 17, several days ahead of NPS projections — tied for one of the earliest peaks in decades.

These examples demonstrate not only how much each season can differ, but also a trend toward earlier spring blossoms in recent years.

Advertisement

What to Expect for Spring 2026

As of early March 2026, the cherry trees are still dormant. The buds haven’t begun significant growth yet. The weather will become more critical in the weeks leading up to the bloom will be the biggest factor in determining when peak bloom happens in 2026.

Heavy winter cold, as experienced this year, tends to delay bloom compared with recent early springs. In contrast, an early warm stretch could push peak bloom earlier — as long as it doesn’t come with subsequent frost.

Look for the green bud stage first. This is when the buds are small, tight, and green, with no sign of petals yet. Trees are still several weeks from blooming.

Cherry Blossom Stages

Tips for Cherry Blossom Visitors

Plan in the “sweet spot” — peak bloom often lasts a few days to about a week, but weather (rain, wind, heat) can shorten that window.

Visit slightly before or after the predicted peak dates for smaller crowds and extended color. Blossoms can be gorgeous even before 70% bloom or as petals begin falling.

Advertisement

Check NPS updates and First Alert Weather forecasts in late March for tweaked peak bloom dates.

The cherry blossoms of Washington, D.C. remain one of the most iconic harbingers of spring in the U.S., and while exact bloom dates vary year-to-year, history and natural patterns point to late March through early April as your best bet for seeing the Tidal Basin in full floral glory.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Fact Check Team: Iran conflict revives Washington fight over who can authorize US force

Published

on

Fact Check Team: Iran conflict revives Washington fight over who can authorize US force


As the war in Iran intensifies across the Middle East, a constitutional battle is unfolding in Washington over a fundamental question: Who has the authority to declare war, Congress or the president?

The debate focuses on the War Powers Resolution, a 1973 law designed to prevent years-long military conflicts without congressional approval. Lawmakers passed the measure in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to reclaim authority they believed had drifted too far toward the executive branch.

What Is the War Powers Resolution?

The War Powers Resolution was intended to put limits on a president’s ability to send U.S. troops into combat without Congress signing off.

Advertisement

Under the law, a president can deploy forces into hostilities only if Congress has formally declared war, passed a specific authorization for the use of military force, or the U.S. has been attacked.

The resolution also sets strict deadlines.

The president must notify Congress within 48 hours of introducing U.S. forces into hostilities. From there, a 60-day clock begins. If Congress does not approve the military action within that time, troops must be withdrawn — though the law allows an additional 30-day wind-down period.

Some argue the law was crafted to prevent “never-ending wars.” While others say presidents from both parties have routinely stretched and sidestepped its requirements.

WASHINGTON, DC – JANUARY 14: Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) visits with Senate pages in the basement of the U.S. Capitol Police ahead of a vote on January 14, 2026 in Washington, DC. Republicans voted to block a Venezuela war powers resolution after receiving assurances from President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio of no U.S. forces remaining in Venezuela and pledges for congressional involvement in major future operations. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Advertisement

What Does the Constitution Say?

The War Powers Resolution is rooted directly in the U.S. Constitution.

Article I, Section 8 gives Congress — not the president — the power “to declare War.”

Article II, Section 2 names the president as Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy.

In simple terms, Congress decides whether the country goes to war. The president directs the military once it is engaged.

Advertisement

The framers intentionally split that authority. Their goal was to avoid concentrating too much war-making power in one person — likely a reaction to the monarchy they had just broken away from.

But how that balance plays out in real time is often a legal and political fight. At times, disputes over war powers have reached the courts, though Congress and the executive branch frequently resolve them through political pressure rather than judicial rulings.

A Pattern of Stretching the War Powers Resolution

Essentially, every president since 1973 has pushed the boundaries of the War Powers Resolution rather than fully complying with its original intent. As the Council on Foreign Relations explains, the resolution was designed to “provide presidents with the leeway to respond to attacks or other emergencies” but also to **require termination of combat after 60 to 90 days unless Congress authorizes continuation.”

For example:

Advertisement
  • Ronald Reagan ordered the U.S. invasion of Grenada in 1983 without prior congressional authorization, later reporting to Congress in a manner “consistent with” the resolution.
  • Bill Clinton directed the 1999 NATO air campaign in Kosovo after congressional authorization efforts failed, continuing U.S. engagement beyond the WPR’s typical 60-day reporting window.
  • Barack Obama oversaw U.S. participation in the 2011 Libya campaign, arguing that limited strikes did not trigger the full force of the WPR’s time limits.

In more recent years, Donald Trump’s administration has once again brought these issues to the forefront.

War Powers Arguments from the White House

The Trump administration’s principal legal rationale has centered on two points:

Short-term strikes or limited military actions do not always trigger the full 60-day clock under the War Powers Resolution, especially when described as defensive, limited in scope, or tied to national security emergencies rather than prolonged hostilities. In some cases, the White House relies on prior Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs) or other statutory authorities rather than seeking new congressional approval.

Current Public Opinion on Iran Strikes

Public opinion reflects significant skepticism about the current U.S. military engagement with Iran. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll found that just 27% of Americans support the recent U.S. and allied strikes on Iran, while 43% disapprove and 29% remain uncertain.

Advertisement

Another national poll conducted by SSRS for CNN found that nearly 60% of U.S. citizens disapprove of the military actions, and a similar share said that President Trump should seek Congressional authorization for further action.

Beyond polling, internal deliberations in Congress have already begun. Both Democratic and Republican lawmakers have pushed for votes on war powers resolutions that would seek to limit or require authorization for further military action against Iran. Past attempts to pass similar restraints have failed, reflecting deep partisan divisions and the complexities of enforcing the War Powers Resolution.



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Students at Southeast charter school outperformed 75% of DC on citywide math test – WTOP News

Published

on

Students at Southeast charter school outperformed 75% of DC on citywide math test – WTOP News


Two years ago, leaders at Center City Public Charter School’s Congress Heights campus made a decision to offer more advanced math classes to some of their oldest students.

This page contains a video which is being blocked by your ad blocker.
In order to view the video you must disable your ad blocker.

Students at Southeast charter school outperformed 75% of DC on citywide math test

Two years ago, leaders at Center City Public Charter School’s Congress Heights campus in D.C. decided to offer more advanced math classes to some of their oldest students.

Advertisement

The choice was complicated, and some educators wondered whether the kids would be ready.

To prepare for the possible change, Principal Niya White and her team visited high schools, both nearby and farther away, to see how algebra was being taught.

In some classrooms, White would see former students sleeping in the back. They were bored or had already finished their work.

For White, that made the choice clear — in order to set students up for success, they needed to expand their offerings so kids felt challenged and engaged by the time they reached high school.

“I’m born and raised here,” White said. “I was given the option of whether to leave Southeast D.C., leave D.C., go off to do things and come back. There are a lot of folks and a lot of students or a lot of families that don’t ever get that option. They’ve got to have it.”

Advertisement

Now, the Southeast D.C. campus is offering pre-algebra to seventh graders and algebra to eighth graders. In the 2024-25 school year, 70% of eighth graders at the school either met or exceeded expectations on the citywide standardized math test.

Education news outlet The 74 first reported that’s a stronger mark than the 64% of eighth graders who met or exceeded expectations in Ward 3. Only one-fourth of all D.C. students did the same.

Jessi Mericola, who teaches seventh and eighth grade math, was one of the educators who considered whether students were ready to make such a significant leap.

Initially, half of the rising eighth graders did an accelerated seventh grade curriculum, and then attended summer school to finish the curriculum so they could take algebra in eighth grade.

This year, for the first time, all of seventh grade is being accelerated so next year, “all of our students will be doing algebra,” Mericola said.

Advertisement

“We found that if we tell them they’re ready for it, they believe you, and they want to meet that expectation,” Mericola said.

Each class has about 20 students, with the largest in the school at 26, she said. Classes are divided into sections. There’s an individual review on a recently learned concept, a small group review on something from earlier in the year and then a full group lesson.

Mericola co-teaches with a colleague, and even if a student is struggling to grasp an idea, “we come back and reteach things from before that maybe you missed it the first time, but you catch it the second time; and if you miss it the second time, you catch it the third time.”

It’s an approach, White said, comes from avoiding the assumption that “we can’t move a child forward because of something or one of the things they haven’t mastered yet.”

Eighth grader Kennedy Morse said math was a struggle before she got to the Congress Heights campus, but now, it’s become one of her strongest subjects.

Advertisement

She’s gained confidence from tutoring help and being able to ask questions without judgment.

“It was really shocking for me to be on a higher level,” Morse said. “It was hard. It was hard at first.”

Leonard White had a similar experience.

“I’m actually glad that they can believe in me to do the harder work in these classes,” White said.

While getting access to more advanced math classes at a younger age could help students take more rigorous courses in high school and college, Principal White said with any change, the focus is helping “show them all the possibilities and help them make the choice for themselves, versus it being forced upon them.”

Advertisement

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending