Connect with us

Virginia

Gov. Spanberger ends ICE agreement involving Virginia State Police and corrections officers – WTOP News

Published

on

Gov. Spanberger ends ICE agreement involving Virginia State Police and corrections officers – WTOP News


The agreement — which stems from Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s administration —  had effectively placed state law enforcement under federal control and supervision to conduct civil immigration enforcement. 

This article was reprinted with permission from Virginia Mercury. 

Gov. Abigail Spanberger has formally ended an agreement with the U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement that had allowed Virginia State Police troopers and Virginia Department of Corrections officers to assist ICE.

The agreement — which stems from Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s administration —  had effectively placed state law enforcement under federal control and supervision to conduct civil immigration enforcement.

Advertisement

Ending the agreements was a campaign promise of Spanberger’s last year when she said tasking state and local law enforcement to help with federal law enforcement was a “misuse of those resources.”

She said she’d rather law enforcement focus on its core duties than serve as deputies to ICE.

Executive Order 12 builds on her earlier day-one executive order that gave her the option to end the agreement that Order 12 now rescinds.

The order directs all state law enforcement agencies to review policies, training and practices to ensure they align with standards of protecting human life and to “not engage in fear-based policing, enforcement theater, or actions that create barriers to people seeking assistance in their time of need.”

Spanberger pointed to national conversations around ICE’s tactics in a meeting with the news media on Wednesday. As President Donald Trump’s administration has had the agency hyper-focused on Minneapolis in recent weeks, American citizens like Renee Good and Alex Pretti have been killed by agents.

Advertisement

“I think it has brought the conversation to the forefront,” Spanberger said of how their deaths helped inspire her new order.

Drawing on her own background in law enforcement, she emphasized that the order is intended to reinforce accountability, public service, and safety.

“I think it’s extraordinarily important to make sure that we are celebrating, and honoring and recognizing the strong vetting, the strong training, and the incredibly high standards that here in the commonwealth of Virginia, we hold our law enforcement agencies to,” Spanberger said. “We want to make sure that we’re making a clear line in the sand about what is expected of our law enforcement officials.”

Republicans, however, offered a sharply different view.

Sen. Glenn Sturtevant, R-Chesterfield said in reaction Wednesday that he believes the order reflects Spanberger “putting politics over public safety.”

Advertisement

As of late last year, the majority of the thousands of people detained by ICE in Virginia had no criminal histories.

With Virignia’s legislature and governorship now under Democratic control — at a time when  President Donald Trump has targeted Democratic-led states — immigration advocates and civil rights groups have argued the commonwealth could become the next focal point for ICE enforcement.

Some Republican lawmakers have suggested Trump could retaliate against Virginia over Spanberger’s actions. Del. Karen Hamilton, R-Culpeper, speculated in a recent social media post that the president could withhold federal funding following Spanberger’s previous ICE-related order — a move Youngkin once threatened against localities that declined to cooperate with ICE.

When asked Wednesday whether he believes Trump might retaliate, Sturtevant said, “we’ll see.”

“At the end of the day,” he added, “we know we have criminal illegal aliens here in Virginia. We have federal law enforcement, whose job it is to go and identify, find, and deport these individuals. We had been working constructively with those federal partners to do that.”

Advertisement

Spanberger, meanwhile, said her order does not prohibit cooperation between state agencies and ICE under limited circumstances, such as participation in special task forces or when ICE presents  judicial warrants requesting assistance.

“That’s a clear delineation,” she said. “But taking Virginia law enforcement, state agency personnel, and basically giving them over to ICE, is something that ends today.”

Virginia Mercury reporter Shannon Heckt contributed to this story.



Source link

Advertisement

Virginia

Virginia Supreme Court voids voter-approved redistricting referendum

Published

on

Virginia Supreme Court voids voter-approved redistricting referendum

On May 8, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the General Assembly violated the state constitution when it tried to redraw congressional districts, nullifying the results of the April election in which Virginians narrowly approved redistricting.

Electoral maps are usually redrawn once every 10 years, but multiple states began redrawing them early after President Donald Trump urged Republicans to redraw district lines to ensure more favorable results for the party in the November 2026 elections. 

This started a nationwide political battle for control of the U.S. House of Representatives. Texas was the first of several states to redraw districts favoring Republicans, and Virginia Democrats had proposed a constitutional amendment to allow redistricting in order to favor Democrats. 

As of May 8, Republicans had initiated redistricting efforts in eight states; Democrats had led redistricting efforts in three states, including Virginia, the Washington Post reported.

In April, Virginia voters supported the redistricting amendment with 51.7% voting for it out of more than 3 million ballots cast. It could have given Democrats up to four extra seats in the U.S. House, according to the Washington Post (subscription required).

Advertisement

But the Virginia Supreme Court, in a 4-3 ruling, found that there were procedural errors in how the Democratic legislature handled the process, nullifying the election results.

The Virginia Constitution says that proposed constitutional amendments must pass in the General Assembly twice before the public can vote on them: once before an election of the House of Delegates, and again after an election. According to the Virginia Supreme Court majority opinion written by Justice D. Arthur Kelsey, early voting for the general election had already been open for six weeks when the General Assembly cast its first vote on the amendment in October 2025, with more than 1.3 million voters having already cast their ballots.

“This violation irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum vote and renders it null and void,” the court majority opinion stated.

The court’s ruling means the state reverts to the old district maps adopted in 2021. Based on those maps, Virginia voters elected six Democrats and five Republicans to the U.S. House.

Following the court’s ruling, some Virginia Democrats who planned to run for the U.S. House told the New York Times that they have to abandon their campaigns, while others, such as Tom Perriello who is running for the 5th District, face much more difficult campaigns.

Advertisement

Virginia Democrats on Friday asked the court to pause the nullification of the referendum results while they prepare their appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, according to VPM.

Get in touch if you’ve been impacted by the overturned redistricting results

If you’ve been impacted by the Virginia State Supreme Court’s decision to nullify the results of the April 21 special election on redistricting, we want to hear from you.

Send us a tip or question using our contact form. You can also call (434) 218-3649 and give us as much information as you can in your voice message. You can also reach our newsroom on Signal at (434) 218-3649 or @cvilletomorrow.05. Signal is a chat and voice app for your smartphone that has end-to-end encryption and is run by a nonprofit organization.

While we can’t cover every story that’s important to you, we do our best to be responsive to your needs. We use tips from readers to choose which stories to cover, to incorporate information into broader reports or to help us decide how to grow Charlottesville Tomorrow. Here’s where you can tell us what you think we should be covering.

2026 Central Virginia Voter Guide

View live results of Virginia’s redistricting referendum, a high-stakes vote on whether Democrats who control state government can redraw congressional maps ahead of this fall’s election.

Advertisement
Virginia’s redistricting battle moves to the courts

Attorney General Jay Jones vows to appeal as early voting fast approaches.

What does a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote actually mean in Virginia’s special election on redistricting?

Voters are getting mixed messages. Here’s a clear breakdown.



Source link
Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia Heads To Knoxville Regional With Third Straight NCAA Bid

Published

on

Virginia Heads To Knoxville Regional With Third Straight NCAA Bid


CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. – The No. 23 Virginia softball team (38-13) earned its third consecutive NCAA Tournament berth on Sunday (May 10) and will play in the Knoxville Regional, it was announced during the NCAA Selection Show on ESPN2. The Cavaliers face Indiana (42-14) in the first game of the day. The Cavaliers are the seven-seed […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Democrat Rep. Ted Lieu calls Virginia Supreme Court decision on redistricting

Published

on

Democrat Rep. Ted Lieu calls Virginia Supreme Court decision on redistricting




Democrat Rep. Ted Lieu calls Virginia Supreme Court decision on redistricting “disgraceful” – CBS News








































Watch CBS News


Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu told “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” that the Virginia Supreme Court decision that threw out the state’s referendum that redrew their congressional districts was “not only wrong, it was disgraceful.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending