Connect with us

Virginia

2025 College Swimming Previews: #9 Virginia Tech Men In Groove With Scoring Relays, Key Stars

Published

on

2025 College Swimming Previews: #9 Virginia Tech Men In Groove With Scoring Relays, Key Stars


It’s that time of the year again. SwimSwam will be previewing the top 12 men’s and women’s teams (and then some) from the 2023 NCAA Championships. Follow along with the College Swimming Preview Channel. Want to read even more? Check out the latest edition of the SwimSwam magazine

#9 Virginia Tech Hokies

Key Losses: AJ Pouch (8 NCAA points)

Key Additions: Kyle Algrim (IL – distance free), Levente Balogh (Hungary – fly/back), JC Gordon (VA – distance free), Eli Martin (VA – breast/IM), Jakub Poliacik (Slovakia – freestyle)

Returning Fifth Years: Youssef Ramadan (32 NCAA points, 4 NCAA relays), Carles Coll Marti (30 NCAA points, 4 NCAA relays)

Advertisement

GRADING CRITERIA

Over the years, we’ve gone back and forth on how to project points, ranging from largely subjective rankings to more data-based grading criteria based on ‘projected returning points.’ We like being as objective as possible, but we’re going to stick with the approach we’ve adopted post-Covid. The “stars” will rely heavily on what swimmers actually did last year, but we’ll also give credit to returning swimmers or freshmen who have posted times that would have scored last year.

Since we only profile the top 12 teams in this format, our grades are designed with that range in mind. In the grand scheme of college swimming and compared to all other college programs, top 12 NCAA programs would pretty much all grade well across the board. But in the interest of making these previews informative, our grading scale is tough – designed to show the tiers between the good stroke groups, the great ones, and the 2015 Texas fly group types.

  • 5 star (★★★★★) – a rare, elite NCAA group projected to score 25+ points per event
  • 4 star (★★★★) – a very, very good NCAA group projected to score 15-24 points per event
  • 3 star (★★★) – a good NCAA group projected to score 5-14 points per event
  • 2 star (★★) – a solid NCAA group projected to score 1-4 points per event
  • 1 star (★) –  an NCAA group that is projected to score no points per event, though that doesn’t mean it’s without potential scorers – they’ll just need to leapfrog some swimmers ahead of them to do it

We’ll grade each event discipline: sprint free (which we define to include all the relay-distance freestyle events, so 50, 100 and 200), distance free, IM, breaststroke, backstroke, butterfly and diving. Use these grades as a jumping-off point for discussion, rather than a reason to be angry.

Also, keep in mind that we are publishing many of these previews before teams have posted finalized rosters. We’re making our assessments based on the best information we have available at the time of publication, but we reserve the right to make changes after publication based on any new information that may emerge regarding rosters. If that does happen, we’ll make certain to note the change.

2023-2024 LOOKBACK

The Hokies seemed to hit a groove last year in their sixth season under head coach Sergio Lopez. They weren’t quite able to defend their second-place effort at ACCs, due to a dynamic performance from the then-rising Notre Dame squad, but they held strong at NCAAs, tying their best-ever finish by taking 9th overall with 172 points.

At the 2018 NCAA Championships, the Virginia Tech men finished 33rd with nine points, all from diving. Here’s how they’ve fared at NCAAs since Lopez came on board prior to the 2019 season:

Advertisement
  • 2019 – 35th (11)
  • 2020- N/A
  • 2021 – 11th (135)
  • 2022 – 11th (143)
  • 2023 – 9th (133)
  • 2024 – 9th (172)

It’s not a huge secret that scoring in all five relays and having a couple of key individuals is the path to a top 10 finish at NCAAs, but Virginia Tech has made a habit of that over the last couple of seasons.

Youssef Ramadan suffered a fractured wrist in the fall, but he bounced back to snare a pair of 9th-place finishes in the 50 and the 100 free, and he also finished 4th in the 100 fly to net 32 points. Fellow senior Carles Coll Marti garnered 30 points with 5th and 3rd place efforts in the 100 and 200 breast, respectively, and he probably would’ve scored in the 200 IM had he not drawn a DQ for a false start. Not to be left out, fifth-year AJ Pouch scored in both breaststroke events, taking 15th in the 100 and 11th in the 200.

Freshman Brendan Whitfield didn’t score individually but was a key contributor nonetheless, swimming on all five of the Hokies relays. Those relays all finished between 6th and 10th, accounting for another 102 points. All told Virginia Tech scored nearly 40 more points than they did in 2023 while holding fast at 9th place.

We’ll go ahead and note here that this preview is going to look very similar to last year’s, as the Hokies return eight of their nine NCAA qualifiers from last year, with Pouch being the sole exception.

SPRINT FREE: 

Youssef Ramadan (photo: Jack Spitser)

As we stated above, Youssef Ramadan was just a bit off of his lifetime bests of 18.68/41.15 last season. He’s back for a fifth year, and if he can stay injury-free, he should once again be a threat to make ‘A’ finals in both of those events, while also being a dynamo on the relays.

Advertisement

Last year we suggested that Brendan Whitfield could make NCAAs and swim all three sprint free relays, and sure enough, he did. The Virginia native had big time drops as a freshman, going from 19.48/42.67/1:33.97 to 19.10/41.61/1:32.50. All those individual bests came at ACCs, but his 100 free time would’ve scored at NCAAs had he matched it there.

A trio of relay contributors hit lifetime bests in individual sprint free events at NCAAs last year. Luis Domínguez led off the 800 free relay with a 1:32.25 split, then went 42.31 individually to go along with a 41.51 split on the 400 free relay. As a sophomore last year, Will Hayon improved from 19.65/43.12 to 19.54/42.53, with those best times coming via a pair of 44th-place finishes at NCAAs. Mario Molla Yanes bounced back last year to hit lifetime bests of 19.29/42.39 at NCAAs, and split 19.06 and 1:32.25 on the 200 and 800 free relays.

Breaststroker/IMer Carles Coll Marti once again contributed on free relays, splitting a 1:32.23 on the 800 free relay and 41.34 on the 400 free relay. He’s also capable of splitting around 19-flat on the 200 free relay.

Lithuanian national Daniil Pancerevas went 44.15 and 1:34.44 last year, but his long course times of 22.95/49.68/1:48.93 in LCM suggest that he could add some relay depth if his yards swimming develops as well as some of the other Hokie international swimmers’ have.

The newcomer most likely to make an impact in the sprint freestyles may be Slovakian national Jakub Poliacik. He trends a little more towards the distance side, but his SCM best times convert to SCY times of roughly 20.9/43.3/1:34.8. Virginia native Luis Domínguez arrives with bests of 20.76/45.18, while Texas’ Danny Bishop has been 21.25/45.59/1:37.96.

Advertisement

DISTANCE FREE: 

Once again, Luis Domínguez and Nicolas Garcia were the only two Hokie men to qualify for NCAAs in distance events, and both swam the 500 free, where they went 4:16.09 (39th) and 4:20.30 (47th) respectively.

Lee Naber dropped roughly six seconds in his 500 and 22 seconds in the 1650 last season and contributed at ACCs by finishing 14th in the 500 (4:20.58) and 8th in the 1650 (15:14.21). Similar drops this year would put him into NCAA invite range.

The ACC didn’t have much depth in the 1650 last year (everyone who swam and wasn’t DQ’d scored), although that may change with the addition of Cal and Stanford. Regardless, the freshman class should help at at least the ACC level. Kyle Algrim (15:30.73) and JC Gordon (15:30.12) both arrive with ACC scoring times in the 1650, and Jakub Poliacik‘s best times convert to roughly 4:21.57/15:23.00.

BACKSTROKE: 

With Forest Webb out of eligibility, the Hokies only return two ACC scorers in this discipline. The key one is Spanish Olympian Nicolas Garcia. He once again qualified for NCAAs, but never cracked 1:40 last year and didn’t score at NCAAs. His lifetime best of 1:39.49 from the 2023 ACCs would put him in the B-final at NCAAs if he could match it.

Gabriel Yuk was the only other Hokie to score at ACCs, with a 23rd-place effort in the 100 back. Once again, Virginia Tech’s fastest man in the 100 last year was actually Youssef Ramadan, who led off the 400 medley relay with times of 45.34 (ACCs) and 45.61 (NCAAs), although he clocked a 44.59 leadoff in 2023.

Advertisement

Hungary’s Levente Balogh comes to Blacksburg this year with LCM bests of 55.73 and 2:00.35, which convert to roughly 47.4 and 1:43.10 in yards. At the very least he should be a scoring threat at ACCs, and given how successful many internationals have been at Virginia Tech, he could qualify for NCAAs sooner rather than later.

BREASTSTROKE: ★★★

Carles Coll Marti (photo: Jack Spitser)

After missing scoring in the 100 in 2023, Carles Coll Marti finished in the top five at NCAAs in both breaststroke races. He hit a lifetime best of 50.95 at ACCs, and he nearly matched that time with a 51.06 to finish 5th in the 100. Similarly, he was a bit off of his 1:49.69 lifetime best in the 200, but his 1:49.99 put him only behind Leon Marchand and Matt Fallon. With Marchand going pro, Fallon’s probably the favorite to win the title in March, but Coll Marti could be right there with him.

Ethan Maloney had another solid showing as a sophomore, going 52.15/1:55.45 to pick up points at ACCs. Both those times are just a bit off of his bests of 51.95/1:55.15 from 2023. Aiken Do hit a lifetime best of 54.02 at the Virginia Tech invite and also has been 1:59.41 in the 200.

The Hokies add a little depth with freshmen Eli Martin (54.65/1:57.28) and Pablo Silva (55.13/1:58.17).

Advertisement

BUTTERFLY: ★★★

After capturing the 2023 NCAA title in the 100 fly one of the most memorable post-race interviews in recent memory, Yossef Ramadan’s 2023-2024 season got off to a rougher start when he was out for several meets in the fall due to injury. He never quite back to his best times, but most swimmers would be pretty happy when an “off” season resulted in a 4th-place finish at NCAAs, where he touched in 43.95. Josh Liendo was all the rage last year, but Ramadan’s best of 43.15 is only 0.08s off of Liendo’s winning time, so this should be a great race to watch come March.

In 2023, Mario Molla Yanes went 45.44 in ACC prelims, then finished dead last at NCAAs, apparently dealing with sickness or injury. In 2024, he clocked a new lifetime best of 45.06 with an 18th place finish at NCAAs, while also holding down the 400 medley relay fly leg so Ramadan could swim back.

For the second year in a row, Will Hayon hit a lifetime best at a Last Chance meet, clocking 45.35 in early March. That time earned him a NCAA invite, and he finished 31st with a time of 45.86.

Carl Bloebaum bounced back from a freshman campaign that was limited by injury to finish 6th at ACCs in the 200 fly, then continued to improve his best with a 1:42.16 at a Last Chance meet. He made the C-final in the 100 and clocked a 46.12, but he went 45.68 in high school, so he still has the potential to be another Hokie knocking on the door of a sub-45 swim.

Fellow rising junior Landon Gentry was one of the top butterfly prospects in the country coming out of high school, but didn’t manage to qualify for NCAAs last year after doing so as a freshman. Like Bloebaum, his best times (46.07/1:42.32) mean that as long as he’s healthy, he’s an ACC scorer, and he certainly has the potential to make NCAAs again.

Advertisement

Freshman Levente Balogh represented Hungary at the 2023 European Juniors, where he set a best time of 1:59.58 in the long course 200 fly. That converts to roughly a 1:44.4, which puts him in ACC scoring range, while his 100 LCM best of 54.56 converts to a 47.7.

IM: 

This has historically been a fairly strong area for the Hokies, and Carles Coll Marti is one of the fastest men in college swimming, owning a lifetime best of 1:39.63 from 2022. While last season was a bit of a hiccup for him, matching his lifetime best would put him back squarely in the middle of the ‘A’ final.

Nicolas Garcia has a best time of 3:41.63 in the 400 IM, but he didn’t swim the event this year, leaving Coll Marti with the Hokies’ only NCAA swim in this discipline. Garcia’s best time last year was a 3:45.90 from ACCs, but his lifetime would’ve made the B-final at NCAAs, so there is a potential for additional points here if he returns to form.

It’s hard to say if this will be a focus for Jakub Poliacik, but his best SCM converts to roughly 1:46.8, which would’ve put him behind only Coll Marti and Daniil Pancerevas (1:45.31) and equal with Mario Molla Yanes (1:46.89) on last year’s roster. Additionally, Landon Gentry owns an ACC scoring-worthy time of 1:45.16 from 2023.

DIVING: 

Jacob Fisher was Virginia Tech’s best diver at ACCs last season, netting 46 points, but he missed qualifying for NCAAs after doing so as a freshman in 2023. Zach Shaddy also added points at ACCs in the 1m and 3m events.

Advertisement

RELAYS: ½

The name of the game for Virginia Tech relays is “stability.” They didn’t lose a single leg going from 2022-2023 into 2023-2024, and once again they return all their legs from last year. That’s some almost unheard-of continuity.

Without any other obvious solution for the backstroke leg, Youssef Ramadan will likely continue to lead-off the medley relays, while Carles Coll Marti will swim breast and Brendan Whitfield will anchor. Will Hayon swam the fly leg on the 200 medley, while Mario Molla Yanes held it down on the 400. There’s a chance we could see some flex on that leg, especially Carl Bloebaum or Landon Gentry make some strides, or if a backstroker emerges to free Ramadan to move back to fly, but otherwise the medleys look pretty locked in already.

It’s a similar situation on the freestyle relays, where there doesn’t seem to be an obvious impetus to shake up last year’s lineups. Perhaps someone like Jakub Poliacik forces his way onto the 800 and frees up another swimmer, but with four guys splitting between 1:32.2 and 1:32.5, there’s no obvious weak leg. 

Total Stars: 19½/40

2024-2025 OUTLOOK 

While they didn’t move up in the overall team standings, there’s a strong argument that they were a markedly better team in 2024 than they were in 2023. They scored roughly 40 more points, got all five relays to score, and a number of swimmers hit lifetime bests at NCAAs. Take away a 200 IM DQ, and the Hokies would’ve finished ahead of Stanford and possibly challenged Texas for 7th.

Advertisement

Virginia Tech is in the enviable position of only losing one NCAA qualifier and returning all relay legs. The top of the sport has such a concentration of talent that it’s tough to see a path for them to crack into the top 7 or so, but assuming no mishaps, they’re a safe bet for another top-10 NCAA finish.

MEN’S PREVIEW INDEX:

Team Sprint Free Distance Free Backstroke Breaststroke Butterfly IM Diving Relays Total Stars
#9 Virginia Tech Hokies ★★★ ★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★★½ 19.5/40
#10 Notre Dame Fighting Irish Suspended
★★★ ★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★ 20/40
#12 Auburn Tigers ★½ ★★★ ★★½ ★★ ★★½ ★★★½ 17/40

See all of our College Swimming Previews with the SwimSwam Preview Index here.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Virginia

Round Robin: Evaluating Virginia Basketball’s 3-0 Start

Published

on

Round Robin: Evaluating Virginia Basketball’s 3-0 Start


With three games of data collected, we’ve learned quite a bit about the 2024-2025 Virginia basketball team, but many questions are still unanswered and there is still a great deal to learn about the Cavaliers, especially as they head to the Bahamas for a couple of tough non-conference matchups against ranked opponents.

As we evaluate what we’ve seen from UVA so far, four members of the Virginia Cavaliers On SI writing staff – William Smythe, Aidan Baller, Val Prochaska, and Matt Newton – are going to answer some questions and give their impressions of this year’s Virginia team through the first three games of the season.

What’s your impression of Virginia’s 3-0 start? What has surprised you so far? 

William: It’s an encouraging start, and you should always be happy with a 3-0 record (unless you’re 2024-25 Syracuse) heading into a tough non-conference slate this weekend. I believe that Coach Ron Sanchez did a tremendous job against Villanova of tailoring the offense to Isaac McKneely and his sharpshooting ability even while keeping the tempo painstakingly slow. I’ve been most surprised, however, by the dual-package of Andrew Rohde and Dai Dai Ames on the court against the Wildcats. The former might get pushed more to a wing role if sophomore forward TJ Power fails to find his shot, yet Rohde’s ascendance could result in an extra ball-handler, distributor, and potential shot creator appearing alongside the Kansas State transfer.

Aidan: Cautiously optimistic is the best way to put it. Ron Sanchez has checked the boxes in earning three solid wins but the Cavaliers still need to be truly tested. The two biggest surprises this season are Virginia’s dominant three-point shooting, showcased best against Villanova, and Jacob Cofie, who has delivered double-digit scoring in all three games.

Advertisement

Val: Despite all the supposed change and newness this season was supposed to represent — the new coach, the three transfers (who were expected to immediately fill in at the top of the lineup) and the two freshmen (who were not redshirting,) the emphasis on getting into the offensive sets faster and a heavily tweaked offensive scheme — this team still looks very much like last year’s team.  Last year the team averaged 60.1 possessions.  This year the team is slower at 58.3 possessions.  Every year the team has a game where the bucket looks as big a manhole cover, and those are exciting games to watch, but every team can hang around.  Virginia shot an absurd 56% from beyond the arc, but only beat Villanova by 10 points.

Matt: I’ve been moderately impressed by Virginia’s 3-0 start. The wins over Campbell and Coppin State didn’t (and shouldn’t) move anyone, but the victory over Villanova was a good sign that the Cavaliers can compete and beat a talented, albeit poorly coached major conference foe. This week will tell us a great deal about who the Hoos actually are this season.

Virginia has shot the three-ball well so far, but where will the buckets come from if the threes aren’t falling? 

William: We’re familiar with the mantra, “live by the three, die by the three.” While ‘Nova caught the brunt end of a Virginia shooting-spree, a 50+ 3PT% might not be sustainable. If Virginia can allow forward Elijah Saunders to outmuscle smaller defenders, it can unlock a safety valve for this offense. Saunders and sophomore center Blake Buchanan — a bit rusty to start his second-year campaign — shouldn’t face too many double teams on account of Virginia’s threats from outside. I’d lean towards Saunders as the more prolific scorer of the two, as he looked relatively comfortable operating in the paint through the first two games in particular. An offense capable of stretching the floor and creating one-on-one matchups in the frontcourt would be ideal.

Aidan: If the threes aren’t falling, I look to Elijah Saunders; the San Diego State transfer has shown he has a presence at and around the basket. His presence has the potential to open up points for Blake Buchanan and Jacob Cofie while helping them find their rhythm and confidence in the paint. Besides those three, the only other players who have shown glimmers of the midrange are Isaac McKneely, who has shown he can shoot from anywhere, and Taine Murray, who may not have played against Villanova but showed his ability to get to the basket in the first two games.

Val: If Virginia is going to be able to win games when the threes aren’t raining down, it will be because the Hoos are getting points at the rim.  The team is never going to fast break so it will mean that Elijah Saunders has found his post game, that the Blake Buchanan – Jacob Cofie two-man high-low game is growing, and that Isaac McKneely is hunting his mid-range game.  I’m not confident that these three things will happen per se, but the season is still young and the potential is there.  The most notable tweak to the offense is entry pass into a big at the top of the key which leads to a host of new screening actions as well as the dribble hand off.  Virginia’s continuity ball screen/Sides offense had long passed it’s expiration date, but this addition to the offensive arsenal seems much more sustainable than the brief fling Tony Bennett had with the Five-Out offensive set during the Sam Hauser/Trey Murphy year.  Virginia has a higher ceiling than they’ve had in the past four-five years.

Advertisement

Matt: Elijah Saunders’ post game and hook shot will be the key, just as Anthony Gill’s paint production was a huge asset to the Malcolm Brogdon Virginia teams in 2015 and 2016. Blake Buchanan still needs a bit of help developing his touch on his hook shots, but UVA running the ball through Buchanan above the free throw line is an exciting new wrinkle to Virginia’s offense. With that said, I’m personally content with the Cavaliers living and dying by the three this season. They have the shooters for it and the resultant spacing should allow more opportunities to attack the rim when the threes aren’t falling.

What will TJ Power’s role be going forward?

William: Despite his ineffectiveness from a scoring standpoint, I think Coach Ron Sanchez keeps Power in the starting lineup and allows him to experience the thrill of a breakout game (it’ll come eventually, right?). He hasn’t been proactive on offense and hasn’t been completely exposed on defense, but it’s possible that — at the moment — Power serves more of a glue-guy role as one of the appointed leaders of this new-look Virginia team. There aren’t many immediate threats to his playing time outside of guard Andrew Rohde, and that’s only if he’s playing the wing alongside Ames. I don’t know if I can assign a certain label to Power’s role. I fear that the realistic comparison is Jacob Groves, yet I’m confident he’ll crawl closer to his five-star billing once he sees a few threes go through.

Aidan: The former Duke sharpshooter has lacked sharpness in his first three outings for the team in Charlottesville. Considering his three-point shooting ability is the only dominant part of his game, if that’s missing, it’s highly problematic. Despite this, everyone knows Power’s capability to shoot, so keep letting him fire away until he finds his rhythm. It’s way too early to stop giving him minutes.

Val: Power was the #21 recruit two years ago coming out of high school.  His first three games of his Virginia career seem eerily similar to his first year at Duke.  He’s a tall guy with a reputation for being a good shooter, but all it is rep at this point.  Duke last year, and Virginia this year, play better when he is off the court.  Which is about as damning a thing as you can say about someone. I think Power’s ceiling is that of Jacob Groves, but I don’t know if he’s going to reach it this year.  For this year, I think Power will ultimately settle as the fourth big on the floor behind Buchanan, Saunders and Cofie.  Power should be good for three or four games a year where he gets in a groove and has a 4/7 night from beyond the arc.  Saunders and Cofie have each had a game where they’ve struggled with fouls so I think Power will get more minutes than he got at Duke, but at best he’ll be a super sub off the bench.

Matt: Even with his slow start, I’m hopeful that the UVA coaching staff will allow Power, who is still getting accustomated to this level of basketball after playing sparingly last season, time to get into a rhythm on both ends of the floor. I must admit that I’d hoped to see brighter signs of Power’s potential through these first few games, but it’s also too early to give up on the former five-star. Elijah Saunders said Power sometimes looks like the best three-point shooter on the team in practice. If we start to see evidence of that “possibly insulting to Isaac McKneely” statement in games, then Power could still be one of Virginia’s most important players this season. If not, then he’ll be relegated to spot bench minutes with his ceiling being the occasional three-point flurry in a handful of games. Power and the Hoos are certainly hoping the former is the case.

Advertisement

Have your expectations for this season changed after three games? More specifically, what’s your prediction for Virginia’s two games in the Bahamas? 

William: Villanova doesn’t look like it has turned the corner in year three of Coach Kyle Neptune’s tenure, so it’s certainly not the litmus test we might’ve expected if we saw this scheduling four years ago. However, the expectations surrounding McKneely have ratcheted up, especially if Virginia works furiously to help him create his own three-point looks off of the dribble. This double-date in the Bahamas reminds me of the Main Event Classic in Vegas two years ago. Albeit under different leadership, an overlooked Virginia will take to a neutral court against No. 11 Tennessee. I predict a rock fight and late triumph over the Volunteers in a failed Igor Miličić Jr. Revenge Game. Now, I don’t know if the ‘Hoos have the talent to knock off one of the two other top-25 squads — Baylor and St. John’s — in the championship, even if Virginia is awfully familiar with two of the Bears’ starters. A win over Tennessee would be massive. Let’s just start there.

Aidan: My expectations have not changed much as this team has yet to be truly tested, although being 3-0 does feel good. Against Villanova, the Cavaliers comfortably cruised past the Wildcats without being tested in the clutch moments, which we will most certainly see this weekend. My predictions for the Bahamas are that the Volunteers will be too fast and teach Virginia a lot. Still, on night two, Virginia pulls itself together to leave the Continental Baha Mar Championship 1-1, with plenty of lessons learned.

Val: Not really.  Reports out of training camp were that Dai Dai Ames would be a more effective back up point guard, presumably to the now-departed Jalen Warley, than Dante Harris was last year for Reece Beekman.   I was never impressed with Warley at Florida State so I am much more excited to see how Ames grows.  I had no idea what to think of Cofie before the season started, but I now think he has the potential to be the second banana to McKneely.  His emergence is my biggest source of optimism for this season. I’m not much for predictions.  If you are betting man, do just the opposite of what I say and you’ll be living in a nice house soon.  I expect Virginia will go cold against Tennessee and get pounded by Tennessee and then bounce back for the second game.

Matt: I’m going to wait to give a real answer to that question about expectations until after this week. With a pair of games against ranked opponents ahead of them, the Cavaliers could come back from Bahamas with their first and second defeats of the season. I don’t need to see Virginia go 2-0 or even 1-1 in order to be encouraged about what this season could become, but Ron Sanchez and the Hoos must show they can at least compete with these talented and well-coached teams in order for me to be convinced that a successful season in the ACC is on the table for Virginia. As for a prediction, I agree with Val and Aidan that the most likely outcome is that the Cavaliers fall to Tennessee, but then win the second game against either Baylor or St. John’s.

ACC Basketball Weekly Roundup: Power Rankings and the Good, Bad, and Ugly

Advertisement

UVA Basketball Report Card: Evaluating Virginia Through Three Games

The Plus/Minus: Virginia Basketball Lights Up Villanova

Virginia Basketball Storms Past Villanova 70-60 | Key Takeaways

Why Did Tony Bennett Retire? UVA Basketball Coach Explains Decision



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

Maryland and Virginia in top 5 for best states for teachers

Published

on

Maryland and Virginia in top 5 for best states for teachers


Maryland and Virginia were both listed in the top five best states for teachers, according to a study.

Advertisement

The survey assessed various metrics to determine the ranking, including average salary, income growth potential, average pension, and more. According to the report, Virginia is ranked as the third-best state for teachers and also has the highest income growth potential in the country. The average starting salary for teachers in Virginia is $45,141 and ranks 13th in the nation. 

New York is ranked as the best state for teachers and Washington is the second-best. According to the analysis, New York is also the highest average annual salary for public school teachers after adjusting for the cost of living, at $82,571.

Advertisement

Washington, D.C. landed at 46 on the list with the second highest student-teacher ratio. The district fell at the tail end of the list, with Maine being listed as one of the worst states for teachers at 51. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Duke run defense set for tough matchup against Virginia Tech's Bhayshul Tuten in Week 12

Published

on

Duke run defense set for tough matchup against Virginia Tech's Bhayshul Tuten in Week 12


At 7-3, the Duke Blue Devils could build upon an already impressive 2024 football season over the final two games. The first of those chances comes on Saturday night when they face the Virginia Tech Hokies.

The Blue Devils’ defense has been their strength so far this season, specifically the secondary. However, their run defense hasn’t been the greatest, which could make for a poor matchup with the Hokies.

Duke has allowed 149.3 yards per game on the ground this season, 71st among FBS teams. The Blue Devils improve on a per-play basis, moving up to 44th at 3.83 yards allowed per carry, and they’ve only given up 10 rushing touchdowns in 10 games, but it’s a far cry from their pass defense (12th in yards per attempt).

On the flip side, the Virginia Tech rushing offense ranks 36th in the nation with 185.3 yards per game. The Hokies are one of five ACC teams averaging more than five yards per attempt, and that is mostly carried by running back Bhayshul Tuten.

Advertisement

On the season, Tuten amassed 951 yards and 12 touchdowns on 146 attempts, an average of 6.51 yards per tote. He’s eclipsed 100 yards five times, including a 266-yard performance against Boston College that included three trips to the end zone.

Quarterback Kyron Drones also deserves attention for the Hokies’ offense on the ground. The redshirt junior has added 336 rushing yards and six touchdowns.

Those two have more than 69% of the team’s rushing production in 2024. If Duke is to win this game, the key will be limiting Tuten and Drones.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending