Connect with us

Texas

What does SpaceX’s move to Texas really mean for the South Bay?

Published

on

What does SpaceX’s move to Texas really mean for the South Bay?


The news that SpaceX, the massive aerospace company with an equally vast headquarters in Hawthorne, is apparently departing the South Bay for a new kind of south, caused an immediate stir among other local aerospace startups looking to hire — but also left locals with more questions than answers about how the move will impact the local economy.

Mercurial billionaire and SpaceX founder Elon Musk announced the company’s move from Hawthorne to Texas on Tuesday, July 16, in a post on X, formerly Twitter, rather suddenly.

But despite specific details on the move, other space startups have already been making a drive to recruit SpaceX workers disillusioned by Musk’s plans, offering them perks and inclusive office cultures.

On X, for example, asteroid mining company Astroforge Inc. replied to Musk’s tweet announcing his plans by stating they are hiring and based in Seal Beach  — about 25 miles from SpaceX’s current headquarters.

Advertisement

Musk said his reason to relocate because of frustration over a new law in California related to transgender children in public schools.

The decision was in response to California Gov. Gavin Newsom signing a new state law, which prohibits school districts from requiring staff to notify parents of their child’s gender identification change.

Musk, who has increasingly leaned into far-right conservative rhetoric in recent years, called the governor’s decision a “final straw.”

The CEO of French aerospace company Latitude, Stanislas Maximin, responded by calling on “SpaceX employees misaligned with these values and looking to join an inclusive and highly ambitious rocket company in a great living city near Paris.”

Latitude would cover the cost of moving, visas, health care and find work for a spouse, Maximin said.

Advertisement

But it’s unclear whether such moves will be necessary.

That’s because besides a couple of posts on X, Musk and SpaceX officials have yet to provide any substantial details about what the relocation will actually entail.

SpaceX’s Hawthorne headquarters, a 1-million-square-foot sprawling campus, is home to more than just upper level admin workers — it’s also a production facility for some of the company’s flagship rockets.

Musk and the company have not said whether the entire campus — or other SpaceX facilities in Southern California — would be shut down and moved.

It is possible that the company has already prepared for an extensive and complicated move like that, though. SpaceX, after all, has been building out Starbase — a large facility in South Texas where SpaceX builds and launches its massive Starship rocket system — over the past several years.

Advertisement

Company officials did not respond to requests for comment on both Tuesday and Wednesday —so it is still all together unclear whether that is the company’s actual plan.

Hawthorne city officials, late Tuesday, issued a statement seeming to back up the uncertain nature of the relocation.

“Hawthorne has learned that SpaceX, one of our valued businesses, may potentially relocate its headquarters,” Mayor Alex Vargas said. “While this move would represent a significant change for our community, we remain committed to supporting our local economy and fostering growth.”

SpaceX, according to a report about Hawthorne’s finances during the 2022-23 fiscal year, provides nearly 7,000 jobs — or about 16% of total employment — in the city.

The second largest employer in the city, according to the report, was the Hawthorne School District, with 1,029 and 606 employees, respectively; the next is an Amazon Fulfillment Center in third place.

Advertisement

SpaceX has long been the largest employer in Hawthorne, at least dating back to the 2015-2016 fiscal year, which was the first time Hawthorne included employment levels by company in its annual financial reports.

But it’s unclear whether SpaceX’s plan to relocate the company’s headquarters will include moving its entire facility and all employees to Texas.

“That’s an incredibly expensive decision to make,” Christopher Thornberg, the founding partner of Beacon Economics, said in a previous interview earlier this week. “(And) people who live here, live here for a reason — and you’re not going to convince a lot of these people to get up and move to Texas, simple as that.”

There’s also precedent for Musk companies leaving California to Texas — such as Tesla.

Few employees were compelled to move during that transition, and the car company still maintains a huge presence in the Bay Area, including a factory in Fremont that employs thousands of people.

Advertisement

But it’s not just Musk companies. When Toyota announced that it was planning to vacate its Torrance headquarters — also to move to Texas — in 2014, the city faced backlash from both state officials and residents for failing to keep the business, and about 3,000 jobs, in town.

But several years following the company’s official exit in 2017, the actual material impact on Torrance and the South Bay economies have been minimal at best.

The city’s revenues, officials said previously, were not seriously impacted by Toyota’s departure. Torrance was more impacted by the loss of the company as a sponsor of community events.

That’s likely because the South Bay economy — and Torrance’s in particular — is diverse, with various large malls, company headquarters and industries, as opposed to relying on one single major business.

It might be a different story for Hawthorne, though, should SpaceX completely pull out of the city.

Advertisement

“SpaceX has been an integral part of our community,” Vargas, the Hawthorne mayor, said, “contributing to our local economy and helping to establish Hawthorne as a hub of technological innovation.”

Hawthorne has done its fair share to persuade SpaceX to stay local.

In 2012, for example, the city approved a deal with SpaceX to cap its annual business license fees at $260,000 a year.

Those fees, typically, were calculated based on gross tax receipts — meaning the more revenue the company generated, the higher fees it would have to pay.

That deal, agreed upon through 2022, essentially allowed SpaceX to maintain a flat tax rate despite its continued growth.

Advertisement

City leaders, at the time, cited the deal as a way to incentivize SpaceX — which was already fielding offers to move to other states, including Texas and Florida — to stay in Hawthorne.

Hawthorne also agreed to reduce building and planning fees for SpaceX should the company decide to expand its local facilities by 75% of the normal cost.

The city also included a corporate citizenship clause in that economic development deal — which allowed the city to use the SpaceX logo in its own branding to promote community engagement with the company and vice versa.

It’s unclear whether that deal was re-approved by the Hawthorne City Council after it expired in 2022. The city did not respond to requests for comment on Wednesday.

But given Hawthorne’s seemingly strong reliance on SpaceX as a driver of the local economy — it’s possible the company’s departure could have more lasting impacts on the city.

Advertisement

Long Beach, for example, is still recovering from the shut down of Boeing’s C-17 Globemaster production facility, which shut down after the Department of Defense terminated its contract for the aircraft in 2015.

The closure of the facility, according to a 2021 city report, resulted in the loss of about 1,158 direct jobs and another 3,781 jobs in the related supply chain.

Since the last C-17 left Long Beach in 2015, the city has spent years figuring out a plan to redevelop the area, an approximate three-mile corridor bordering the Long Beach Airport.

The Long Beach City Council, in 2021, finally approved a finished version of the Globemaster Specific Corridor Plan — a nearly 200-page document that will guide the area’s redevelopment into a “21st Century employment district,” according to the city.

But even with the economic crater left in the absence of Boeing’s Long Beach presence, the city’s aerospace industry managed to survive with the launch of Virgin Orbit in 2017 — which spurred several other space companies to plant their roots in Long Beach, including Rocket Lab and Vast Space — despite Virgin’s own bankruptcy delivering another blow to the city last year.

Advertisement

But for Hawthorne, time will tell how SpaceX’s departure will change the city’s economy, job market, and regional importance.

“Despite this potential move, Hawthorne remains resilient and optimistic about the future,” Vargas said. “The city is dedicated to attracting new businesses, supporting existing ones, and continuing to foster an environment of innovation and opportunity.”

Bloomberg News contributed to this report.

Originally Published:



Source link

Advertisement

Texas

Kentucky vs. Texas A&M: Time, TV channel, preview for DI women’s volleyball championship

Published

on

Kentucky vs. Texas A&M: Time, TV channel, preview for DI women’s volleyball championship


From the 64 teams selected to compete in the NCAA DI women’s volleyball tournament, just No. 1 Kentucky and No. 3 Texas A&M remain. Reaching the national championship is no small feat, from Dec. 4 all the way to Dec. 18, these two programs have battled to etch their names into history. 

Let’s take a look on how the Wildcats and the Aggies punched their tickets to the national final. 

No. 1 Kentucky ROUND NO. 3 TEXAS A&M
Def. Wofford, 3-0 First Def. Campbell, 3-0
Def. UCLA, 3-1 Second Def. No. 6 TCU, 3-0 
Def. Cal Poly, 3-0 Regional semifinals Def. No. 2 Louisville, 3-2
Def. No. 3 Creighton, 3-0 Regional finals Def. No. 1 Nebraska, 3-2
Def. No. 3 Wisconsin, 3-2 National semifinals Def. No. 1 Pitt, 3-0

👉 Check out the full schedule, scores from the 2025 women’s volleyball tournament

No. 1 Kentucky (30-2)

Big Blue fought for a dramatic five-setter victory over No. 3 Wisconsin to earn its second ever national championship appearance and first since their 2021 national title. The Badgers seemed to have all control after a Set 1 25-12 victory, but Kentucky wouldn’t be denied. Eva Hudson was on fire, accruing 29 kills on .455 hitting, while Molly Tuozzo’s back-court defense—with 17 critical digs—fought off a career night from Mimi Colyer. 

Advertisement

No. 3 Texas A&M (28-4)

The Aggies knocked off No. 1 Pitt in three straight sets, continuing their historic season by earning the program’s first-ever national championship appearance. Kyndal Stowers powered the Maroon and White with 16 kills on .433 hitting while setter Maddie Waak orchestrated her balanced offense to an impressive .382 clip, with four different Aggies earning at least eight put-aways. 

Both programs are heating up at just the right time, priming Sunday’s matchup to be an intense face-off between SEC foes. Make sure to  follow the action here on NCAA.com at 3:30 p.m. ET. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

Next Up – Texas Tech In NYC

Published

on

Next Up – Texas Tech In NYC


Date 12/20 || Time 8:00 || Venue Madison Square Garden || Video ESPN

With the exception of Michigan on February 21st, Duke will finish off non-conference play on Saturday with Texas Tech in Madison Square Garden.

Why the Garden? Well, first because Duke has a lot of alum in the area. They call it Cameron North for a reason. And second, playing in MSG always draws a lot of attention. Duke could play in United Center – and in fact did, facing off against Arkansas there on November 27th – and it doesn’t draw the sort of attention that MSG does.

Years ago, Texas Tech was an afterthought. Then Chris Beard made the Red Raiders a major power and now Grant McCasland has done very well there too. He has an interesting history.

Advertisement

Other than two-year stints at Northeastern JUCO as an assistant and Arkansas State as a head coach, McCasland’s career has been entirely in the Lone Star state. He’s also been at Midland College, Midwestern State, Baylor as an assistant, North Texas and now Texas Tech.

And he’s won everywhere. And this is really important to understand: it’s really hard to win at places like Midland, Midwestern State, Arkansas State and North Texas. His NCAA record is 263-109 (.707) and 142-32 (.816).

For perspective, Mike Krzyzewski’s career winning percentage at Duke is .766. We’re the last people to take anything from Coach K, but even he’d probably admit it’s easier to succeed at Duke than it is at the places McCasland has coached.

Texas Tech finished 28-9 last season (McCasland’s Texas Tech record: 55-21. Winning percentage .724) and so far this season, is 8-3. The losses have come against Illinois (81-77), Purdue (86-56) and Arkansas (93-86).

Arkansas is the only common opponent but Texas Tech also played Wake Forest, so presumably that video will be a two-for-one for scouting purposes.

Advertisement

Impressively, he’s not coaching the same way at Texas Tech as he did at North Texas. With the Mean Green, with less talent, he played a more deliberate style. In Lubbock, he’s opened things up a bit. His offense is a little freer or maybe less structured is a better way to put it, or maybe less deliberate. He has more room for error with Texas Tech.

The unquestioned star for Texas Tech is JT Toppin, a 6-9/230 lb. junior who is a legitimate Player of the Year candidate. Toppin is putting up 21.9 ppg, 10.6 rebounds and 2.0 assists. He’s got a 7-0+ wingspan and is also an excellent defender. He needs to work on his outside game but is widely seen as a future pro. He’ll almost certainly guard Duke’s star Cameron Boozer.

McCaslin also has a solid backcourt with Chris Anderson and Donovan Atwell. Anderson, a 6-3 sophomore from Atlanta, is getting 19.3 ppg, 3.5 apg and an impressive 7.5 assists.

Atwell, a 6-5 senior, is putting up 11.3 ppg, 3 rebounds, a half an assist and 1.3 steals.

LeJuan Watts, a 6-6 junior, averages 14 ppg, 5.9 rebounds and 2.6 assists.

Advertisement

Jaylen Petty is a 6-1 freshman who is getting 26 mpg, so obviously McCaslin trusts him. He’s putting up 7.4 points, 3.2 rebounds and 1.9 assists.

Tyeree Bryan is a 6-5 senior who is getting 5.6 ppg and 3.4 rebounds.

The last guy in the rotation, Luke Bamgboye, is 6-11/220 but he is injured and most likely won’t play Saturday.

McCaslin, clearly, is a brilliant coach, but he has had some issues this year, not least of all defense.

Texas Tech has struggled on the defensive end, which is one thing against Purdue or Illinois, but it was a problem against Northern Colorado (the Rockies UNC), where the Bears scored 90 points on the Red Raiders, shooting 44% on threes and 56% overall.

Advertisement

The Lubbock Avalanche-Journal said this about the game against Northern Colorado: “McCasland hasn’t gotten what he needs defensively from, really, anybody else on the team. He pointed to the team’s lack of ability to guard 1-on-1, in the post, covering switches and working through screens. After a solid defensive showing against LSU and a close game against Arkansas, McCasland said the team took ‘a big step back’ on the defensive end.”

That’s a tough assessment from the hometown paper.

Our guess though is that McCasland will figure out some of his issues between Tuesday’s win over the Bears and Saturday’s trip to New York.

And if Duke plays as poorly as it did in the first half against Lipscomb, Texas Tech won’t have to play great defense. They’ll just pick off balls like the Bisons did with Duke’s 16 first-half turnovers.

Part of that is down to exam/holidays and a lack of continuity, and indeed, that could be the case for Texas Tech’s tough game against Northern Colorado (by the way, we forgot to mention that the Bears were missing their best player, Quinn Denker).

Advertisement

Duke has tended to start slow this year and make it up in the second half and at times they may have been to reliant on Cam Boozer.

But we’ve seen signs of change.

Caleb Foster is turning into a solid presence and a guy who can do things when they need to be done. He’s reliable, in other words. Isaiah Evans hasn’t been shooting that well, but he’s due for a big game that might come in New York. And if not, he’s defending well, rebounding well and even blocking shots. He’s been terrific.

So has Patrick Ngongba, who has sort of snuck up on people. Last year he became a reliable presence off the bench but this year, he looks much more like a warrior. He’s really come on. Then there’s Nik Khamenia, who is as tough a player as we’ve seen in Duke blue for a while.

Maliq Brown is, well, Maliq Brown. He’s just a great asset, especially on defense. We’d like to see Dame Sarr take a step up, along with Darren Harris and Cayden Boozer. All three are very capable of playing better and Duke will go up a level when they do.

Advertisement

New York is a funny place to play. The Garden has such an aura that it can intimidate some players. There are other players who thrive there under the bright lights. It’ll be interesting to see who does this time.



Source link

Continue Reading

Texas

North Texas man gives away 120 Christmas trees after slow sales

Published

on

North Texas man gives away 120 Christmas trees after slow sales


The first year selling trees didn’t go as planned for one North Texas man.

Tim Miller, co-owner of Hidden Honey Farm in Midlothian, still had more than half of his inventory earlier this week. But he made the best of a tough situation.

One after another, families kept Miller busy picking, preparing and packing up trees— just in time for Christmas.

All of a sudden, trees were flying off the lot. But that wasn’t the case just days before.

Advertisement

With more than 100 Douglas firs still standing, Miller said sales had come to a grinding halt.

“Four days straight with no one,” Miller said.

With Christmas quickly approaching, he had a decision to make.

“We have two options: We’re going to have to dispose of 100 plus trees, or I can give them away and somebody will get some use out of them, so that’s what we decided to do,” he said.

On Tuesday, Miller posted on Facebook: “Our first year of selling Christmas trees didn’t go as well as we had hoped for… If anyone doesn’t have a tree, or knows of someone who needs a tree, they are free for the taking.”

Advertisement

Families who otherwise couldn’t afford a tree began showing up—and word spread quickly.

“I thought, ‘Hey, I wanted to get a Christmas tree for our house anyway. Let’s go get one!’” said Miriam Beachy, holding her 1-year-old son Jeremiah.

Miller said the response was overwhelming, with donations pouring in from across the country.

“All over! Illinois, Missouri, North Carolina, California, somehow or another, people have seen our post and said, you know, we’d like to help,” he said. “I had no idea we would get the results that we have.”

In just two days, all 120 trees found their “fir”-ever homes.

Advertisement

“It really felt like a gift,” Beachy said.

“The appreciation that they have, and I know there’s results I’ll never know of,” Miller added.

He’s still deciding whether to sell trees again next Christmas, but said after the feedback and support he’s received, he’s leaning toward it.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending