South-Carolina
South Carolina’s “Sister Senators” on finding common ground
If the walls of Sandy Senn’s office could talk, they might not have much to say anymore. The South Carolina State Senator is stripping them of their memories. Meanwhile, Senator Katrina Shealy has her 12-year political career all crammed into cardboard boxes. And we found freshman Senator Penry Gustafson sorting through emails from her soon-to-be former constituents.
All three lost in their primaries this past June.
Asked if she thinks she will get back into politics, Gustafson replied, “I don’t know.”
Earlier this summer the three said their goodbyes in the South Carolina Senate Chamber. “My farewell is conflicted, because I don’t want to go,” Gustafson said.
Shealy told her soon-to-be-former colleagues, “We’ve helped women and we’ve helped veterans, and what I’m so worried about is, who is going to do that now?”
Senn was firm: “I don’t regret a single vote that I ever took,” she said, “and I would make the vote again.”
That vote, in opposition of the state’s near-total ban on abortion, would be of little surprise if it came from Democrats. But these three are all members of the GOP.
“I’m a Republican, I think!” Shealy said. “I’m not sure right now, do they claim me or not?”
Gustafson said, “If you look at my voting record, there’s no doubt I’m a red R, but that one vote makes be a RINO baby-killer.”
“Republican In Name Only” – they heard that a lot. They didn’t just buck their party; they reached across the aisle to Margie Bright Matthews, a Democrat, and Mia McLeod, an Independent. “I’m super-proud of my sisters,” McLeod said, “because they knew what was at stake, they knew what they stood to lose, and they did it anyway.”
This unusual coalition, on three separate occasions, successfully filibustered an abortion ban, halting its passage. Not that they agreed on everything (they didn’t), but as women and mothers, they agreed that banning an abortion at six weeks was time too little. Gustafson explained to the Senate, “We do not know when we’re pregnant, when we get pregnant.”
“If we didn’t say it on the floor, it wasn’t going to be heard,” Gustafson told “Sunday Morning.”
On the Senate floor Bright Matthews declared, “This bill is about control, using the Bible to say that you can control my body.”
“I’d say things just to rattle the men,” Bright Matthews laughed. “Like, ‘Wouldn’t you want your side piece to be able to get an abortion?’ And then all the older men just looked at me like, You don’t say things like that!“
Shealy told the 46-member Senate (41 of whom were male), “Maybe the men who wrote it know more about pregnancy than the women in this chamber who can actually get pregnant and give birth.”
Asked when they knew they were jeopardizing their political careers by filibustering the abortion bill, Shealy replied, “I knew it at the time I said it, because my party was, like, calling me and screaming at me.”
“Two hours before the vote, I was pulled off the floor, and had a very strong, intense conversation: ‘This could be a career-ending vote,’” Gustafson said.
Senn said, “I didn’t care. I had to look myself in the mirror.”
They were the only five women in the Senate, in a state that, they say, has often left women behind. Shealy said, “In 1920 they gave women the right to vote. Well, South Carolina didn’t ratify that ’til 1969, and then we didn’t put it into law until 1973. We are just a little behind.”
The filibusters were their versions of “mansplaining.” Bright Matthews said, “When someone makes a statement, ‘Well, if you’re raped or you get pregnant as the result of incest, it’s not the child’s fault; you just need to learn to love on the baby’?”
McCleod added, “That same senator held up a woman’s picture and said she told him she was ‘grateful’ to have been raped, because it was the only opportunity God gave her to conceive a child. And I almost lost it. As a survivor of sexual assault … there are no words.”
They didn’t have words for the level of anti-abortion pushback, either; taunts, personal attacks, odd gifts left in their offices, like spines that came with a note warning them to “grow one.”
Shealy took her gifted spine to the Senate floor and said, “I’ve got one hell of a spine already, but now I’ve got another backup!”
It got more intense, and even more disturbing. According to Shealy, “We had one gentleman – I’m not sure we can call him that – stands at the top of the escalator every day, and he preaches to us, he has his Bible.”
“Swings a baby around with a rope, noose around its neck,” added Senn.
The same man went to Shealy’s church, calling her a “baby killer.” “And she’s singing in the choir while he’s doing this,” Senn said.
Shealy also said she had her tires slashed, and a window in her home shot with a pellet gun. “My kids and grandkids were seeing that,” she said. “I’m glad I’m not going to be in politics, because politics are mean.”
In May of last year, the “Sister Senators” could no longer hold off the vote on what is now the state’s law: a six-week ban on abortion.
And yet, not all was lost. All five senators were recognized last year with the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award. At the presentation ceremony Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg said, “We’re fortunate to be able to gather to celebrate courageous leadership, which we need more than ever today.”
Noting her award during her goodbye speech on the Senate floor, Shealy said, “I am proud of losing this Senate race, just to get this. Because I stood up for the right thing. I stood up for women, I stood up for children, I stood up for South Carolina.”
According to Bright Matthews, the abortion restriction passed is not popular among the public. “The polling shows that 70+ percent of women in South Carolina do not want a total ban. All of us have stood up and agreed and tried to put forth a referendum to put it on the ballot; they said we can’t.”
Unlike 10 other states that will have abortion rights on the ballot in November (Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New York and South Dakota), South Carolina doesn’t allow voters that option.
What is clear is that post-Roe v. Wade, abortion rarely breaks down on clean partisan lines.
What the Sister Senators have shown is, it’s in that grey area where compromise, while costly, may not be as endangered as we all think.
“Instead of just attack someone for feeling differently on an issue, it’s better to ask why,” said Bright Matthews.
Gustafson said, “In a world of politics where we’re constantly being told we can’t do that, or we shouldn’t do that, and you’re expected to be this way, we’ve just broke that political, social mores right in half.”
“But, you paid the price for it,” said Cowan.
“We paid the price for it, but look what we have right now,” Gustafson said. “We have this national ear for the most wonderful thing of finding common ground, respect, civility in politics. That is what we gain, that is what America gains, from the Sister Senators of South Carolina.”
For more info:
Story produced by Deirdre Cohen. Editor: Ed Givnish.
South-Carolina
Editorial: SC Legislature left DUI and THC bills for dead; DUI restrictions can be revived
It’s astounding, in a state that won’t even allow tightly controlled medical marijuana use, that South Carolina has no restrictions on what is essentially recreational marijuana, in the form of highly intoxicating THC products that are sold at convenience stores to anyone who wants them.
It’s the result of hardline Republicans and Freedom Caucuseers on the right who insist on an outright ban even though there’s clearly not sufficient support for that and Democrats who — in a repeat of the alliances that allowed video gambling to thrive for years in our state — reject even the most modest of limits on convenience-store and other small-business sales of hemp-derived products.
This unholy coalition means that for another year — barring federal changes that might be coming — kids who can’t even legally purchase alcohol will be able to walk into convenience stores and purchase THC-infused gummies and seltzers, no questions asked.
What’s even more astounding — and outrageous — is that the stalemate over this matter has endangered a hard-fought effort to reduce South Carolina’s status as the most deadly state for DUI deaths per capita and per mile driven.
Our distinction comes largely as a result of a state law that practically begs drivers to refuse the breath test that is nearly essential for a conviction. A law that requires police to produce a practically perfect video of any tests they manage to administer. A law that forces judges to tell jurors it’s just fine for them to ignore that 0.15 percent blood-alcohol content if the driver just didn’t look all that drunk to them on the perfect video.
Sen. Tom Davis, the chief sponsor of S.52 (and coincidentally, the chief sponsor of bills to legalize medical marijuana), tells us a central effort behind his anti-driving-under-the-influence bill was to make it easier to do blood tests on intoxicated drivers, since breath tests detect only alcohol. We don’t know for sure how big a role legal and illegal cannabis plays in crashes and even deaths — some estimates go as high as 40 percent — but we are certain it’s not zero.
S.52 also would raise penalties for repeat drunken drivers and remove some of the provisions that make it easy for drunk drivers to get off on technicalities.
But the blood-test efforts — which were watered down but not eliminated in a House-Senate conference committee — weren’t the reason the Legislature failed to pass a DUI bill on June 25. The THC provisions in the DUI bill, after all, were not particularly tough. The DUI bill instead was held hostage when Senate Democrats refused to vote for bills that needed a two-thirds vote to pass because they included language that wasn’t in either the House or Senate version. S.52 was on that short list.
The weird good news is that the House voted to reject the THC bill, which Sen. Davis hopes will free up that bill’s supporters to vote for the DUI compromise. And that needs to happen when the Legislature returns to Columbia to pass a budget.
Of course even if budget negotiators do reach a deal on the budget and the Legislature returns to pass it and the DUI bill does become law, it won’t do as much to save lives as the Senate-passed version of the bill, because House leaders, many of whom make a living representing drunk drivers, oppose a DUI law that includes many of the provisions that are commonplace in nearly every other state.
As Mothers Against Drunk Drivers’ Steven Burritt tells us, while the compromise contains some significant improvements, it also creates new loopholes. “It’s frustrating,” he said, “that the original mission of only making the DUI law simpler, fairer and tougher was apparently too much to ask for some.”
But while we urge Senate negotiators to try once more to get some concessions from House negotiators, the fact is that even the inadequate current version will result in the conviction and punishment of a few more people who are driving while they’re drunk or under the influence of THC or cocaine or pain pills or another intoxicant. It will require a few more intoxicated drivers to use ride-share or ride with friends because they have an ignition-interlock system that prevents them from starting their vehicle while impaired. It might even cause a few more people to decide not to drive when they have absolutely no business driving.
And that in turn will prevent a few crashes that leave innocent victims with bills they shouldn’t have to pay and inconveniences they shouldn’t have to endure and injuries they shouldn’t have to suffer. It’ll save a few more lives — and save a few more of our neighbors and friends from the heartbreak of their loved ones’ deaths. And it will cost innocent members of our society absolutely nothing.
But only if the Legislature finally passes S.52. There is no acceptable excuse not to do so.
Click here for more opinion content from The Post and Courier.
South-Carolina
South Carolina sees second straight year of declining overdose deaths
LEXINGTON, S.C. (WCSC) — South Carolina recorded a significant decline in drug overdose deaths in 2024, marking the second consecutive year fatalities have decreased and the first back-to-back annual decline in more than a decade, according to newly released data from the South Carolina Department of Public Health.
State health officials reported just under 1,500 overdose deaths in 2024, a 31% decrease from 2023. The reduction represents nearly 500 lives saved compared with the previous year and is being credited to expanded access to overdose-reversal medications, increased public awareness and broader prevention efforts across the state.
“Even one is too many,” Dr. Brannon Traxler, acting director of the South Carolina Department of Public Health, said. “Almost 500 — that’s almost 500 people’s loved ones that are alive that might not have been, and so that is a big deal.”
Charleston, Greenville and Horry counties recorded the highest numbers of overdose deaths in 2024, followed by Richland and Lexington counties. Statewide, adults ages 35 to 44 were the age group most affected by fatal overdoses.
Meanwhile, Jasper, Georgetown and Spartanburg counties saw some of the largest declines in overdose deaths compared with the previous year.
Health leaders say expanded availability of naloxone, commonly known by the brand name Narcan, has played a key role in reducing fatalities. The medication can rapidly reverse the effects of an opioid overdose and has become more widely available through public health agencies, community organizations and harm-reduction programs.
Amber Frazier, who works with The Courage Center and has experienced the impact of substance use disorder firsthand, said overdoses continue to affect families across South Carolina.
“At first, when you hear about it, it’s kind of like, ‘Is this real?’ and then reality hits you,” Frazier said, reflecting on the loss of loved ones to addiction.
Officials and recovery advocates say the decline also reflects increased education efforts and a growing willingness among people struggling with addiction to seek treatment.
“Really trying to continue to decrease the stigma around it, truly recognizing it is a disease,” Traxler said. “Just like we want to make treatment available for diabetics, we want to make treatment available for this.”
Marc Burrows, executive director of Challengers Inc. of South Carolina, said continued investment in harm-reduction strategies will be needed to sustain the progress.
“We need to keep pushing, keep distributing naloxone, keep focusing on harm-reduction interventions and continue to get these services to the people that need them,” Burrows said.
Despite the encouraging trend, health officials emphasized that the overdose crisis remains a serious public health challenge and that every overdose death represents a family and community affected by loss.
Frazier urged South Carolinians to remember the humanity of those struggling with addiction.
“Just remember that next time you see someone, that is someone’s mother, daughter, father, brother, sister or cousin,” she said. “That is another human being.”
The Department of Public Health continues to offer free overdose safety kits through local health departments across South Carolina, with no questions asked. Officials encourage anyone struggling with substance use disorder or concerned about a loved one to seek help and learn how to recognize and respond to an overdose.
Copyright 2026 WCSC. All rights reserved.
South-Carolina
South Carolina National Guard lifts suspensions for pilots in July Fourth flyover
MYRTLE BEACH, S.C. (WBTV) – The South Carolina National Guard on Friday lifted the suspensions of eight pilots who took part in a July Fourth flyover.
Eight Apache helicopter pilots who flew in the 2026 Salute from the Shore event in Myrtle Beach on Saturday, July 4, were initially suspended by the National Guard. The agency said the suspensions stemmed from events that day, adding the nonpunitive safety measure was routine and not a disciplinary action.
In a July 10 news release, the Guard said it lifted the suspensions and praised the 59th Aviation Troop Command as an “exceptional helicopter unit, renowned throughout the Army and the National Guard for its unwavering commitment to excellence and soldier safety.”
“The subject events of July 4th are no exception, as our pilots remain deeply committed to excellence and the highest standards of safety,” Maj. Lisa Allen said in the release.
–> Also read: ‘Truly sickened’: Remains of missing South Carolina girl recovered; parents face additional charge
Allen did not specify what prompted the suspensions, but said returning the pilots to flight status would help the Guard maintain peak operational readiness.
Copyright 2026 WBTV. All rights reserved.
-
North Dakota2 minutes agoNorth Dakota State looks awesome on College Football 27
-
Ohio9 minutes agoHas there been an explosion of chipmunks this year? Yes. Here’s why
-
Oklahoma12 minutes agoHow Will Oklahoma Softball Benefit From SEC Revenue Distribution?
-
Oregon17 minutes agoRazor clam harvesting set to close soon on north Oregon Coast
-
Pennsylvania24 minutes agoPennsylvania Wins “Best in Show” at The Great American State Fair – Tri-State Alert
-
Rhode Island27 minutes agoHow Federal Hill became Rhode Island’s iconic Little Italy food hub
-
South-Carolina32 minutes agoEditorial: SC Legislature left DUI and THC bills for dead; DUI restrictions can be revived
-
South Dakota39 minutes agoSouth Dakota GFP Commission Holds July Meeting
