Connect with us

South-Carolina

South Carolina football: Keep calm and settle in for the stretch run

Published

on

South Carolina football: Keep calm and settle in for the stretch run


Scott Davis has followed South Carolina athletics for over 40 years and provides commentary from a fan perspective. He writes a weekly newsletter year-round (sign up here) and a column during football season that’s published each Monday on GamecockCentral.com.


Sometimes, I wonder why anyone bothers to speculate on an ongoing college football season.

Should we just pass a law today that makes it illegal to talk about what’s happening during a football season while it’s still happening? Things change so quickly and so profoundly and so ridiculously that it’s a wonder any of the leading analysts and opinionators are able to maintain a job for longer than 15 minutes.

No one knows what’s happening, not really, not even with all the numbers and all the stats and all the rock-solid analytical predictions and percentages.

Advertisement

And for regular old fans like us? We have about as much business trying to forecast what’s next as we do teaching a graduate-level class on the Principles of Microeconomics, so little do we actually have any idea about what’s getting ready to happen.

As much as all of us have made about the sheer, spectacular unpredictability of South Carolina football during the Shane Beamer Era, college football itself is what’s genuinely incomprehensible right now.

Let’s start with South Carolina’s 2024 football schedule, shall we?

Before the season began, all of us – and I do mean all of us – looked towards the month of October with deep foreboding and extreme gravity. October was going to be when the rubber met the road, when the story was told, when the die was cast.

Ole Miss at home. Alabama on the road. Oklahoma on the road.

Advertisement

South Carolina would either make a stand or be overwhelmed like driftwood amidst a tidal wave. October was the test, and it would make or break the 2024 season.

Just a month ago, when we stepped out onto the shores of the first of two Bye Weeks in 2024, I wrote a column in which I compared the middle portion of the schedule – the October Onslaught – to the second film in a movie trilogy. October represented “The Empire Strikes Back” or “The Dark Knight” for our Gamecocks. How would our heroes respond at the moment of their greatest peril?

A couple of weeks later, that neat and tidy summation of the current season has been scrambled like eggs in a Waffle House.

Ole Miss, while still potent offensively, no longer appears to be a legitimate College Football Playoff contender. Defending SEC champion Alabama lost twice in October and the Tide have struggled just enough in the post-Saban Era to get the notoriously entitled Bama fan base ready to start sharpening pitchforks.

Meanwhile, Oklahoma (which appeared in the College Football Playoff as recently as 2019 and started the preseason ranked No. 16) has fallen completely off the map in their first season as a member of the Southeastern Conference. After collapsing in Oxford on Saturday, the Sooners have lost four SEC games before November has even arrived.

Advertisement

On the other hand, this last phase of the schedule, the phase that looked at least somewhat more manageable when we glanced at it back around Labor Day, is suddenly beginning to loom as a gauntlet every bit as arduous as the one South Carolina just completed (and maybe even more).

When we all last convened here during the first Bye Week to take stock on where we’d been and where we were going, we didn’t know what we didn’t know.

As September closed, we still didn’t know much of anything about Texas A&M under new coach Mike Elko. Since then, the Aggies have reeled off win after win, and after a come-from-behind victory over LSU in College Station on Saturday night, A&M now stands at 7-1 and is the lone program that is still undefeated in Southeastern Conference competition. Guess where their next game is located? (I’ll give you a hint: They open games by playing “2001” there).

As September closed, Clemson appeared to be continuing its slow decline from the glory days of the 2010s. But as October closes, the Tigers have surged into the Top 10 amidst a series of dominating offensive performances. South Carolina gets to finish its season on the road against that program, in case you’d forgotten.

Missouri – which the Gamecocks play on November 16 – looks slightly less formidable than they did at the beginning of the season, but then again, they’ve still won six football games. And Vanderbilt? Forget about it. Since we last did this Bye Week thing, the Commodores took down mighty Alabama, beat South Carolina nemesis Kentucky and nearly defeated Texas (which was ranked Number One in the nation a little over a week ago). What the @#$% is going on in Nashville?

Advertisement

We thought if we could merely survive October, we’d have a chance to thrive in November. But the October Onslaught has simply given way to the November Knockout.

And we still don’t know what we don’t know. All that hangs in the balance is a bowl berth, the future of the Shane Beamer Era and an epic battle between the forces of good and evil.

So keep calm and carry on, friends. The stretch drive has arrived.

[Join GamecockCentral for fast, accurate, and in-depth coverage of Gamecock sports and recruiting]

What Just Happened?

Considering everything we just stipulated above, it’s worth wondering whether we even need to bother taking stock of what South Carolina just accomplished in October.

Advertisement

But since most of us like to believe we can make sense of chaos and confusion, let’s take stock anyway. It’s good for our emotional well-being.

As October dawned, I wrote that a satisfactory result for the Gamecocks in that month would be for them to win one of their three games and look competitive in all three. That is more or less what happened, though I will definitely hear and perhaps listen very intently to arguments that South Carolina was not competitive in its head-scratching performance against Ole Miss.

Still, let’s accept that some positive things happened this month. South Carolina won on the road in Norman, something few teams have done historically: We’re just not accustomed to seeing the Sooners get walloped that thoroughly by anyone inside the confines of their own stadium.

South Carolina very nearly – and probably even should have – won in Tuscaloosa against an Alabama team that featured many of the key players that won the SEC last year. And if we allow ourselves to stretch back into September and take into account the Gamecocks’ battling LSU to the wire in Williams-Brice Stadium, it should be obvious to all of us that we are rooting for a team that is capable of competing with and even beating just about anyone on any given Saturday.

How will that team handle A&M, Clemson and (I can’t believe I’m saying this) Vandy?

Advertisement

[Win two tickets to the South Carolina-Texas A&M football game]

Time to Take Offense

Can the Gamecocks make it through the November Knockout without a few strong showings by the offense?

I’m inclined to say no.

Of course, South Carolina just defeated Oklahoma 35-9 despite being outgained in Total Yards by the Sooners, so anything’s possible.

But as well as the Gamecocks are playing defensively – and can we have a warm round of applause for Clayton White’s unit, please? – they’re getting ready to match wits with some intriguing offensive heavyweights.

Advertisement

Texas A&M runs the football as well as anyone in the SEC. Does South Carolina’s defense – which specializes in causing havoc, creating disruption and attacking the passer – have the answers for a bruising attack or for the elusive Marcel Reed at quarterback, who stepped into the spotlight against LSU and ran wild over the Tigers?

More challenges loom: Clemson suddenly seems to be lighting up the scoreboard, the Gamecocks just simply haven’t matched up well with Missouri’s offense in recent years no matter who’s been playing for either team, and no one really knows what to expect from Vanderbilt at this point.

Won’t South Carolina need to make something happen offensively – and maybe even make a lot of things happen – to succeed over the next few weeks? You would certainly think so.

Then again, South Carolina 35 – Oklahoma 9.

We don’t know what we don’t know. On the other hand, here’s what we do know…

Advertisement

The SEC is Deeper Than Ever

We’d all agree with the following, right? The Southeastern Conference has been, by far, the most dominant and potent force in college football for at least the last 20 years. No one could – or would – seriously dispute this.

But if there’s been a knock against the league over the last few years, it’s been that its handful of most powerful teams (Alabama, LSU, Georgia) have masked the reality that there have been quite a few mediocre programs filling out the lineup. South Carolina, sadly, would have been included among the also-rans.

No longer.

In 2024, it feels like just about anyone in the SEC could beat just about anyone anywhere. With the exception of an undeniably struggling Mississippi State, everyone else in the league rises to the level of “pretty darn good, and to be honest, I really wouldn’t want to play them right about now.” Including your South Carolina Gamecocks.

No one, for example, considers Arkansas to be a contender to win the SEC. And yet the Razorbacks have routinely been posting offensive performances of 500 or more – and sometimes even 600 or more – total yards per game. Would it shock you to see Arkansas (or Kentucky or South Carolina or almost anyone in the conference) defeat someone like Oregon or Penn State or Ohio State? It shouldn’t.

Advertisement

Many of us believed the rise of the Transfer Portal and the infusion of cash from NIL deals might result in a top-heavy game in which the same five teams dominated annually. And that may still happen, because as noted above, nobody knows anything.

But for now, the SEC’s teams all seem to be rising to meet the challenge. And with the expansion of the College Football Playoff, we could be nearing a result in which a three-loss SEC team still wins the national championship. Under the old system, an absolutely loaded team – like last year’s Georgia squad – could lose a single game and be denied an opportunity to play for a title. That won’t happen again.

Let’s put it this way: If Tennessee were to work its way into the Playoff this year, would you be stunned to see them win a title? You wouldn’t. That’s because anyone from the SEC can beat anyone anywhere.

That makes an already difficult November for South Carolina even more difficult.

Then again, the Gamecocks are one of those teams that could beat anyone anywhere.

Advertisement

And who knows? Maybe they will.

Tell me how you’re feeling about the November Knockout by writing me at [email protected].



Source link

South-Carolina

Former SC Lt. Gov. André Bauer nominated to be next US Ambassador to Belize

Published

on

Former SC Lt. Gov. André Bauer nominated to be next US Ambassador to Belize


NOTE: The above video is a livestream of WIS featuring current newscasts, Soda City Living and Gray Media’s Local News Live.

COLUMBIA, S.C. (WIS) – Former South Carolina Lt. Gov. André Bauer has been nominated for a position in foreign diplomacy.

The White House on Tuesday listed Bauer as a nominee to be the next U.S. Ambassador to Belize, a Central American country bordering Guatemala.

It’s unclear when a confirmation hearing will take place. WIS has reached out to the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee for more information.

Advertisement

Bauer was South Carolina’s lieutenant governor from 2003-2011, serving under then-Gov. Mark Sanford. Before that, he served terms in the South Carolina House of Representatives and the South Carolina Senate.

More recently, Bauer entered the race for U.S. Senate in July 2025, looking to unseat Sen. Lindsey Graham in the Republican primary. He ended his campaign the following month.

Feel more informed, prepared, and connected with WIS. For more free content like this, subscribe to our email newsletter, and download our apps. Have feedback that can help us improve? Click here.

Copyright 2026 WIS. All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston

Published

on

Republican candidates for South Carolina governor debate key issues in Charleston


Six Republican candidates vying to become South Carolina’s next governor met in downtown Charleston for a wide-ranging debate that put abortion, infrastructure and the future of data centers at the center of the race.

The forum was held at the Sottile Theatre, where Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette, state Sen. Josh Kimbrell, U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, Lowcountry businessman Rom Reddy and Attorney General Alan Wilson took the stage.

Questions included whether they would support a state hate crime law, how they would address concerns about growth and infrastructure, how to navigate collaboration, abortion and the future of data centers in the state.

One issue that drew near-unanimous opposition was state Senate Bill 1095, a proposed total abortion ban that passed out of committee earlier in the day. All of the candidates opposed the bill, but they differed on what they would do if it reached the governor’s desk.

Advertisement

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Norman said he would sign it.

“You know, this is an emotional issue, but I will tell you if this bill came to my desk as governor. If it passed the House and the Senate, I would sign it,” Norman said.

All of the other candidates on stage said they would veto the bill if it came across their desk as governor, with Reddy arguing the question should be decided by voters.

“The Supreme Court did not say the loudest voice in the ruling class prevails. It said it’s up to the people in the state, so let’s put it to a referendum,” Reddy said.

Advertisement

On infrastructure, candidates discussed reforming the South Carolina Department of Transportation and allowing private-sector involvement to help pay for improvements.

Wilson outlined ideas that included leasing interstate easements and expanding private express lanes.

“We privatized that grass between the interstates. We turn it into private express lanes that can be told we leased the easements on the sides of interstates to telecommunication companies and energy companies, and charge them for natural gas line and fiber optic fiber optic cables,” Wilson said.

Evette also pointed to public-private partnerships and the possibility of fast-pass lanes.

READ MORE | South Carolina governor candidates tout infrastructure, growth at business forum

Advertisement

“We want to make sure that we’re innovative public private partnerships coming in and creating fast pass lanes to allow people that are in a hurry to be able to utilize that,” Evette said.

The final question focused on data centers, with candidates agreeing corporations should “pay their way.”

“They should pay for their water. They should pay for their infrastructure, any roads around it, and we should look at what Governor Ron DeSantis has done in Florida with the large data centers that are coming to Florida. That should be the model in South Carolina and everywhere,” Mace said.

Kimbrell said the state should set limits to protect natural resources and guard against higher power costs for residents.

“Put parameters around data centers to ensure that the water consumption does not impact places like the ACE Basin,” Kimbrell said. “Ensuring that the Public Service Commission makes absolutely sure nobody’s power rate goes up and we try to get behind the meter energy grids in place so they can be self-sufficient.”

Advertisement

Two more debates are planned ahead of the primaries on June 9.



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances

Published

on

SC lawmakers’ second push to ban most abortions advances


A bill that could make it a felony for doctors to perform an abortion is moving to the full South Carolina Senate with just a few weeks left in the legislative session.

The South Carolina Senate medical affairs committee continued a debate of Senate Bill 1095 on April 21 in Columbia. The bill, sponsored by State Sen. Richard Cash, R-Anderson, builds on a restrictive abortion bill that failed to progress in the fall.

The committee passed the measure in an 8-4 vote, moving it to the full Senate for consideration. Lawmakers have until May 14, the last day of the 2026 legislative session, to pass the bill for it to become law.

Advertisement

Senate Bill 1095, also called the “Unborn Child Protection Act,” bans performing an abortion or supplying abortion drugs. It makes it illegal for a woman to get an abortion, with the only exception being to save a pregnant woman’s life.

It also makes mifepristone and misoprostol Schedule IV controlled substances. Alprazolam (Xanax) and zolpidem (Ambien) are two other examples of Schedule IV substances.

Pro-Life Greenville, an anti-abortion organization based in Greenville, responded to the bill’s progress with “full endorsement” of the legislation.

“Unborn children, like all human beings, deserve to have their lives protected under law here in the Palmetto State,” Pro-Life Greenville stated. “Today’s vote by the SC Senate Medical Affairs Committee brings that urgent need one step closer to reality.”

Advertisement

Under the bill, a woman who has an abortion could face misdemeanor charges. The maximum sentence would be two years in jail with a $1,000 fine.

Those found guilty of performing an abortion or providing a pregnant woman with abortion-inducing drugs could face felony charges, a maximum sentence of 20 years in jail, and a possible $100,000 fine.

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT), a firm opponent of the bill, decried the Senate committee passage. PPSAT Director of Public Affairs Vicki Ringer said in a statement that the bill will cost people their lives, and it will make it more difficult for women to get reproductive and pregnancy healthcare.

“Abortion bans have and will continue to cost people their lives,” Ringer stated. “As this ban inches closer to the governor’s desk, it is becoming increasingly clear just how many of our lives anti-abortion lawmakers are willing to endanger in service to their agenda.”

Bella Carpentier covers the South Carolina legislature, state, and Greenville County politics. Contact her at bcarpentier@gannett.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending