The 2024 college football season came to an end on Monday night in Atlanta, Georgia. The Ohio State Buckeyes won the College Football Playoff National Championship Game, defeating the Notre Dame Fighting Irish by a score of 34-23. It was the first national title for the Buckeyes in 10 years, as they won in the first year of the 12-team CFP. They also won the inaugural four-team playoff back in 2014.
With the season coming to a close, it’s time to look ahead to the 2025 campaign. After a disappointing 2024, the Oklahoma Sooners are looking to bounce back after going 6-7 in head coach Brent Venables’ third year. As many are beginning to compile early rankings for next year, there’s no guarantee that OU is included in the Top 25.
That is the case for ESPN. Staff writer Mark Schlabach put together his way-too-early college football top 25 for the 2025 season and the Oklahoma Sooners missed the cut. They were also excluded from the “also considered” category.
The Sooners were ranked in On3’s version of the list, as OU landed at No. 18. That goes to show the variance of what analysts believe Oklahoma could look like in 2025.
Advertisement
There were a total of nine SEC teams included in ESPN’s Top 25 as Texas, Georgia, LSU, South Carolina, Alabama, Florida, Tennessee, Texas A&M and Ole Miss all found their way on the list. Both Auburn and Missouri were teams that were also considered for the Top 25.
It’s a startling reminder of how far things have fallen under Venables’ leadership. The Sooners would be at best the No. 12 team in the SEC going into the season, according to ESPN. The head coach has to oversee a very dramatic turnaround in Norman, or he’ll be elsewhere in 2026.
Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions.You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.
Families enrolling children in Oklahoma public schools will have to provide proof of their U.S. citizenship under new rules approved Tuesday by the state’s education board.
The proposed regulation, which must be approved by the governor and the Legislature, would require school districts to track the number of students who cannot verify their immigration status and report those figures to the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
“Our rule around illegal immigration accounting is simply that; it is to account for how many students of illegal immigrants are in our schools,” Ryan Walters, the state superintendent, said at the Tuesday meeting of the Oklahoma State Board of Education.
Outside the building in Oklahoma City, dozens of students protested Walters’ immigration policies and called to keep deportation agents off school campuses.
Advertisement
Walters — who gained a reputation in office for focusing on culture war issues and inviting right-wing influencers into state government — met resistance last year when he said he intended to ask school districts to help his office calculate the cost of illegal immigration on the public education system.
A dozen districts told NBC News in August that they would not check the immigration status of their students, with many citing a desire not to violate Supreme Court precedent, nor discourage foreign-born families from enrolling children in school.
Walters said Tuesday that Oklahoma spent $474 million to educate children of undocumented immigrants under the Biden administration. That figure came from an analysis by the Federation for American Immigration Reform — a right-wing nonprofit founded by the late activist John Tanton, who promoted eugenics and opposed nonwhite migration to the U.S. — and was based on an estimate the group did using census data from 2020.
“You have to have the data around where your kids are coming from,” Walters said at the state board meeting. “We will make sure that President Trump and his administration have this information.”
Melissa Lujan, an immigrant rights attorney in Oklahoma City, said she has received at least six calls from clients this week asking what documentation they need to show at their children’s schools — under the mistaken assumption that the rules are already in effect, and in light of Walters’ statement that he would allow Immigration and Customs Enforcement to collect children from public schools for deportation.
Advertisement
“They’re freaking out,” Lujan said.
In 1982, the Supreme Court ruled in Plyler v. Doe that the government cannot prevent children of undocumented immigrants from attending public school. The vote was 5-4, but the dissent did not advocate for excluding undocumented immigrant children from public schools.
A decade ago, federal courts struck down a similar Alabama law to collect the immigration status of school children.
Kit Johnson, a University of Oklahoma law professor who specializes in immigration law, predicts that the rules advanced by Walters will meet a similar fate when they are inevitably challenged in court.
“This one will be found unconstitutional,” Johnson said. “Even with Walters saying, ‘Oh, we’re just data collecting’ — if it’s going to chill the opportunity for children to have an equal access to education, it is not allowed.”
Advertisement
Tamya Cox-Touré, executive director of the ACLU of Oklahoma, said the group is considering litigation to block the rules if the governor and Legislature approve them, but that doesn’t provide a lot of comfort in the near term for immigrant families.
“Just the threat of this causes harm, and we believe that is the intention — to scare students from going to school,” she said.
Oklahoma Attorney General Gentry Drummond “believes it is lawful to request such documentation” of a child’s immigration status, because the rule stipulates “failure to produce the material does not preclude enrollment,” a spokesman for his office said Tuesday.
Gov. Kevin Stitt and Republican legislative leaders did not respond to requests for comment on the immigration rules.