Connect with us

North Carolina

Spectrum News Poll: N.C. voters on education, masks in schools

Published

on

Spectrum News Poll: N.C. voters on education, masks in schools


Among the most heated debates over the previous 12 months have concerned training: the instructing of important race principle, mandating face masks in faculties and questions over requiring COVID vaccines.

Faculty board conferences have develop into the focal point for these contentious points, with protests throughout North Carolina over masks within the classroom and the way faculties can educate about sure topics, like gender id and the legacy of racism in America.

A brand new Spectrum Information/IPSOS ballot, launched Monday, surveyed 1,158 registered voters in North Carolina between March 31 and April 12. It has a margin of error of 4.2%. It included questions in regards to the financial system, the coronavirus pandemic, the warfare in Ukraine, training and inflation.

Advertisement

What You Want To Know

  • A brand new Spectrum Information/IPSOS ballot discovered many in North Carolina help instructing important race principle and the legacy of slavery and racism in the USA
  • The ballot, launched Monday, surveyed greater than 1,100 registered voters in North Carolina and has a margin of error of 4.2%
  • Spectrum Information 1 might be diving into points within the ballot all week, on tv and on the Spectrum Information 1 app and web site
  • Learn the total outcomes from the Spectrum Information/IPSOS ballot right here 

North Carolina voters stated probably the most urgent points going through the state are inflation, elevating costs and reasonably priced housing, based on the ballot.

Diving into problems with training, the brand new ballot discovered extra nuanced opinions about important race principle than some may presume from information protection over college board protests.

Spectrum Information Ballot: How do the individuals of North Carolina really feel in regards to the financial system?

“In our present period of banning books and discuss important race principle and parental alternative, there’s nonetheless this overwhelming sense, greater than half, 57%, that say it actually needs to be as much as educators,” stated Mallory Newall with IPSOS, the corporate that carried out the ballot.

“Whenever you pressure individuals to decide on, the bulk nonetheless assume that it’s educators and directors that ought to have the say on what’s taught within the classroom, moderately than mother and father having the ability to push again,” she stated.

 

Advertisement

Regardless of the vocal protests, there may be help for instructing college students in regards to the historical past and legacy of slavery and racism in the USA, the ballot discovered.

“Vital race principle is form of a buzzword. Whenever you ask individuals in the event that they help banning the instructing of the historical past and the impression of slavery and racism, explaining somewhat little bit of what that truly may entail, nearly one in 10 help it, there may be overwhelming opposition,” Newall stated.

“Whenever you simply say, ‘Do you help banning the instructing of important race principle?’ Even utilizing that charged buzzword, about one in three help that,” she stated.

When requested in the event that they help “banning the instructing of important race principle in North Carolina public faculties,” about 26% stated they strongly help that and one other 7% stated they “considerably help” the ban.

However 27% stated they “strongly opposed” a ban on instructing important race principle, and eight% stated they “considerably opposed.”

Advertisement

Requested a special method, solely 12% stated they help “Banning the instructing of the historical past and impression of slavery and racism in North Carolina public faculties.” Virtually 80% stated they opposed banning these classes, based on the ballot.

 

 

A majority of voters in North Carolina opposed any new statewide masks mandate in faculties, based on the Spectrum Information/IPSOS ballot. However greater than half supported requiring college lecturers and employees to get a coronavirus vaccine.

The ballot discovered that 41% would help a brand new statewide classroom masks mandate, whereas 53% would oppose it. Six p.c stated they didn’t know.

On requiring lecturers and college employees to get vaccinated, 56% stated they supported a vaccine mandate whereas 38% opposed, based on the ballot.

In the case of making selections about COVID-19 restrictions, greater than 1 / 4 stated it needs to be as much as native college boards and 17% stated it needs to be left as much as mother and father. The ballot discovered 13% stated it needs to be left as much as the governor and one other 13% stated it needs to be as much as the federal authorities.

Advertisement

The brand new ballot discovered robust help with registered voters in North Carolina for the federal authorities forgiving scholar mortgage debt.

“However there’s somewhat little bit of nuance there,” stated IPSOS’s Newall. “Assist is definitely greater for the federal authorities forgiving a portion however not all of individuals’s scholar mortgage debt.”

A majority of voters within the ballot, 52%, stated they supported the federal authorities forgiving all scholar loans debt. An excellent greater majority, 60%, supported the federal authorities forgiving some however not all scholar mortgage debt.

Whereas there may be no less than some settlement from North Carolina on scholar mortgage forgiveness, divisive points just like the instructing of important race principle usually are not going away.

With each seat within the North Carolina Normal Meeting up for election this 12 months, the debates over issues like COVID-19 restrictions and significant race principle seemingly usually are not going wherever. They could even get extra intense because the campaigns ramp up after the primaries in Might.



Source link

Advertisement

North Carolina

Freeze watch issued for counties in Western North Carolina

Published

on

Freeze watch issued for counties in Western North Carolina


CHARLOTTE, N.C. (WBTV) – A freeze watch was issued on Wednesday for counties in Western North Carolina.

Officials said that the freeze watch was issued for Ashe, Avery, and Watauga counties along with southwest and west central Virginia, southeast West Virginia, and the northern mountains of North Carolina.

The freeze watch was expected to last through Friday morning, according to officials.

Temperatures were expected to reach as low as 28 degrees for Ashe, Avery, and Watauga counties.

Advertisement

Forecast –> Charlotte Metro to remain cool and dry through the weekend

Thursday and Friday morning will start in the 30s and low 40s for most across the area. Temperatures in the upper 20s are even possible in our mountain communities on Friday morning, prompting a freeze watch for those locations.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina loses three more players, including early season offensive line starter

Published

on

North Carolina loses three more players, including early season offensive line starter


Three more players have left the North Carolina football team amid a tumultuous start to head coach Bill Belichick’s first season with the Tar Heels.

Offensive lineman William Boone, pass rusher Pryce Yates and tight end Yasir Smith are no longer with the team, a team spokesman confirmed to WRAL on Tuesday. Inside Carolina first reported the departures.

None of the players are listed on the team’s online roster. UNC (2-4 overall, 0-2 in the ACC) hosts No. 16 Virginia on Saturday.

Boone, a transfer from Prairie View A&M, started the first three games of the season. His agent posted on social media that Boone “will be pursuing a medical redshirt in hopes of having 2 years of eligibility remaining. He should be 100% for spring practice.”

Advertisement

 Yates, a transfer from UConn, played in just one game for the Tar Heels after dealing with an injury in the early part of the season. Smith, a freshman tight end, didn’t appear in a game for the Tar Heels.

Previously, senior running back Caleb Hood announced his retirement after UNC’s fifth game of the season. Hood scored the first touchdown of the Belichick era in the season opener against TCU.

Wide receivers Paul Billups and Aziah Johnson and offensive tackle Treyvon Green also left the program earlier this season.

The most recent departures come two weeks after a WRAL report that players brought in by Belichick were receiving preferential treatment over those who were with the program before Belichick’s arrival. One assistant coach was suspended for NCAA violations tied to the report, though cornerbacks coach Armond Hawkins is back with the team.

Several sources who spoke to WRAL News, including high school football coaches, former UNC players and an NIL agent, said Belichick’s demeanor when it comes to recruiting and dealing with former players is starting to sour people from the program.

Advertisement

While the program has faced scrutiny and a call for an independent review for student leadership, Belichick refuted a report that he was looking for an early exit from the program and said he felt the reports of a divide in the locker room were unfounded.

“I don’t know what kind of perspective some of those people have that are saying that, but I think anybody that’s around it on a daily basis would see that,” Belichick said in an Oct. 13 press conference. 

“I’m sure the players all see the improvement they’re making.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina Supreme Court Lets Stand Greg Lindberg’s Civil Fraud Liability

Published

on

North Carolina Supreme Court Lets Stand Greg Lindberg’s Civil Fraud Liability


The North Carolina Supreme Court has decided that it will not, after all, review another legal filing by convicted insurance entrepreneur Greg Lindberg.

The Oct. 17 ruling lets stand a 2023 decision by the state Court of Appeals, which found that Lindberg and some of his affiliated companies were liable for fraud by misleading life insurance companies and a reinsurance firm that he once owned.

“We hold the trial court’s conclusions of law were supported by findings of fact based on competent evidence,” the appeals court judges wrote in the 2023 opinon.

The high court in December 2023 had agreed to review the appeal court’s order, at Lindberg’s behest. But after hearing oral arguments, the Supreme Court justices changed their minds, noting that “discretionary review was improvidently allowed by order on 13 December 2023.”

Advertisement

No further explanation was offered. But with multiple criminal and civil proceedings stemming from the bribery conviction of and the regulatory crackdown on Lindberg, the appeal court’s 24-page opinion offers a valuable recount of some of the main aspects of the voluminous litigation involving Lindberg since 2016.

“Simply put, Lindberg created a scheme in which he caused $1.2 billon held for Plaintiffs’ policyholders to be invested into other non-insurance companies that he also owned or controlled,” the appellate judges wrote in the opinion in Southland National Insurance Corp., et al, vs. Greg Lindberg, et al.

Lindberg

It all began in 2014 under previous North Carolina Insurance Commissioner Wayne Goodwin, the court explained. Lindberg sought to re-domesticate Southland, Bankers Life Insurance Co., Colorado Bankers Life Insurance Co., and Southland National Reinsurance Corp. to North Carolina. Lindberg struck a special agreement with Goodwin, allowing Lindberg to break what has often been considered a cardinal rule for insurance companies – keeping adequate reserves on hand and under the control of the insurance carrier.

Instead, Lindberg was allowed to invest up to 40% of the insurance companies’ assets into affiliated business entities, and Lindberg soon invested hundreds of millions into non-insurance firms he owned or controlled.

In 2016, Mike Causey defeated Goodwin in the election and took over as insurance commissioner. Causey moved swiftly to reduce the cap on affiliated investments – back to 10%, the court explained.

Advertisement

Lindberg in early 2018 attempted to bribe Causey with heavy campaign contributions, hoping for a relaxation of the rules as he struggled to “untangle his affiliated investments,” the appellate judges noted. Causey cooperated with federal authorities and wore a recording device during the meeting with Lindberg. Lindberg was convicted of bribery in 2020, had his conviction overturned due to improper jury instructions, then was convicted again in 2024. He’s still awaiting sentencing.

Meanwhile, in late 2018, while Lindberg’s prosecution was pending, it became obvious that Lindberg’s affiliated companies would not meet their obligations to restore funds to cover the life insurers’ policyholder liabilities. NCDOI placed Southland and the other insurance companies under administrative supervision. An out-of-state consultant was put in charge, and deadlines were set for repayment of the assets.

With it becoming clear that Lindberg’s affiliated firms would not meet the deadlines, Southland and the other insurance companies signed a memorandum of understanding and other agreements, restucturing the financial obligations, providing a $40 million line of credit to a company owned by Lindberg, and making the affiliated firms subsidiaries of a newly created holding company, the court explained.

In 2019, Lindberg’s affiliated firms failed to meet the restructuring agreements’ goals and failed to make the affiliated businesses part of the holding company. Southland filed suit, charging fraud.

The trial court in Wake County largely agreed, and the appeals court upheld the lower court’s ruling.

Advertisement

“Defendants attempt to convince this Court that the MOU’s main purpose was not only to rehabilitate Plaintiffs’ companies, but to ensure Lindberg would continue to benefit from the overall transaction,” the appellate judges wrote. “This argument ignores another of Defendants’ motivations: to make money using capital provided by hardworking, North Carolina policyholders.”

Lindberg’s team claimed that the memorandum of understanding was unenforceable. The appeals court didn’t buy that argument.

“Defendants and Lindberg have enjoyed the benefit of millions of dollars of debt relief provided by Plaintiffs, yet continue to claim the MOU is unenforceable,” the court wrote.

On other arguments the court was equally critical of Lindberg’s assertions.

“Put plainly, Defendants made representations about their ability to perform under the MOU, then just two weeks before performance was due, cited those exact representations as the reason why they could not perform,” Judge April Wood wrote in the opinion.

Advertisement

And because Lindberg understood the intricacies of the affiliated businesses’ structures, he knew that performance under the MOU was impossible, “yet made representations that induced Plaintiffs to enter into the contract. For those reasons, we hold the trial court did not err in finding Defendants’ actions satisfied the elements of fraud.”

The appeals court remanded part of the case to the lower court to determine remedies available to Southland and the other plaintiff insurance companies.

In November 2024, Lindberg pleaded guilty to $2 billion in fraud in a related prosecution. In July of this year, a federal judge approved a plan to distribute $318 million from the sale of a Lindberg-owned software firm to the life insurance policyholders. In early October, the judge allowed the release of policyholder information so that a special master in the case could finally begin distributing funds to the victims of the fraud.

Read more about Lindberg’s bribery conviction here, and other court rulings here.

Topics
Fraud
North Carolina
Liability

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending