Connect with us

North Carolina

North Carolina Proposes Total Abortion Ban

Published

on

North Carolina Proposes Total Abortion Ban


Click to skip ahead: Hands Off has a few of my favorite protest signs from this weekend. The 12-Week Lie looks at the new total abortion ban proposed in North Carolina—two years after they promised they’d stop at 12 weeks. Truth Wars warns about social media ‘fact checking.’ All Eyes on Extremism with news on a new ‘equal protection’ bill in Alabama. In the States, news from Texas, Pennsylvania, Kansas, Michigan, Colorado, and more. In the Nation reports that the new solicitor general of the United States believes that some kinds of contraception are actually ‘abortifacients.’ Coming Soon has a glimpse of what’s in tomorrow’s newsletter.

Before we delve into today’s news, just a quick gallery of some of my favorite signs from the Hands Off protests across the country:

Nearly two years ago, North Carolina passed its 12-week abortion ban—with Republicans calling it “common sense, reasonable” legislation that voters should see as a “compromise.” Never mind that the law forced women to carry doomed pregnancies to term, or required suicidal patients to stay pregnant against their will. Republicans had their talking point.

At the time, I warned they would never stop at 12 weeks—that banning abortion after the first trimester was just their first step. (I even wrote a column called “The 12-Week Lie.”)

And now here we are: Republican Representative Keith Kidwell has introduced HB 804, a total abortion ban that allows care only if a woman would die without it. Under Kidwell’s bill, performing an abortion would be a felony punishable by life in prison.

Advertisement

So the question is: Will Republican legislators stick to the 12-week promise they made to their constituents—or is punishing women even further just too tempting to pass up?

While we’re waiting to find out, a few things about HB 804: It only allows for miscarriage treatment if the fetus has expired; it defines personhood as beginning at fertilization; and it requires doctors to perform abortions “in a manner that…provides the best opportunity for the unborn child to survive.” That’s language we’ve seen before—it’s meant to force doctors to perform c-sections and induce labor rather than provide a standard abortion procedure.

Like the 12-week ban/lie that came before it, HB 804 also claims to allow life-saving care—but with a deliberate and telling exception: suicide. The bill’s language makes it clear that the risk of death doesn’t count if it comes from “a claim or diagnosis that the female would engage in conduct that may result in the female’s death.”

In other words: Even if your doctor determines that you’re at risk of killing yourself, the law would still force you to stay pregnant against your will. I’ve always found these caveats to be among the most revealing: Republicans know their bans will make women want to kill themselves—and they’ve written into law that they don’t care.

I’ll keep you updated as HB 804 moves forward.

Advertisement

When I woke up this morning, I found that one of my tweets—about the young woman arrested for her miscarriage in Georgia—had been hit with a ‘community note.’ For those of you lucky enough to have escaped Twitter (sorry, X), community notes are supposed to be crowdsourced fact-checks. In reality, they’re just another way for the conservative mob to decide what counts as truth—and to train the platform’s algorithm to reflect their worldview. What could go wrong?!

In this case, the “context” added to my tweet claimed the Georgia woman was charged with disposing of her “dead baby,” and reminded readers that “having a miscarriage is not a criminal offense in Georgia.”

This terrifies me. We are watching, in real time, as the right wing rewrites reality—replacing facts with whatever narrative suits them. Conservatives have always ignored the truth when it comes to abortion, but now they get to present their bullshit as if it’s objective fact in one of the country’s most visible online spaces.

The last time I got a community note, it was for sharing images of what early pregnancy/abortion actually look like. Determined to convince the public that an 8-week embryo resembles one of those plastic baby dolls they hand out outside clinics, anti-abortion activists claimed the images were fake or doctored. The community note echoed that lie.

And this isn’t just an X problem. Right around the time Trump took office, Mark Zuckerberg announced that Meta was ditching its partnership with fact-checking organizations that were supposed to keep the platform free from disinformation. Just as absurd: he claimed the move was about protecting free speech and fighting censorship—even as information about abortion continues to be suppressed.

Advertisement

More and more, I’m worried we’re losing the internet as a tool for truth—and that speaking honestly about abortion online is only going to get harder. (Keep an eye out for a separate email from me about this soon.)

Alabama has become the 12th state to introduce legislation that would punish abortion patients as murderers.

Introduced by Rep. Ernie Yarbrough, Alabama’s “Prenatal Equal Protection Act” (aka House Bill 518) would mandate that abortions be prosecuted as homicides, and eliminate a provision in state law that protects patients from being charged with murder.

The bill also says that while women could use “duress” as a defense, they would not be able to do so if they “intentionally or recklessly placed himself or herself in a situation in which it was probable that he or she would be subjected to duress.”

Want to know what that means? Consider Marshae Jones: She’s the Alabama woman who was charged with murder after she lost her pregnancy after being shot in the stomach. The state argued that she put herself in a bad situation which resulted in her pregnancy loss. (Seriously.) Or think about a woman who was beat up by her husband; this legislation would allow the state to charge her with murder if she miscarries. Because why didn’t she leave?

Advertisement

Unfortunately, the possibilities are endless with this kind of bill. While no ‘equal protection’ bill has passed yet, these radical calls to punish women are gaining steam—along with sponsors and support. Find out more here.

More evidence this week that the abortion rights fight is increasingly happening at the local level: Less than 24 hours after the San Antonio City Council voted to allocate $100,000 towards helping people travel out of the state to get abortions, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a suit against the city.

As Eleanor Klibanoff at the Texas Tribune points out, the suit wasn’t a surprise; Paxton did the same thing when Austin created an abortion fund. In his current suit, the Republican AG calls the San Antonio fund “an illegal abortion procurement scheme,” and asks the court for a temporary injunction.

San Antonio councilwoman and mayoral candidate Melissa Cabello Havrda said, “I’ve got one job up here, and it’s to protect the people I represent.”

Since Roe was overturned, we’ve seen a handful of progressive cities try to soften the blow of their states’ bans. The anti-abortion movement has also targeted towns and counties—proposing and passing local ordinances that make it more difficult for women to leave their states for care. For a glimpse at what that looked like for the activists in one Texas town, read this guest post from the Amarillo Reproductive Freedom Alliance:

Advertisement
How to Stop An ‘Abortion Trafficking’ Ordinance

How to Stop An ‘Abortion Trafficking’ Ordinance

Meanwhile, a Pennsylvania Democrat is urging her fellow legislators to enshrine the federal FACE Act, which protects abortion clinics from violence and harassment, into state law. Rep. Lindsay Powell’s bill comes in the wake of the Trump Justice department announcing they won’t pursue FACE Act cases—essentially giving anti-abortion activists a green light to harass and hurt patients, clinic staff, and doctors. From Powell:

“My deepest fear is if the federal government fails us and we don’t have a failsafe in Pennsylvania, we could be repeating the dangerous and dark history we’ve seen before the FACE Act existed.”

Read more about how the Trump administration has declared open season on clinics here.

The Kansas Reflector got their hands on more than 1,500 public comments submitted to the Republican-led state Senate Committee on Government Efficiency. About 300 of those—sent in during February and March—were about abortion:

“Most begged legislators to leave the issue alone, as voters made their opinions clear in the August 2022 primary, during which a constitutional amendment to eliminate abortion rights failed by a 59-41 margin.”

Consider it just another reminder that Republicans don’t give a shit about what voters want.

Speaking of ignoring the will of voters: In the wake of Trump’s Title X cuts, Planned Parenthood of Michigan has announced that they’re permanently shuttering three clinics.

The healthcare centers in Jackson, Petoskey, and Marquette will shut down on April 30, with the latest patient appointments happening on April 25th. The group is also cutting 10% of their staff. I’m so sorry for the people in Michigan—especially for the communities served by these three clinics. Donate to Planned Parenthood of Michigan here.

Advertisement

In better news, Colorado continues to lead the way in abortion rights: A bill is advancing through the legislature that will repeal the state’s prohibition on public funds for abortion. Remember, voters already approved a constitutional amendment in November to allow public funding—this bill is how lawmakers will put that amendment into action.

Quick hits:

  • Wyoming’s new abortion law is forcing patients to travel hundreds of miles out of state;

  • MSNBC on the ruling prohibiting Alabama from prosecuting abortion funds that help patients get out-of-state care;

  • And the Arkansas Times has its latest installment of their series on what went wrong with the Arkansas abortion rights ballot measure.

The country’s new solicitor general—a role sometimes referred to as the “tenth justice”—isn’t just anti-abortion. D. John Sauer opposes contraception, and has argued as much to the Supreme Court. Good times.

Remember the Hobby Lobby case? This landmark SCOTUS ruling allowed the craft store giant to deny employees insurance plans that cover contraception. In 2014, Sauer submitted an amicus brief in support of Hobby Lobby, arguing that some kinds of birth control “function as abortifacients.”

If you’ve been reading the newsletter for a while, you know that conservatives have been quietly advancing this argument for years—laying the groundwork to ban birth control. They claim that IUDs, emergency contraception, and sometimes any hormonal contraceptive interrupt the implantation of a fertilized egg—and are therefore ‘abortions.’

Advertisement

That’s exactly Sauer’s argument:

“Regardless of the Government’s definition of ‘abortion,’ the Catholic faith views the destruction of a human embryo at any time after conception—including during ‘the interval between conception and implantation of the embryo’—as an abortion, and gravely wrongful.”

One of the reasons conservatives are so hot on this argument is that it allows them to target birth control while claiming they’d never ever target birth control. After all, they say—they’re just banning ‘abortion’! Read more from Abortion, Every Day on this tactic below:

The GOP’s Plan to Ban Birth Control (Part I)

The GOP’s Plan to Ban Birth Control (Part I)

The New York Times published a piece last week digging into Sauer’s anti-abortion bonafides, which is worth a read if you’d like to learn more. In addition to his work on Hobby Lobby, Sauer has done trainings with Alliance Defending Freedom (the group that overturned Roe), represented the anti-abortion activists behind deceptively edited videos attacking Planned Parenthood, and—just to round things out—his father founded Missouri Roundtable for Life.

Freya Riedlin, the senior federal policy counsel for the Center for Reproductive Rights, told the Times that between him and Attorney General Pam Bondi, “they’re in a position to really cause grave and longstanding damage to reproductive rights.”

Quick hits:

  • New data from the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) reports that more than six in 10 Americans support abortion rights;

  • Rachel Rebouché is at The Nation explaining why the SCOTUS abortion case is about more than ‘defunding’ Planned Parenthood;

  • Finally, a Live Action anti-abortion activist was punched in the face after antagonizing a New York woman in a gotcha ‘interview’. No link because the only places covering this are right-wing, but thought you all might want to know!

“If we stop, they’ve won. If we stop, my baby’s death was in vain. I’m not stopping.”

Advertisement

Shanette Williams, whose daughter Amber Nicole Thurman was killed by a Georgia abortion ban

In the newsletter tomorrow: More on the Trojan Horse bill in Texas that was in front of a House committee; a study showing the impact of abortion bans on teenagers; two states that had their Title X funding restored; and Trump cuts to the CDC that will impact reproductive and maternal health.



Source link

North Carolina

Concord resident, candidate for North Carolina House dies unexpectedly, officials say

Published

on

Concord resident, candidate for North Carolina House dies unexpectedly, officials say


CONCORD, N.C. (WBTV) – A Concord resident and a candidate for the North Carolina House District died Monday afternoon, according to the North Carolina Democratic Party.

Kim Delaney, a Democratic candidate for the North Carolina House District 73, died unexpectedly around 2:05 p.m. on Monday, Jan 26, according to officials.

In a statement by the North Carolina Democratic Party they said Delaney was surrounded by family when she died and left behind two children.

You can read the full statement below:

Advertisement

“We are deeply saddened to share the passing of Kim Delaney of Concord, a candidate for North Carolina House District 73, who passed away unexpectedly on January 26, 2026.”

“Kim passed away at 2:05 PM, surrounded by her family.”

“Kim was a devoted mother and leaves behind two children. Our thoughts are with them, as well as with Kim’s family and loved ones, during this incredibly difficult time.”

“Kim was a kind, sincere, and caring person who believed in community and in showing up for others.”

The family established a Spotfund to assist with funeral expenses and to support her children. To donate you can click here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Iced-over North Carolina faces grid preparedness questions after other states enact stricter laws

Published

on

Iced-over North Carolina faces grid preparedness questions after other states enact stricter laws


North Carolinians scrambled to find generators ahead of this weekend’s ice and snow.

Now questions are resurfacing about whether the state should adopt laws to better protect the power grid. The answers may lie in other states, such as Texas, which also dealt with winter storms this weekend.

Winter Storm Uri in 2021 left at least 200 people dead and more than 4 million homes and businesses without power when it hit Texas five years ago. 

The crisis caused Texas lawmakers to pass laws requiring public utilities to better prepare power infrastructure for extreme weather. The law also created penalties for noncompliance and allowed funding for backup power at hospitals and other critical facilities.

Advertisement

The new requirements appear to be working: As of Monday, there were few to no power outages reported in nearly all Texas counties, according to KDFW-TV, a Dallas news station, even though this weekend’s storm brought record-breaking snowfall to the state.

North Carolina, which faces winter storms occasionally, still relies primarily on emergency response and voluntary utility measures, raising the question: Should the state wait for disaster before taking certain proactive actions?

“This storm reaffirmed that preparation is key and can make a real difference in saving lives,” Gov. Josh Stein told WRAL Monday.

Duke Energy, which provides power to nearly all North Carolina businesses and residents, says that even without mandates it still regularly takes voluntary action to prepare and improve the state’s power grid.

North Carolina has had more power outages than all but three other states since 2000, according to U.S. Department of Energy data. 

Advertisement

“The Texas situation should have sprung us into action, to think about this in advance,” North Carolina state Rep. Pricey Harrison, D-Guilford, said, adding that she’s not aware of any rules here similar to what Texas instituted. 

Measures in North Carolina

Harrison said there were some measures she believed were beneficial but they are no longer laws. There is weatherization funding available for individual homeowners under the federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program. “Unfortunately, that funding has been cut pretty dramatically at the federal level,” Harrison told WRAL.

WRAL asked Senate Leader Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, and House Speaker Destin Hall, R-Caldwell, whether the state should adopt new laws to better protect the power grid from future storms. Neither indicated they’d support new requirements on utilities.

A spokesperson for Hall says he’s focused on “maintaining a strong rainy-day fund to ensure we are prepared to weather future natural disasters if necessary.”

Berger said he’s been in touch with emergency officials and that “since we’re still in the middle of the storm and do not have damage estimates, it is premature to discuss details of potential legislative action.”

Advertisement

When storms approach the state, state and federal officials routinely declare states of emergency, have state transportation crews treat icy roads, activate the National Guard, and provide temporary Medicaid flexibilities such as early prescription refills.

Duke Energy says its emergency response strategy doesn’t only consist of sending crews out after a storm to repair downed lines. “We have a very robust multi-year grid improvement strategy that we’ve worked with our regulators to establish that helps us to strengthen the grid, to make it more resistant to outages from severe weather,” Jeff Brooks, a Duke Energy spokesman, said in an interview Monday.

The company plans its spending five years out.

“Roughly half of what we’re spending in our current five-year plan is for modernizing and improving the electric grid. And that would include reliability and resiliency improvements,” Brooks said.

Money spent on improving the state’s power grid might simply be passed onto customers in the form of higher power bills. Texas, unlike North Carolina, requires utilities to weatherize generation, transmission and natural gas facilities for extreme weather. And Texans also have higher power bills.

Advertisement

According to the website Choose Energy, which analyzes electricity costs nationwide, Texans pay more for their power than North Carolinians do, although both states are below the national average.

Other states have taken different approaches to power-outage worries. Virginia has a state program — the Emergency Shelter Upgrade Assistance Grant Fund — that provides matching funds to localities to install or repair backup energy generation infrastructure at emergency shelters.

Brooks said Duke Energy takes it upon itself to make sure it is cost effective for customers. Duke has what it calls self-healing technology across the state that can help automatically detect power outages and reroute power to restore service faster, Brooks added.

The energy giant has also buried some of its power lines, another strategy that comes with added expense but has been proven to lessen power outages.

These are voluntary measures since North Carolina doesn’t require utilities to do the work. 

Advertisement

Substation vulnerabilities

Extreme weather isn’t the only risk to power infrastructure. Lawmakers considered new measures after a December 2022 incident in which Duke Energy substations in Moore County were shot at, knocking out power for thousands for several days and contributing to at least one death, according to authorities.

The state legislature responded by raising criminal penalties for damaging utility equipment. But lawmakers did nothing to take proactive measures to prevent similar attacks in the future. A bipartisan bill that would have required Duke to put in place security upgrades at its facilities — potentially cameras, fences, sensors or guards — wasn’t allowed up for a vote at the state legislature, where Duke spends substantial amounts of money on lobbying and campaign contributions. 

“Our objective was appreciating people wanting to help and trying to find good solutions, but making sure that we could find the right solution that met our unique needs as a utility,” Brooks said.

Technologies and Costs

Duke Energy has deployed self-healing grid technology in pilot areas to automatically reroute electricity around outages. The technology prevented millions of hours of power outages for people and businesses statewide in 2025, Duke told WRAL last week.

Burying power lines is another option, but Duke says it’s expensive and can take longer to repair. Burying lines might also be difficult in places with rocky terrain or other difficult soil or topography.

Advertisement

Do Proactive Measures Make Sense?

Duke energy said mandates could raise costs for customers, and that current technology and emergency response may suffice.

The current measures appeared to be enough for this weekend’s storm. At its height Sunday, 31,000 utility customers across the state lost power, which is a small percentage of the state’s 11 million residents and thousands of businesses.

Duke Energy says it is evaluating more advanced grid resilience technologies. The company is also a financial backer of a public-private push to boost university research, called NC Innovation, whose projects include research from UNC-Charlotte on improving power grid efficiency.

But without legal requirements, large-scale infrastructure investments are left to the utility’s discretion.

Stein said last week, ahead of the storm, that he was confident in Duke’s ability to respond quickly to power outages.

Advertisement

“They are taking this storm very seriously, and they are bringing in assets from other states that are not as threatened as North Carolina is,” Stein said.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Syracuse women’s basketball rallies late to force OT, but falls to North Carolina

Published

on

Syracuse women’s basketball rallies late to force OT, but falls to North Carolina


The Syracuse women’s basketball team staged a furious late rally to force overtime, but lost to the North Carolina Tar Heels 77-71 Sunday in Chapel Hill, N.C.

The Orange trailed by eight points with less than 3:30 remaining in regulation, but held the Tar Heels scoreless for the rest of the quarter. A jumper and a free throw by Journey Thompson, a layup and then a pair of free throws by Uche Izoje and a free throw by Sophie Burrows tied the game.

The Tar Heels scored the first seven points of overtime, though, five of them by Nyla Harris, to come away with the win.

Izoje led the Orange with 27 points, a career high, and 12 rebounds. It’s her ninth double-double of the season.

Advertisement

Dominique Darius added 19 points for SU. Sophie Burrows had 10 points and Journey Thompson 10 rebounds.

Harris led North Carolina with 21 points and 10 rebounds.

Syracuse, now 6-3 in the ACC and 16-4 overall, face Georgia Tech on Thursday at the JMA Wirless Dome. Tipoff is set for 6 p.m.

North Carolina improved to 6-3, 17-5.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending