Connect with us

North Carolina

North Carolina Proposes Total Abortion Ban

Published

on

North Carolina Proposes Total Abortion Ban


Click to skip ahead: Hands Off has a few of my favorite protest signs from this weekend. The 12-Week Lie looks at the new total abortion ban proposed in North Carolina—two years after they promised they’d stop at 12 weeks. Truth Wars warns about social media ‘fact checking.’ All Eyes on Extremism with news on a new ‘equal protection’ bill in Alabama. In the States, news from Texas, Pennsylvania, Kansas, Michigan, Colorado, and more. In the Nation reports that the new solicitor general of the United States believes that some kinds of contraception are actually ‘abortifacients.’ Coming Soon has a glimpse of what’s in tomorrow’s newsletter.

Before we delve into today’s news, just a quick gallery of some of my favorite signs from the Hands Off protests across the country:

Nearly two years ago, North Carolina passed its 12-week abortion ban—with Republicans calling it “common sense, reasonable” legislation that voters should see as a “compromise.” Never mind that the law forced women to carry doomed pregnancies to term, or required suicidal patients to stay pregnant against their will. Republicans had their talking point.

At the time, I warned they would never stop at 12 weeks—that banning abortion after the first trimester was just their first step. (I even wrote a column called “The 12-Week Lie.”)

And now here we are: Republican Representative Keith Kidwell has introduced HB 804, a total abortion ban that allows care only if a woman would die without it. Under Kidwell’s bill, performing an abortion would be a felony punishable by life in prison.

Advertisement

So the question is: Will Republican legislators stick to the 12-week promise they made to their constituents—or is punishing women even further just too tempting to pass up?

While we’re waiting to find out, a few things about HB 804: It only allows for miscarriage treatment if the fetus has expired; it defines personhood as beginning at fertilization; and it requires doctors to perform abortions “in a manner that…provides the best opportunity for the unborn child to survive.” That’s language we’ve seen before—it’s meant to force doctors to perform c-sections and induce labor rather than provide a standard abortion procedure.

Like the 12-week ban/lie that came before it, HB 804 also claims to allow life-saving care—but with a deliberate and telling exception: suicide. The bill’s language makes it clear that the risk of death doesn’t count if it comes from “a claim or diagnosis that the female would engage in conduct that may result in the female’s death.”

In other words: Even if your doctor determines that you’re at risk of killing yourself, the law would still force you to stay pregnant against your will. I’ve always found these caveats to be among the most revealing: Republicans know their bans will make women want to kill themselves—and they’ve written into law that they don’t care.

I’ll keep you updated as HB 804 moves forward.

Advertisement

When I woke up this morning, I found that one of my tweets—about the young woman arrested for her miscarriage in Georgia—had been hit with a ‘community note.’ For those of you lucky enough to have escaped Twitter (sorry, X), community notes are supposed to be crowdsourced fact-checks. In reality, they’re just another way for the conservative mob to decide what counts as truth—and to train the platform’s algorithm to reflect their worldview. What could go wrong?!

In this case, the “context” added to my tweet claimed the Georgia woman was charged with disposing of her “dead baby,” and reminded readers that “having a miscarriage is not a criminal offense in Georgia.”

This terrifies me. We are watching, in real time, as the right wing rewrites reality—replacing facts with whatever narrative suits them. Conservatives have always ignored the truth when it comes to abortion, but now they get to present their bullshit as if it’s objective fact in one of the country’s most visible online spaces.

The last time I got a community note, it was for sharing images of what early pregnancy/abortion actually look like. Determined to convince the public that an 8-week embryo resembles one of those plastic baby dolls they hand out outside clinics, anti-abortion activists claimed the images were fake or doctored. The community note echoed that lie.

And this isn’t just an X problem. Right around the time Trump took office, Mark Zuckerberg announced that Meta was ditching its partnership with fact-checking organizations that were supposed to keep the platform free from disinformation. Just as absurd: he claimed the move was about protecting free speech and fighting censorship—even as information about abortion continues to be suppressed.

Advertisement

More and more, I’m worried we’re losing the internet as a tool for truth—and that speaking honestly about abortion online is only going to get harder. (Keep an eye out for a separate email from me about this soon.)

Alabama has become the 12th state to introduce legislation that would punish abortion patients as murderers.

Introduced by Rep. Ernie Yarbrough, Alabama’s “Prenatal Equal Protection Act” (aka House Bill 518) would mandate that abortions be prosecuted as homicides, and eliminate a provision in state law that protects patients from being charged with murder.

The bill also says that while women could use “duress” as a defense, they would not be able to do so if they “intentionally or recklessly placed himself or herself in a situation in which it was probable that he or she would be subjected to duress.”

Want to know what that means? Consider Marshae Jones: She’s the Alabama woman who was charged with murder after she lost her pregnancy after being shot in the stomach. The state argued that she put herself in a bad situation which resulted in her pregnancy loss. (Seriously.) Or think about a woman who was beat up by her husband; this legislation would allow the state to charge her with murder if she miscarries. Because why didn’t she leave?

Advertisement

Unfortunately, the possibilities are endless with this kind of bill. While no ‘equal protection’ bill has passed yet, these radical calls to punish women are gaining steam—along with sponsors and support. Find out more here.

More evidence this week that the abortion rights fight is increasingly happening at the local level: Less than 24 hours after the San Antonio City Council voted to allocate $100,000 towards helping people travel out of the state to get abortions, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a suit against the city.

As Eleanor Klibanoff at the Texas Tribune points out, the suit wasn’t a surprise; Paxton did the same thing when Austin created an abortion fund. In his current suit, the Republican AG calls the San Antonio fund “an illegal abortion procurement scheme,” and asks the court for a temporary injunction.

San Antonio councilwoman and mayoral candidate Melissa Cabello Havrda said, “I’ve got one job up here, and it’s to protect the people I represent.”

Since Roe was overturned, we’ve seen a handful of progressive cities try to soften the blow of their states’ bans. The anti-abortion movement has also targeted towns and counties—proposing and passing local ordinances that make it more difficult for women to leave their states for care. For a glimpse at what that looked like for the activists in one Texas town, read this guest post from the Amarillo Reproductive Freedom Alliance:

Advertisement
How to Stop An ‘Abortion Trafficking’ Ordinance

How to Stop An ‘Abortion Trafficking’ Ordinance

Meanwhile, a Pennsylvania Democrat is urging her fellow legislators to enshrine the federal FACE Act, which protects abortion clinics from violence and harassment, into state law. Rep. Lindsay Powell’s bill comes in the wake of the Trump Justice department announcing they won’t pursue FACE Act cases—essentially giving anti-abortion activists a green light to harass and hurt patients, clinic staff, and doctors. From Powell:

“My deepest fear is if the federal government fails us and we don’t have a failsafe in Pennsylvania, we could be repeating the dangerous and dark history we’ve seen before the FACE Act existed.”

Read more about how the Trump administration has declared open season on clinics here.

The Kansas Reflector got their hands on more than 1,500 public comments submitted to the Republican-led state Senate Committee on Government Efficiency. About 300 of those—sent in during February and March—were about abortion:

“Most begged legislators to leave the issue alone, as voters made their opinions clear in the August 2022 primary, during which a constitutional amendment to eliminate abortion rights failed by a 59-41 margin.”

Consider it just another reminder that Republicans don’t give a shit about what voters want.

Speaking of ignoring the will of voters: In the wake of Trump’s Title X cuts, Planned Parenthood of Michigan has announced that they’re permanently shuttering three clinics.

The healthcare centers in Jackson, Petoskey, and Marquette will shut down on April 30, with the latest patient appointments happening on April 25th. The group is also cutting 10% of their staff. I’m so sorry for the people in Michigan—especially for the communities served by these three clinics. Donate to Planned Parenthood of Michigan here.

Advertisement

In better news, Colorado continues to lead the way in abortion rights: A bill is advancing through the legislature that will repeal the state’s prohibition on public funds for abortion. Remember, voters already approved a constitutional amendment in November to allow public funding—this bill is how lawmakers will put that amendment into action.

Quick hits:

  • Wyoming’s new abortion law is forcing patients to travel hundreds of miles out of state;

  • MSNBC on the ruling prohibiting Alabama from prosecuting abortion funds that help patients get out-of-state care;

  • And the Arkansas Times has its latest installment of their series on what went wrong with the Arkansas abortion rights ballot measure.

The country’s new solicitor general—a role sometimes referred to as the “tenth justice”—isn’t just anti-abortion. D. John Sauer opposes contraception, and has argued as much to the Supreme Court. Good times.

Remember the Hobby Lobby case? This landmark SCOTUS ruling allowed the craft store giant to deny employees insurance plans that cover contraception. In 2014, Sauer submitted an amicus brief in support of Hobby Lobby, arguing that some kinds of birth control “function as abortifacients.”

If you’ve been reading the newsletter for a while, you know that conservatives have been quietly advancing this argument for years—laying the groundwork to ban birth control. They claim that IUDs, emergency contraception, and sometimes any hormonal contraceptive interrupt the implantation of a fertilized egg—and are therefore ‘abortions.’

Advertisement

That’s exactly Sauer’s argument:

“Regardless of the Government’s definition of ‘abortion,’ the Catholic faith views the destruction of a human embryo at any time after conception—including during ‘the interval between conception and implantation of the embryo’—as an abortion, and gravely wrongful.”

One of the reasons conservatives are so hot on this argument is that it allows them to target birth control while claiming they’d never ever target birth control. After all, they say—they’re just banning ‘abortion’! Read more from Abortion, Every Day on this tactic below:

The GOP’s Plan to Ban Birth Control (Part I)

The GOP’s Plan to Ban Birth Control (Part I)

The New York Times published a piece last week digging into Sauer’s anti-abortion bonafides, which is worth a read if you’d like to learn more. In addition to his work on Hobby Lobby, Sauer has done trainings with Alliance Defending Freedom (the group that overturned Roe), represented the anti-abortion activists behind deceptively edited videos attacking Planned Parenthood, and—just to round things out—his father founded Missouri Roundtable for Life.

Freya Riedlin, the senior federal policy counsel for the Center for Reproductive Rights, told the Times that between him and Attorney General Pam Bondi, “they’re in a position to really cause grave and longstanding damage to reproductive rights.”

Quick hits:

  • New data from the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI) reports that more than six in 10 Americans support abortion rights;

  • Rachel Rebouché is at The Nation explaining why the SCOTUS abortion case is about more than ‘defunding’ Planned Parenthood;

  • Finally, a Live Action anti-abortion activist was punched in the face after antagonizing a New York woman in a gotcha ‘interview’. No link because the only places covering this are right-wing, but thought you all might want to know!

“If we stop, they’ve won. If we stop, my baby’s death was in vain. I’m not stopping.”

Advertisement

Shanette Williams, whose daughter Amber Nicole Thurman was killed by a Georgia abortion ban

In the newsletter tomorrow: More on the Trojan Horse bill in Texas that was in front of a House committee; a study showing the impact of abortion bans on teenagers; two states that had their Title X funding restored; and Trump cuts to the CDC that will impact reproductive and maternal health.



Source link

North Carolina

Proposed NC property tax cap, affordable housing exemption set for debate

Published

on

Proposed NC property tax cap, affordable housing exemption set for debate


A proposal to limit property tax increases is set to go before state lawmakers Tuesday — an effort that could culminate with North Carolinians voting on the issue as early as this year.

The state House of Representatives’ Finance Committee is scheduled to discuss a proposed state constitutional amendment restricting how much city and county governments could raise property taxes each year. 

Amendments to the state Constitution must be approved by North Carolina voters. If the idea is approved by a supermajority of legislators, North Carolinians would be asked to decide the issue through a ballot vote, likely in November.  

The legislation, House Bill 1089, doesn’t outline a limit for property tax increases. It calls on state lawmakers to come up with specific restrictions at a later date — if the referendum is approved by voters.

Advertisement

The bill is part of a broader push by legislators in the Republican-controlled General Assembly to address affordability issues ahead of the midterm elections. 

Republicans in the state Senate last week approved a bill that would temporarily block county governments from applying appraisals conducted during this calendar year to property tax bills. Reappraisals often lead to higher property tax bills. Republican Senate leader Phil Berger has referred to that proposal as a “moratorium” that could bring temporary relief to taxpayers in a number of counties scheduled to reappraise properties this year — including Guilford and Harnett. Berger has framed the idea as simply buying time for the legislature to come up with more sweeping reforms.

The proposed constitutional amendment moving forward in the House could be that more sweeping idea, although it’s unclear if the Senate will go along if the idea passes the House.

Tax reduction has been a stated goal of Republican lawmakers for decades, but the proposed reappraisal moratorium and constitutional amendment are not guaranteed to pass. Neither Berger nor House Speaker Destin Hall has committed to supporting the other chamber’s idea for addressing rising property taxes.

Democrats have expressed skepticism over both plans. Senate Minority Leader Sydney Batch, D-Wake, chided Senate Republicans last week for failing to take up an amendment to Berger’s bill that would have lowered the state’s income threshold to qualify for property tax exceptions.

Advertisement

Rep. Lindsey Prather, D-Buncombe, said Monday — during a press conference calling for higher taxes on millionaires — that the property tax changes being proposed by GOP lawmakers seemed aimed more at gathering political credit than solving a problem.

“We can be the quote-unquote ‘good guys’ down here in Raleigh and say we’re going to lower your property taxes,” Prather said. “But all that means is that the local governments are going to have to be the ‘bad guys’ to raise revenue in other ways.”

Closing a loophole

The House Finance committee on Tuesday is expected to consider a proposal that could help municipal governments recoup more property tax revenue. The committee is expected to discuss House Bill 1042, which would tighten rules for nonprofit organizations that receive property tax exemptions.

The state currently allows certain organizations to avoid paying property taxes if they use their property entirely for charitable purposes and are not run for profit — a law that kept nearly $750 million worth of property out of Wake County’s tax base in 2025. The proposed change seeks to winnow down the list of who qualifies, especially nonprofits that provide affordable housing for low- or moderate-income people. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina (NCHSAA) High School Softball 2026 State Playoff Brackets, Matchups, Schedule – May 11

Published

on

North Carolina (NCHSAA) High School Softball 2026 State Playoff Brackets, Matchups, Schedule – May 11


The 2026 North Carolina high school softball state playoff brackets are out, and High School On SI has all eight brackets with matchups and schedules for every team.

The first round begins on May 5, and the playoffs will culminate with the NCHSAA state championships being played May 27-30 at Duke University in Durham.

2026 North Carolina High School Baseball State Tournament Schedule

Advertisement

May 5: First Round
May 8: Second Round
May 12: Third Round
May 15: Fourth Round
May 19-23: Regionals
May 27-30: State Championships

North Carolina (NCHSAA) High School Softball 2026 State Playoff Brackets, Matchups, Schedule – May 11

CLASS 1A BRACKET (select to view full bracket details)

Advertisement

Third Round – May 12

No. 1 Bear Grass Charter vs. No. 5 Vance Charter

No. 3 East Columbus vs. No. 2 Northside – Pinetown

No. 1 Robbinsville vs. No. 5 Falls Lake Academy

Advertisement

No. 6 Bethany Community vs. No. 2 Oxford Preperatory


Third Round – May 12

No. 1 North Duplin vs. No. 8 Camden County

Advertisement

No. 5 Rosewood vs. No. 4 East Carteret

Advertisement

No. 3 Perquimans vs. No. 11 Pamlico County

No. 10 Franklin Academy vs. No. 2 Manteo

No. 1 South Stanly vs. No. 9 East Wilkes

No. 5 South Stokes vs. No. 4 Starmount

Advertisement

No. 3 Swain County vs. No. 6 Murphy

Advertisement

No. 7 Highland Tech vs. No. 2 Roxboro Community


Third Round – May 12

Advertisement

No. 1 Midway vs. No. 9 Providence

Advertisement

No. 12 Wallace-Rose Hill vs. No. 4 Heide Trask

No. 3 Farmville Central vs. No. 11 Ayden – Grifton

No. 10 Northwood vs. No. 2 McMichael

No. 1 West Lincoln vs. No. 8 Union Academy

Advertisement

No. 5 Draughn vs No. 4 Pine Lake Preperatory

Advertisement

No. 3 West Davidson vs. No. 11 East Surry

No. 7 Walkertown vs. No. 2 West Wilkes

Advertisement

Third Round – May 12

Advertisement

No. 1 Randleman vs. No. 9 Nash Central

No. 5 Bunn vs. No. 4 East Duplin

No. 3 Southwest Onslow vs. No. 6 Roanoke Rapids

No. 7 Ledford Senior vs. No. 2 Central Davidson

Advertisement

No. 1 West Stokes vs. No. 8 Forbush

Advertisement

No. 5 Pisgah vs. No. 4 West Stanly

No. 19 North Surry vs. No. 11 Foard

No. 10 Mount Pleasant vs. No, 2 Bunker Hill


Advertisement

Third Round – May 12

No. 1 Southeast Alamance vs. No. 8 C.B. Aycock

No. 5 Seaforth vs. No. 4 Rockingham County

No. 3 Eastern Alamance vs. No. 6 West Carteret

Advertisement

No. 7 South Brunswick vs. No. 2 Southern Nash

Advertisement

No. 1 Enka vs. No. 9 Oak Grove

No. 5 Crest vs. No. 13 West Rowan

No. 3 North Davidson vs. No. 6 Franklin

No. 10 East Rowan vs. No. 2 North Lincoln

Advertisement


Third Round – May 12

No. 1 Union Pines vs. No. 9 South Johnston

No. 5 South View vs. No. 4 Gray’s Creek

Advertisement

No. 3 J.H. Rose vs. No. 6 Harnett Central

Advertisement

No. 7 Triton vs. No. 2 West Brunswick

No. 1 Kings Mountain vs. No. 8 Charlotte Catholic

No. 5 Alexander vs. No. 13 T.C. Roberson

No. 3 Piedmont vs. No. 6 Central Cabarrus

Advertisement

No. 10 A.C. Reynolds vs. No. 2 South Caldwell


Third Round – May 12

No. 1 D.H. Conley vs. No. 8 Wake Forest

Advertisement

No. 5 Purnell Sweet vs. No. 4 Cleveland

Advertisement

No. 3 Heritage vs. No. 6 Topsail

No. 7 South Central vs. No. 2 New Bern

No. 1 Weddington vs. No. 8 Mooresville

No. 5 A.L. Brown vs. No. 4 Hickory Ridge

Advertisement

No. 3 East Forsyth vs. No. 11 Porter Ridge

Advertisement

No. 7 Ronald Reagan vs. No. 2 South Iredell


Third Round – May 12

Advertisement

No. 1 Willow Spring vs. No. 4 Hoggard

Advertisement

No. 3 E.A. Laney vs. No. 2 Cornith Holders

No. 1 Providence vs. No. 4 Hough

No. 3 West Forsyth vs. No. 2 Apex Friendship


More Coverage from High School on SI

Advertisement
Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Perspective | What North Carolina gets right about workforce: Progress beyond politics

Published

on

Perspective | What North Carolina gets right about workforce: Progress beyond politics


Across the country, workforce development is often framed as a policy challenge. In North Carolina, we’ve come to understand it as something more fundamental: a shared responsibility between educators and employers that works best when it rises above politics. It is a nonpartisan priority with bipartisan support — and a clear focus on outcomes.

North Carolina’s approach to workforce and talent development offers a different model — one grounded in collaboration, consistency, data, and a relentless focus on student and employer needs.

Over the past several years, our state has aligned around an ambitious goal: ensuring that 2 million North Carolinians ages 25-44 hold a high-quality credential or postsecondary degree by 2030. myFutureNC is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, led by a bipartisan Board of Directors, that was created to champion this work.

This goal is not owned by a single administration or political party. It is the state’s attainment goal — codified in law with bipartisan support and signed by the governor — to ensure North Carolina remains economically competitive now and into the future. The work is guided by leaders across business, education, policymakers, and philanthropy.

Advertisement

Sign up for Awake58, our newsletter on all things community college.

This kind of alignment doesn’t happen by accident. It requires trust, discipline, and a willingness to prioritize long-term impact over short-term wins — placing the needs of students and employers above the silos that often define education and workforce systems.

Advertisement

North Carolina’s leaders don’t agree on everything, and unanimity is not what makes this work. There is broad agreement on a set of essential truths: Talent is the top driver of economic development. Education fuels economic prosperity, public safety, and healthier communities. Having a robust educational system and an educated population is one of our state’s greatest assets. Economic mobility matters. And preparing people for meaningful work benefits everyone.

This alignment is delivering results. North Carolina has been named the No. 1 state for business three out of the past four years and ranks No. 1 for workforce — reinforcing what’s possible when leaders stay focused on shared priorities.

This strong foundation has enabled progress in areas that often stall in partisan debate. Through strategic policy and philanthropic investments, the state has expanded pathways into high-demand careers, strengthened connections between education and industry, and increased access to work-based learning opportunities, including apprenticeships and pre-apprenticeships.

That same foundation is shaping how policy is developed in real time. The proposed Workforce Act of 2026 reflects North Carolina’s cross-sector approach — bringing together business and education leaders, policymakers, and philanthropists to strengthen pathways into high-demand careers and expand access to work-based learning. Rather than introducing a new direction, this Act builds on what is already working, demonstrating how alignment can translate into coordinated action.

The bipartisan-led Governor’s Council on Workforce and Apprenticeships puts this approach into practice. Building on the state’s existing foundation, the council brings together leaders from industry, education, and government to strengthen coordination across the workforce system. Its value lies not in setting a new direction, but in reinforcing and accelerating a shared one.

Advertisement

This is what it looks like to build systems designed to last. Workforce development is not a one-year initiative or a single funding cycle — it is a long-term investment in people, communities, employers, and the educational infrastructure that supports them. North Carolina’s progress is rooted in structures that bring partners together consistently, align efforts across sectors, and create continuity beyond political cycles.

By embedding collaboration into how the work gets done — not just what gets prioritized — the state has created a model that can evolve over time while staying focused on its goals.

Work remains to be done. Gaps in attainment persist, and ensuring opportunity reaches every corner of the state will require continued focus and innovation. But North Carolina’s significant progress and continued success being No. 1 nationally in many related categories demonstrates what is possible when leaders choose partnership over partisanship.

At a time when it’s easy to focus on what divides us, North Carolina offers a reminder: Some of the most important work we do — preparing people for the future of work and ensuring employers have access to skilled talent — is our north star and unifying force.

And in our shared goal of 2 million by 2030, we are not just building a stronger workforce. We are building a stronger state — for today and for generations to come.

Advertisement
Cecilia Holden

Cecilia Holden is the president and CEO of myFutureNC, a statewide initiative focused on the state’s educational attainment goal.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending