Connect with us

North Carolina

North Carolina lawmakers share reactions following US strike on Iran

Published

on

North Carolina lawmakers share reactions following US strike on Iran


A day after the United States launched missile strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, North Carolina lawmakers are sharing their reactions.

“Clearly, Iran should never have a nuclear weapon. However, it is Congress’s responsibility to declare war. And I have been calling since last week for a high-level briefing of members of Congress for the Trump administration to explain to us exactly what’s going on and what they were going to do. Instead, they deceived the American public and they didn’t comply with the law or the Constitution,” said Congresswoman Deborah Ross, a Democrat who represents the state’s 2nd District.

The strikes saw the United States utilize B-2 bombers to drop “bunker-buster” bombs on three sites: Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan.

Ross believes the President overstepped his authority in ordering the strikes, which a senior administration official tells ABC News he told Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to carry out on Saturday.

Advertisement

“It is very dangerous. It is unconstitutional. And frankly, it is unprecedented,” said Ross.

Congresswoman Valerie Foushee, a Democrat who represents the state’s 4th District, echoed Ross’ concern in a statement:

“Trump’s strikes in Iran without Congressional authorization is deeply irresponsible and unconstitutional. This escalation places our troops and diplomatic personnel in immediate and unnecessary danger, and risks implicating our nation in a potentially disastrous war.

“The President has severely overstepped his power by bypassing Congress, drawing our nation dangerously close to yet another war in the Middle East. Reckless military action taken without consultation or the proper authorization endangers both our national security and the lives of our brave servicemembers.

“Let me be clear: urgent de-escalation of this conflict is needed to save lives. We must act swiftly to reduce tensions and pursue a diplomatic path forward.”

Advertisement

RELATED | NC politicians, US lawmakers respond to US attack on Iranian nuclear sites

Ross expressed concern over a potential response from Iran.

“This regime is the most dangerous regime because they are back on their heels. They are angry. They have sworn that they want to destroy Israel and the United States. And now they are desperate, which means they could do anything, anything to our troops in the region, anything to our allies,” said Ross.

Congressman Don Davis, a Democrat and Air Force veteran who represents the state’s 1st District, released a statement on X:

Iran is the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism and must be prevented from developing nuclear weapons. A nuclear-armed Iran poses a dire threat not only to the United States but also to our strongest ally in the Middle East, Israel, and the entire international community. We must not underestimate the danger Iran presents.

Advertisement

Congressman Mark Harris, a Republican who represents the 8th District, defended the President’s decision-making.

“I believe the president is the Commander-in-Chief. I believe that this was a one-off strike. I think he made that perfectly clear. He’s not calling for boots on the ground,” said Harris.

He cited Iran’s history in the region, including its role in backing proxy attacks.

“The president gave (Iran) a 60-day window to come to the table and talk, and they just continue to stonewall. And that seems to be their mode of operation is to put off and put off and put off while all the time getting closer and closer to being able to put a warhead, a nuclear warhead, on one of those missiles and fire it. I think the president recognizes that we had to do it,” said Harris.

Rep. Greg Murphy released a statement on X, writing:

Advertisement

The Islamic Republic of Iran and its terroristic mullahs have been a threat to peace in the Middle East, the United States, and the global community for decades. An Iran with a nuclear bomb gives birth to a world in jeopardy of cataclysmic destruction. President Trump worked to negotiate with the regime in good faith, however Ali Khamenei overplayed his hand and now must pay the price. May God protect the innocent lives at stake and the United States and Israel’s righteous efforts to put an end to the grievous bloodshed carried out by Iran and its jihadi proxies. God bless our servicemen safely on their way home tonight.

He further backed Trump’s decision in an exchange with fellow Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, who had responded to the President’s announcement of the strike by writing on X: “This is not Constitutional.”

Congressman Chuck Edwards, a Republican who represents North Carolina’s 11th District, wrote on X:

In the wake of today’s strike on Iran, our unwavering support is with the brave men and women of our armed forces. They put their lives on the line not for recognition or reward, but out of a deep sense of duty to protect our nation and uphold peace and security around the world.

Congressman Richard Hudson, who represents the state’s 9th District and serves as the Chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee, wrote on X:

Advertisement

President Donald Trump has been consistent and resolute that Iran- the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism- will not be allowed to build a nuclear weapons capability. He negotiated in good faith and offered Iran peace in exchange for ending their nuclear ambition. Iran did not take President Trump seriously and they have learned tonight that was a mistake. It would be another mistake for Iran to retaliate against Americans anywhere in the world. I support President Trump, I stand with Israel and I pray for the safety of our brave men and women in uniform around the world. America leads with resolve, and the world is safer when we do.

Congressman David Rouzer, a Republican who represents the state’s 7th District, shared a screenshot of the President’s announcement on Truth Social of the strikes, writing on X:

I commend President Trump for taking decisive and resolute action to destroy Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Regardless of any Iranian response which may occur, the President and those in our great military responsible for successfully carrying out this difficult mission have provided a meaningful opportunity for lasting peace in the Middle East and safety to the United States and our allies.

Congressman Addison McDowell, a Republican who represents the state’s 6th District, also shared a screenshot of the President’s announcement on Truth Social of the strikes, writing on X:

President Trump protects America and our interests: A nuclear Iran was never an option. God bless America and the brave men and women who serve our nation.

Advertisement

Congressman Brad Knott, a Republican who represents the state’s 13th District, wrote on X:

Our prayers and gratitude are with the United States Armed Forces. My plea for the nation of Iran remains the same: now is the time to reorient and work for peace. The condition has been clear for decades under presidents of both parties: there cannot be a nuclear-armed Iran. Our President means what he says and has worked tirelessly to secure peace with Iran. Across America, now is the time to put politics aside and unite on a bipartisan basis in support of the President as commander-in-chief of our armed services. President Trump has now given Iran’s regime an opportunity to turn the page, end its nuclear ambitions, and instead embrace peace and prosperity for the people of Iran.

Congressman Tim Moore, a Republican who represents the state’s 14th District, wrote on X:

Iran’s radical regime is a threat to freedom everywhere and has spent decades spreading terror across the globe. President Trump made clear that any attack on Americans or our allies would be met with overwhelming force. May God bless and protect our troops as we confront the evil of Iran and its terrorist proxies.

Republican Senator Thom Tillis wrote on X:

Advertisement

This was the right decision by @POTUS. We cannot allow Iran to build nuclear weapons. God Bless our brave servicemembers who supported and executed this mission.

Republican Senator Ted Budd wrote on X:

Tonight, the United States dealt a decisive blow to Iran’s nuclear program. The U.S. military alone had the capability to destroy these facilities deep underground, and I commend President Trump for standing with our Israeli allies in their efforts to end the threat of a nuclear Iran once and for all. May God bless and protect our troops, who continue to keep us safe around the world.

Nationally, lawmakers have shared a range of reactions to the strikes.

During his address Saturday night, President Trump addressed the impact of the strikes.

Advertisement

“Tonight, I can report to the world that the strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,” said Trump.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also used the term “obliterated” in describing Iran’s nuclear ambitions during a press conference at the Pentagon Sunday morning.

However, other officials have used different language, including General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who also spoke at Sunday’s press conference.

“I know that battle damage is of great interest. Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,” Caine said.

Former CIA officer, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East and ABC News contributor Michael “Mick” Mulroy estimates that the U.S. military operation “likely set back the Iranian nuclear weapons program 2-5 years,” based on the type and amount of munitions used, but told ABC News that the full battle damage assessment will give a more accurate determination.

Advertisement

“(The) President made it clear he’s not about creating war. He’s about ending wars, and he wants to see peace in that region. There wasn’t ever going to be peace as long as there was the threat of a nuclear Iran, and we hope that’s been removed now,” said Harris.

Ross is calling for more communication prior to any further decisions.

“Two things must happen immediately. Number one, we must have a confidential, high-level security briefing because any further action requires Congress to take action. And number two, and this is something I am hopeful for, but I’m not holding my breath, we need to have bipartisan cooperation in looking at what this Congress will authorize going forward,” said Ross.

ABC News contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2025 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Advertisement



Source link

North Carolina

Sickness causing explosive diarrhea reportedly reaches 145 cases in North Carolina

Published

on

Sickness causing explosive diarrhea reportedly reaches 145 cases in North Carolina


The video above is a live stream of WBTV and affiliated programming, and may not be directly related to the article below.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. (WBTV) – A sickness causing explosive diarrhea across the United States has been reported in North Carolina.

State health officials confirmed on Tuesday, July 7, that at least 145 cases of cyclosporiasis had been reported in North Carolina since May 1.

According to the state’s health website, cyclosporiasis is an intestinal illness caused by a parasite known as cyclospora. Sickness is often brought on by consuming food or water that is contaminated with the parasite.

Advertisement

The state’s website says it usually takes a week for symptoms to show up after consuming the contaminated food or water.

Among the symptoms are:

  • Watery diarrhea with frequent, sometimes explosive bowel movements
  • Loss of appetite
  • Weight loss
  • Stomach cramps/pain
  • Bloating
  • Increased gas
  • Nausea
  • Fatigue

Health officials said cyclospora is often associated with fresh herbs and produce that are served uncooked. They said because those items often go uncooked, it is imperative for them to be cleaned prior to eating.

According to the CDC, healthy people who contract cyclosporiasis usually recover without treatment but may have symptoms for a few days to a month or longer. In other cases, the sickness can be treated with antibiotics.

As of mid-June, the CDC reported cyclosporiasis cases in 17 states. At that point, no deaths had been reported.

FILE PHOTO — A sickness that can cause explosive diarrhea has made its way to North Carolina.(MGN)

Also Read: One US state is now reporting 700+ cases of ‘explosive’ diarrhea linked to parasite

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WBTV. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Manns Harbor Bridge repairs to be ‘most complete’ in decades | Coastal Review

Published

on

Manns Harbor Bridge repairs to be ‘most complete’ in decades | Coastal Review


Diver Roman Morgan applies quick-setting mortar by hand, the final step in this method of repairing damaged bridge pilings. Photo: Kip Tabb

As the Manns Harbor Bridge over the Croatan Sound nears its 70th birthday, it’s getting what North Carolina Department of Transportation Resident Engineer Pablo Hernandez recently called “the first major renovation that I’m aware of in my 28-, almost 29-year career here in Dare County.”

The bridge, he added quickly, needs work, but overall, “the fact is that we got almost 70 years out of it without a tremendous amount of maintenance investing.”

Hernandez also added that the work that had been done, mainly minor concrete repairs and a paint job about every 25 to 30 years, “but the current project seems to be the most complete.”

When the William B. Umstead Bridge, as it is officially known, opened to traffic in December 1956, Outer Banks newspaper the Coastland Times described it as “a fine Christmas present for the Southern Albemarle region,” adding that it “will make possible a lot of holiday visiting, particularly on the Dare County mainland.”

Advertisement
North Carolina Department of Transportation Resident Engineer Pablo Hernandez takes Coastal Review under the bridge. Photo: Kip Tabb
North Carolina Department of Transportation Resident Engineer Pablo Hernandez takes Coastal Review under the bridge. Photo: Kip Tabb

The bridge connects mainland Dare County with Roanoke Island and the Outer Banks. This delivered 20th century amenities to the isolated hamlets and towns of mainland Dare County that had yet to be electrified. With the bridge carrying connections for electric power and telephones, “some eight families will have electric lights for the first time” in the sleepy fishing village of Mashoes. And in the longstanding, unincorporated Manns Harbor community, “the bridge makes possible modern telephone,” the Coastland Times reported.

Although the bridge may appear to be in surprisingly good shape, it is a solid 40 years beyond its expected lifespan, and when the $33.75 million project began in summer 2023, uncertainty remained about the extent of repairs needed.

The original price tag has risen: “Estimated projections of total costs are currently around $45 million,” Hernandez wrote in an email. “We are doing what we can to control the costs but not to the detriment of the structure.”

“Until you’re there, you don’t know what you’re going to find, just like with an old house,” Hernandez said, “you start renovating it, and things need attention.”

The project is a blend of modern materials and traditional, often hands-on applications. Resurfacing the deck, for example, was completed using an epoxy that included an aggregate material to provide a textured surface. During the application process, the bridge was closed for nine months.

This aerial view of the Umstead Bridge over Croatan Sound and connecting Manns Harbor and Roanoke Island was made by photographer Charles Brantley
This aerial view of the Umstead Bridge over Croatan Sound and connecting Manns Harbor and Roanoke Island was made by photographer Charles Brantley “Aycock” Brown in 1957. Source: State Archives of North Carolina

“All of those layers of the epoxy, as well as the aggregate to provide the textured surface, were all applied by hand, so over 300,000 square feet of bridge deck was rolled and squeegeed with these four separate layers of epoxy,” Hernandez explained.

The decision to apply the new surface in this way, instead of using “specialty trucks and pavers,” was in part because of the bridge’s 70-year-old design and the weight of the materials. “We don’t put a lot of what we call dead load on the bridge,” said Hernandez.

Advertisement

Other factors were also considered. “The deck was in surprisingly solid, good condition,” Hernandez said, “so there was no need to remove an inch just to put back another inch.”

The epoxy used is a viscous material that seals any cracks that may have developed.

Hernandez said the bridge design has a “certain robustness to begin with. It’s kind of like building a a deck on your house when you use a six-by-six post or an eight-by-eight or four-by-four post.”

Home to purple martins, pre-dedication damage

The bridge has for years been home to thousands of purple martins during summer. Hernandez, in response to Coastal Review’s query, was emphatic that the birds’ droppings had not damaged the bridge. He pointed out that the aerobatic birds roost on the bridges steel beams and atop the caps, concrete members that support the steel beams and are only there at night.

“From my experience, we have not seen a tremendous amount of bird droppings,” he said. Hernandez cited as evidence one night when he was with the Purple Martin Society conducting bird surveys. “We provided a boat and there were hundreds of thousands flying around. I don’t think anybody got nailed (with droppings).”

Advertisement
A piling was removed from this part of the structure after a grain barge rammed the bridge in March 1957. Photo: Kip Tabb
A piling was removed from this part of the structure after a grain barge rammed the bridge in March 1957. Photo: Kip Tabb

The most recent work has been below the bridge deck and the view down there is concerning. On the north side of the bridge, toward the mainland side, an entire piling is missing. In its place, iron girders support this part of the bridge. A March 1957 storm took out the piling before the bridge was officially dedicated the following month.

A grain barge, the C. W. Curlett “struck the bridge when it got out of control, said to have been due to the failure of one of the two motors. It swung down and struck the North side of bridge, shattering one of the huge concrete piles, so that the reinforcing steel inside it was exposed and bent,” the Coastland Times reported.

Just to the east of the bridge’s center rise, workers have been lowered to assess its condition. One worker taps the concrete with a hammer while another makes notes of their observations.

“They are listening for a hollow or dull sound,” Hernandez explained. “This indicates a deteriorated concrete layer.  If it is solid, it will have a distinct sharp, pinging sound.”

Repairs to the concrete pilings are now the project’s focus. The concrete is showing its age, largely because of the limited materials available in 1956, as compared to current designs. The bridge pilings, Hernandez said, were only “mildly” reinforced. “It just has reinforcing bars in it.”

Kevin Brown and Adam Conner with the bridge crew evaluate a piling for spalled and deteriorated concrete. Photo: Kip Tabb
Kevin Brown and Adam Conner with the bridge crew evaluate a piling for spalled and deteriorated concrete. Photo: Kip Tabb

The reinforcing bars, or rebar, is exposed through cracks in the concrete. Repairs involve removing any rust from the iron and replacing the concrete. Although there is visible rust on the rebar, the one-inch bars are still in good shape with only basic maintenance needed to clean the rust and repack the concrete.

Hernandez compared the Manns Harbor Bridge pilings to those supporting the nearby new Lindsay C. Warren Bridge, aka the Alligator River Bridge, a project to replace the early 1960s-era structure that Hernandez also supervises. The pilings there are prestressed, by “basically taking a very dense and durable cable and stretching it, pouring concrete around it, and then letting that elastic force come back in (and) help squeeze the concrete together, so you get a denser piling that can go through a lot more cycles without any kind of cracking.”

Advertisement

Looking back: State awards $450M deal to build new Alligator River bridge

The cracks in the Umstead Bridge were not unexpected after seven decades. Temperature variations and cycles of freezing and thawing in a marine environment will cause the material to develop small fissures. Once air reaches the rebar, the iron begins to rust. Conversely, below the surface of the water, in what is considered anaerobic conditions, “the concrete is dense and sound, and the rebar is protected from water and oxygen,” Hernandez replied in an follow-up email. “The majority of the deterioration of the concrete and rebar is in the splash zone where there his ample oxygen to facilitate the corrosion process of ferrous metals.”

Repacking the piling concrete is one of the most labor-intensive, hands-on parts of the project. After removing the damaged concrete and cleaning the rebar of rust, barges form a protected area around the work zone under the bridge. On a barge deck, workers mix Speed Crete Blue Line, a product described by Hernandez as a “rapid-setting underwater concrete repair mortar.” According the manufacturer, Euclid Chemical, the product will set in three to five minutes after coming in contact with water.  

Three divers are also employed in the repairs, reaching into buckets of mortar, pulling out a handful and pushing it into the voids and continuing the process until the piling is back to its original specs.

The mortar creates an airtight seal, protecting the rebar inside the piling. Then the pilings get an additional layer of protection.

Advertisement

“After we do the concrete piling, we come back with an epoxy-saturated carbon-fiber sheet of fabric and wrap that around the piling shell,” Hernandez said.

The bridge is considered one of the state’s “high-value bridges,” Hernandez said, referring to bridges within a $50 to $70 million range replacement cost.

Hernandez noted an NCDOT assessment of the bridge that asked, “Could we invest in a significant bridge preservation effort to get another 20, 30 or 40 years of life out of those structures?”

The repairs, Hernandez said, are going well, but the work originally slated for a Nov. 26 completion date that is “around the corner,” is unlikely to wrap up as scheduled. “Unfortunately we’re not going to be complete with the concrete repairs.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

SIGN: Pass Duke’s Rescue Act to Protect Dogs and Cats in North Carolina

Published

on

SIGN: Pass Duke’s Rescue Act to Protect Dogs and Cats in North Carolina


235 Signatures Collected

PETITION TARGET: North Carolina House Speaker Destin Hall and Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger

A pit bull named Duke, who spent the first four years of his life chained outside in Windsor, North Carolina, was found emaciated, anemic, suffering from heartworm disease, and living in filth, according to local news. Chained nearby were several other neglected dogs and the skeletal remains of his sister, Minnie, who reportedly died of starvation.

Following the discovery of Minnie’s death, all the dogs on the property were rescued—but many dogs aren’t so lucky.

Advertisement

To help prevent tragic cases like this, North Carolina lawmakers introduced Duke’s Rescue Act, which would prohibit outdoor tethering of animal companions in extreme weather, establish minimum care standards for dogs and cats, and give authorities clearer direction and better tools to help animals left without the care they need.

If enacted, those who violate the law would face a Class 3 misdemeanor for a first offense and a Class 2 misdemeanor for any subsequent offense. It would also provide funding for public education, so guardians responsible for dogs and cats can understand the basic care the law would require.

The suffering Duke, Minnie, and the other dogs on that property allegedly endured should never have been allowed to happen. No dog or cat should be left without food, clean water, proper shelter, or veterinary care — or left chained for years, forced to watch a companion die in front of them.

Sign our petition urging North Carolina House Speaker Destin Hall and Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger to help advance Duke’s Rescue Act so North Carolina can pass clear minimum care standards for dogs and cats.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending