North Carolina
NCAA picks up major legal victories in multiple key eligibility lawsuits

In legal victories for the NCAA, a judge denied an injunction for Duke and North Carolina athletes in two eligibility lawsuits. The cases were both filed in North Carolina Business Court in Durham County, N.C.
Judge Matthew T. Houston declined to grant a preliminary injunction in Jones v. NCAA and Smith v. NCAA. Four athletes – UNC football player JJ Jones and Duke football players Ryan Smith, Cam Bergeron and Tre’Shon Devones – filed the suits and challenged the NCAA’s “five-year rule,” which gives most athletes four seasons on a roster over five years, barring injury exemptions or waivers.
The NCAA denied Smith, Bergeron and Devones’ waiver requests, but Jones is still waiting on an answer. They brought the suits on the same day, April 3, in Durham County and are being heard together – Jones and Bergeron are listed as plaintiffs in the Jones suit, while Smith and Devones are plaintiffs in the Smith case. The players argued they should receive an extra year due to factors such as mental and physical struggles, a lack of playing time or struggling to adjust to academic standards.
However, during Tuesday’s hearing, Houston cited a lack of sufficient evidence to support granting a preliminary injunction. That means the NCAA’s rules will still be enforced as written. Because the players are all NFL Draft-eligible, they can either wait for the case to proceed out or head to the NFL.
“That plaintiffs have ultimately presented a possibility, certainly sufficient evidence of a possibility of prevailing on the merits,” Houston said from the bench, via WRAL News’ Brian Murphy. “I think the evidence and record at this point is not sufficient to support a finding that there is a likelihood of prevailing on the merits and it’s largely an issue of what the record supports.”
Devones played six years of college football entering 2025, starting his career at Rice in 2019 and transferring to Duke in 2024. During that time, he has played in 45 games, although he missed the 2021 season due to an injury. By redshirting that year, he had one more season on top of the COVID-19 waiver from the impacted 2020 campaign.
Smith was teammates with Devones and Bergeron in 2019 at Duke as part of his five-year career, which also included the 2020 season. He appeared in 56 games during that time, including three starts. Bergeron, meanwhile, played in 46 games over five years and put together an impressive 2024 season with 83 tackles.
Jones just completed his fourth season at UNC and has nearly 1,800 career yards. However, according to WRAL, there’s “disagreement” about how many games he played as a true freshman in 2021.
The Jones and Smith cases are the latest in a line of eligibility lawsuits the NCAA is facing. A notable one is ongoing in New Jersey as Rutgers player Jett Elad filed suit challenging the five-year rule, claiming he was offered $500,000 to play for the Scarlet Knights this year and the NCAA’s inconsistent approach to waivers is keeping him from earning those NIL dollars.
As the suits continue to go through the process, a group of college basketball players without eligibility were proactive and entered the transfer portal before the window closed Tuesday. If the NCAA’s eligibility rules shift after a judge’s ruling, those athletes could get another year.

North Carolina
North Carolina court says it's OK to swap jurors while they are deliberating

RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina’s highest court on Friday left intact a murder conviction that a lower appeals court had thrown out on the grounds that a jury shake-up during deliberations violated the defendant’s rights and required a new trial.
By a 5-2 decision, the state Supreme Court reversed last year’s decision of a state Court of Appeals panel that had sided with Eric Ramond Chambers, who has been serving a sentence of life in prison without parole.
The state constitution says no one can be convicted of a crime except by “the unanimous verdict of a jury in open court” that state justices have declared in the past repeatedly must be composed of 12 people.
A 2021 state law says an alternate juror can be substituted for one of the 12 after deliberations begin as long as the judge instructs the amended jury to begin deliberations anew. The judge at Chambers’ 2022 trial did just that when an alternate juror joined deliberations because an original juror couldn’t continue the next day due to a medical appointment.
The original 12 had deliberated for less than 30 minutes the day before. Chambers, who was representing himself in the trial, was not in the courtroom when the substitution occurred. By midday the reconstituted jury had reached a verdict, and Chambers was convicted of first-degree murder and a serious assault charge for the 2018 shooting in a Raleigh motel room.
Chambers petitioned the Court of Appeals, which later ruled that his right to a “properly constituted jury” had been violated and the 2021 law couldn’t supersede the state constitution because 13 people had reached the verdict. State attorneys then appealed.
Writing for Friday’s majority, Chief Justice Paul Newby said the 2021 law doesn’t violate Chamber’s right because it provides “critical safeguards that ensure that the twelve-juror threshold remains sacrosanct.”
Newby wrote the law says no more than 12 jurors can participate in the jury’s deliberations and that a judge’s instruction to begin deliberations anew means “any discussion in which the excused juror participated is disregarded and entirely new deliberations are commenced by the newly-constituted twelve.”
The four other justices who are registered Republicans joined Newby in his opinion.
In a dissenting opinion to retain the new trial, Associate Justice Allison Riggs wrote the 2021 law is an unconstitutional departure from the concept of 12-member juries and “endangers the impartiality and unanimity of the jury.”
No matter what directions a trial judge gives to jurors to begin deliberations anew, Riggs added, “we must assume by law that the original juror’s mere presence impacted the verdict.”
Associate Justice Anita Earls — who with Riggs are the court’s two registered Democrats — also dissented.
North Carolina
Lowering U.S. and NC Flags to Half-Staff in Honor of Memorial Day

In tribute to the sacrifices of our armed services personnel, Governor Josh Stein has ordered all United States and North Carolina flags at state facilities be flown at half-staff from sunrise until 12 noon on Monday, May 26 in honor of Memorial Day.
Statement from Governor Stein
“Throughout our nation’s history North Carolinians have answered the call to serve our country and protect our freedoms, and this weekend we honor those who paid the ultimate price in that service. Anna’s and my heart are with all the North Carolinians who are mourning their loved ones. Let us honor their legacy by preserving their memories, celebrating their bravery, and nourishing our democracy.”
Background
North Carolina flag announcements are issued in accordance to regulations outlined in the U.S. Flag Code.
Click for the NC State Government Flag Guide.
Sign up for the North Carolina Flag Alert list.
North Carolina
Obituary for Donna Darlene Foy at Jones Funeral Home of Jacksonville

-
Education1 week ago
Video: Opinion | We Study Fascism, and We’re Leaving the U.S.
-
Technology1 week ago
Love, Death, and Robots keeps a good thing going in volume 4
-
News1 week ago
As Harvard Battles Trump, Its President Will Take a 25% Pay Cut
-
Culture1 week ago
Book Review: ‘Hunger Like a Thirst,’ by Besha Rodell
-
Technology1 week ago
Meta asks judge to throw out antitrust case mid-trial
-
Politics1 week ago
Republicans say they're 'out of the loop' on Trump's $400M Qatari plane deal
-
World1 week ago
Commissioner Hansen presents plan to cut farming bureaucracy in EU
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
Classic Film Review: ‘Mad Max: Fury Road’ is a Lesson in Redemption | InSession Film