Connect with us

North Carolina

Flounder fallout: With the 2024 NC recreational season scrapped, what happens now?

Published

on

Flounder fallout: With the 2024 NC recreational season scrapped, what happens now?



The state’s flounder fishery has been struggling for decades, with data showing stocks severely depleted. But rebuilding the fishery could require more tough and unpopular decisions

What if the most popular fish was taken off the menu? Would a restaurant be expected to take a hit?

That’s what some North Carolina coastal communities could be dealing with in the near future after state regulators decided to cancel the 2024 recreational flounder fishing season due to concerns over the status of the stressed fishery.

The move has ignited a firestorm of criticism along the coast and rekindled the ever-present dispute between recreational and commercial fishermen over who is to blame for the overfishing that biologists say plagues many of North Carolina’s most popular fisheries − including flounder, arguably the most popular and traditional coastal Tar Heel State fish.

Advertisement

But the impact of last month’s decision by the Marine Fisheries Commission could extend beyond the frustration of local anglers.

In 2022, the last year for which figures are available, North Carolina sold more than 485,000 fishing licenses. The majority of the permits sold were annual licenses to state residents, many of them to allow fishing in both coastal and non-coastal public waters. But nearly 146,000 of them were short, 10-day licenses sold to non-residents − in other words tourists who fill the hotels, restaurants and tackle shops of many small towns along the coast.

If these visiting anglers from Tennessee or Ohio can no longer cast for flounder, especially in the state’s near-shore waters, will they instead head to neighboring states like South Carolina where flounder rules are much less stringent for their fishing vacations?

David Sneed, executive director of the Coastal Conservation Association of North Carolina, which has filed a lawsuit alleging the state has mismanaged its coastal fisheries, including flounder, said if it’s not already happening, it will.

Advertisement

The fishing license numbers might already be showing that as North Carolina regulators have moved to limit flounder and other fisheries due to overfishing concerns, with nearly 15,000 fewer 10-day licenses sold in 2022 than 2021 − albeit the surge in outdoor activities two years ago during the pandemic shutdown could have helped swell those numbers.

Casting into Banks Channel at the southern end of Wrightsville Beach near Masonboro Inlet last week, Billy Mitchell said with a grin that he was just hoping to catch “anything.”

“But flounder is the best, and certainly what the wife likes,” said the visiting angler from Nashville. Fishermen often cite flounder as their favorite fish because of its mild taste and that you don’t need expensive gear or boat to get offshore to catch it.

Knowing it’s out of season, Mitchell said he had already caught one of the flat fish and tossed it back. He added that he had intended to come back to the N.C. coast when the short recreational season was expected to open later this year.

But now?

Advertisement

“I’m not sure,” Mitchell said, wiping his brow and adjusting his burnt orange University of Tennessee Volunteers hat. “I’ll have to check with the wife, but that might change things.”

SINKING FEELING: As flounder numbers flounder, NC fishermen stew over short recreational season

How did we get here?

For years, regulators have been walking a tightrope in trying to balance economic, recreational, cultural and even political needs with the hard facts of a struggling fishery in trouble.

The big rollback in the flounder fishery began in 2019, when regulators moved to limit the recreational flounder season in response to data that showed the fishery was seriously overfished.

A series of more and more stringent restrictions led to the 2023 recreational season shortened to two weeks, but even that proved to be too much.

Advertisement

“Estimates from 2023 indicate the recreational catch exceeded the quota allowed under a stock rebuilding plan that was included in Amendment 3 to the Southern Flounder Fishery Management Plan and adopted by the N.C. Marine Fisheries Commission,” stated a release from the Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) announcing the total cancellation of the 2024 recreational season.

The amendment, adopted in May 2022, called for a 72% reduction in the southern flounder harvest, with both commercial and recreational fisheries seeing dramatic cuts.

Climate change is another concern among scientists, with warming sea temperatures potentially impacting the sex ratio of the fishery. Since juvenile flounders hang out in shallow, inland estuary waters, warmer water temperatures likely trigger more of the fish to be male. That could be a growing problem because female flounders grow bigger than males, and thus are more highly sought than the smaller males.

KEEPING TABS: Catch a flounder or red drum? NC recreational fishermen will soon have to report it

Advertisement

Didn’t just happen

Dr. Louis Daniel was the former state marine fisheries director for nearly a decade before leaving in 2016 and is now senior marine scientist at the N.C. Wildlife Federation and an adjunct professor at N.C. State University.

He said the plight the state and flounder fishermen find themselves in today didn’t just happen, but has been an issue for several decades as stock assessments showed pressures growing on the fishery even as rules were put into place to supposedly help it recover.

“This has been like watching a train wreck in slow motion,” CCA’s Sneed said.

Daniel said overfishing and discounting the impacts of discards, especially in the state’s commercial fisheries, is hampering stock recovery efforts − even as many fishermen claim they are seeing more flounder in the water than they’ve ever seen before.

“What they did with the recreational fishery was absolutely right,” he said of the decision by the state’s fishing regulators. “They did what the science told them they had to do.”

Advertisement

If the state can hold the line on the recreational catch and get more realistic about the impacts of flounder discards getting caught up in other fisheries, Daniel said the flounder fishery is likely to show some improvements in coming years.

But commercial fishermen, although small in number compared to recreational fishermen, have strong political allies in Raleigh, a long and rich sentimental attachment to the coast, and a significant economic impact in many areas where there are few other opportunities or industries.

In North Carolina, the number of participants in the commercial fishing industry has dropped from more than 5,000 in 2000 to fewer than 2,200 last year − a decrease of 57%. Other state statistics show the number of commercial permits and licenses issued by the state has decreased from more than 27,000 to around 19,300 in 2023. The number of fish dealer licenses also are falling as the industry shrinks, down 23% from 850 in 2000 to 655 in 2023.

Fisheries spokesperson Patricia Smith said the 2024 quota for the commercial flounder fishery has yet to be determined.

STATE OFFICIALS: No NC recreational flounder season in 2024

Advertisement

HOOK, LINE AND SINKING? What’s the future of NC’s commercial fishing industry?

What happens next year?

Under current management rules, exceeding a quota in one year means the following year’s allowable catch number must be reduced by the amount that exceeded the limit. When recreational fishermen caught too many flounder in 2023, that prompted the state to act.

“After subtracting the recreational overage from 2023, the recreational quota remaining for 2024 is not large enough to allow for a season opening,” stated the marine fisheries’ release announcing the closure of this year’s recreational season. “The leftover quota will be used to account for the anticipated dead discards that will occur due to incidental catch and release.”

With the 2024 recreational season canceled, the state shouldn’t have a problem having a 2025 recreational season, although it will probably have similar rules to the 2023 season − one fish per person, per day, and a minimum size of 15 inches.

The massive haul last year by recreational fishermen wasn’t the first time it has happened.

Advertisement

In 2022, the state’s recreational quota, or total allowable catch (TAC), was 170,655 pounds. But regulators estimated fishermen exceeded this amount by 56,340 pounds. During the two-week 2021 flounder season, recreational fishermen caught an estimated 627,000 pounds of flounder − well over the quota of 152,808 pounds.

Things, however, are looking up for recreational flounder fishermen − at least in the near term. Their overall share of the flounder fishery will increase from a 70-30 ratio this year to 60-40 next year, and that increased quota coupled with not having a recreational season this year should allow enough wiggle room for a limited recreational season in 2025.

But unless something changes, Daniel said we’re likely to see whatever recreational quota number is eventually set by regulators exceeded again.

“If we can’t effectively manage the fishery, we’ll be right back here in a couple years,” he said. “What this really highlights is the overcapacity in the fisheries, both commercial and recreational.

“That’s what we have to focus on fixing.”

Advertisement

Reporter Gareth McGrath can be reached at GMcGrath@Gannett.com or @GarethMcGrathSN on X/Twitter. This story was produced with financial support from the Green South Foundation and the Prentice Foundation. The USA TODAY Network maintains full editorial control of the work. 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Carolina

Former North Carolina, Arkansas QB Jacolby Criswell signs with surprising school

Published

on

Former North Carolina, Arkansas QB Jacolby Criswell signs with surprising school


North Carolina transfer quarterback Jacolby Criswell has signed to play for East Tennessee State in 2025, On3’s Pete Nakos confirmed. He spent four total seasons in Chapel Hill and will have one year of eligibility remaining.

Criswell played the first three seasons of his college career with the Tar Heels before transferring to Arkansas ahead of 2023. He played one year in Fayetteville before deciding to come back to North Carolina ahead of this season.

Criswell didn’t begin as the starter this past season but took over after Max Johnson went down with injury. He finished the year with 2,459 yards and 15 touchdowns to six interceptions.

This story will be updated.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina among 18 states suing to stop Trump’s order blocking birthright citizenship

Published

on

North Carolina among 18 states suing to stop Trump’s order blocking birthright citizenship


WASHINGTON, D.C. (WITN) – Attorneys general from 18 states sued Tuesday to block President Donald Trump’s move to end a decades-old immigration policy known as birthright citizenship guaranteeing that U.S.-born children are citizens regardless of their parents’ status.

Trump’s roughly 700-word executive order, issued late Monday, amounts to a fulfillment of something he’s talked about during the presidential campaign. But whether it succeeds is far from certain amid what is likely to be a lengthy legal battle over the president’s immigration policies.

North Carolina is one of the 18 states challenging the executive order. Attorney General Jeff Jackson is asking the court to invalidate the executive order and stop it from being implemented.

“This executive order is a straightforward violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to all people born on U.S. soil. For over a century, this principle has been upheld by the Supreme Court and remains a bedrock of our constitutional framework,” said Jackson.

Advertisement

Attorney General Jackson says the Constitution leaves no room for reinterpreting this matter.

“As Attorney General, my role is straightforward as well: to defend the Constitution. That’s why I’ve joined this lawsuit, to uphold the rule of law and preserve the rights that have defined our nation for generations,” said Jackson.

Here’s a closer look at birthright citizenship, Trump’s executive order and reaction to it:

What is birthright citizenship?

Birthright citizenship means anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. People, for instance, in the United States on a tourist or other visa or in the country illegally can become the parents of a citizen if their child is born here.

It’s been in place for decades and enshrined in the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, supporters say. But Trump and allies dispute the reading of the amendment and say there need to be tougher standards on becoming a citizen.

Advertisement

What does Trump’s order say?

The order questions that the 14th Amendment extends citizenship automatically to anyone born in the United States.

The 14th Amendment was born in the aftermath of the Civil War and ratified in 1868. It says: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Trump’s order excludes the following people from automatic citizenship: those whose mothers were not legally in the United States and whose fathers were not U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents; people whose mothers were in the country legally but on a temporary basis and whose fathers were not citizens or legal permanent residents.

It goes on to bar federal agencies from recognizing the citizenship of people in those categories. It takes effect 30 days from Tuesday, on Feb. 19.

What is the history of the issue?

The 14th Amendment did not always guarantee birthright citizenship to all U.S.-born people. Congress did not authorize citizenship for all Native Americans born in the United States, for instance, until 1924.

Advertisement

In 1898 an important birthright citizenship case unfolded in the U.S. Supreme Court. The court held that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrants, was a U.S. citizen because he was born in the country. After a trip abroad, he had faced denied reentry by the federal government on the grounds that he wasn’t a citizen under the Chinese Exclusion Act.

But some advocates of immigration restrictions have argued that while the case clearly applied to children born to parents who are both legal immigrants, it’s less clear whether it applies to children born to parents without legal status.

What has the reaction to Trump’s order been?

Eighteen states, plus the District of Columbia and San Francisco sued in federal court to block Trump’s order.

New Jersey Democratic Attorney General Matt Platkin said Tuesday that presidents might have broad authority but they are not kings.

“The president cannot, with a stroke of a pen, write the 14th Amendment out of existence, period,” he said.

Advertisement

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a U.S. citizen by birthright and the nation’s first Chinese American elected attorney general, said the lawsuit was personal for him.

“The 14th Amendment says what it means, and it means what it says —- if you are born on American soil, you are an American. Period. Full stop,” he said. “There is no legitimate legal debate on this question. But the fact that Trump is dead wrong will not prevent him from inflicting serious harm right now on American families like my own.”

Not long after Trump signed the order, immigrant rights groups filed suit to stop it.

Chapters of the American Civil Liberties Union in New Hampshire, Maine and Massachusetts along with other immigrant rights advocates filed a suit in New Hampshire federal court.

The suit asks the court to find the order to be unconstitutional. It highlights the case of a woman identified as “Carmen,” who is pregnant but is not a citizen. The lawsuit says she has lived in the United States for more than 15 years and has a pending visa application that could lead to permanent status. She has no other immigration status, and the father of her expected child has no immigration status either, the suit says.

Advertisement

“Stripping children of the ‘priceless treasure’ of citizenship is a grave injury,” the suit said. “It denies them the full membership in U.S. society to which they are entitled.”

In addition to North Carolina, New Jersey and the two cities, California, Massachusetts, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin joined the lawsuit to stop the order.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes in NC, FEMA maps show

Published

on

Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes in NC, FEMA maps show


play

Tropical Storm Helene destroyed nearly 1,000 homes when it tore through Western North Carolina Sept. 27, maps from the Federal Emergency Management Agency show.

The maps, which show verified damage to homes as of Jan. 7, were presented to the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners at its Jan. 16 budget retreat.

Advertisement

In Buncombe County, Helene destroyed 340 homes, according to the maps. More than 170 were owner-occupied, while the remaining were rental properties.

The maps also show how many homes across the state sustained major damage and how many require repairs so residents can move back in.

According to the maps, 2,360 homes suffered major damage. Nearly one-third were rentals. Additionally, nearly 30,000 homes require habitability repairs, according to the maps. More than 6,000 of those homes were occupied by renters.

The number of damaged homes verified by FEMA is significantly lower than initial estimates from the state. According to a Dec. 13 damage needs assessment compiled by the N.C. Office of State Budget and Management, more than 73,000 homes were projected to be damaged, the majority of which were expected to be single-family and manufactured homes, and duplexes. In total, the state is estimating nearly $13 billion in residential damage alone.

Advertisement

The Citizen Times requested updated damage maps from FEMA on Jan. 17.

How did homes in Buncombe, Henderson, McDowell, Madison and Yancey counties fare?

Destroyed homes:

Buncombe: 340

Advertisement

Henderson: 89

McDowell: 92

Yancey: 100

Madison:11+

Major damage:

Advertisement

Buncombe: 640

Henderson: 354

McDowell: 128

Yancey: 166

Madison: 56

Advertisement

Homes requiring habitability repairs:

Buncombe: 8,920

Henderson: 3,988

McDowell: 1,442

Yancey: 1,767

Advertisement

Madison: 302

Jacob Biba is the county watchdog reporter at the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. Email him at jbiba@citizentimes.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending