Connect with us

North Carolina

Crypto concerns: Why makers of digital currency want to be here. What makes NC counties wish they left.

Published

on

Crypto concerns: Why makers of digital currency want to be here. What makes NC counties wish they left.


Of all the companies that have come to North Carolina in recent years, from Toyota to Google to Amazon, cryptomining operations don’t exactly spring to mind.

But the state, because of its vast swaths of land, is increasingly being targeted by these outfits looking to operate here — much to the chagrin and consternation of local residents.

But as politicians and lawmakers cozy up to crypto, these mining operations are of ever-increasing importance. 

When it comes to the “mining” of digital currency, don’t think of it like digging for coal. The mines authenticate crypto transactions and add these transactions to what’s known as a “blockchain.” Without mining, Bitcoin and other digital currencies would cease to function.

Advertisement
[Subscribe for FREE to Carolina Public Press’ alerts and weekend roundup newsletters]

Which brings us to North Carolina. When digital currency mining was outlawed in China during 2021, many cryptomining operations migrated to the United States. Crypto companies are attracted to sparsely-populated areas where power — of which they need a staggering amount — is affordable and abundant. 

As a bonus, there aren’t many people around to complain about the thunderous noise, which comes from the whirring of high-speed fans that run day and night to cool the mine’s computers. 

Recently, a cryptomine operation appeared ready to open in Burke County until the Town Council passed a set of restrictive zoning laws — after a group called the National Coalition Against Cryptomining drew attention to the company’s plans.

Sounding the alarm

It’s hard to sleep when you live near a cryptomine. 

People compare the sound of the fans to a roaring jet engine. Or a continually crashing waterfall. Or a motorcycle endlessly revving its engine.

Advertisement

Cyndie Roberson left Cherokee County to escape the din of the mines. She has seen others break down in tears at public meetings when describing the noise.

For Roberson, cryptocurrency mining is environmentally destructive and socially disruptive. The operation only benefits distant crypto investors, leaving the community itself in a noisy confusion. It is about as welcome as a high-speed racetrack in her backyard.

To the untrained eye, cryptomines look like unremarkable rows of storage containers. There are no employees. The computers loudly hum along on their own, verifying crypto transactions by attempting to solve an endless stream of complex mathematical puzzles.

When the computers solve a puzzle correctly, it verifies a group of cryptocurrency transactions and adds it to the public ledger known as the blockchain. As a reward for the intensive work of verification, the cryptomining company receives newly-minted cryptocurrency and transaction fees. To do this work, the computers use a tremendous amount of electricity and generate a lot of heat, which explains the need for the deafening fans. 

One cryptomine uses hundreds of megawatts of power per hour. Consider that one megawatt can supply more than 400 homes. 

Advertisement

For this reason, cryptominers like to set up their facilities near substations or other sources of power. 

Nine of North Carolina’s mountain counties, including Cherokee, now have a ban or protective ordinance against cryptomining. But by the time Cherokee County outlawed cryptomining in 2023, three mines were already in operation and not subject to the ban. 

Today, they continue their intense blare.

Too legit to quit

Digital currency is gaining legitimacy in North Carolina. House Bill 920 aims to transform cryptocurrency into valid, legal tender in the state. Another bill — approved by the House — allows NC Treasurer Brad Briner to place up to 5% of the state’s investments into crypto. 

But even though Briner thinks crypto is a smart investment for North Carolina, he doesn’t necessarily want it to be mined in the state. 

Advertisement

“I’m concerned about cryptomines,” Briner told Carolina Public Press. “If your business is not really employing people and just consuming a ton of cheap power, that’s not the best business for us to recruit.”

At the federal level, President Donald Trump promised to make the United States the “crypto capital of the world,” establishing a Bitcoin reserve and loosening all kinds of restrictions on digital currency.

North Carolina doesn’t keep a registry of cryptomines, so it’s hard to know how many are operating across the state. 

Cryptomining controversy

Despite the growing fondness of crypto in Raleigh and Washington, local governments are pushing back against allowing these operations to exist within their borders.

When Digihost, a Canadian cryptomining company, bought a piece of land inside the limits of Hildebran, a small Burke County town northwest of Charlotte, the transaction initially went unnoticed by many.

Advertisement

The town had no idea Digihost was planning to build a mine on the land the company bought a couple years back. 

Once alerted to the company’s plan, however, Hildebran acted swiftly, passing restrictive zoning ordinances against cryptomining at a Town Council meeting in late April. The laws restrict the decibel level to an almost unattainable quiet for cryptomines — 55 decibels, which compares to the sound of a household refrigerator. Normal cryptomines can reach 95 decibels, which at sustained exposure, can cause permanent hearing loss.

But the mines aren’t expressly banned, and Hildebran is leaving the door open.

“At this time, the town has no official knowledge of when or if any such operation will begin,” according to a statement from Hildebran’s Town Council. “Our goal with the proposed ordinances is to keep cryptomining operations sound-neutral … and not to impact the power usage of citizens and industries in town.”

The zoning also limits the hours of operation, which bars the mine from running overnight. 

Advertisement

Roberson says this is “game over” for cryptomines.

That may be true in Burke County.

But not necessarily in North Carolina.

Advertisement

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. You may republish our stories for free, online or in print. Simply copy and paste the article contents from the box below. Note, some images and interactive features may not be included here.





Source link

North Carolina

2026 primary turnout report released for eastern NC counties; see your county’s numbers

Published

on

2026 primary turnout report released for eastern NC counties; see your county’s numbers


Here are the voter turnout numbers for the 2026 primary election, according to the North Carolina State Board of Elections.

Hyde County had the highest voter turnout, while Onslow County had the lowest turnout. Check out what the voter turnout in your county was below:

BERTIE COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

Advertisement

31.85% (3,911 out of 12,280)

CARTERET COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

29.06% (16,543 out of 56,931)

CRAVEN COUNTY

Advertisement

Ballots Cast:

18.63% (14,119 out of 75,778)

DUPLIN COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

21.93% (6,981 out of 31,832)

Advertisement

EDGECOMBE COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

18.16% (6,428 out of 35,396)

GREENE COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

Advertisement

19.70% (2,147 out of 10,900)

HYDE COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

37.27% (1,123 out of 3,013)

JONES COUNTY

Advertisement

Ballots Cast:

25.91% (1,805 out of 6,966)

LENOIR COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

16.73% (6,251 out of 37,371)

Advertisement

MARTIN COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

17.61% (2,858 out of 16,228)

ONSLOW COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

Advertisement

11.44% (14,816 out of 129,537)

PAMLICO COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

24.03% (2,446 out of 10,180)

PITT COUNTY

Advertisement

Ballots Cast:

15.71% (19,429 out of 123,705)

TYRRELL COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

30.49% (723 out of 2,371)

Advertisement

WASHINGTON COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

28.66% (2,312 out of 8,067)

WAYNE COUNTY

Ballots Cast:

Advertisement

21.49% (16,408 out of 76,358)



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Statewide tornado drill has NC schools and workplaces practicing safety

Published

on

Statewide tornado drill has NC schools and workplaces practicing safety


Wednesday, March 4, 2026 6:41PM

NC schools and businesses encouraged to practice tornado safety

RALEIGH, N.C. (WTVD) — North Carolina schools and businesses took part in a statewide tornado drill Wednesday morning as part of Severe Weather Awareness Week.

The National Weather Service led the drill at 9:30 a.m., broadcasting it on NOAA Weather Radio and the Emergency Alert System. Schools, workplaces and households across the state were encouraged to join in.

The National Weather Service didn’t issue a follow up alert to mark the end of the drill. Instead, each school or business wrapped up once they felt they had practiced the procedures thoroughly.

Wednesday’s drill also replaced the regular weekly NOAA Weather Radio test.

Advertisement

SEE | New warning for parents amid new ‘fire-breathing’ social media trend

Make sure to download the ABC 11 Mobile App ABC11 North Carolina Apps for Connected TV, Mobile News, Echo

Copyright © 2026 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina Rep. Valerie Foushee holds narrow lead over challenger Nida Allam

Published

on

North Carolina Rep. Valerie Foushee holds narrow lead over challenger Nida Allam


Nida Allam in 2022; Rep. Valerie Foushee (D-NC) in 2025.

Jonathan Drake/Reuters; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Jonathan Drake/Reuters; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Incumbent Rep. Valerie Foushee holds a narrow lead over challenger Nida Allam in the Democratic primary for North Carolina’s 4th Congressional district as ballots continue to be counted.

In a race seen as an early test of whether Democratic voters desire generational change within the party, Foushee holds a lead of just over 1,000 votes with 99% of results in so far, according to the Associated Press.

Advertisement

Under state law, provisional votes will be counted in the coming days in a district that includes Durham and Chapel Hill. If the election results end up within a 1% margin, Allam could request a recount.

Successfully ousting an incumbent lawmaker is often extremely difficult and rare. However, there have been recent upsets in races as some voters are calling for new leaders and several sitting members of Congress face primary challengers this cycle.

Allam, a 32-year-old Durham County Commissioner, is running to the left of Foushee, 69, framing her candidacy as part of a broader rejection of longtime Democratic norms.

On the campaign trail, Allam ran on an anti-establishment message, pledging to be a stronger fighter than Foushee in Congress, both in standing up against President Trump’s agenda and when pushing for more ambitious policy.

Advertisement

“North Carolina is a purple state that often gets labeled red, but we’re not a red state,” she told NPR in an interview last month, emphasizing the need to address affordability concerns. “We are a state of working-class folks who just want their elected officials to champion the issues that are impacting them.”

She drew a contrast with the congresswoman on immigration, voicing support for abolishing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Foushee has declined to go that far, advocating instead for ICE to be defunded and for broader reforms to the federal immigration system.

Allam also clashed with Foushee over U.S. policy towards Israel. As a vocal opponent of Israel’s war in Gaza, Allam swore off campaign donations from pro-Israel lobbying groups, such as AIPAC, and repeatedly criticized Foushee for previously accepting such funds.

Though Foushee announced last year that she would not accept AIPAC donations this cycle, she and Allam continued to spar over the broader role of outside spending in the race.

Their matchup comes four years after the candidates first squared off in 2022, when Allam lost to Foushee in what became the most expensive primary in the state’s history, with outside groups spending more than $3.8 million.

Advertisement

However, this year is poised to break that record. Outside groups have reported spending more than $4.4 million on the primary matchup, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

WUNC’s Colin Campbell contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending