Connect with us

North Carolina

Crypto concerns: Why makers of digital currency want to be here. What makes NC counties wish they left.

Published

on

Crypto concerns: Why makers of digital currency want to be here. What makes NC counties wish they left.


Of all the companies that have come to North Carolina in recent years, from Toyota to Google to Amazon, cryptomining operations don’t exactly spring to mind.

But the state, because of its vast swaths of land, is increasingly being targeted by these outfits looking to operate here — much to the chagrin and consternation of local residents.

But as politicians and lawmakers cozy up to crypto, these mining operations are of ever-increasing importance. 

When it comes to the “mining” of digital currency, don’t think of it like digging for coal. The mines authenticate crypto transactions and add these transactions to what’s known as a “blockchain.” Without mining, Bitcoin and other digital currencies would cease to function.

Advertisement
[Subscribe for FREE to Carolina Public Press’ alerts and weekend roundup newsletters]

Which brings us to North Carolina. When digital currency mining was outlawed in China during 2021, many cryptomining operations migrated to the United States. Crypto companies are attracted to sparsely-populated areas where power — of which they need a staggering amount — is affordable and abundant. 

As a bonus, there aren’t many people around to complain about the thunderous noise, which comes from the whirring of high-speed fans that run day and night to cool the mine’s computers. 

Recently, a cryptomine operation appeared ready to open in Burke County until the Town Council passed a set of restrictive zoning laws — after a group called the National Coalition Against Cryptomining drew attention to the company’s plans.

Sounding the alarm

It’s hard to sleep when you live near a cryptomine. 

People compare the sound of the fans to a roaring jet engine. Or a continually crashing waterfall. Or a motorcycle endlessly revving its engine.

Advertisement

Cyndie Roberson left Cherokee County to escape the din of the mines. She has seen others break down in tears at public meetings when describing the noise.

For Roberson, cryptocurrency mining is environmentally destructive and socially disruptive. The operation only benefits distant crypto investors, leaving the community itself in a noisy confusion. It is about as welcome as a high-speed racetrack in her backyard.

To the untrained eye, cryptomines look like unremarkable rows of storage containers. There are no employees. The computers loudly hum along on their own, verifying crypto transactions by attempting to solve an endless stream of complex mathematical puzzles.

When the computers solve a puzzle correctly, it verifies a group of cryptocurrency transactions and adds it to the public ledger known as the blockchain. As a reward for the intensive work of verification, the cryptomining company receives newly-minted cryptocurrency and transaction fees. To do this work, the computers use a tremendous amount of electricity and generate a lot of heat, which explains the need for the deafening fans. 

One cryptomine uses hundreds of megawatts of power per hour. Consider that one megawatt can supply more than 400 homes. 

Advertisement

For this reason, cryptominers like to set up their facilities near substations or other sources of power. 

Nine of North Carolina’s mountain counties, including Cherokee, now have a ban or protective ordinance against cryptomining. But by the time Cherokee County outlawed cryptomining in 2023, three mines were already in operation and not subject to the ban. 

Today, they continue their intense blare.

Too legit to quit

Digital currency is gaining legitimacy in North Carolina. House Bill 920 aims to transform cryptocurrency into valid, legal tender in the state. Another bill — approved by the House — allows NC Treasurer Brad Briner to place up to 5% of the state’s investments into crypto. 

But even though Briner thinks crypto is a smart investment for North Carolina, he doesn’t necessarily want it to be mined in the state. 

Advertisement

“I’m concerned about cryptomines,” Briner told Carolina Public Press. “If your business is not really employing people and just consuming a ton of cheap power, that’s not the best business for us to recruit.”

At the federal level, President Donald Trump promised to make the United States the “crypto capital of the world,” establishing a Bitcoin reserve and loosening all kinds of restrictions on digital currency.

North Carolina doesn’t keep a registry of cryptomines, so it’s hard to know how many are operating across the state. 

Cryptomining controversy

Despite the growing fondness of crypto in Raleigh and Washington, local governments are pushing back against allowing these operations to exist within their borders.

When Digihost, a Canadian cryptomining company, bought a piece of land inside the limits of Hildebran, a small Burke County town northwest of Charlotte, the transaction initially went unnoticed by many.

Advertisement

The town had no idea Digihost was planning to build a mine on the land the company bought a couple years back. 

Once alerted to the company’s plan, however, Hildebran acted swiftly, passing restrictive zoning ordinances against cryptomining at a Town Council meeting in late April. The laws restrict the decibel level to an almost unattainable quiet for cryptomines — 55 decibels, which compares to the sound of a household refrigerator. Normal cryptomines can reach 95 decibels, which at sustained exposure, can cause permanent hearing loss.

But the mines aren’t expressly banned, and Hildebran is leaving the door open.

“At this time, the town has no official knowledge of when or if any such operation will begin,” according to a statement from Hildebran’s Town Council. “Our goal with the proposed ordinances is to keep cryptomining operations sound-neutral … and not to impact the power usage of citizens and industries in town.”

The zoning also limits the hours of operation, which bars the mine from running overnight. 

Advertisement

Roberson says this is “game over” for cryptomines.

That may be true in Burke County.

But not necessarily in North Carolina.

Advertisement

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. You may republish our stories for free, online or in print. Simply copy and paste the article contents from the box below. Note, some images and interactive features may not be included here.





Source link

North Carolina

Judges approve North Carolina’s use of GOP-friendly district map – UPI.com

Published

on

Judges approve North Carolina’s use of GOP-friendly district map – UPI.com


Nov. 26 (UPI) — A three-judge panel on Wednesday permitted North Carolina to adopt a redrawn congressional map that is expected to favor the Republican Party.

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina unanimously ruled against the plaintiffs’ request for an injunction against legislation approved in October by the state’s General Assembly that critics say threaten one federal congressional district, specifically Congressional District 1, which represented by Democrat Don Davis.

In their 57-page ruling on Wednesday, the three Republican-appointed judges said the plaintiffs failed to prove that the state’s General Assembly enacted the legislation, Senate Bill 249, with the intent to “minimize or cancel out the voting potential” of Black North Carolinians as they had claimed.

The ruling comes in protracted litigation that began in 2023, when the Republican-led state sought to redraw some of the districts for electing representatives to the state Senate and federal Congress.

Advertisement

The plaintiffs, who include the North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, sued that December. In October, amid litigation on the maps, the state’s General Assembly passed legislation to swap counties between Congressional District 1 and Congressional District 3.

The plaintiffs again sued the state, alleging the legislation was unconstitutional and asking the court to enjoin S.B. 249.

Earlier this month, the same three-judge panel issued a ruling approving the changes to the map put forward in 2023.

A hearing on S.B. 249 was held Nov. 19, during which the plaintiffs argued that the speed with which the General Assembly passed the 2025 plan was evidence of discriminatory intent.

But the panel of judges disagreed, stating “they have offered no reason to believe that the speed of the 2025 process indicates an intent to discriminate on the basis of race. Nor do they explain what weight we are supposed to assign to what they call ‘the near uniform outcry among North Carolina voters against the map and the process.’”

Advertisement

The ruling comes amid something of a gerrymandering race in the United States that began in earnest when Texas this summer — under pressure of President Donald Trump — sought a mid-decade redraw of its maps to make them more favorable to the Republican Party.

California is in the process of redrawing its maps in retaliation and other states under control of both parties have followed with similar plans.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina calls on Shopify to stop illegal e-cigarette sales on its platform

Published

on

North Carolina calls on Shopify to stop illegal e-cigarette sales on its platform


North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson has joined a coalition of 25 other attorneys general calling on Shopify, a popular e-commerce platform, to take stronger action against merchants who use its services to sell illegal tobacco products and e-cigarettes.

In a Nov. 24 news release, the AG’s office said there are more than two dozen illegal e-cigarette websites that utilize Shopify’s platform and another 200 websites that are selling illegal tobacco products.

“If states and the federal government create laws to protect our residents, companies can’t sidestep those for their own profit,” Jackson said in the news release. “We have protections against selling e-cigarettes to children because we know how harmful it is for them, and we need Shopify to step up and keep those products off of its platforms.”

VAPING IMPACTS BLOOD VESSELS & OXYGEN, NEW STUDY SAYS

Advertisement

The AG’s office said that due to their highly addictive nature and potential health risks, especially for young people, e-cigarettes are strictly regulated by federal law, as well as by many state laws across the country. E-cigarettes also cannot be sold to people under the age of 21.

Jackson’s office said Shopify has removed merchants for using its services for unlawful activities in recent years, but merchants continue using it to sell e-cigarettes.

The bipartisan attorneys general are asking Shopify to work together to find a solution that keeps unlawful products off their platforms and out of the market, according to the release.

NORTH CAROLINA LAWSUIT DOCUMENTS AGAINST JUUL NOW PUBLIC

Comment with Bubbles
Advertisement

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

In 2019, North Carolina sued electronic cigarette company JUUL for unlawfully designing, marketing, and selling e-cigarettes to teenagers. It won a $47.8 million judgment against Juul in 2021.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

In wake of apparent road rage shootings, Thanksgiving drivers, travelers prepare

Published

on

In wake of apparent road rage shootings, Thanksgiving drivers, travelers prepare


DURHAM, N.C. (WTVD) — Safety is top of mind for many people in the Triangle after a violent week of apparent road rage shootings, including one over the weekend in Wake County on Knightdale Blvd., where one person died.

“It’s a little overwhelming, it’s like anxiety inducing,” Raj Rana said.

Rana said he’s seen firsthand how driving behavior can escalate on North Carolina roads.

“I’ll try to understand my surroundings and get to a place where I cannot be in someone’s way or have their anger not be directed at me,” Rana said.

Advertisement

AAA is projecting nearly 90% of Thanksgiving travelers will travel by car, including in Durham County, where driving instructor Calvin Brewer is teaching students how to avoid and manage road rage.

It’s better to just drive away rather than confront other drivers.

Calvin Brewer, Driving Instructor

Advertisement

“We have been seeing a lot more road rage and a lot more incidents about road rage, especially with the population increase,” Brewer said.

North Carolina is home to more than 11 million people, meaning more drivers on the road.

Some of the safety tips Brewer said include:

  • Removing yourself from the situation

He added that there could be legal consequences depending on how you react to aggressive behaviors on the road.

“Remember the value of staying calm in stressful situations,” Brewer said. “We always teach that safety is top priority. If you feel threatened or if you know something like that, it’s better to just drive away rather than confront other drivers.”

SEE ALSO | Deadly shooting may have been sparked by road rage in Wake County

Advertisement

SEE ALSO | 1 person injured after shooting in south Raleigh, police say

Copyright © 2025 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending