Connect with us

North Carolina

Apple Delays Build Of Taxpayer-Subsidized North Carolina Campus

Published

on

Apple Delays Build Of Taxpayer-Subsidized North Carolina Campus


Apple Inc. appears to be delaying its plans to build a corporate campus in Research Triangle Park, which is sited on the boundaries of Raleigh, Chapel Hill and Durham in North Carolina.

Construction was originally slated to begin in 2026, but the tech giant has reportedly told state officials of its desire to delay groundbreaking for up to four years. The delay would be a considerable setback for the area, which anticipated substantial economic growth and job creation from the project.

Advertisement

The first phase of the project was expected to include six buildings across 41 acres, with a promise of a future expansion on a 281 acre site. The proposed project was intended to house roles in machine learning, artificial intelligence, and software engineering, with estimates of 3,000 jobs with salaries approaching $200,000.

As the region grapples with news of the delay, the broader implications in terms of economic development are somewhat less clear. The taxpayer-funded incentives bound up in the project may have made the development less of an unalloyed positive for North Carolinians.

Massive Taxpayer Contributions

The cost to North Carolina for securing Apple’s investment was substantial, with $845.8 million in tax breaks promised over 39 years and local incentives adding another $20 million. The all-in cost to taxpayers totaled nearly $1 billion, or roughly $333,000 per job added.

For context, this is just a few thousand dollars shy of a noted tax incentive boondoggle: the “border war” between Kansas City between Missouri and Kansas. There, some 414 jobs were created in Kansas at a cost of $340,000 per job.

Advertisement

The track record of the Job Development Investment Grant Program, which would facilitate the tax breaks accruing to Apple, has been mixed at best. Notable projects that have also been pushed back by the recipients of tax incentives include an agreement with Allstate to create 2,200 jobs which was made impractical by a shift to remote work and a commitment by a Vietnamese automaker to create 7,500 jobs which has been delayed until 2025.

Apple’s decision to delay the construction of its Research Triangle Park campus brings into question the future economic impact on the Raleigh-Durham area—but it is far from clear the result will be a net negative for North Carolina taxpayers.

Tax Incentives and Job Creation

The efficacy of tax incentives in fostering job creation more broadly has been long debated. While incentives are often touted as necessary to attract large companies and thereby spur economic development, evidence has for some time suggested that they may not be as effective as advertised.

One main criticism is that the incentives often result in a relocating of existing jobs rather than the creation of new ones—put differently, there is no net addition of jobs to the economy writ large, merely a subtraction from one region or state and an addition in another. This can have beneficial local effects, but those effects may be blunted by the broader net loss inherent where an expenditure is made to maintain the same total number of jobs.

The practice of offering tax incentives leads to a zero-sum game, where cities or regions engage in a destructive bidding war, each vying to spend more taxpayer money to the benefit of no one save for the corporations being fought over.

Advertisement

In fact, research suggests that the primary drivers of job growth are not older firms—but young firms. This would suggest North Carolina would be better off incentivizing the next Apple to start its business in the Research Triangle, rather than trying to attract existing behemoths. Newer firms inject competition, spur innovation, and are more likely to hire new workers.

Thus, policies that support the creation of new businesses, rather than providing tax incentives to existing ones, may be more beneficial for long-term sustainable development—but they don’t make the headlines.



Source link

North Carolina

North Carolina lawmakers react to Venezuela strikes, Maduro capture

Published

on

North Carolina lawmakers react to Venezuela strikes, Maduro capture


ASHEVILLE – Expressing a range of support and skepticism, North Carolina lawmakers are reacting to react to the United States bombing of Venezuelan military sites and the capture of President Nicolas Maduro on Jan 2.

The morning of Jan. 3, President Donald Trump announced that the United States had captured Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife and bombed military sites in the country’s capital, Caracas. During a press conference in the early afternoon, Trump said the United States would “run” the country until a new leader could be appointed. Congress had not been told about the operation due to concerns lawmakers would “leak” information, Trump said.

According to USA TODAY, citing CNN reporting, a plane carrying Maduro and Flores landed at Stewart Air National Guard Base in New York the afternoon of Jan. 3.

Advertisement

Republican Sen. Ted Budd of North Carolina expressed support for the president’s actions in a statement on social media, calling Maduro “an illegitimate dictator who has long been wanted in the U.S. on charges of narco-terrorism, corruption, & drug trafficking.”

“These actions are within the President’s Article II authority & send a clear message to America’s enemies our nation will not allow threats to our safety & security to continue unchecked,” Budd, who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, wrote on X Jan. 3.

As of 5 p.m. on Jan 3., Republican Rep. Chuck Edwards, who represents much of Western North Carolina, had not yet released a statement on the events in Venezuela. On Jan. 1, Edwards published an op-ed in the Washington Times in support of Trump’s directive to strike boats off the coast of the Latin American country. The president has said the boats facilitated “narcoterrorism.”

Advertisement

The Citizen Times has reached out to Edwards’ office and the office of Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, who has also not yet issued a statement on the president’s actions. Tillis is not seeking re-election.

Adam Smith, a former Green Beret running against Edwards in the Republican primary for North’s Carolina 11th Congressional District, said Maduro’s arrest “represents a decisive and long-overdue action in defense of the Western Hemisphere and the security interests of the United States and its allies.”

Democrats skeptical of legality

In a statement on X, North Carolina Rep. Deborah Ross for the Second Congressional District, said that Trump, while acting “without regard for the constitution and without considering the long-term consequences for our security or our democracy” sought to capture a “despot who stole elections, imprisoned his political opponents, and trampled on the rights and dignity of his people.”

“Using military force to remove a foreign head of state unquestionably requires congressional authorization. Trump ignored that requirement, once again thumbing his nose at our constitution and Congress. At a minimum, Congress must be fully and transparently briefed and then take appropriate action,” Ross wrote in her statement.

Advertisement

Though former governor and North Carolina Democratic Senate Candidate Roy Cooper has not released a statement on Maduro’s capture, Republican Senate candidate Michael Whatley said he supported Trump’s decision in a post on X.

“He has taken decisive and aggressive action to dismantle the criminal networks responsible for addiction, violence, and death no matter where they operate or how powerful they claim to be,” Whatley said. “I am proud to support a President who will stop at nothing to protect our people and hold those who traffic death into our country fully responsible.”

As protests were expected across the country the afternoon of Jan. 3, around 75 protestors gathered in Pack Square Plaza in Asheville around 2:30 p.m. holding signs that said “no blood for oil” and “stop bombing Venezuela.”

Protestor Jeffrey DeCristofaro said he had been planning to rest on Jan. 3 but came to the protest after he felt Trump’s actions were “more than just illegal, but dangerous.” Given the lack of details on the future of the conflict, the strikes have made him feel uneasy.

Advertisement

“I didn’t know what to make of it,” DeCristofaro said of Trump stating the United States would “run” Venezuela. “I’m kind of walking a tightrope between passionate anger and cynical exhaustion.”

Holding a sign stating “money for people’s needs, not the war machine,” Anne Turnbow-Raustol said she attended the protest amid what she felt was “hypocrisy” by the Trump administration, comparing Trump’s decision to capture Maduro as similar to how the Venezuelan president operates.

“I don’t think any of it is legal,” Turnbow-Raustol said.

Advertisement

This story will be updated.

Reporting contributed by Cybele Mayes-Osterman, Davis Winkie, Francesca Chambers, Bart Jansen, Hannah Phillips, Jeanine Santucci, Eduardo Cuevas, Mike Snider of USA TODAY

Will Hofmann is the Growth and Development Reporter for the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA Today Network. Got a tip? Email him at WHofmann@citizentimes.com or message will_hofmann.01 on Signal.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

How to watch Penn State Nittany Lions: Live stream info, TV channel, game time | Dec. 29

Published

on

How to watch Penn State Nittany Lions: Live stream info, TV channel, game time | Dec. 29


The North Carolina Central Eagles (4-10) and Freddie Filione V’s Penn State Nittany Lions (8-4) hit the court at Bryce Jordan Center on Monday, Dec. 29, beginning at 1 p.m. ET.

We provide more details below, and that includes how to watch this game on TV.

Here is what you need to prepare for Monday’s college basketball action.

Penn State vs. North Carolina Central: How to watch on TV or live stream

  • Game day: Monday, December 29, 2025
  • Game time: 1 p.m. ET
  • Location: University Park, Pennsylvania
  • Arena: Bryce Jordan Center
  • TV Channel: BTN
  • Live stream: Fubo – Watch NOW (Regional restrictions may apply)

Check out: USA TODAY Sports Coaches Poll

Watch college basketball on Fubo!

Advertisement

Penn State vs. North Carolina Central stats and trends

  • Penn State is averaging 78.2 points per game (173rd-ranked in college basketball) this season, while surrendering 74.9 points per contest (222nd-ranked).
  • The Nittany Lions have struggled to accumulate rebounds this season, ranking 20th-worst in college basketball with 28.6 boards per game. They rank 109th by allowing 29.4 rebounds per contest.
  • Penn State ranks 249th in college basketball with 13.5 dimes per contest.
  • The Nittany Lions rank 10th-best in college basketball by averaging only 9 turnovers per game. In terms of forced turnovers, they rank 159th in college basketball (12.3 per contest).
  • This year, Penn State is draining 6.8 threes per game (276th-ranked in college basketball) and is shooting 34% (181st-ranked) from three-point land.
  • The Nittany Lions rank 324th in college basketball by allowing 9.4 three-pointers per game, but they are allowing a 37.8% shooting percentage from beyond the arc, which ranks ninth-worst in college basketball.
  • Penn State is attempting 38.7 two-pointers per game this year, which account for 65.8% of the shots it has attempted (and 75.9% of the team’s baskets). Meanwhile, it is attempting 20.1 three-pointers per contest, which are 34.2% of its shots (and 24.1% of the team’s buckets).

Penn State vs. North Carolina Central Odds and Spread

  • Spread Favorite: Nittany Lions (-22.5)
  • Moneyline: Penn State (-12500), North Carolina Central (+2600)
  • Total: 149.5 points

NCAA Basketball odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Monday at 2:23 a.m. ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub.

Watch college basketball on Fubo!

Follow the latest college sports coverage at College Sports Wire.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

How North Carolina’s Offense Looked in December

Published

on

How North Carolina’s Offense Looked in December


While the North Carolina Tar Heels’ defense has been the most consistent feature of the team, the offensive operation has been up and down throughout the course of the season.

Advertisement

Those struggles extended into December, but with Seth Trimble returning to the lineup, there have been glimpses of what the offense can be when at full strength. The veteran guard had missed nine consecutive games, dating back to early November. Trimble had not played since Nov. 7 against the Kansas Jayhawks.

Advertisement

Let’s take a closer look at how North Carolina’s offense performed in the month of December.

Assessing the Tar Heels Offense in December

Advertisement

Dec 22, 2025; Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels guard Seth Trimble (7) drives during the second half against the East Carolina Pirates at Dean E. Smith Center. Mandatory Credit: Scott Kinser-Imagn Images | Scott Kinser-Imagn Images

Through the first six games of this month, North Carolina is averaging 79.1 points per game, which is inflated by a 99-point outing against East Carolina this past Monday. The scoring output has not been the issue for Tar Heels. The problem has been the team’s slow starts, specifically when Trimble was not in the lineup.

Advertisement

Dean Smith Center | Grant Chachere, North Carolina Tar Heels On SI

Advertisement

While speaking with the media earlier this month, head coach Hubert Davis discussed North Carolina’s sluggish starts and how it was becoming problematic.

  • “I don’t want them to take time because every team is different,” Davis said. “When you go into conference play, everybody has a way that they play on both ends of the floor. I don’t want to get off to slow starts. I felt like we did. It wasn’t just defensively. I didn’t feel like we were sharp on the offensive end. I think the first 12 shots that we took, seven of them were from three.”

Dec 22, 2025; Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels head coach Hubert Davis talks with guard Kyan Evans (0) during the first half against the East Carolina Pirates at Dean E. Smith Center. Mandatory Credit: Scott Kinser-Imagn Images | Scott Kinser-Imagn Images

  • “I thought on both ends of the floor it took us a little while to get into the rhythm, and once we did, which it started with us defensively, I felt like it translated on the offensive end as well,” Davis said.

  • “No, I don’t. I wouldn’t necessarily say that we’ve consistently gotten off to slow starts,” Davis said. “I would say that at times we haven’t been consistent at the beginning, where we’ve gotten off to a fast start and then we had a four- or six-minute lull on both ends of the floor. We allow a team to come back. We’re in a situation where maybe we could extend the lead.”

Advertisement

Dec 16, 2025; Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels head coach Hubert Davis looks on during the second half against the ETSU Buccaneers at Dean E. Smith Center. Mandatory Credit: Scott Kinser-Imagn Images | Scott Kinser-Imagn Images

It is difficult to say that North Carolina has completely figured it out in Trimble’s first two games back in the fold, as the Tar Heels were lackluster in the first half against Ohio State, but were firing on all cylinders against East Carolina. It is somewhere in the middle, but conference play will reveal exactly where this offense stands. Overall, the offensive performance was a mixed bag in December.

Advertisement

Please follow us on X when you click right HERE! Please make sure you follow us today on our Facebook page when you click right HERE!

Advertisement

Never again miss one major story related to your beloved Tar Heels when you sign up for our 100% FREE newsletter that comes straight to your email with the latest news. SIGN UP HERE NOW



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending