Connect with us

Maryland

Cracker Barrel ‘refused service’ to special education students at Maryland restaurant, school says

Published

on

Cracker Barrel ‘refused service’ to special education students at Maryland restaurant, school says



“I don’t have the option of being quiet about these things,” parent Stacey Campbell said after speaking out on the incident.

play

A field trip for special education students to a Cracker Barrel in Maryland this week has resulted in outcry from teachers and parents.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, a group of 11 students and seven staff members from Maryland’s Charles County Public Schools District were “refused service” at the Cracker Barrel restaurant in Waldorf, Maryland, Superintendent Maria Navarro said in a statement. The outing was a part of community-based instruction for students at the district’s Dr. James Craik Elementary School. The instruction allows students in special education programs to perform practical skills and socialize with the public.

The Cracker Barrel general manager told teaching staff the restaurant “cannot accommodate to your group” and that the restaurant should be removed from the approved list of restaurants for community-based instruction, Charles County Public Schools special education teacher Katie Schneider told parents in an email, which has been shared online.

Stacey Campbell told USA TODAY that her autistic, non-speaking 9-year-old son, who goes by “JoJo,” attended the outing on Tuesday.

“I saw red,” Campbell said about when she read Schneider’s email.

Advertisement

“JoJo” attends Charles County Public Schools’ ACHIEVE, a regional program in Charles County that serves students in kindergarten through age 21 with “significant cognitive disabilities.” Students in the school district’s ACHIEVE and SOAR (regional program for students with Autism) programs attend community-based instruction outings once a month between November and May, Campbell said.

What happened at the Cracker Barrel?

In her statement, Navarro said Charles County Public Schools staff notified the Waldorf Cracker Barrel of the group’s size and purpose of its visit, but they were told reservations were unnecessary.

Though the group did not ultimately dine-in, the restaurant did permit the students and staff to place a carryout to-go order, Schneider said in her email to parents.

“During this time, the servers were blatantly rude to our staff and ignored all of our students, Schneider continued in her email. “Refusing to serve them, they did not even ask if our students wanted a drink or anything. Our students were so well behaved and sat at the tables patiently, which you know can be hard, waiting for their food and drinks to-go.”

Advertisement

After about an hour of waiting, Schneider said the students were moved to wait outside on the school bus. They ate the lunch back at the elementary school. Schneider did not immediately respond for comment about the experience when contacted on Friday afternoon.

In a statement provided to USA TODAY, Cracker Barrel said a “staffing challenge” led to impacting the group’s experience.

“At Cracker Barrel, we strive to create a welcoming environment for all our guests, and we understand that a recent visit by this group to our Waldorf location fell short of those expectations,” the statement reads. “A staffing challenge that day led to the closure of part of our second dining room, creating confusion that impacted the group’s experience. We take this matter seriously and are working directly with the group’s leadership to better understand what happened, extend our apologies and make things right.”

Parent organizes protest at Cracker Barrel

In response to this week’s events, Dustin Reed, whose 7-year-old daughter Madelynn attended the community-based instruction outing, has organized a protest to occur at the Waldorf Cracker Barrel on Sunday afternoon. Madelynn attends the districts’ SOAR program.

Advertisement

“I can’t put into words how I felt − anger, sadness and worry,” Reed told USA TODAY about learning of what happened at the restaurant. “I’ve battled wanting to protect (and) shield her from the world but not forgetting why we’re doing this. I’ve spent more time crying over her and praying she never has to experience this again.”

Reed said he hopes the protest sheds light on the fact that just because some children have different abilities, it doesn’t make them less than anyone else.

Screenshots of Schneider’s email, shared by Campbell in a public Facebook group, have garnered a lot of attention, with the post boasting nearly 300 shares, as of Friday afternoon. Campbell said she doesn’t have much of a social media presence, but she felt obligated to share her son’s experience.

“I don’t have the option of being quiet about these things,” Campbell said.

Advertisement

Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Follow her on X and Instagram @gretalcross. Story idea? Email her at gcross@gannett.com.



Source link

Maryland

Maryland crab prices climb as catches fall

Published

on

Maryland crab prices climb as catches fall


Art D’Amico remembers when a bushel of crabs cost about $35 in the mid-1970s. Today, the president of the Annapolis Anglers Club pays nearly $400 a bushel — a price he says has climbed by at least $150 in the past five years.

“Everything’s more expensive,” said D’Amico, who has been involved in Chesapeake Bay fishing and crabbing since 1973, adding that he’s never seen crab prices like this before.

The soaring cost reflects more than inflation. Watermen, seafood dealers and economists say higher operating costs, shifting markets and concern about Maryland’s blue crab population are pushing prices higher, making one of the state’s signature summer traditions more expensive. But many Marylanders are still buying crabs, even at record prices.

“It’s definitely not what we’re accustomed to this time of year as far as quantity and price,” said John Ecker, a managing partner of Conrad’s Crabs, which has four locations in Maryland. “I’ve been here for 19 years doing this and, yeah, they’re getting higher.”

Advertisement

Read the full story on The Baltimore Sun.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

MD woman sentenced to 2 years, $6.8M restitution in multi-million-dollar laundering scheme

Published

on

MD woman sentenced to 2 years, .8M restitution in multi-million-dollar laundering scheme


A Maryland woman was sentenced to two years in prison for her involvement in a multi-million-dollar money laundering scheme, the U.S. Attorney’s Office of Maryland announced on Friday.

Fatoumata Boiro, 32, of Largo, will serve two years in prison, followed by two years of supervised release, and has also been ordered to pay $6,838,558.31 in restitution.

Boiro was found guilty of conspiring to engage in a large, multi-member money-laundering operation. She pled guilty to being involved in the conspiracy and acknowledged that at least $3 million was laundered through her direct participation.

From 2021 through February 2024, she and several other individuals laundered proceeds from a significant wire fraud scheme, according to court documents.

Advertisement

Court documents revealed that the conspirators engaged in various financial transactions to conceal the source, ownership, and control of the wire fraud proceeds, as well as their location.

ALSO READ | Former AACO police officer sentenced in insurance fraud scheme involving fake car thefts

The victims of this scheme included government agencies, organizations, and companies, such as an environmental trust, an urban redevelopment program, a medical center, a transportation company, a logistics company, a school district, a college, and a county government, officials reported.

Boiro and her co-conspirators created limited liability companies to act as shell entities, opened bank accounts in the names of these entities, and received and laundered funds from fraudulent activities.

Fourteen defendants have been charged in connection with the money-laundering conspiracy, with 13 already pleading guilty.

Advertisement

Officials reported that Faizou Gnora, 28, formerly of Alexandria, Virginia, remains at large.

The following includes the individuals previously sentenced:

  • Yahya Sowe, 42, of College Park, to 114 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release, restitution of $13,050,827.03, and forfeiture of $1 million
  • Bright Boateng, 45, of Bladensburg, Maryland, to 108 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release, restitution of $1,247,950, and a forfeiture of $431,750
  • Victor Killen, 33, of Hyattsville, Maryland, to 63 months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release, restitution of $7,070,656.46, and a $3-million forfeiture order
  • Gedeon Agbeyome, 31, of Montgomery County, Maryland, to 72 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, along with restitution of $2,938,424.65, and a $2.8 million preliminary order of forfeiture
  • Lawrence Ogunsanwo, 33, to 40 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, and restitution of $5,648,816.23
  • Lakeisha Parker, 33, of Baltimore, to 36 months in federal prison, followed by three years supervised release, and restitution of $8,306,930.95
  • Martin Ogisi, 37, of Severn, Maryland, to 33 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, restitution of $11,077,044.17; and a $500,000 forfeiture order
  • Kevin Colon, 34, of Curtis Bay, Maryland, to 27 months in federal prison, followed by two years of supervised release, restitution of $2,515,159.63, and a $214,518.42 forfeiture order
  • Areal Harris, 27, of Hanover, Maryland, to 24 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, and restitution of $3,159,482.83
  • Emily Gil Arias, 29, of Silver Spring, Maryland to 24 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, and restitution of 2,102,919.27
  • Lorena Perez Herrera, 29, of Washington, DC, to 24 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, and restitution of $1,473,125.58
  • Blondel Ndjouandjouaka, 31, of Silver Spring, Maryland, to 24 months in federal prison, followed by one year of supervised release, restitution of $733,941.48, and a $757,562.63 forfeiture order.

Now, Boiro will spend the next two years in prison.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Justice Department sues Maryland over immigration policies

Published

on

Justice Department sues Maryland over immigration policies


(Photo by Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The Department of Justice is suing Maryland and State Attorney General Anthony Brown, alleging the state’s “sanctuary” policies hinder the enforcement of federal immigration laws. 

The lawsuit claims that Maryland’s sanctuary policies are illegal under federal law and that the state’s “refusal to cooperate with federal immigration authorities” has had negative consequences for immigration law enforcement officials. 

Advertisement

What we know:

According to the lawsuit, the state’s refusal to cooperate has led to facilities refusing to help transfer immigrants to federal custody. 

Advertisement

Under the direction of Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, the DOJ’s Civil Division will identify state and local laws, policies and practices that violate federal laws or impede federal operations. 

“When sanctuary jurisdictions enact laws to shield [undocumented immigrants] from federal law enforcement, it is not merely federal law that is violated, but the voices of everyday American voters silenced,” said Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward.

The lawsuit cites Maryland’s Community Trust Act, a law that went into effect in May, which prevents local law enforcement from holding an individual without a warrant on behalf of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). There is an exception for those who commit felonies or sex offenses. 

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

The Community Trust Act law sparked pushback from local law enforcement leaders across the state, with 17 of Maryland’s 24 sheriffs suing, and saying the law “undermines public safety and restricts cooperation” between local and federal officials.

Advertisement

“Such blatant disregard for federal laws that have been on the books for decades is not merely a political disagreement or passive abstention; it is deliberate, disruptive action that jeopardizes the public safety for all Americans,” the DOJ lawsuit reads. “The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits a state from obstructing Congress and the Executive in this manner.”

The Source: This information is from a Department of Justice lawsuit.

ImmigrationD.C. PoliticsPoliticsNewsDonald J. Trump
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending