Maryland
Analysis: Maryland climate plan is comprehensive but lacks short-term legislative strategy – WTOP News
The MDE plan stops short of recommending a short-term strategy for beginning to fund climate initiatives — at the time when state government is facing fiscal shortfalls.
This article was republished with permission from WTOP’s news partners at Maryland Matters. Sign up for Maryland Matters’ free email subscription today.
By most accounts, the Maryland Department of the Environment’s plan outlining the policy actions required to dramatically reduce the state’s greenhouse gas emissions is innovative and ambitious.
But the 98-page document, released during the quiet days between Christmas and New Year’s, lacks a cohesive short-term legislative strategy for how Maryland can meet its climate and clean energy goals. More importantly, it does not lay out concretely how the state can begin generating about $1 billion a year needed to implement the plan. That’s leaving lawmakers and environmental advocates scrambling to develop a battle plan less than a week before the 90-day General Assembly session.
“There are some parts of the plan that are strong and some parts of the plan that are less developed,” said Josh Tulkin, executive director of the Sierra Club’s Maryland chapter. “The question is, what now?”
The plan was released, on schedule, before the end of 2023, meeting a mandate in the Climate Solutions Now Act of 2022 — the comprehensive legislation that set the state’s aggressive goals of cutting greenhouse gas emissions 60% from 2006 levels by 2031, achieving 100% clean energy by 2035, and reaching net zero emissions by 2045.
“This plan provides the blueprint we need to reach our climate goals,” Serena McIlwain, secretary of the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), said in a statement. “We know that ending climate pollution will not be easy. We are committed to implementing this plan with the help of citizens, elected officials, nonprofit organizations, and businesses, because we are all in this together. Maryland will lead the transition to the green economy and leave no one behind.”
The report comes as McIlwain and Gov. Wes Moore (D) vow to make Maryland a leader in innovative state-based climate policy. Yet it still isn’t clear how much energy and political capital the governor plans to invest in advancing the plan during the busy and uncertain legislative session.
In the broadest possible terms, the MDE document lays out an array of promises and priorities for combating the climate crisis, which will impact practically every sector of the economy.
“It gives us the road map we need, it gives us the skeleton we need to build on to get through the next few years,” said Del. Lorig Charkoudian (D-Montgomery), one of the climate policy leaders in the General Assembly.
The plan includes recommendations for:
- How to complete the transition away from coal-fired power plants;
- Scaling renewable energy infrastructure, especially solar, wind and battery power;
- Providing more incentives for consumers to choose electric vehicles when they are ready to replace their cars and expanding EV charging infrastructure;
- How to make energy retrofits on 9,000 existing buildings and ways to help consumers electrify their homes by switching to heat pumps, electric water heaters and electric appliances;
- Electrifying school buses, transit buses and government fleet vehicles.
The plan also lays out specific areas where carbon reductions are possible, including establishing an innovative zero-emission heating equipment standard, a 20% reduction in vehicle miles traveled, and eliminating trash incineration credits from Maryland’s Renewable Portfolio Standard, which provides state incentives for renewable energy generation.
MDE estimates that at least $1 billion annually in new state spending is necessary for investments that would help the state meet its climate mandates. These would include:
- Home energy efficiency and electrification incentives from the Maryland Energy Administration, expanding point-of-sale rebates for consumers and contractor incentives;
- Scaling up green-building incentives for commercial, multifamily and institutional construction and low-interest loans for projects in large buildings;
- Point-of-sale state rebates for consumers who purchase electric vehicles and EV charging equipment;
- Grant and loan programs for several emissions reduction and carbon sequestration programs;
- Expansion of state apprenticeship and workforce development programs for electricians, heat pump installers, and other clean energy jobs;
- Aggressive promotional campaign to inform Marylanders of rebates and tax credits available to them for clean energy transition;
- More funding for technical support for building owners on decarbonization projects.
To meet the additional expense of funding these initiatives, the plan sketches out potential sources of revenue, including a possible “cap-and-invest” carbon pricing program that seeks to limit greenhouse gas emissions, taxes polluters and makes fossil fuel companies pay for previous environmental damage. MDE also envisions expanding the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which allows Maryland and Northeastern states to collect funds from power plants that are powered by fossil fuels and use the revenue for clean energy programs.
The plan also proposed that Maryland can charge companies a fee for transporting hazardous substances through the state and that owners of cars and trucks powered by fossil fuels should pay an extra fee when registering their vehicles.
The report suggests that the state’s three green banks can play a role in providing and leveraging funding to help expand clean energy and says the state could issue green revenue bonds. It also lists a long menu of federal grants that state agencies can seek for climate and clean energy programs. Every state gets some portion of this federal funding, but additional funds are freed up for the states that develop the most innovative proposals.
“If we are doing model, cutting-edge stuff in Maryland, we’ll get more competitive federal funding,” Charkoudian said.
That amps up the pressure on state officials to develop creative programs — and funding streams — quickly.
But the MDE plan stops short of recommending a short-term strategy for beginning to fund climate initiatives — at the time when state government is facing fiscal shortfalls.
“It seems like a pretty good plan — the question is, where do we get the money for the plan?” said Del. David Fraser-Hidalgo (D-Montgomery), another environmental stalwart in the legislature.
While joining other environmental groups in praising the overall scope and ambitions of the MDE plan, the Maryland League of Conservation Voters, an early supporter of Moore’s in the 2022 election, expressed disappointment that it lacked adequate funding strategies.
“Without designated funding, or even a commitment to finding funds, there is no guarantee the policies will be implemented and the plan is simply — a plan,” the green group said in a written analysis.
The plan does provide some details on executive actions that state agencies can take in the short term. For example, it suggests that MDE can, over the next year, adopt a zero-emission heating equipment standard; adopt a clean heating standard; strengthen the RGGI program; evaluate a cap-and-invest program; and work to finalize vehicle emissions standards.
The Maryland Energy Administration, the report suggests, can determine this year whether the state can adopt a clean power standard under existing law and can study whether additional state action is needed to accelerate solar power deployment. The agency can also begin to expand its capacity to provide technical support on building decarbonization projects and electric vehicle expansion.
The Maryland Department of Transportation, according to the report, can begin to implement expansive EV programs this year and should begin finalizing and implementing a long-term transportation plan — even as state transportation officials warn that major cuts to key projects may be necessary in the short term.
The plan suggests that the Maryland Public Service Commission — which just released a study in late December showing that the region’s electric grid is capable of handling a major transition to building and vehicle electrification — should initiate a proceeding this year to require natural gas utilities to develop plans to transition to net-zero emissions.
And it lays out ways the Maryland Department of Labor and the state’s new service year program can begin to build a bigger clean energy workforce in the state this year, including the possible establishment of a climate corps.
Legislative actions
But when it comes to a legislative strategy, while the MDE report recommends half a dozen bills to help the state reach its climate goals, it doesn’t necessarily say that the Moore administration plans to take the lead on these during the upcoming legislative session. Instead, the plan says, “Fully implementing this plan will require action by the Maryland General Assembly. Maryland is fortunate to have policy experts in the legislature who are skilled at developing targeted legislation to address the complexity of the clean energy transition.”
The Moore administration’s plan envisions legislative action on half a dozen fronts, including funding initiatives; modifying the state’s renewable portfolio standards; requiring new multifamily buildings to be “EV-ready;” updating the state’s EmPOWER program, which currently promotes energy savings in buildings; developing new rules to regulate carbon emissions in manufacturing; and strengthening the state’s EV purchasing incentives.
Yet the Moore administration has thus far not said whether it plans to take the lead on any of these proposed legislative measures — either as part of the governor’s 2024 legislative package or in the form of bills advanced by MDE. And with the first major new standards laid out in the Climate Solutions Act just seven years off, it’s unclear how much urgency the administration attaches to implementing MDE’s comprehensive proposals.
So several lawmakers are developing — or reintroducing — climate legislation of their own.
Fraser-Hidalgo and Sen. Katie Fry-Hester (D-Howard) are introducing a measure called the Responding to Emergency Needs from Extreme Weather Act, or the RENEW Act, which would empower the state to seek reparations from fossil fuel companies for prior environmental degradation in the state. By Fraser-Hidalgo’s estimate, such efforts, would inevitably end up in the courts, could yield $9 billion for the state — and almost single-handedly pay for all the climate initiatives.
“The sooner you go ahead and get the process going, the sooner you get your money,” he said.
Environmental advocates are staging a rally in support of the legislation in front of the State House on Wednesday afternoon, the first day of the session.
Environmentalists are also gearing up to support a bill by Hester and House Economic Matters Committee Chair C.T. Wilson (D-Charles) that would set statewide standards for siting solar installations. They’re also backing a bill by Sen. Karen Lewis Young (D-Frederick) and Del. Vaughn Stewart (D-Montgomery) to remove trash-to-energy facilities from eligibility for clean energy subsidies.
Other climate bills on the docket include a bill from Sen. Benjamin Brooks (D-Baltimore County) and Del. Adrian Boafo (D-Prince George’s) to require that all new buildings have electric heat and cooling systems; a bill from Charkoudian setting up a pilot program for geothermal energy in the state; a bill by Fraser-Hidalgo and Senate Education, Energy and the Environment Chair Brian J. Feldman (D-Montgomery) urging the Public Service Commission to work with utilities to set different rates for off-peak and peak electricity use; a bill developed by Del. Regina T. Boyce (D-Baltimore City) and Sen. Michael Jackson (D-Prince George’s) to require that environmental justice considerations be part of most permitting decisions; and a bill by Sen. Sarah K. Elfreth (D-Anne Arundel) and Del. Sara Love (D-Montgomery) to establish a watershed restoration pilot program.
There will, no doubt, be others that environmental groups decide to fight for.
“I think it’s going to be a bumper crop year for climate legislation,” said Jamie DeMarco, Maryland director for the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. “We basically need every year to be a bumper crop year between now and 2031.”
Editor’s note: This story was updated to better describe the proposed RENEW Act.
Maryland
Oregon football’s 3 keys to victory vs. Maryland in Big Ten matchup
Video: Oregon football’s Dan Lanning talks matchup vs Maryland
Oregon head football coach Dan Lanning talks about the No. 1 Ducks’ upcoming home matchup against the Maryland Terrapins.
The Oregon football team will put its consensus No. 1 ranking in the country to the test once again on Saturday against an unranked Maryland team fighting for bowl eligibility.
The Ducks (9-0, 6-0 Big Ten) will play the Terrapins (4-4, 1-4 Big Ten) at 4 p.m. in Autzen Stadium.
Here are three keys to a successful outing for Oregon football at home.
Continue to roll with punches amid injuries to key players
Though the Ducks were bolstered by the returns of stars such as tight end Terrance Ferguson and edge Jordan Burch, they lost a few more key players last Saturday in leading receiver Tez Johnson and sixth-year offensive lineman Marcus Harper II.
Though it’s uncertain how long either player will be out, or if Harper, in particular, could appear this week against Maryland, the Ducks have a plan for their absences.
“I’m confident that we’ve shown there’s a lot of guys that can play winning football for us right now,” Oregon coach Dan Lanning said. “Who that’ll be come Saturday, I’ll leave that for us to figure out in-house, but we’ve got a lot of guys that can play winning football for us, and there’s gonna be some guys that step up, like we’ve had all season.”
In the immediate term, Traeshon Holden had a career day at Michigan while Johnson sat on the sidelines, hauling in six passes for 149 yards, both career highs.
With Harper sidelined late in the game, sophomore Kawika Rogers stepped up to play at right guard on the final drive that sealed the game after playing sparingly this season.
Oregon football must contain Billy Edwards Jr., Maryland passing game
Only one team in the Big Ten has a better statistical passing offense than Oregon: the Terrapins.
Maryland is the only team in the conference that accounts for over 300 passing yards per game, with quarterback Billy Edwards Jr. throwing for 2,314 yards with 13 touchdowns and six interceptions.
The Ducks’ passing defense ranks fifth in the Big Ten, giving up just 172.8 passing yards per game with opposing quarterbacks completing 55.7% of their passes.
“He’s extremely efficient,” Lanning said of Edwards. “He knows where to put the ball and when to put the ball there. I think they’ve done a good job of coaching him up. Where’s the extra hat, and how can I take advantage of advantage throws when those opportunities exist? And he’s been really accurate doing that.”
Ducks must continue to win ground game battle, control pace of game
Lanning has stressed the importance of stopping the run and outrushing opponents on a week-to-week basis throughout the season.
Despite playing a pass-heavy team, Lanning emphasized that point Monday this week.
“The best defenses in college football, consistently, are always good at stopping the run,” Lanning said. “Teams that win football games are always good at running the ball and stopping the run. So that’s an important trait. But certainly you want to be able to take away a team’s strength.”
The Ducks rank seventh in the Big Ten in rushing yards per game (168.11) to Maryland’s 14th (119), but the Terrapins’ run defense is slightly better than the Ducks, ranking sixth in the Big Ten, giving up 105.25 rushing yards per game.
Though Oregon has outrushed most of the opponents it has played this season, Saturday’s game will be a test due to Maryland’s fast and pass-heavy pace of play.
Alec Dietz covers University of Oregon football, volleyball, women’s basketball and baseball for The Register-Guard. You may reach him at adietz@registerguard.com and you can follow him on X @AlecDietz.
Maryland
Election aftermath: Maryland's winners and losers – Maryland Matters
It’s all over but the shouting.
The sheer scale of former President Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential election was breathtaking — and will still require a lot of soul-searching and contemplation in a lot of corners of this country.
Here in Maryland, Election Day didn’t produce too many surprises. But still, there were consequential developments, and performances, and political trends, that are worth talking about.
So without further ado, here’s our list of winners and losers. It’s by no means complete. And we apologize in advance for any sins of commission or omission.
Winner: Angela Alsobrooks
Another history-making political star is born in Maryland, and she’s headed to the U.S. Senate. Even her vanquished opponent, former Gov. Larry Hogan (R), said her election was something to celebrate — as is the fact that there will be two Black women serving together in the Senate for the first time in history.
After a shaky start, the Prince George’s County executive ran a disciplined, focused campaign and prosecuted the case against Hogan — who left office with mind-bending job approval ratings — almost flawlessly. She revealed just enough of herself, as a hardworking, conscientious public servant from humble beginnings, to connect with the voters.
But she won’t be going to Capitol Hill with the mission she envisioned. Instead of serving in a Democratic Senate, with a Democratic president who was a friend and mentor, Alsobrooks will be heading into hostile territory, dominated by Republicans. Her predecessor, outgoing U.S. Sen. Ben Cardin (D), managed to be productive under GOP majorities. That now becomes Alsobrooks’ challenge.
Winner: Sheila O’Connell
The veteran Democratic strategist has now guided both of Maryland’s U.S. senators — Alsobrooks and Chris Van Hollen (D), who is about to become the state’s senior senator — to victory. Not bad…
Winner: Diversity in the state’s congressional delegation
Maryland has had zero women in its congressional delegation for the past eight years, but with Alsobrooks’ victory and Democratic state Sen. Sarah K. Elfreth’s win in the 3rd Congressional District puts two women in the state’s 10-member Capitol Hill contingent. Assuming April McClain Delaney (D) hangs on in the 6th District, that will make three of 10.
The record for women in Maryland’s delegation? Four. From 1987-1993, the state delegation included Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D) and Reps. Helen Delich Bentley (R-2nd), Beverly Byron (D-6th) and Connie Morella (R-8th).
With Alsobrooks’ election, the state will also have more Black members of Congress than ever before, as she joins Reps. Glenn Ivey (D-4th) and Kweisi Mfume (D-7th). And her victory comes on the heels of Wes Moore’s election as governor and Anthony Brown’s election as state attorney general in 2022, a reminder that Black politicians are prospering as candidates for statewide office in Maryland.
Winner: Andy Harris
Maryland’s lone Republican member of Congress is a strong ally of President-elect Donald Trump and should see many of his priorities enacted — or initiatives that he hates blocked — in the next few years. Harris is currently the chair of the far-right House Freedom Caucus, whose ranks will grow in the next Congress. He’s rising in seniority. And the physician will invariably be considered for a high-ranking position in the Trump administration — most likely in the health care realm — if that’s something that interests him.
Loser: Neil Parrott
The third time does not appear to have been the charm for the Republican nominee in the 6th Congressional District, pending the count of the final mail-in ballots. Parrott is a canny guy, with a following, so his political career may not be over. But it seems highly unlikely that the GOP will want to nominate the ex-state lawmaker for this competitive congressional seat a fourth time.
The governors
Push: Larry Hogan
Sure, he lost his high-profile Senate bid to Alsobrooks. But face it, he never wanted to be in the Senate anyway, as he said repeatedly over the years.
Hogan ran a high-profile race that regularly attracted national media attention, not to mention tens of millions of dollars. He kept Democrats at home and largely off-balance, with the threat that he could flip a long-held Democratic seat, and made Maryland matter this election cycle. And even though he lost in part because Democrats did such a good job of tying him to national Republicans, he managed to largely keep his independent reputation intact — at least with the national media.
Hogan’s goal is always to be part of the political conversation. He’ll always be welcome on the cable chat shows, and invariably, there will be speculation that he might run for governor again in 2026. So … mission accomplished!
Push: Wes Moore
Our energetic governor was a coveted surrogate for the Harris-Walz ticket and other Democrats around the country, engendering good will among fellow officeholders, party donors and activists, and notice from the national pundit class. He’ll undoubtedly be discussed as a potential Democratic candidate for president in 2028.
But man, Trump’s victory and the likelihood of full Republican hegemony on Capitol Hill is a disaster for Moore’s policy priorities and many of Maryland’s federal funding imperatives, at a time when four senior members of Congress from Maryland are moving on. [Loser: Matthew Verghese, Moore’s director of federal relations and senior adviser. Sorry, Matt.] How does the state prepare and compensate?
And we wonder: Are Moore and his team ready for the additional and inevitable national scrutiny and expectations, especially when there are so many governing and funding challenges ahead? How does he balance the work that’s required at home with his presumed national ambitions? Where does he fit in the national conversation about the future of the Democratic Party? Who’s advising him on these matters?
Loser: Martin O’Malley
His term as commissioner of the Social Security Administration ends around the time Trump will reenter the White House in January, and there’s zero chance he’ll be reappointed, which means he’ll be out of a job then. Adding to the indignity, Baltimore City voters ignored his advice to vote against Question F, a ballot measure that will pave the way for the redevelopment of the Inner Harbor.
The resistance
Push: Jamie Raskin
Whether or not Democrats retake control of the U.S. House of Representatives, which may be a stretch at this point, Raskin will use his position as the top Democrat on the Oversight and Accountability Committee to serve as a counterweight to Trump and Republican excesses on a variety of fronts. Obviously being chair comes with real power, while being the ranking member at least provides a bully pulpit. We can only begin to imagine how bummed Raskin, who has spent the last several years defending freedom and the Constitution, must be feeling right now. But people will listen — even if they don’t hear.
Push: Anthony Brown
See Raskin, Jamie, above. Especially if Republicans have full control of the federal government, Democratic attorneys general like Brown could become the last line of defense against extreme Trump and Republican policies — a role Brown’s predecessor, Brian Frosh (D), performed well during Trump’s first term.
In a statement Wednesday, Brown acknowledged the challenges ahead and vowed to act against any federal actions that threaten Marylanders’ rights.
“No matter who sits in the White House, my dedication to protecting the rights and well-being of Maryland’s communities remains unwavering,” he said.
The question is, how many federal judges remain who will be receptive to the Democratic AGs’ arguments?
The rest
Winners: Ambitious Montgomery County politicians
Now that MoCo voters have effectively booted County Executive Marc Elrich (D) by imposing a two-term limit that prevents him from seeking reelection in 2026, umpteen ambitious Montgomery Democrats, most of whom serve on the county council, can begin mobilizing in earnest to try to replace him.
How many will run in the end? How many will share the same political bases and cut into each others’ base of support? Are there any outsiders who could make a viable run in the Democratic primary? How many candidates will agree to use the county’s robust public financing system, minimizing the influence of special interest money?
And could 2026 finally be the year that Montgomery County elects a woman as county executive? They’ve already done it in Anne Arundel, Cecil, Frederick, Harford, Howard, Prince George’s and Wicomico counties, and in Baltimore City — but not in the jurisdiction that prides itself on being the most forward-looking and progressive in the state.
Meanwhile, Elrich could have the last laugh: He’s contemplating running for a county council at-large seat again — a position he held for three terms before being elected executive in 2018. We would not bet against him.
Winner: Brandon Scott
Although he never had to sweat the general election, Scott (D) on Tuesday became the first Baltimore mayor to be reelected since Martin O’Malley in 2003. Because he looks like a kid, and sometimes displays a teen’s edgy energy, Scott is often underestimated. He shouldn’t be.
Winner: Zeke Cohen
Another political reformer wins citywide office. Cohen (D) will take over as Baltimore City Council president in December. That’s not a bad thing.
Winner: Abortion rights
Seventy-four percent of state voters can’t be wrong.
Push: Prince George’s County
County residents, who often complain that they’re overlooked in the DMV, can and will take enormous pride in the election of Angela Alsobrooks as the state’s next U.S. senator. But Alsobrooks’ looming departure for greener political pastures comes at a potential cost to the county. For 14 years, even during crises like the pandemic, the county government had fairly stable and forward-looking leadership, after a major and deflating scandal — first under Rushern Baker (D), then under Alsobrooks (D).
Now the county enters a period of political transition and uncertainty, with even the method for picking Alsobrooks’ temporary successor not altogether clear. And many of the competent professionals who surrounded Alsobrooks in county government are likely to disburse.
Loser: The Washington Post
The newspaper was roundly criticized, and rightfully so, after failing to endorse a presidential candidate for the first time since the 1970s. So much for “Democracy Dies in Darkness.”
But even people who saw great import in the Post’s White House endorsements conceded that a minuscule number of readers, at most, could be influenced by what the editorial board said about presidential candidates.
Where the Post could be, and has been, influential is with endorsements in local races. And this year, the paper all but abdicated that responsibility. In fact, the only Maryland general election in which the editorial board weighed in was the U.S. Senate race, opting for Alsobrooks over Hogan, though it praised both.
The New York Times this year announced that it would no longer endorse candidates in local races, though it did endorse Kamala Harris for president. Is the Post moving out of the endorsement business altogether? That would be a diminishment of its power and civic duty.
Maryland
Delaney, Parrott race for Maryland’s 6th District too close to call Wednesday
FREDERICK, Md. – Democrat April McClain Delaney and conservative Republican Neil Parrott remain in a close contest Wednesday in Maryland’s most competitive U.S. House race.
The outcome of the race will determine whether Maryland’s 6th Congressional District continues being represented by Democrats or flips over to Republicans.
Live election results map: President and Congressional races
With 84% of votes counted just before noon Wednesday, Delaney slightly led Parrott by a count of 160,138 to 159,823, according to the Associated Press.
Maryland’s 6th District covers a wide swath of rural western Maryland as well as the more affluent liberal suburbs of Washington, D.C.
Delaney has campaigned heavily on issues impacting women, including abortion. She also pledged to protect reproductive freedoms in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to end the constitutional right to an abortion and leave such questions to individual states.
Parrott deflected questions about reproductive rights during the campaign. He also prioritized his commitment to lowering inflation, creating a stronger economy for middle-class families and stopping illegal immigration.
Delaney, Parrott race for Maryland’s 6th District too close to call Wednesday
During the campaign, both candidates sought to paint one another as extreme and out of touch.
Parrott claims Delaney is disconnected from the struggles of everyday Americans, as evidenced by her choice to live several miles outside the 6th District in an affluent suburb of Washington, D.C.
Delaney used the same argument against Parrott who is a longtime resident of Hagerstown, a small city in western Maryland surrounded by farmland.
Tensions between the candidates erupted into a heated exchange during a public forum last month, demonstrating how even down-ballot races are becoming contentious and personal in the current political climate.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
-
Business6 days ago
Carol Lombardini, studio negotiator during Hollywood strikes, to step down
-
Health7 days ago
Just Walking Can Help You Lose Weight: Try These Simple Fat-Burning Tips!
-
Business5 days ago
Hall of Fame won't get Freddie Freeman's grand slam ball, but Dodgers donate World Series memorabilia
-
Business1 week ago
Will Newsom's expanded tax credit program save California's film industry?
-
Culture4 days ago
Yankees’ Gerrit Cole opts out of contract, per source: How New York could prevent him from testing free agency
-
Culture3 days ago
Try This Quiz on Books That Were Made Into Great Space Movies
-
Business1 week ago
Apple is trying to sell loyal iPhone users on AI tools. Here's what Apple Intelligence can do
-
Technology5 days ago
An Okta login bug bypassed checking passwords on some long usernames