Connect with us

Louisiana

Louisiana lawmakers return to Capitol for special session focused on tax reform

Published

on

Louisiana lawmakers return to Capitol for special session focused on tax reform


BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — Louisiana lawmakers returned to the state Capitol on Wednesday for their third special legislative session of the year, this time with a focus on tax reform.

As the state faces an estimated budget hole of more than $700 million next year, largely due to the expiration of a temporary .45% sales tax and a tax on business utilities, Gov. Jeff Landry is urging the GOP-dominated Legislature to overhaul the state’s tax structure. His reforms call for retaining this sales tax and allowing the business utilities tax to expire. But he is pushing for far more sweeping constitutional amendments that would require voter support in statewide elections scheduled for March.

Among the governor’s proposals is the flattening of income and corporate tax rates. To offset those revenue losses, Landry is proposing extending the sales tax to other services and digital goods, such as Netflix, lobbying, dog grooming and car washes.

Landry also seeks to merge two state trust funds holding nearly $3.8 billion dollars combined. Less money would be channeled to the state’s savings account under this proposal and more money from corporate tax and mineral revenue would be at the disposal of lawmakers to spend, according to an analysis from the Public Affairs Research Council, a nonpartisan Louisiana think tank.

Advertisement

Additionally, there are plans to remove dozens of tax breaks, including for the state’s film industry and for rehabilitating historic structures. Supporters believe the changes to corporate and income taxes will attract businesses and keep the state competitive with its neighbors as Louisiana battles outward migration.

Currently, there are 223 sales tax exemptions, Richard Nelson, Secretary of the Department of Revenue, said.

“I would say the tax code is one of the major drivers of why Louisiana fails to get ahead,” Nelson said at an Aug. 30 panel on the tax reforms.

Democrat Minority Leader Matthew Willard said at the same panel that he was not convinced that flattening individual income tax would improve the state’s economic outlook and feared it would increase the state’s deficit.

According to information from the state’s Department of Revenue, Louisiana residents currently pay a 4.25% tax rate on income $50,000 and above, 3.5% on income between $12,500 and $50,000, and 1.85% on income $12,500 and below. Landry’s proposal would eliminate income tax for those making up to $12,500 and would set a flat income tax rate of 3% of those earning above $12,500.

Advertisement

There are nine states that do not levy an individual income tax. Among those are the nearby states of Florida, Tennessee and Texas.

The vast majority of Louisianians will see significant tax cuts following the proposed changes to state income and sales taxes, according to an analysis conducted by the state legislator’s longtime former chief economist and funded by a coalition of nonpartisan public policy groups. A little over 1 million households would see their state-level taxes reduced by 20%, the study found.

The reform package would eliminate the corporate franchise tax and ultimately reduce taxes on corporate income tax to a flat rate of 3.5%. Currently, the state applies a 7.5% tax rate to corporate profits exceeding $150,000, a 5.5% rate to profits between $50,000 and $150,000, and a 3.5% rate to profits below $50,000.

Skeptics have expressed concern that the proposed reforms would grant overly generous tax cuts to corporations.

“It’s small business subsidizing big business, is basically what it is, and that’s not right,” said State Senator W. Jay Luneau, a Democrat, at an Oct. 24 Senate hearing.

Advertisement

Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle also stressed that they want to ensure local parish governments do not lose revenue they rely on as a result of the tax overhaul. The proposed changes would incentivize local governments to eliminate property taxes on business inventory and end local taxes on prescription drugs and incentives.

Nelson, the Department of Revenue secretary, said the proposed change would prevent citizens from being taxed for medical needs and instead shift their taxes to consumer services such as landscaping.

“My neighbors are going to crucify me” in response to proposed taxes on lawn-mowing services, said Republican Senator Stewart Cathey, Jr.

Other lawmakers noted there will likely be stiff opposition from numerous special interest groups set to lose their longstanding tax breaks. And they have questioned whether a special session in the aftermath of the national election would be enough time for lawmakers to fully process and debate massive policy changes.

Daniel Erspamer, CEO of the Pelican Institute, a conservative think tank, said the need to simplify the state’s tax code has been a long time in coming and applauded the attempt to confront the issue.

Advertisement

“I’m pleased that the governor really said, you know, let’s put our money where our mouth is and get this thing done,” Erspamer said. “We’ll see how the Legislature feels about that.”

While Landry has framed the session as tax-focused, his session call proclamation had 23 items listed — including teacher pay and a possible reworking of the state court system.

The special session will begin at 3 p.m. Nov. 6. Landry is scheduled to speak to the Legislature on the opening day. The legislative gathering must conclude no later than 6 p.m. on Nov. 25.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Louisiana

Louisiana voters want federal money from offshore wind to go toward coastal restoration

Published

on

Louisiana voters want federal money from offshore wind to go toward coastal restoration


Louisiana voters approved an amendment asking them if revenues from offshore alternative energy should go towards coastal restoration and protection.

Federal money from offshore oil and gas production already goes into Louisiana’s Coastal Restoration and Protection Fund. “We’ve received hundreds of millions of dollars over the years because of that. What this amendment would do is basically the same,” Barry Erwin, president and CEO of Council for a Better Louisiana, told Louisiana Considered. 

Despite these oil and gas revenues flowing into the fund, the state doesn’t have enough money to fund its Coastal Master Plan. Amendment 1 sets up the state to receive slightly more.

The yes vote on the amendment means federal money from the emerging offshore alternative energy industry, which is primarily wind, will go into that same fund for the coast. A no vote would have put the money into the state’s general fund, which is spent how the legislature chooses.

Advertisement

There are no completed wind projects off of Louisiana’s Gulf coast yet. Two were granted leases by the state last December and are underway. The Danish firm Vestas – which operates under the name Cajun Wind in Louisiana – was granted nearly 60,000 acres off of Cameron Parish. Diamond Wind, which is owned by the Japanese company Mitsubishi, was granted a little over 6,000 acres of the coast of Terrebonne and Lafourche parishes.

The federal government doesn’t share offshore alternative energy revenues with states, but some in Louisiana’s congressional delegation have been pushing for it. Sen. Bill Cassidy co-sponsored the Reinvesting in Shoreline Economies & Ecosystems (RISEE) Act and Rep. Steve Scalise sponsored the Budgeting for Renewable Electrical Energy Zone Earnings Act (BREEZE Act), both of which would bring revenues from offshore wind to states.

But Erwin said even if revenues start coming in, it won’t be very much money. Estimates put the amount at about 10 percent of what Louisiana gets from oil and gas, which is about $160 million a year. “We’re gonna be losing a lot of the coastal money that we’re getting right now when the BP oil payments are kind of finalized in a few years,” he said. “So I think the proponents feel like every dollar that we can still muster towards coastal protection.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Louisiana

3 injured as EF-1 tornado touches down in Basile, Louisiana

Published

on

3 injured as EF-1 tornado touches down in Basile, Louisiana


BASILE, La. – An EF-1 tornado injured three people when it struck near Basile, Louisiana, Tuesday morning, according to the National Weather Service.

The NWS noted the twister had estimated peak wind speeds of 95 mph, with a path that was 1 mile long and 150 yards wide.

The tornado touched down along U.S. Highway 190 west of the town of just over 1,200 people.

Advertisement

Basile Mayor Mark Denette said three people were sent to the hospital for assessment and treatment. 

He added that the tornado caused extensive damage to a local grocery store called Rhea’s Specialty Meats and expressed his condolences to the store owner, Jude Burton.

“Prayers for Jude, his family, and his staff as his place of business is a very important part of Basile,” he said in a Facebook post.

Advertisement

Other storm damage included downed trees and damage to an RV, Denette said. 

A tornado was also spotted near the town of Maurice, which lies southeast of Basile, the NWS said. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

Louisiana asks appeals court to keep Title IX rule protecting LGBTQ+ students on hold

Published

on

Louisiana asks appeals court to keep Title IX rule protecting LGBTQ+ students on hold


On Monday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans heard oral arguments in the case stemming from Louisiana’s lawsuit.

“Given the fact that the United States Supreme Court has already denied stays on these injunctions, I’m optimistic that this court will also uphold the injunction,” Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill told reporters after the Monday evening hearing.

At issue is the new U.S. Department of Education rule that says discrimination against students based on sexual orientation and gender identity is prohibited under Title IX, a 1972 federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in schools and colleges that receive federal funding. Other provisions of the rule add protections for pregnant students and expand the definition of sexual harassment at schools and colleges.

The rule, which was set to take effect Aug. 1, does not address transgender students’ participation in school sports, a highly contentious issue that will be the subject of a separate directive. 

Advertisement

The new federal regulations could invalidate Louisiana laws that forbid transgender people from using school bathrooms that match their gender identity and protect teachers who refuse to refer to students by their preferred names and pronouns. If the rules took effect and Louisiana was found in violation of them, the state would face the prospect of losing billions of dollars in federal funding for schools, Murrill said Monday.

Murrill’s office filed a federal lawsuit to block the new Title IX rule immediately after it was issued in April. The lawsuit, which three other states joined, said that Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration had overstepped its authority and upended Title IX, which they argued was intended to protect only biological girls and women.

“This law was driven originally by a desire to stop discrimination against women in the education environment,” Murrill said Monday. “It is now being turned on its head.”

In a court filing, the state’s attorneys said the new Title IX interpretation would “transform” schools and harm students.

“Boys and girls will be forced to share bathrooms, locker rooms, and lodging on overnight field trips with members of the opposite sex, including adults,” the Sept. 19 filing said. “Students and teachers will be forced to use whatever pronouns a student demands based on his or her self-professed ‘gender identity.’”

Advertisement

Lawyers for the federal government argue that the new Title IX rule is based on a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court ruling, Bostock v. Clayton County, that said a federal ban on sex-based discrimination in the workplace also prohibits discrimination against gay and transgender people. The same logic applies to discrimination in schools, the Biden administration says.

“It is impossible to explain what it is you’re doing when you are intentionally discriminating against someone based on their gender identity without consideration of that person’s sex,” said Jack Starcher, an attorney representing the federal government, at Monday’s hearing. “Discrimination based on gender identity is discrimination based on sex.”

The Biden administration asked the court to limit the pause on the law to just those parts dealing with gender identity, allowing other provisions — such as those dealing with lactation spaces for pregnant students — to take effect while the legal challenges proceed. But Louisiana’s lawyers argue the rule’s expanded definition of sex-based discrimination touches every aspect of the law.

“Their new definitions are pervasive throughout the rule,” Murrill said after the hearing, adding that it would be confusing for schools to determine which parts of the new rule were in effect and which were paused.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is considered one of the country’s most conservative appellate courts. Judge Jerry Smith, one of the three presiding judges at Monday’s hearing, appeared skeptical of the Biden administration’s rule.

Advertisement

Smith, who was appointed by former President Ronald Reagan, gave a hypothetical scenario in which a biological female student objected to playing volleyball during physical education class alongside a transgender girl. Under the new rule, Smith suggested, the student would lose access to her P.E. class if she refused to participate.

That “young woman would be denied the benefits of educational services by saying, ‘I don’t want this great big burly guy coming in here and competing against me,’” he said, referring to the transgender student as a “guy.”

The appeals court is expected to rule in the coming weeks. Murrill said she expects that one of the cases challenging the new Title IX will eventually head to the U.S. Supreme Court. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending