Connect with us

Florida

Florida attorney general says state will investigate Starbucks for DEI practices

Published

on

Florida attorney general says state will investigate Starbucks for DEI practices


play

Florida’s top legal officer on Wednesday said the state will investigate Starbucks, the multinational chain of coffeehouses, for its diversity, equity and inclusion practices.

“So many of these DEI policies that have been pushed in corporate America that were meant to address and prevent discrimination are now pushing policies and programs and initiatives that may in fact be unlawful employment practices, in fact becoming discriminatory themselves,” Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody said, while appearing on Sean Hannity’s radio show, which Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis guest hosted.

Advertisement

Moody filed a complaint with the Florida Commission on Human Relations, which she said would launch a “full investigation.” The decades-old commission is meant to enforce the Florida Civil Rights Act and address discrimination issues.

“We’re going to make sure that this quota for hiring and programs that cause every employee to determine whether they are the problem based on the color of their skin, whether that violates Florida’s anti-discrimination laws,” Moody said.

The governor, an opponent of DEI programs who signed a bill last year banning such initiatives at state universities, thanked her for the work: “You should treat people as individuals, judge them based on the content of their character, not the color of their skin or their ethnicity or anything like that.”

Both the Commission on Human Relations and Starbucks did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Tallahassee Democrat, part of the USA TODAY Network.

Advertisement

Over the past few years, Republican lawmakers across the country have sought to dismantle DEI programs in higher education and in the corporate world. Since last year, some 85 anti-DEI bills have been introduced in 28 states, with 13 becoming law, according to The Chronicle of Higher Education. Conservative groups argue that the initiatives are discriminatory to those not benefitting from them, while supporters say programs are tackling systemic inequality.

More: Trump tried to crush the ‘DEI revolution.’ Here’s how he might finish the job.

DEI under siege: Why more businesses are being accused of ‘reverse discrimination’

Starbucks has a DEI page on its website

In the complaint, Moody accused the company of having policies that “appear on their face to discriminate on the basis of race.”

She pointed to a portion of Starbucks’ website that mentioned the company’s “annual inclusion and diversity goals of achieving BIPOC representation of at least 30 percent at all corporate levels and at least 40 percent of all retail and manufacturing roles by 2025.”

Advertisement

She also brought up how executive bonuses were tied to DEI goals, which was also mentioned.

Starbucks promotes on a separate webpage a commitment to diversity and inclusion, saying it has anti-bias curriculum, pay equity and that it was working to “enhance our efforts in reaching a broader pool of candidates and reaching talent that brings new perspectives and experiences to improve our business and workplace.”

But the company’s investors earlier this year in a non-binding vote approved a plan to drop executive bonuses correlated with DEI goals.

Meantime, a federal appeals court recently OK’d a block on a key provision of Florida’s “Stop WOKE Act.”

Advertisement

That provision restricted businesses’ diversity practices and trainings, blocking concepts that could make employees feel “personal responsibility” for actions committed in the past — such as discriminatory ones — by someone of the “same race, color, sex or national origin.”

More: Florida Gov. DeSantis hosts Sean Hannity’s radio show, warns of threat from the left

Contributing: Christopher Cann, USA TODAY



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Florida

Florida Democrats fix eyes on abortion protections ahead of 2024 election

Published

on

Florida Democrats fix eyes on abortion protections ahead of 2024 election


TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — On the second anniversary of the reversal of Roe v. Wade, Florida Democrats on Monday emphasized reproductive rights as an issue they’re betting may tip the scales in Florida’s 2024 election cycle. 


What You Need To Know

  • Monday marked two years since the reversal of Roe v. Wade       
  • Florida Democrats say they are betting Amendment 4 — which would protect abortion access in Florida up roughly 24 weeks — will drive voters to the polls
  • Constitutional amendments require 60% voter approval to pass


“Florida is on the front lines of this fight and we’re going to work every single day from now until November to take our rights and our freedoms back,” said Florida Democratic Party Chair Nikki Fried at a Tallahassee event.

The party’s eyes are fixed on Amendment 4, which, if approved by voters, would protect abortion access up to viability, which is estimated at roughly 24 weeks of pregnancy.

“We’re really trying to reach Floridians all over the state, whether they’re rural or urban, and that includes folks across the political spectrum,” said Natasha Sutherland, who serves as the communications director for Floridians Protection Freedom.”

Advertisement

A constitutional amendment requires 60% voter approval, and Amendment 4 faces considerable opposition in the state.

The amendment, among others, is on Gov. Ron DeSanits’ radar. He recently launched the Florida Freedom Fund to oppose to the amendment — and others, including an amendment that would allow recreational marijuana in Florida.

“I’m going to be involved in doing what I think is right for the state, whether its the political committee or other things,” said DeSantis in mid June, while also noting he’d like to impact some lower ballot races. “There’s a lot of things going on in the state.”

Florida currently bans abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, with exceptions for rape, incest and to save the mother’s life.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Florida

Space debris crashes into Florida home, family sues for damages

Published

on

Space debris crashes into Florida home, family sues for damages


Lawyer Mica Nguyen Worthy is suing NASA on behalf of Florida homeowner Alejandro Otero and his family to recover damages after space debris hit their family home in early March, according to the Cranfill Sumner Law Firm where Worthy is a partner.

On March 8, a piece of space debris crashed through the roof of Otero’s home while his son Daniel was in the room. The debris left a large hole in the roof through the sub-flooring.

Advertisement

NASA confirmed later that the space debris was from its flight support equipment, which was used to mount the batteries on the cargo pallet. 

In March 2021, NASA’s ground force used the International Space Station’s robotic arm to release a cargo pallet containing batteries from the space station after installing new batteries as part of an upgrade on the orbital outpost.

NASA stated that although the hardware was expected to burn up during its entry into Earth’s atmosphere on March 8, a piece of hardware survived re-entry and struck the Florida home. 

Advertisement
The International Space Station’s 57.7-foot-long robotic arm, also known as the Canadarm2, is pictured attached to the Harmony module. (credit: NASA)

In discussing the cause of the debris, NASA added, “Based on the examination, the agency determined the debris to be a stanchion from the NASA flight support equipment used to mount the batteries on the cargo pallet. The object is made of the metal alloy Inconel, weighs 1.6 pounds, is 4 inches in height and 1.6 inches in diameter.” 

The space agency said they will continue to investigate why the hardware did not burn up during entry and update their systems so it does not occur again. 

Advertisement

Damages Otero family is seeking

The Otero family members are seeking claims for non-insured Property Damage loss, Business Interruption damages, Emotional/Mental anguish damages, and the costs of assistance from third parties required in the process. 

Furthermore, the Oteros’ homeowner’s insurance carrier submitted a simultaneous claim for the damages to the property it had subrogated.

“Space debris is a real and serious issue because of the increase in space traffic in recent years,” Worthy emphasized. 

Advertisement

“My clients are seeking adequate compensation to account for this event’s stress and impact on their lives. They are grateful that no one sustained physical injuries from this incident, but a ‘near miss’ situation such as this could have been catastrophic. If the debris had hit a few feet in another direction, there could have been serious injury or a fatality,” Worthy added.

Worthy is a partner in the Charlotte, North Carolina office of Cranfill Sumner LLP and Chair of the firm’s Aviation and Aerospace Practice Group.

Advertisement

Worthy also emphasized to NASA that it should consider that US citizens should not have to make a claim under a negligence legal theory when the US government has committed to being “absolutely liable” under international treaty law for damage to persons or property on Earth’s surface caused by its space objects.

“If the incident had happened overseas, and someone in another country was damaged by the same space debris as in the Oteros’ case, the US would have been absolutely liable to pay for those damages under the Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects also known as the ‘Space Liability Convention,’” Worthy noted. 

“We have asked NASA not to apply a different standard towards US citizens or residents, but instead to take care of the Oteros and make them whole,” she said. 

Advertisement

“Here, the US government, through NASA, has an opportunity to set the standard or ‘set a precedent’ for what responsible, safe, and sustainable space operations should look like. If NASA were to take the position that the Oteros’ claims should be paid in full, it would signal to other governments and private industries that such victims should be compensated regardless of fault,” Worthy concluded.

NASA will have six months to respond to the allegations. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Florida

Rip Currents Kill At Least Six Florida Visitors | Weather.com

Published

on

Rip Currents Kill At Least Six Florida Visitors | Weather.com


undefined

Play

  • At least six people have died in rip currents over two days.
  • All six victims were visitors to Florida.
  • The parents of six children were among the victims.

“I​t’s just too dangerous to swim right now.” That was the warning Sunday from the Bay County Sheriff’s Office in Florida after announcing double red flag warnings and closing the water to swimmers.

Over the span of two days, at least six people were killed in rip currents along Florida beaches.

Three Alabama men who went for an evening swim shortly after arriving at a Florida Panhandle beach were caught in a rip current and died, authorities say.

The young men had traveled to the Panama City Beach area Friday evening with a group of friends and had just checked into their rental and gone for a swim when they went into distress, the Bay County Sheriff’s Office said in an updated Facebook post Saturday evening.

“The three men were caught in a rip current shortly after entering the water,” the post said.

Advertisement

The sheriff’s office had received the initial emergency call about the distressed swimmers shortly after 8 p.m., officials said. The U.S. Coast Guard and others began rescue efforts. The men were found separately and eventually pronounced dead at area hospitals, authorities said.

The sheriff’s office identified the three as Birmingham, Alabama, residents Harold Denzel Hunter, 25, Jemonda Ray, 24, and Marius Richardson, 24. Earlier this week, single red flags had been posted at the beach, indicating high-hazard surf and rip current conditions.

A​ Pennsylvania couple died in a rip current on a Florida beach Thursday while on vacation with their six children.

T​he incident happened about an hour north of West Palm Beach at Hutchinson Island, a barrier island in Martin County on the Atlantic coast.

Brian Warter, 51, and Erica Wishard, 48, were visiting with their six kids, most of whom are teenagers, according to the Martin County Sheriff’s Office.

Advertisement

T​hey were swimming outside of an area farther up the beach that’s protected by lifeguards and where red flags warned of the danger.

The Martin County Sheriff’s Office said in a Facebook post that two children were able to break free of the current and tried to help their parents but were forced to swim ashore when conditions became too dangerous.

A​lso on Thursday, a 19-year-old visiting Panama City Beach from Oklahoma drowned after getting separated from a friend, WJHG.com reported. Fire Chief Ray Morgan said the young man was swimming under single red flag conditions.

P​anama City Rescue lifeguards pulled him out of the surf and started CPR but they were unable to save him.

T​he Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending