Connect with us

Delaware

Opinion: We have to do better in Delaware. We have to embrace smart development

Published

on

Opinion: We have to do better in Delaware. We have to embrace smart development



3-minute read

play

Delaware confronts a collection of related crises: a shortage of affordable housing; a surge in unhealthy medical conditions; erosion of environmental resilience; and rising air and water pollution. While none of these have simple causes or solutions, public decisions over the past several decades have exacerbated them.

Delaware’s sprawling development patterns force us to drive — to school, to work, to the store, to the fitness center and elsewhere — and often at considerable distances. Decades of piecemeal land-use decisions have made us totally dependent on our personal motor vehicles.

That dependence has cost us a great deal. It has compromised our health, created a shortage of diverse and affordable housing, gobbled up open space, farmland, forests and wetlands, increased pollution, escalated the public costs of infrastructure and services, driven climate change and eroded the sense of place and quality of life that makes strong communities.

Consider Delaware’s elevated incidences of obesity, diabetes and heart disease, due partly to our sedentary lifestyle; the increase in pediatric asthma due partly to local air pollution; and the high cost of healthcare associated with all those conditions.

Consider, too, increased air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from traffic, the high cost of transportation as a percentage of household income, high rents and the continued building of homes at prices out of reach for too many Delawareans.

Advertisement

Our development patterns also compound the mobility and housing challenges faced by our large and growing older population, including the ability to age in place, which has downstream impacts on healthcare costs for state Medicaid and retiree programs and services.

All of these conditions hit our most vulnerable neighbors hardest. Their health is worse than the population overall, flooding of their neighborhoods is routine and more consequential, their housing options are more limited, and they are cut off from valuable resources and economic opportunities.

What’s more, the loss of open space from new development has greatly diminished the land’s ability to absorb storm water, which has increased flooding during major weather events and extreme high tides, compromising our already compromised climate resilience and increasing the need for expensive infrastructure improvements.

Advertisement

And with every traffic study aimed at accommodating more cars and with every zoning change we approve — every subdivision, strip center or office park — we make the challenges harder to address.

Delaware must reform land-use strategies

Yet there is a simple solution: Address the challenges together by reforming our land-use strategies. In a nutshell, spur development where it makes real sense and discourage development where it causes the most damage.

The time has come. In Delaware, 60 government entities make land-use decisions under a structure designed when our state was 60% less populated and confronted fewer critical challenges. There is little coordination between those entities and there are no penalties for deviating from state planning guidance or county comprehensive plans.

We hope the incoming administration will recognize that smart land use is one of the most powerful and cost-effective tools for addressing our housing challenges, mitigating climate effects, building community resilience and improving human and environmental health.

Advertisement

Shouldn’t municipal, county and state governments be on the same page? Rethinking Delaware believes they should. Rethinking Delaware is an informal coalition of former state officials and nonprofit, non-governmental organizations that believe government at all levels, led by the state, should encourage development of compact, mixed-use, walkable, transit-supportive communities as a central part of the state’s housing, transportation, health, environmental and climate priorities. Our recommendations to the new administration include:

  • Review and amend all state and local land-use and infrastructure policies and funding for transportation, schools, and water and sewer systems that impede development of compact, walkable communities.
  • In support of more compact development patterns, shift transportation investment to accommodate walking, biking and a new suite of transit services.
  • Re-orient all comprehensive plans and zoning laws to prioritize mixed-use neighborhoods with places to live, work, shop, learn, and play while increasing the supply and diversity of housing and transportation options.
  • Establish state- and/or county task forces to develop innovative proposals for specific areas that address the collective challenges of housing and transportation costs, our changing demographics and health challenges, and climate-related threats, all in ways that incorporate a sustainable economic strategy for the future.

Imagine what could be. Walk the kids to school or the bus stop, then walk to the local café for a coffee on the way to the co-op workspace or transit stop. It’s right near the grocer, pharmacy and cleaners. On the weekends, hike or bike the beautiful green trails around the neighborhood—the same trails others use to cycle to work. Walk or bike to the park and ball fields, the farm stand, to restaurant night.

The result: more physical activity that lowers health risks, which eases the cost of healthcare; better air and fewer respiratory ailments, which also eases healthcare costs; less valuable time spent in traffic; lower transportation costs (which translates to more discretionary spending for our households), more necessities readily available to seniors, and stronger communities; a more resilient environment.

That’s a better Delaware for everyone. If you agree, reach out to your town council, county council representatives and state legislators and the governor-elect to urge action. Reach us at rethinkingdelaware@gmail.com.

Rethinking Delaware is an informal coalition of former cabinet secretaries and state officials including Anne Canby, Rita Landgraf, Christophe Tulou, Joseph Pika, Mark Chura, and Charles Salkin; New Castle County Council representative Dee Durham; and nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations including Delaware Chapter of the Sierra Club, Delaware Nature Society, Healthy Communities Delaware, Housing Alliance of Delaware and The Nature Conservancy in Delaware.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Delaware

Nick Minicucci accounts for 6 TDs and Delaware tops Campbell 41-22 in final FCS home game

Published

on

Nick Minicucci accounts for 6 TDs and Delaware tops Campbell 41-22 in final FCS home game


Associated Press

NEWARK, Del. (AP) — Nick Minicucci threw for four touchdowns and ran for two more as Delaware won its final home game as an FCS program, beating Campbell 41-22 on Saturday.

A member of the Football Champion Subdivision member since 1980, the Blue Hens earned 19 postseason appearances. Delaware (9-1, 6-1) will transition to the FBS and join Conference USA in 2025.

Advertisement

Minicucci took the Blue Hens on a seven-play, 68-yard first-quarter drive to take a 6-0 lead, scoring on a six-yard run, but Nate Reed’s PAT attempt was blocked. Minicucci then fired 33 yards to Phil Lutz to make it 12-0 after a two-point conversion attempt failed.

The pair combined again to start the second quarter with an eight-yard touchdown pass and Minicucci found Max Patterson for the two-point conversion to make it 20-6. Minicucci ran three-yards for his second rushing touchdown of the half to make it 27-13 and the Blue Hens led 27-16 at intermission.

Minicucci added a 17-yard touchdown pass to Jake Thaw and a 38-yard scoring pass to JoJo Bermudez to cap the scoring in the fourth quarter.

Minicucci completed 16 of 26 passes for 230 yards and was picked off once and ran 11 times for 78 yards. Marcus Yarns carried 17 times for 134 yards and Lutz caught four passes for 75 yards.

Mike Chandler was 16 of 31 passing for 267 yards and two touchdowns for the Camels (3-8, 1-6) but was intercepted twice. VJ Wilkins caught five passes for 172 yards and two touchdowns. Campbell was held to just 54 yards on 27 carries.

Advertisement

Delaware finished 7-0 at Delaware Stadium, the program’s 14th undefeated home slate since the facility opened in 1953.

__

Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-football-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-football




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Delaware

Advance Auto Parts to close hundreds of stores. Delaware stores’ future unclear

Published

on

Advance Auto Parts to close hundreds of stores. Delaware stores’ future unclear


play

Advance Auto Parts is shuttering or leaving over 700 locations around the country by mid-2025.

The car parts store based in North Carolina announced the closures on Nov. 13. It is a part of a “restructuring” and “asset optimization plan” with the goal of increasing profits and streamlining the companies operations, according to a public filing. There will be a headcount reduction as a result.

Advertisement

It is closing 523 corporate stores and four distribution centers and exiting 204 independent locations. The locations of the closures have not been made public as of this writing.

 “We are charting a clear path forward and introducing a new three-year financial plan, with a focus on executing core retail fundamentals to improve the productivity of all our assets and to create shareholder value,” said CEO and president Shane O’Kelly in a statement on Nov. 14.

How many Advance Auto Parts locations are in Delaware?

There are 19 locations in Delaware, with stores in all three counties. Which locations are closing, if any, has not been released to the public.

As of October, there were 4,781 locations total in the U.S., Canada, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

Opinion: Delaware’s charter schools must embrace a new standard of accountability

Published

on

Opinion: Delaware’s charter schools must embrace a new standard of accountability



3-minute read

It’s charter school renewal season once again and now is the perfect time to reflect on what this means for our schools.

Every five years, charter schools are required to renew their charters. The charter is the agreement between the school and their authorizer, the governing body which grants them specific rights, powers, and responsibilities. This is a rigorous process that ensures they are living up to the promises made to their authorizer, board, parents, students, and communities. The process places charter schools under a lot of scrutiny – a level of oversight not typically experienced by district schools, which do not face such renewal requirements. Yet, despite this, there is a common misconception that charter schools operate with less accountability and lower standards.

Advertisement

Charter schools operate with a unique blend of flexibility and accountability. Flexibility allows them to be innovative and creative, but it comes at a cost — strict accountability measures that seem to increase over time. Unfortunately, while the accountability requirements have remained stringent, the flexibility these schools need to thrive has been slowly taken away.

The reality of charter school accountability

During the renewal process, each charter school must prove to its authorizer that it’s providing the outcomes promised when its charter was granted. This comprehensive evaluation covers everything from academic performance, including growth and proficiency, to financial transparency and organizational health. In addition to annual independent financial audits, charter schools must also ensure that they comply with most if not all regulations and maintain a safe and healthy environment for students and staff.

This year, six Delaware charter schools are up for renewal. Each school must provide a wealth of detailed information during this process, including their curriculum, how they plan to support students with learning differences, their academic progress over the past five years, in-depth financial information, and organizational health information. This intense evaluation process pushes these schools to reflect on their achievements and shortcomings, ensuring they are prepared to meet future opportunities and challenges.

A comprehensive review process

While a large part of the process is the review of academic performance, materials utilized and staff employed to meet these outcomes, our schools must also undergo an all-encompassing review of both their financial and organizational performance. Analysis of these areas includes many aspects of both, but two key areas are governance and fiscal management.

Advertisement

Boards of charter schools must receive governance training every three years to maintain high standards of leadership, ensuring they provide proper oversight without overstepping into the management of the school. This governance structure is critical in distinguishing successful schools.

In the financial area, each charter school is required by law to undergo an independent financial audit every year, ensuring transparency and responsible fiscal management. These audits are not only assessed annually and posted publicly on their website but are used as part of the extensive five-year financial performance review. Reviewing these measures is designed to confirm that charter schools are safe and healthy, financially viable and guarantee administrative integrity and full regulatory compliance.

Of note, while district schools are held accountable in different ways, they are not required to renew their existence every five years.

Flexibility paired with responsibility

One of the reasons charter schools are often misjudged is due to the flexibility they are given in how they meet their educational goals. This flexibility is critical — it allows schools to innovate, respond to the needs of their students, and adopt methods that might differ from traditional public school models. Flexibility is not synonymous with a lack of accountability or lower standards. In fact, it often enhances accountability and standards, as schools must prove that their methods are working.

In the end, we must ask ourselves: is there room to offer more flexibility across the board, in exchange for heightened accountability? The goal is the same for both charter and district schools — to provide high-quality education for our children. Charter schools have shown that this can be done through innovation and accountability. After 28 years, maybe it’s time for Delaware to think about how this balance could benefit the broader public education landscape.

Advertisement

Kendall Massett is executive director of the Delaware Charter Schools Network.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending