Connect with us

Delaware

Delaware jury to decide if Fox is liable for defaming Dominion

Published

on

Delaware jury to decide if Fox is liable for defaming Dominion


WILMINGTON, Delaware, March 31 (Reuters) – A jury will determine whether or not Fox Corp (FOXA.O) defamed Dominion Voting Programs with false vote-rigging claims aired by Fox Information after the 2020 U.S. election, a Delaware decide dominated on Friday, dealing a setback to the media firm that had sought to keep away from a trial within the $1.6 billion lawsuit.

Delaware Superior Courtroom Choose Eric Davis denied motions from Fox and partially granted Dominion motions to resolve the problem of defamation legal responsibility forward of the scheduled April 17 trial date. The ruling places the high-profile case within the arms of a jury that may decide whether or not Fox acted with precise malice and whether or not Dominion suffered any damages.

The trial, to be held in Wilmington, is anticipated to final roughly 4 weeks. It’s potential the events may nonetheless settle the case. Davis heard arguments from either side throughout a two-day pretrial listening to on March 21 and 22.

“This case is and all the time has been in regards to the First Modification protections of the media’s absolute proper to cowl the information,” Fox stated in a press release. “Fox will proceed to fiercely advocate for the rights of free speech and a free press as we transfer into the following section of those proceedings.”

Advertisement

Dominion stated it was gratified by the ruling and seemed ahead to the trial.

This is among the most intently watched U.S. defamation lawsuits in years and includes one in every of America’s largest cable networks, dwelling to many outstanding conservative commentators.

Denver-based Dominion sued New York-based Fox Corp and Fox Information in 2021, accusing them of ruining its status by airing false claims by former President Donald Trump and his attorneys that its voting machines had been used to rig the end result of the election towards him and in favor of Democrat Joe Biden.

Dominion has stated in courtroom filings that inner emails, texts and deposition testimony show that Fox personnel at each degree – from producers to hosts, all the best way as much as Chairman Rupert Murdoch – knew the election-rigging claims had been false and aired them anyway in pursuit of scores as they misplaced viewers to far-right retailers that embraced Trump’s claims.

Staff clear up the burnt stays of a Christmas tree exterior the Information Corp. and Fox Information constructing in New York Metropolis, New York, U.S. December 8, 2021. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz

Dominion argued this met the “precise malice” customary to win a defamation case underneath which a plaintiff should show a defendant knowingly unfold false info or acted with reckless disregard for the reality.

Advertisement

Davis, nevertheless, stated precise malice will likely be decided by the jury.

The decide dominated in Dominion’s favor on some parts of defamation together with that the allegedly defamatory statements by Fox involved Dominion, that the statements had been printed by Fox and had been false.

“The proof developed on this civil continuing demonstrates that (it) is CRYSTAL clear that not one of the statements regarding Dominion in regards to the 2020 election are true,” wrote Davis, utilizing all capital letters for emphasis.

Fox has argued that its protection of the election claims was protected by press freedoms enshrined within the U.S. Structure’s First Modification as a result of it was newsworthy and correctly framed as opinion or unproven allegations. Fox additionally has argued that Dominion’s go well with advances a very broad interpretation of U.S. defamation regulation and is a risk to freedom of the press.

Legal professionals for Fox even have invoked the authorized doctrine of “impartial reportage,” which holds that the press can’t be held accountable for publishing newsworthy allegations in a impartial approach.

Advertisement

Davis, nevertheless, stated in his ruling the doctrine wouldn’t defend Fox from legal responsibility, as a result of the community didn’t conduct disinterested reporting.

Fox faces an identical lawsuit by voting-technology firm Smartmatic, which is in search of $2.7 billion in damages from Fox Corp, the cable community, Fox hosts and company.

Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delawared; Enhancing by Jonathan Oatis and Invoice Berkrot

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Belief Rules.

Tom Hals
Advertisement

Thomson Reuters

Tom Hals is an award-winning reporter with 25 years of expertise working in Asia, Europe and the US. Since 2009 he has coated authorized points and high-stakes courtroom battles, starting from challenges to pandemic insurance policies to Elon Musk’s marketing campaign to finish his deal for Twitter.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Delaware

Study: Young Black men in Wilmington say they can’t survive without a firearm

Published

on

Study: Young Black men in Wilmington say they can’t survive without a firearm


From Philly and the Pa. suburbs to South Jersey and Delaware, what would you like WHYY News to cover? Let us know!

A new study published in the Delaware Journal of Public Health offers a stark glimpse into the experiences and perceptions of young African American men living in communities often associated with violence.

The research, conducted by scholars from Texas Southern University, Delaware State University, Coppin State University, Jackson State University, and Thurgood Marshall College, interviewed 400 young men between the ages of 15 and 24 who either owned or recently owned a firearm. Of the total group, about 100 participants were from Wilmington, Del.; the others were from Baltimore; Jackson, Miss.; and Houston.

The study — titled “Understanding the Perception of Place and Its Impact on Community Violence” — revealed that many participants felt compelled to carry firearms for safety, often after witnessing or experiencing violence in their neighborhoods. In Wilmington, 86% of respondents described the city negatively, with 74% using only negative terms.

Advertisement

Their descriptions included words like “murder town,” “treacherous,” “crazy,” “chaotic,” and “a war zone.” A persistent sense of threat pervaded their understanding of the city around them.

Safety concerns drove most participants to arm themselves.

According to the study, young men often encountered firearms at an early age — sometimes as young as 10 — and many had family members or close friends who introduced them to guns. The findings indicate that these decisions are not made lightly, nor in isolation. Social media pressures, limited economic opportunities, limited role models, and easy access to firearms shaped a landscape where carrying a gun seemed logical, even necessary, to the young men for personal protection.

Nurturing hope among young people

These research findings resonate with ongoing efforts at One Village Alliance, a Wilmington nonprofit seeking to nurture young people in a city often misunderstood by outsiders. One evening at the organization’s location on West 31st and Market streets, children gathered in a small kitchen to fill plastic bags with healthy snacks. The exercise, though seemingly simple, has a clear purpose: to instill good nutritional habits and provide a sense of stability. The community around them is sometimes referred to as a food desert, making nutritious food scarce.

By taking part in such activities, the children learn new skills and build confidence. “Can I get this one?” one child asked, eager to take part. Here, learning about healthy eating serves as an introduction to broader life skills that can help counter the environmental factors the study highlights.

Advertisement

The nonprofit’s after-school enrichment programs aim to reinforce positive experiences and set children on a path toward excellence through education, mentorship, and personal development. It offers a safe space and an alternative to the streets. This approach is informed by staff members who know the stakes all too well.



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

A Delaware Water Gap park visit may cost more in ‘25: How you can weigh in

Published

on

A Delaware Water Gap park visit may cost more in ‘25: How you can weigh in


A fee increase and expansion are proposed for Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area, and federal park officials want to hear what people think about it.

The National Park Service on Monday opened a 30-day public comment period to solicit public input on several proposed changes to the park’s fee system.

The proposal includes an increase in fee amounts, a two-week extension of the fee season, changes to the annual pass purchases, and the addition of two new fee sites. If approved, the changes would go into effect in April 2025.

The last fee increase was implemented in 2015, and the park service says revenues aren’t stretching as far as they once did. For starters, visitation to the park has increased 26% since 2019, the park service says. And due to inflation and rising costs, the $10 amenity fee currently charged at the park now purchases nearly 33% less than it did in 2015 when the fee was increased from $7 — it now takes over $13 to buy the same goods and services.

Advertisement

“Over the past several years, the park’s budget has remained relatively flat while costs and visitation have both increased, facilities and equipment have aged, and the need for routine maintenance has grown,” Superintendent Doyle Sapp said in a news release on the proposal.

“It is essential that we seek additional revenue sources to help us fill the funding gap so that we can continue to offer outstanding recreational opportunities and visitor experiences while protecting the park’s natural and cultural resources in perpetuity,” he continued.

The park service is authorized to collect and retain revenue under the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, provided the money is used to enhance visitor experiences. More information on the act can be found at nps.gov.

Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area does not charge entrance fees to visit the park. Amenity fees are charged for specific areas used for swimming, picnicking and launching boats.

Over the past three years, revenue from Delaware Water Gap’s amenity fees has been used for restroom repairs and upgrades throughout the park, river campsite improvements, multiple trail projects including rehabilitation, stabilization and resurfacing of the McDade Recreational Trail, and work at George W. Childs Park. Revenue also has been used to pay for seasonal maintenance, fee collection and public safety staff.

Advertisement

“What you pay here, stays here, in this park, where it is used for repair, maintenance, and facility enhancements directly related to visitor enjoyment, access, health, and safety and for seasonal staff that serve park visitors and improve their experiences,” Elizabeth Winslow, the park’s fee program manager, states in the release.

The National Park Service is seeking public comment on the proposed changes that include:

  • Increasing amenity fees from $10 per vehicle per day to $20 per vehicle per day at the sites that charge amenity fees and extending the fee season by approximately two weeks to Nov. 1.
  • Increasing the cost of an annual pass from $45 to $60 and discontinuing discounts for multiple passes issued to the same household.
  • Charging amenity fees at two new sites, Kittatinny Point in New Jersey, and Hialeah Picnic Area in Pennsylvania. Day passes for these sites would be available through recreation.gov, the NPS online reservation system, or in person by using a drop box and fee envelope like those used at other unstaffed fee sites in the park.

If approved, increased revenue from the proposed fee changes would allow the park to hire additional seasonal employees, including custodians, trail workers, interpretive park rangers and visitor center staff, and public safety staff to help meet the public’s needs and ensure outstanding visitor experiences, according to the release.

Additionally, over the next five years the park plans to invest around $800,000 of fee revenue on hiking trail improvements and vegetation management, including on popular trails such as the Toms Creek Trail, Cliff Park Trails, and Hornbecks Creek Trail in Pennsylvania, and the Van Campens Glen Trail, Military Road Trail, and Rattlesnake Swamp Trail in New Jersey. Improvements to the facilities at Milford Beach also are planned.

To comment on the proposal, go to parkplanning.nps.gov/DEWAFees25 and click on “Comment Now” or mail your written comment to Superintendent Doyle Sapp, Attention: Fee Change Proposal, 1978 River Road, Bushkill, PA 18324. The 30-day comment period is open until midnight on Jan. 14, 2025.

Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area is a nearly 70,000-acre unit of the national park system, located in Pike, Monroe and Northampton counties in Pennsylvania and Warren and Sussex counties in New Jersey.

Advertisement

Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to lehighvalleylive.com.

Kurt Bresswein may be reached at kbresswein@lehighvalleylive.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

Man injured after car slams into truck in Bear, Delaware

Published

on

Man injured after car slams into truck in Bear, Delaware


Man injured after car slams into truck in Bear, Delaware – CBS Philadelphia

Watch CBS News


We are learning new details about a crash that left a man seriously injured in Bear, Delaware.
A man was driving a car that slammed into the back of a truck on Summit Bridge Road near Brennan Boulevard Thursday night.
The investigation revealed the truck was stopped at the traffic light but for reasons still unknown the car did not stop.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending