Connect with us

Austin, TX

Austin Private Wealth, LLC Goe – GuruFocus.com

Published

on

Austin Private Wealth, LLC Goe – GuruFocus.com



Austin Personal Wealth, LLC
lately filed their 13F report for the third quarter of 2022, which ended on 2022-09-30.

The 13F report particulars which shares had been in a guru’s fairness portfolio on the finish of the quarter, although buyers ought to notice that these filings are restricted in scope, containing solely a snapshot of lengthy positions in U.S.-listed shares and American depository receipts as of the quarter’s finish. They aren’t required to incorporate worldwide holdings, quick positions or different kinds of investments. Nonetheless, even this restricted submitting can present priceless info.

3108 N LAMAR BOULEVARD AUSTIN, TX 78705

As of the newest 13F report, the guru’s fairness portfolio contained 135 shares valued at a complete of $476.00Mil. The highest holdings had been
VONE(13.56%),
SPLG(10.49%),
and
VTWO(9.16%).

Advertisement

In response to GuruFocus information, these had been Austin Personal Wealth, LLC’s prime 5 trades of the quarter.

iShares Nationwide Muni Bond ETF

Through the quarter, Austin Personal Wealth, LLC purchased 134,111 shares of ARCA:MUB for a complete holding of 142,879. The commerce had a 2.89% influence on the fairness portfolio. Through the quarter, the inventory traded for a median value of $105.91.

On 10/28/2022, iShares Nationwide Muni Bond ETF traded for a value of $101.68 per share and a market cap of $28.44Bil. The inventory has returned -10.49% over the previous yr.

There may be inadequate information to calculate the inventory’s monetary energy and profitability scores.

When it comes to valuation, iShares Nationwide Muni Bond ETF has

Advertisement

a price-earnings ratio of 9999.00.

Vanguard Intermediate-Time period Bond ETF

The guru established a brand new place price 187,546 shares in ARCA:BIV, giving the inventory a 2.89% weight within the fairness portfolio. Shares traded for a median value of $77.06 in the course of the quarter.

On 10/28/2022, Vanguard Intermediate-Time period Bond ETF traded for a value of $73.09 per share and a market cap of $12.23Bil. The inventory has returned -15.41% over the previous yr.

There may be inadequate information to calculate the inventory’s monetary energy and profitability scores.

When it comes to valuation, Vanguard Intermediate-Time period Bond ETF has

Advertisement

a price-earnings ratio of 9999.00.

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

Through the quarter, Austin Personal Wealth, LLC purchased 197,673 shares of ARCA:SPLG for a complete holding of 1,190,572. The commerce had a 1.74% influence on the fairness portfolio. Through the quarter, the inventory traded for a median value of $46.53.

On 10/28/2022, SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF traded for a value of $45 per share and a market cap of $13.96Bil. The inventory has returned -14.99% over the previous yr.

There may be inadequate information to calculate the inventory’s monetary energy and profitability scores.

When it comes to valuation, SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF has

Advertisement

a price-earnings ratio of 9999.00 and

a price-book ratio of three.38.

iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF

Through the quarter, Austin Personal Wealth, LLC purchased 290,162 shares of BATS:GOVT for a complete holding of 806,902. The commerce had a 1.38% influence on the fairness portfolio. Through the quarter, the inventory traded for a median value of $23.61.

On 10/28/2022, iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF traded for a value of $22.5102 per share and a market cap of $21.63Bil. The inventory has returned -13.72% over the previous yr.

There may be inadequate information to calculate the inventory’s monetary energy and profitability scores.

Advertisement

When it comes to valuation, iShares U.S. Treasury Bond ETF has

a price-earnings ratio of 9999.00.

iShares MSCI EAFE Progress ETF

Through the quarter, Austin Personal Wealth, LLC purchased 79,127 shares of BATS:EFG for a complete holding of 266,249. The commerce had a 1.2% influence on the fairness portfolio. Through the quarter, the inventory traded for a median value of $81.57.

On 10/28/2022, iShares MSCI EAFE Progress ETF traded for a value of $76.39 per share and a market cap of $9.03Bil. The inventory has returned -29.42% over the previous yr.

There may be inadequate information to calculate the inventory’s monetary energy and profitability scores.

Advertisement

When it comes to valuation, iShares MSCI EAFE Progress ETF has

a price-earnings ratio of 9999.00 and

a price-book ratio of two.93.

Please notice, the numbers and information quoted are as of the writing of this text and should not issue within the newest buying and selling information or firm bulletins.

Wish to present suggestions on this text? Have questions or considerations? Get in contact with us right here, or e-mail us at [email protected]!

Advertisement

This text is common in nature and doesn’t signify the opinions of GuruFocus or any of its associates. This text just isn’t meant to be monetary recommendation, nor does it represent funding recommendation or suggestions. It was written with out regard to your particular person state of affairs or monetary targets. We goal to carry you elementary, data-driven evaluation, The data on this web site is under no circumstances assured for completeness, accuracy or in every other means.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Austin, TX

Lawmakers investigating Texas Lottery

Published

on

Lawmakers investigating Texas Lottery


Both law enforcement and Texas lawmakers are investigating a possible rigging of the Texas Lottery. It is being scrutinized due to suspicious circumstances surrounding recent multi-million dollar jackpot winning tickets being purchased through courier systems

Posted 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Northside ISD PTA group to visit lawmakers in Austin to discuss legislative priorities

Published

on

Northside ISD PTA group to visit lawmakers in Austin to discuss legislative priorities


SAN ANTONIO – A group of parents, teachers and students from the Northside Independent School District (NISD) will visit Austin on Monday for PTA Rally Day, where they will meet with lawmakers to discuss legislative priorities.

Members of the Northside Council of PTA’s, a nonprofit organization overseeing all 117 local PTA’s in the district, will be sending a group to the Texas Capitol for Texas PTA Rally Day.

Over a thousand people from PTA’s across the state are expected to fill capitol grounds today.

Funding priorities the groups are expected to explore include public school funding around enrollment, opposing school vouchers and addressing teacher shortages.

Advertisement

For more on NISD’s priorities, click here.

Read more:

Copyright 2025 by KSAT – All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas Is Suing the NCAA to Demand “Sex Screening” of Student Athletes

Published

on

Texas Is Suing the NCAA to Demand “Sex Screening” of Student Athletes


Texas is suing the largest college sports governing body in the country in the hopes that a court will order the organization to “immediately begin screening the sex of student athletes.” Although the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has already barred transgender women from playing in women’s sports, Texas’ attorney general has accused the group of using loopholes to allow such competition.

The state attorney general, Ken Paxton, is asking for a temporary injunction that either orders the screenings or requires that the NCAA and its affiliates immediately stop using the terms “women,” “female,” or “girl” to market any of its women’s sports teams or competitions.

Advertisement

The lawsuit comes at a time when more women student-athletes are being scrutinized for their height, athletic ability and physical characteristics as evidence that they are transgender. Amid an increasingly hostile political environment for trans people, those often false accusations lead to harassment and national media attention for both cisgender and transgender girls. This dynamic played out on a larger scale in the 2024 Olympics, as women’s boxing champions endured global scrutiny about their gender from billionaires and powerful political figures.

The NCAA announced this month that only cisgender women can compete in women’s school sports, although trans girls and women are still allowed to join women’s practices. This policy followed President Donald Trump’s executive order threatening to withhold federal funding from schools that allow trans girls on girls’ teams.

But in Texas’ view, the NCAA isn’t following Trump’s order — in part, because the organization acknowledges transgender identity at all. Since the NCAA acknowledges gender identity to be “an individual’s own internal sense of their gender” and defines sex assigned at birth as a designation given by doctors on an infant’s birth record, Texas argues that trans girls with updated birth certificates are still able to join women’s sports competitions.

The NCAA disagrees.

Advertisement

“The policy is clear that there are no waivers available, and student-athletes assigned male at birth may not compete on a women’s team with amended birth certificates or other forms of ID,” the NCAA said in an emailed statement to The 19th. The organization added that co-ed practice “has been a staple in college sports for decades, particularly in women’s basketball.”

The NCAA did not provide further comment on Texas’ demands. A sex-screening policy, if it were put into place, would impact over 500,000 student-athletes across the country — in sports like golf, tennis, swimming, and lacrosse — and potentially expose them to invasive exams or require them to submit to genetic testing. The NCAA has given no indication that it intends to pursue such screenings.

Sex testing in elite sports has a long history of being used to deny women entry into athletics based on their hormone levels — which vary widely across both cisgender and transgender women — and of exposing them to abusive practices, particularly in the Global South. Due to that risk, sex eligibility tests run into legal issues relatively quickly. Many techniques have been used and discarded over the decades due to being found invasive or prone to error.

The civil rights group Human Rights Watch, which released a comprehensive report on sex testing in international sports in 2020, says these tests “violate fundamental rights to privacy and dignity,” and that sport governing bodies that implement them create “environments that coerce some women into invasive and unnecessary medical interventions as a condition to compete in certain events.”

Although Texas’ attorney general does not provide many details of what sex-screening student athletes should look like, the lawsuit suggests screening for the SRY gene as one potential avenue. The SRY gene, which is found on the Y chromosome and is responsible for triggering testes development, requires a laboratory setting to analyze a blood or saliva sample.

Advertisement

However, as BBC Sport reported last year, human genetic variations are so varied that some experts say it’s not possible to establish that everyone with a Y chromosome was born male, and everyone without a Y chromosome was born female. Comprehensive testing — which includes analyzing the SRY gene and hormone levels — is expensive, requires niche experts, and causes ethical concerns, one expert told the BBC.

“This assessment can be humiliating. It includes measurements of the most intimate parts of anatomy, like the size of your breast and your clitoris, the depth of your voice, the extent of your body hair,” Alun Williams, who researches genetic factors related to sport performance at the Manchester Metropolitan University Institute of Sport, told the BBC at the time.

Texas previously sued the NCAA in December for “engaging in false, deceptive, and misleading practices by marketing sporting events as ‘women’s’ competitions only to then provide consumers with mixed sex competitions where biological males compete against biological females.” The state sought civil penalties and for a judge to bar the NCAA from allowing trans women to compete in women’s sport competitions in Texas or involving Texas teams.

Now, Texas is seeking much broader action: The new lawsuit does not specify that the court act only within the state’s borders.

“The NCAA’s sleight of hand is designed to intentionally deceive consumers into believing that biological men are no longer allowed to participate in women’s sports,” Paxton said in a statement on Thursday, when the new lawsuit was announced. “Far from aligning with President Trump’s executive order or basic reality, the NCAA’s new policy treats sex as a changeable characteristic determined by a birth certificate instead of biology.”

Advertisement

InterAct, a group that advocates on behalf intersex youth — who are born with differences in their reproductive anatomy or sex traits — opposes sports restrictions based on definitions of sex that rely on reproductive biology and genetics at birth. It is unclear how these rules will be interpreted for intersex students, the group says. When Republicans in Congress proposed to ban trans girls from girls’ sports in federally-funded K-12 schools, interACT said such a ban would subject intersex students to “discrimination and violations of their privacy and dignity that can cause lasting damage.”

“Any form of enforcement raises massive privacy concerns for students, in addition to inviting harassment, invasive questioning and stigma that can be deeply harmful to youth,” interACT said in a statement.

Meghann Burke, executive director for the labor union that advocates for professional women’s soccer players, told BBC News on February 5 that Trump’s executive order does not protect women in sports. It is a cynical political strategy designed to distract from the issues that actually affect Americans, she said — and that strategy tries to force athletes to comment on an issue that few people know anything about.

But questioning women’s eligibility in sports based on their athleticism and their physique is nothing new, she said.

“Here’s what we do know: women’s sports, as a concept, as a category itself, was born out of exclusion,” she said. “As women’s sports advocates, in women’s sports, we ought to be really careful before we start going about excluding people.”

Advertisement

We’re resisting Trump’s authoritarian pressure.

As the Trump administration moves a mile-a-minute to implement right-wing policies and sow confusion, reliable news is an absolute must.

Truthout is working diligently to combat the fear and chaos that pervades the political moment. We’re requesting your support at this moment because we need it – your monthly gift allows us to publish uncensored, nonprofit news that speaks with clarity and truth in a moment when confusion and misinformation are rampant. As well, we’re looking with hope at the material action community activists are taking. We’re uplifting mutual aid projects, the life-sustaining work of immigrant and labor organizers, and other shows of solidarity that resist the authoritarian pressure of the Trump administration.

As we work to dispel the atmosphere of political despair, we ask that you contribute to our journalism. Over 80 percent of Truthout’s funding comes from small individual donations from our community of readers, and over a third of our total budget is supported by recurring monthly donors.

Four days remain in our fundraiser, and you can help by giving today. Whether you can make a small monthly donation or a larger gift, Truthout only works with your support.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending