Connect with us

Science

What we know so far about COVID-19 vaccinations for kids

Published

on

What we know so far about COVID-19 vaccinations for kids

Pfizer says its COVID-19 vaccine is secure and efficient in youngsters ages 5 to 11, and that it plans to file for emergency-use authorization “within the coming weeks.”

The query on quite a lot of mother and father’ minds proper now: When can my child get one?

Tens of millions of kids have examined optimistic for COVID-19. Not less than 460 have died. Circumstances in youngsters have accelerated in the course of the Delta variant wave: As of Sept. 2, youngsters made up 15.1% of reported circumstances over the period of the pandemic; in simply the week ending Sept. 2, they made up 26.8% of the entire, in keeping with the American Academy of Pediatrics. That represents a 250% enhance in youngster circumstances for the reason that week of July 22-29.

In accordance with a report within the Atlantic, some mother and father have fudged their children’ delivery dates to get ones simply shy of turning 12-years outdated their pictures. (The FDA doesn’t suggest this.) Others have sought medical doctors who’re keen to vaccinate youthful youngsters through off-label use. (Additionally not advisable.) If the shot is accepted for teenagers 5 to 11, these sorts of work-arounds can be moot.

Advertisement

Right here’s what we all know proper now in regards to the timeline to getting children beneath 12 vaccinated.

How shut are we to a COVID-19 vaccine for teenagers?

On Sept. 20, Pfizer introduced it can search emergency-use authorization for its COVID-19 vaccine for youngsters ages 5 to 11.

On Tuesday, the corporate supplied an replace, saying it has given the FDA the information on the part 2 and three trials it carried out with youngsters, though it hasn’t filed the emergency use software but. Pfizer has mentioned it plans to file for that authorization earlier than the top of this month; a information launch the corporate issued Tuesday mentioned to count on the formal submission “within the coming weeks.”

There isn’t any timetable for a way lengthy the approval course of might take. For comparability, Pfizer submitted the vaccine for emergency-use authorization for adults on Nov. 20, 2020, and acquired that authorization three weeks in a while Dec. 11. Full FDA approval was granted on Aug. 23, 2021. The AP reported that an individual aware of the matter however not approved to debate it publicly mentioned pictures could possibly be out there round Thanksgiving or presumably earlier in November, relying on how rapidly the FDA strikes to evaluate the applying and information.

On Monday morning, Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky advised ABC the company was “enthusiastically awaiting” that data.

Advertisement

“As quickly as [the vaccine data] get submitted to the FDA, I do know the FDA is urgently planning to evaluate these information, it can go from the FDA to the CDC, and we’ll evaluate it with comparable urgency,” Walensky mentioned on ABC’s “Good Morning America.” “And I’m hoping within the order of weeks.”

The FDA’s vaccine chief mentioned earlier this month that he’s “very, very hopeful” that vaccines can be approved and rolled out for youngsters ages 5 to 11 by the top of this 12 months. In the identical interview, he mentioned as soon as the FDA receives information from Pfizer, “we’re going to do an intensive job on that as rapidly as we will” and make a decision “hopefully inside a matter of weeks quite than a matter of months.”

What about Moderna and Johnson & Johnson?

The Moderna medical trials for teenagers 6 to 11 are underway. In July, the New York Instances reported that the Pfizer trials had been transferring sooner than its mRNA vaccine competitor’s.

The Johnson & Johnson vaccine has emergency-use authorization for folks 18 and older. As of this month, the drugmaker is in Section 3 of medical trials to check its vaccine on adolescents ages 12 to 17.

When will children beneath 5 have the ability to be vaccinated?

Pfizer had mentioned in July that it anticipated to have outcomes for the trials on children 5 to 11 by September, youngsters ages 2 to five quickly after that, and infants and toddlers 6 months to 2 years outdated in October or November. It has come by way of on these first outcomes, with no reported delays in trials for any of the youthful age teams. Moderna mentioned it additionally plans to run trials for youngsters as younger as 6 months.

Advertisement

So the reply is: These trials are ongoing. We must always know extra within the subsequent month or two.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

Published

on

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

A cluster of workers at Ventura County berry farms have been diagnosed with a rare disease often transmitted through sick animals’ urine, according to a public health advisory distributed to local doctors by county health officials Tuesday.

The bacterial infection, leptospirosis, has resulted in severe symptoms for some workers, including meningitis, an inflammation of the brain lining and spinal cord. Symptoms for mild cases included headaches and fevers.

The disease, which can be fatal, rarely spreads from human to human, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Ventura County Public Health has not given an official case count but said it had not identified any cases outside of the agriculture sector. The county’s agriculture commissioner was aware of 18 cases, the Ventura County Star reported.

Advertisement

The health department said it was first contacted by a local physician in October, who reported an unusual trend in symptoms among hospital patients.

After launching an investigation, the department identified leptospirosis as a probable cause of the illness and found most patients worked on caneberry farms that utilize hoop houses — greenhouse structures to shelter the crops.

As the investigation to identify any additional cases and the exact sources of exposure continues, Ventura County Public Health has asked healthcare providers to consider a leptospirosis diagnosis for sick agricultural workers, particularly berry harvesters.

Rodents are a common source and transmitter of disease, though other mammals — including livestock, cats and dogs — can transmit it as well.

The disease is spread through bodily fluids, such as urine, and is often contracted through cuts and abrasions that contact contaminated water and soil, where the bacteria can survive for months.

Advertisement

Humans can also contract the illness through contaminated food; however, the county health agency has found no known health risks to the general public, including through the contact or consumption of caneberries such as raspberries and blackberries.

Symptom onset typically occurs between two and 30 days after exposure, and symptoms can last for months if untreated, according to the CDC.

The illness often begins with mild symptoms, with fevers, chills, vomiting and headaches. Some cases can then enter a second, more severe phase that can result in kidney or liver failure.

Ventura County Public Health recommends agriculture and berry harvesters regularly rinse any cuts with soap and water and cover them with bandages. They also recommend wearing waterproof clothing and protection while working outdoors, including gloves and long-sleeve shirts and pants.

While there is no evidence of spread to the larger community, according to the department, residents should wash hands frequently and work to control rodents around their property if possible.

Advertisement

Pet owners can consult a veterinarian about leptospirosis vaccinations and should keep pets away from ponds, lakes and other natural bodies of water.

Continue Reading

Science

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

Published

on

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

It’s been two weeks since Donald Trump won the presidential election, but Stacey Lamirand’s brain hasn’t stopped churning.

“I still think about the election all the time,” said the 60-year-old Bay Area resident, who wanted a Kamala Harris victory so badly that she flew to Pennsylvania and knocked on voters’ doors in the final days of the campaign. “I honestly don’t know what to do about that.”

Neither do the psychologists and political scientists who have been tracking the country’s slide toward toxic levels of partisanship.

Fully 69% of U.S. adults found the presidential election a significant source of stress in their lives, the American Psychological Assn. said in its latest Stress in America report.

The distress was present across the political spectrum, with 80% of Republicans, 79% of Democrats and 73% of independents surveyed saying they were stressed about the country’s future.

Advertisement

That’s unhealthy for the body politic — and for voters themselves. Stress can cause muscle tension, headaches, sleep problems and loss of appetite. Chronic stress can inflict more serious damage to the immune system and make people more vulnerable to heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, infertility, clinical anxiety, depression and other ailments.

In most circumstances, the sound medical advice is to disengage from the source of stress, therapists said. But when stress is coming from politics, that prescription pits the health of the individual against the health of the nation.

“I’m worried about people totally withdrawing from politics because it’s unpleasant,” said Aaron Weinschenk, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin–Green Bay who studies political behavior and elections. “We don’t want them to do that. But we also don’t want them to feel sick.”

Modern life is full of stressors of all kinds: paying bills, pleasing difficult bosses, getting along with frenemies, caring for children or aging parents (or both).

The stress that stems from politics isn’t fundamentally different from other kinds of stress. What’s unique about it is the way it encompasses and enhances other sources of stress, said Brett Ford, a social psychologist at the University of Toronto who studies the link between emotions and political engagement.

Advertisement

For instance, she said, elections have the potential to make everyday stressors like money and health concerns more difficult to manage as candidates debate policies that could raise the price of gas or cut off access to certain kinds of medical care.

Layered on top of that is the fact that political disagreements have morphed into moral conflicts that are perceived as pitting good against evil.

“When someone comes into power who is not on the same page as you morally, that can hit very deeply,” Ford said.

Partisanship and polarization have raised the stakes as well. Voters who feel a strong connection to a political party become more invested in its success. That can make a loss at the ballot box feel like a personal defeat, she said.

There’s also the fact that we have limited control over the outcome of an election. A patient with heart disease can improve their prognosis by taking medicine, changing their diet, getting more exercise or quitting smoking. But a person with political stress is largely at the mercy of others.

Advertisement

“Politics is many forms of stress all rolled into one,” Ford said.

Weinschenk observed this firsthand the day after the election.

“I could feel it when I went into my classroom,” said the professor, whose research has found that people with political anxiety aren’t necessarily anxious in general. “I have a student who’s transgender and a couple of students who are gay. Their emotional state was so closed down.”

That’s almost to be expected in a place like Wisconsin, whose swing-state status caused residents to be bombarded with political messages. The more campaign ads a person is exposed to, the greater the risk of being diagnosed with anxiety, depression or another psychological ailment, according to a 2022 study in the journal PLOS One.

Political messages seem designed to keep voters “emotionally on edge,” said Vaile Wright, a licensed psychologist in Villa Park, Ill., and a member of the APA’s Stress in America team.

Advertisement

“It encourages emotion to drive our decision-making behavior, as opposed to logic,” Wright said. “When we’re really emotionally stimulated, it makes it so much more challenging to have civil conversation. For politicians, I think that’s powerful, because emotions can be very easily manipulated.”

Making voters feel anxious is a tried-and-true way to grab their attention, said Christopher Ojeda, a political scientist at UC Merced who studies mental health and politics.

“Feelings of anxiety can be mobilizing, definitely,” he said. “That’s why politicians make fear appeals — they want people to get engaged.”

On the other hand, “feelings of depression are demobilizing and take you out of the political system,” said Ojeda, author of “The Sad Citizen: How Politics is Depressing and Why it Matters.”

“What [these feelings] can tell you is, ‘Things aren’t going the way I want them to. Maybe I need to step back,’” he said.

Advertisement

Genessa Krasnow has been seeing a lot of that since the election.

The Seattle entrepreneur, who also campaigned for Harris, said it grates on her to see people laughing in restaurants “as if nothing had happened.” At a recent book club meeting, her fellow group members were willing to let her vent about politics for five minutes, but they weren’t interested in discussing ways they could counteract the incoming president.

“They’re in a state of disengagement,” said Krasnow, who is 56. She, meanwhile, is looking for new ways to reach young voters.

“I am exhausted. I am so sad,” she said. “But I don’t believe that disengaging is the answer.”

That’s the fundamental trade-off, Ojeda said, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution.

Advertisement

“Everyone has to make a decision about how much engagement they can tolerate without undermining their psychological well-being,” he said.

Lamirand took steps to protect her mental health by cutting social media ties with people whose values aren’t aligned with hers. But she will remain politically active and expects to volunteer for phone-banking duty soon.

“Doing something is the only thing that allows me to feel better,” Lamirand said. “It allows me to feel some level of control.”

Ideally, Ford said, people would not have to choose between being politically active and preserving their mental health. She is investigating ways to help people feel hopeful, inspired and compassionate about political challenges, since these emotions can motivate action without triggering stress and anxiety.

“We want to counteract this pattern where the more involved you are, the worse you are,” Ford said.

Advertisement

The benefits would be felt across the political spectrum. In the APA survey, similar shares of Democrats, Republicans and independents agreed with statements like, “It causes me stress that politicians aren’t talking about the things that are most important to me,” and, “The political climate has caused strain between my family members and me.”

“Both sides are very invested in this country, and that is a good thing,” Wright said. “Antipathy and hopelessness really doesn’t serve us in the long run.”

Continue Reading

Science

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

Published

on

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

President-elect Donald Trump joined Elon Musk in Texas and watched the launch from a nearby location on Tuesday. While the Starship’s giant booster stage was unable to repeat a “chopsticks” landing, the vehicle’s upper stage successfully splashed down in the Indian Ocean.

Continue Reading

Trending