Connect with us

Science

This drug could help treat monkeypox. Some patients have struggled to get it

Published

on

This drug could help treat monkeypox. Some patients have struggled to get it

Joseph Cassara determined to move again to the emergency room when the ache made it insufferable to swallow.

“I attempted to eat a banana for breakfast,” he stated, “and it simply felt like I used to be swallowing razor blades.”

Cassara, 33, was nonetheless ready on the take a look at outcomes to verify that he had monkeypox, however was struggling scorching fevers and grotesque lesions on his cheek and chin that felt as in the event that they had been on hearth. The Fresno resident was taking ibuprofen and Tylenol, however the agony endured; at one level, he stated, he woke at 2 a.m. along with his fists and jaw clenched, drenched in sweat, and screamed on the ceiling in ache.

He had been hospitalized and placed on an IV, he stated, when the physician advised him she was making an attempt to get him Tpoxx, a drug not but authorised by the Meals and Drug Administration to deal with monkeypox. Cassara learn by the paperwork and agreed.

Joseph Cassara, middle, who suffered from a painful case of monkeypox, directs movers. He stated the drug he obtained to deal with the illness was “miraculous.”

Advertisement

(Paul Kuroda / For The Instances)

Ten days into his sickness, the drug arrived and the outcome appeared “miraculous,” Cassara stated. Little lesions that had began to unfold to his physique appeared to freeze their onward march after which scabbed over, he stated. The injuries on his face started to shrink. As Cassara started to get better, he questioned: Why had it taken so lengthy to get the drugs that lastly eased his struggling?

Tecovirimat, generally often called Tpoxx, is permitted in Europe and is an authorised therapy within the U.S. for smallpox, however the FDA has not but authorised it to deal with monkeypox. It may be supplied both as oral capsules or injection vials for IV therapy.

Physicians can request it from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention or state well being departments for monkeypox sufferers beneath “compassionate use” — a pathway used to supply new medicine to sufferers with severe circumstances that lack comparable options. Docs have reported that the method, which incorporates filling out paperwork, acquiring knowledgeable consent and reporting again to the CDC on how the affected person is faring, may be daunting.

Advertisement

Federal officers say there are roughly 1.7 million programs of Tpoxx in a nationwide stockpile — “greater than sufficient to deal with the necessity,” Well being and Human Companies Secretary Xavier Becerra advised reporters when the Biden administration declared monkeypox a nationwide public well being emergency. Becerra stated greater than 15,000 of them had been deployed as of this week.

In California, well being officers stated almost 1,900 programs of Tpoxx capsules and 182 intravenous doses had been distributed throughout the state as of Monday. But for a lot of Californians affected by monkeypox, an infectious illness that has taken a disproportionate toll on homosexual and bisexual males, getting the drug has not been easy.

A man washes his face.

Joseph Cassara has scars from monkeypox. He wonders why it took so lengthy to get the drugs that lastly eased his struggling.

(Paul Kuroda / For The Instances)

In San Francisco, David Norman stated his medical supplier advised him “we don’t have it.”

Advertisement

He was as a substitute prescribed the ache medicine gabapentin and despatched house to isolate. The medication “didn’t come wherever near touching the ache,” stated Norman, 36. The painful bumps made it unimaginable to sit down or get up straight. He struggled to sleep.

It was by on-line networks that Norman came upon that San Francisco Metropolis Clinic was offering Tpoxx to folks affected by the sickness. Norman hobbled the blocks to the clinic and met with a nurse practitioner who walked him by the paperwork, then gave him the drugs.

It was “an absolute lifesaver,” stated Norman, a human assets skilled. “The very subsequent day my bumps had been all retreating.”

Thwarting the rash may additionally assist folks make a swifter exit from isolation, which might stretch for weeks as sufferers wait for his or her lesions to scab and heal over.

“This medicine has been proven, up to now, to speed up the therapeutic of the lesions,” stated Michael Bosco, an infectious illness pharmacist at NYU Langone Hospital–Lengthy Island who has argued in favor of broader entry to the therapy. If clinicians have this selection, he stated, “we’re doing a disservice if we’re not serving to folks get entry to that.”

Advertisement
A man opens a box.

Joseph Cassara strikes into his new condo. If he had gotten medicine earlier, he stated, perhaps his ache and nervousness may have been prevented.

(Paul Kuroda / For The Instances)

In Los Angeles County, the general public well being division not too long ago stated it had stocked greater than 600 doses of Tpoxx at 30 “therapy hubs” throughout the county, together with each hospitals and neighborhood websites. It’s also dishing out medicine on to sufferers’ properties, a service it stated was open to any medical supplier keen to comply with the CDC protocol — together with following up with their affected person.

But early in August, the pinnacle of a nonprofit system of neighborhood clinics stated that they had not given Tpoxx to any monkeypox sufferers. Till not too long ago, “we haven’t tried to entry it as a result of we haven’t even recognized that it was obtainable,” Jim Mangia, president and chief government of St. John’s Group Well being, stated in an interview Thursday.

On the time, Mangia stated the clinics had encountered at the very least 4 circumstances of monkeypox and had advised sufferers to isolate and take ibuprofen, which is “sort of like placing a Band-Support on an enormous open wound,” he stated. The next day, Mangia reported that after reaching out to the county, the clinics had obtained 10 doses of Tpoxx for monkeypox sufferers.

Advertisement

Though it’s not FDA-approved for monkeypox, Tpoxx has already been authorised for treating smallpox, thanks partially to its success in quashing monkeypox in primates. As a result of researchers couldn’t ethically take a look at whether or not it stopped smallpox in people, they as a substitute examined whether or not it may deal with comparable viruses in macaques and rabbits.

Scientists additionally examined whether or not human volunteers with out smallpox had any response to the drug, and located “no security considerations had been recognized,” in keeping with an article 4 years in the past within the New England Journal of Drugs.

“This drug was authorised for smallpox for an emergency use with a illness with a mortality of 30 to 50%,” primarily based on animal testing, however had not been examined in folks with illness, FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf advised reporters final week. “We predict it’s going to be efficient in monkeypox — however we now have no proof of that but.”

Some research have been promising: French researchers who examined Tpoxx on cells stated the outcomes — and the “security profile” of the drug — strongly supported its use for extreme circumstances of monkeypox. In Massachusetts, physicians reported that when three sufferers got Tpoxx, their lesions improved and their sickness didn’t grow to be extreme, with none severe unintended effects. As monkeypox circumstances have multiplied within the U.S., extra analysis is underway.

Native physicians stated they’ve seen encouraging outcomes. “It’s very efficient at curbing the pox outbreak virtually instantly,” stated Dr. Anthony Mills, chief government and founding father of Males’s Well being Basis in L.A. County, who stated he had six sufferers taking the drug for monkeypox.

Advertisement

Dr. Graham Walker, an emergency doctor in San Francisco who has handled monkeypox sufferers, stated that “if I had monkeypox or if my husband did, I might completely be doing every thing in my energy to get Tpoxx.”

“We’ve already screwed up this monkeypox pandemic,” Walker stated. “Why are we not utilizing this?”

Califf advised reporters asking about Tpoxx that “make no mistake — our objective is to make it obtainable with out extra paperwork and paperwork. But it surely’s essential that we gather knowledge as a result of we don’t know in regards to the threat of the drug or … how efficient it will likely be.” The FDA commissioner stated a scientific trial was being deliberate to pave the way in which for its full approval.

For medical suppliers, “there are some bureaucratic hoops to leap by,” which may be time-consuming, stated Dr. Jay Gladstein, chief medical officer at APLA Well being. Federal officers have taken steps to ease a number of the hurdles, together with decreasing the variety of follow-up visits and permitting them to be completed by telemedicine.

Gladstein stated that their physicians can now transfer forward with Tpoxx earlier than take a look at outcomes come again in the event that they strongly suspect somebody has monkeypox. However “we’re nonetheless restricted by the truth that there are a really small variety of locations, like us, that really have it in inventory,” Gladstein stated.

Advertisement

The California Division of Public Well being didn’t instantly present an inventory of places offering Tpoxx. Some California sufferers have been annoyed by obstacles to getting the therapy: One other San Francisco resident, who requested to not be recognized to guard the privateness of his companion, stated that when his companion went to Zuckerberg San Francisco Common Hospital, he was repeatedly advised it had no Tpoxx and that “there was nothing they may do to assist him.”

After he and his companion endured, the ailing man was ultimately admitted and given different medicines, however was advised {that a} explicit physician must assess him for Tpoxx as a result of acquiring the drug “would take two hours of paperwork,” the San Francisco resident stated. His companion in the end went to San Francisco Metropolis Clinic, the place he was shortly supplied the medicine, the person stated.

The San Francisco resident stated he feared that the free clinic could be inundated with insured sufferers turned away from different suppliers. Each Zuckerberg San Francisco Common and San Francisco Metropolis Clinic are operated beneath the San Francisco Division of Public Well being, which stated it couldn’t touch upon the expertise of a person affected person, however “at the moment, the variety of suppliers in San Francisco prescribing Tpoxx is proscribed because of the burdensome federal regulatory course of required for clearance and approval.”

Among the many websites now prescribing it’s Zuckerberg, the division stated. The San Francisco well being division stated it was “advocating for the federal authorities to make the method much less burdensome” and offering steerage on the regulatory necessities with the intention to facilitate extra suppliers with the ability to dispense the medicine.

In Los Angeles, one other affected person stated that when he got here to the Cedars-Sinai emergency room, a nurse advised him after hours of ready that “I simply need you to know that you just’re not going to get Tpoxx.”

Advertisement

The following day, after a take a look at got here again optimistic for monkeypox, he received a telephone name that his main care supplier at Cedars was searching for Tpoxx for him, the person stated. However his concern is that different sufferers who flip up on the ER in ache — and don’t have a health care provider for main care — won’t ever get the medicine.

In L.A., “no one is aware of what facility is providing it,” stated the person, who didn’t wish to be named due to considerations about how his employer would possibly reply. (The L.A. County Division of Public Well being stated {that a} listing of its Tpoxx websites was “not publicly obtainable,” however that sufferers and suppliers may get assist accessing the medicine by its name middle.)

Cedars-Sinai spokesperson Marni Usheroff stated the medical middle couldn’t touch upon the expertise of any particular person affected person for privateness causes, however emphasised that the CDC requires sufferers who obtain the investigational drug to get follow-up visits, and “emergency departments aren’t set as much as provide the sort of follow-up care.”

Usheroff stated that Cedars-Sinai has given Tpoxx to “a handful of sufferers” and is working to make it as simple as potential for eligible sufferers to obtain it.

Walker, the San Francisco emergency doctor, stated that though CDC tips state that Tpoxx “could also be thought of” for sufferers who’ve extreme sickness or are vulnerable to it, some physicians could also be reticent to provide it to anybody who doesn’t have particular circumstances explicitly talked about within the steerage.

Advertisement

Medical tradition is “fairly hesitant to strive one thing new or do one thing completely different with out knowledge,” an impulse that “doesn’t come from a foul place,” Walker stated. However “we’re up to now behind on this now-second pandemic that it looks like we have to be utilizing each device that we now have.”

On the Los Angeles LGBT Middle, physicians have been prescribing Tpoxx “in circumstances of extreme illness solely,” stated chief medical officer Dr. Kaiyti Duffy. The physician stated she wish to begin giving the medicine quickly after signs start, as a result of “there’s a robust probability that early initiation will stop illness development and probably additional unfold” by stopping viral shedding earlier. However the middle doesn’t have the capability to broaden its use, she stated, “attributable to the entire administrative effort mandatory in prescribing Tpoxx.”

Like lots of the Californians who’ve been hit by the virus, Cassara is homosexual, and when others argue that “we don’t want to fret about monkeypox,” he stated, “that simply makes me really feel like homosexual males aren’t a part of the ‘we.’” He believes he received the virus from kissing, since his blisters clustered above the neck, and worries about whether or not his face will bear lasting scars.

If he had gotten Tpoxx earlier, he stated, perhaps his ache and nervousness may have been prevented. Vaccines for monkeypox are briefly provide, “however we do have the Tpoxx,” Cassara stated. “So why can’t they begin giving this to folks?”

Instances employees author Eli Stokols in Washington contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

2024 was the hottest year on record, NASA and NOAA confirm

Published

on

2024 was the hottest year on record, NASA and NOAA confirm

Amid a week of horrifying wildfires in Los Angeles, government agencies in the U.S. and around the world confirmed Friday that 2024 was the planet’s hottest year since recordkeeping began in 1880.

It’s the 11th consecutive year in which a new heat record has been set, NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said.

“Between record-breaking temperatures and wildfires currently threatening our centers and workforce in California, it has never been more important to understand our changing planet,” Nelson said.

Firefighters on Friday were battling to protect NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Cañada Flintridge from the Eaton fire, which has burned 13,690 acres and roughly 5,000 buildings thus far.

Research has shown that global warming is contributing significantly to larger and more intense wildfires in the western U.S. in recent years, and to longer fire seasons.

Advertisement

The devastating fires in Southern California erupted after an abrupt shift from wet weather to extremely dry weather, a bout of climate “whiplash” that scientists say increased wildfire risks. Research has shown that these rapid wet-to-dry and dry-to-wet swings, which can worsen wildfires, flooding and other hazards, are growing more frequent and intense because of rising global temperatures.

Extreme weather events in 2024 included Hurricane Helene in the southeastern U.S., devastating floods in Valencia, Spain, and a deadly heat wave in Mexico so intense that monkeys dropped dead from the trees, noted Russell Vose, chief of the monitoring and assessment branch of NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information.

“We aren’t saying any of these things were caused by changes in Earth’s climate,” Vose said. But since warmer air holds more moisture, the higher temperatures “could have exacerbated some events this year.”

Last year’s data also notes a step toward a major climate threshold. Keeping the average global surface temperature from rising 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels has long been seen as necessary to avoid many of the most harrowing climate impacts.

NOAA pegged 2024’s global average surface temperature at 1.46 degrees C above its preindustrial baseline, and NASA’s measurements put the increase at 1.47 degrees C. In 2023, NASA said the temperature was 1.36 degrees C higher than the baseline.

Advertisement

Considering the margin of error in their measurements, “that puts the NOAA and NASA models comfortably within the possibility that the real number is 1.5 degrees,” said Gavin Schmidt, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies.

Calculations from other organizations passed the 1.5-degree mark more clearly.

Berkeley Earth and the European Union’s Copernicus Climate Change Service both said the planet warmed to slightly more than 1.6 degrees C above pre-industrial times in 2024. The United Nations’ World Meteorological Organization said the increase was 1.55 degrees C and the U.K. Met Office, the country’s weather service, measured an increase of 1.53 degrees C.

Although 2024 probably marks the first calendar year in which the average temperature exceeded the 1.5-degree threshold, it doesn’t mean Earth has passed the crucial target set in the Paris Agreement, Vose said.

That describes “a sustained, multi-decade increase of 1.5 degrees,” something that’s not expected to occur until the 2030s or 2040s, the scientists noted.

Advertisement

“For a long time, the global mean temperature changes were a bit of an esoteric thing — nobody lives in the global mean,” Schmidt said. “But the signal is now so large that you’re not only seeing it at the global scale … you’re seeing it at the local level.”

“This is now quite personal,” he said.

The oceans, which store 90% of the planet’s excess heat, also recorded their highest average temperature since records began in 1955.

The Arctic has seen the most warming, which is concerning because the region is home to vast quantities of ice that stands to melt and raise sea levels, Schmidt said.

Temperatures there are rising 3 to 3.5 times faster than the overall global average, he added.

Advertisement

The only place where average surface temperatures have cooled is the area immediately around Antarctica, and that’s probably due to meltwater from shrinking ice sheets, Schmidt said.

A year ago, NOAA predicted there was only a 1 in 3 chance that 2024 would break the record set in 2023, Vose said. Then every month from January to July set a new high, and August was a tie. As a result, Friday’s declaration came as little surprise.

The longer-term trends are no better.

“We anticipate future global warming as long as we are emitting greenhouse gases,” Schmidt said. “That’s something that brings us no joy to tell people, but unfortunately that’s the case.”

Times staff writer Ian James contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

There's a reason you can't stop doomscrolling through L.A.'s fire disaster

Published

on

There's a reason you can't stop doomscrolling through L.A.'s fire disaster

Even for those lucky enough to get out in time, or to live outside the evacuation zones, there has been no escape from the fires in the Los Angeles area this week.

There is hardly a vantage point in the city from which flames or plumes of smoke are not visible, nowhere the scent of burning memories can’t reach.

And on our screens — on seemingly every channel and social media feed and text thread and WhatsApp group — an endless carousel of images documents a level of fear, loss and grief that felt unimaginable here as recently as Tuesday morning.

Even in places of physical safety, many in Los Angeles are finding it difficult to look away from the worst of the destruction online.

Advertisement

“To me it’s more comfortable to doomscroll than to sit and wait,” said Clara Sterling, who evacuated from her home Wednesday. “I would rather know exactly where the fire is going and where it’s headed than not know anything at all.”

A writer and comedian, Sterling is — by her own admission — extremely online. But the nature of this week’s fires make it particularly hard to disengage from news coverage and social media, experts said.

For one, there’s a material difference between scrolling through images of a far-off crisis and staying informed about an active disaster unfolding in your neighborhood, said Casey Fiesler, an associate professor specializing in tech ethics at the University of Colorado Boulder.

“It’s weird to even think of it as ‘doomscrolling,’ ” she said. “When you’re in it, you’re also looking for important information that can be really hard to get.”

When you share an identity with the victims of a traumatic event, you’re more likely both to seek out media coverage of the experience and to feel more distressed by the media you see, said Roxane Cohen Silver, distinguished professor of psychological science at UC Irvine.

Advertisement

For Los Angeles residents, this week’s fires are affecting the people we identify with most intimately: family, friends and community members. They have consumed places and landmarks that feature prominently in fond memories and regular routines.

The ubiquitous images have also fueled painful memories for those who have lived through similar disasters — a group whose numbers have increased as wildfires have grown more frequent in California, Silver said.

This she knows personally: She evacuated from the Laguna Beach fires in 1993, and began a long-term study of that fire’s survivors days after returning to her home.

“Throughout California, throughout the West, throughout communities that have had wildfire experience, we are particularly primed and sensitized to that news,” she said. “And the more we immerse ourselves in that news, the more likely we are to experience distress.”

Absorption in these images of fire and ash can cause trauma of its own, said Jyoti Mishra, an associate professor of psychiatry at UC San Diego who studied the long-term psychological health of survivors of the 2018 Camp fire.

Advertisement

The team identified lingering symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety both among survivors who personally experienced fire-related trauma such as injury or property loss, and — to a smaller but still significant degree — among those who indirectly experienced the trauma as witnesses.

“If you’re witnessing [trauma] in the media, happening on the streets that you’ve lived on and walked on, and you can really put yourself in that place, then it can definitely be impactful,” said Mishra, who’s also co-director of the UC Climate Change and Mental Health Council. “Psychology and neuroscience research has shown that images and videos that generate a sense of personal meaning can have deep emotional impacts.”

The emotional pull of the videos and images on social media make it hard to look away, even as many find the information there much harder to trust.

Like many others, Sterling spent a lot of time online during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Back then, Sterling said, the social media environment felt decidedly different.

“This time around I think I feel less informed about what’s going on because there’s been such a big push toward not fact-checking and getting rid of verified accounts,” she said.

Advertisement

The rise of AI-generated images and photos has added another troubling kink, as Sterling highlighted in a video posted to TikTok early Thursday.

“The Hollywood sign was not on fire last night. Any video or photos that you saw of the Hollywood sign on fire were fake. They were AI generated,” she said, posting from a hotel in San Diego after evacuating.

Hunter Ditch, a producer and voice actor in Lake Balboa, raised similar concerns about the lack of accurate information. Some social media content she’s encountered seemed “very polarizing” or political, and some exaggerated the scope of the disaster or featured complete fabrications, such as that flaming Hollywood sign.

The spread of false information has added another layer of stress, she said. This week, she started turning to other types of app — like the disaster mapping app, Watch Duty — to track the spreading fires and changing evacuation zones.

But that made her wonder: “If I have to check a whole other app for accurate information, then what am I even doing on social media at all?”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Science

Pink Fire Retardant, a Dramatic Wildfire Weapon, Poses Its Own Dangers

Published

on

Pink Fire Retardant, a Dramatic Wildfire Weapon, Poses Its Own Dangers

From above the raging flames, these planes can unleash immense tankfuls of bright pink fire retardant in just 20 seconds. They have long been considered vital in the battle against wildfires.

But emerging research has shown that the millions of gallons of retardant sprayed on the landscape to tame wildfires each year come with a toxic burden, because they contain heavy metals and other chemicals that are harmful to human health and the environment.

The toxicity presents a stark dilemma. These tankers and their cargo are a powerful tool for taming deadly blazes. Yet as wildfires intensify and become more frequent in an era of climate change, firefighters are using them more often, and in the process releasing more harmful chemicals into the environment.

Some environmental groups have questioned the retardants’ effectiveness and potential for harm. The efficiency of fire retardant has been hard to measure, because it’s one of a barrage of firefighting tactics deployed in a major fire. After the flames are doused, it’s difficult to assign credit.

The frequency and severity of wildfires has grown in recent years, particularly in the western United States. Scientists have also found that fires across the region have become faster moving in recent decades.

Advertisement

There are also the longer-term health effects of exposure to wildfire smoke, which can penetrate the lungs and heart, causing disease. A recent global survey of the health effects of air pollution caused by wildfires found that in the United States, exposure to wildfire smoke had increased by 77 percent since 2002. Globally, wildfire smoke has been estimated to be responsible for up to 675,000 premature deaths per year.

Fire retardants add to those health and environmental burdens because they present “a really, really thorny trade-off,” said Daniel McCurry, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Southern California, who led the recent research on their heavy-metal content.

The United States Forest Service said on Thursday that nine large retardant-spraying planes, as well as 20 water-dropping helicopters, were being deployed to fight the Southern California fires, which have displaced tens of thousands of people. Several “water scooper” amphibious planes, capable of skimming the surface of the sea or other body of water to fill their tanks, are also being used.

Two large DC-10 aircraft, dubbed “Very Large Airtankers” and capable of delivering up to 9,400 gallons of retardant, were also set to join the fleet imminently, said Stanton Florea, a spokesman for the National Interagency Fire Center in Boise, Idaho, which coordinates national wildland firefighting efforts across the West.

Sprayed ahead of the fire, the retardants coat vegetation and prevent oxygen from allowing it to burn, Mr. Florea said. (Red dye is added so firefighters can see the retardant against the landscape.) And the retardant, typically made of salts like ammonium polyphosphate, “lasts longer. It doesn’t evaporate, like dropping water,” he said.

Advertisement

The new research from Dr. McCurry and his colleagues found, however, that at least four different types of heavy metals in a common type of retardant used by firefighters exceeded California’s requirements for hazardous waste.

Federal data shows that more than 440 million gallons of retardant were applied to federal, state, and private land between 2009 and 2021. Using that figure, the researchers estimated that between 2009 and 2021, more than 400 tons of heavy metals were released into the environment from fire suppression, a third of that in Southern California.

Both the federal government and the retardant’s manufacturer, Perimeter Solutions, have disputed that analysis, saying the researchers had evaluated a different version of the retardant. Dan Green, a spokesman for Perimeter, said retardants used for aerial firefighting had passed “extensive testing to confirm they meet strict standards for aquatic and mammalian safety.”

Still, the findings help explain why concentrations of heavy metals tend to surge in rivers and streams after wildfires, sometimes by hundreds of times. And as scrutiny of fire suppressants has grown, the Forestry Service has set buffer zones surrounding lakes and rivers, though its own data shows retardant still inadvertently drifts into those waters.

In 2022, the environmental nonprofit Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics sued the government in federal court in Montana, demanding that the Forest Service obtain a permit under the Clean Water Act to cover accidental spraying into waterways.

Advertisement

The judge ruled that the agency did indeed need to obtain a permit. But it allowed retardant use to continue to protect lives and property.

Continue Reading

Trending