Connect with us

Science

MPX? Mpox? The struggle to replace ‘monkeypox’ with a name that isn’t racist

Published

on

MPX? Mpox? The struggle to replace ‘monkeypox’ with a name that isn’t racist

Some individuals argue that the identify is racist and disparages a whole continent. Others view it as offensive to homosexual males. After which there are those that concern it may result in indiscriminate killing of monkeys, as occurred in Brazil.

All that menace from one phrase: monkeypox.

Because the risk from the illness spreads, consultants around the globe have pledged to alter its identify to one thing that doesn’t carry the burden of stigma. No much less an authority than the World Well being Group is holding an open discussion board to elicit recommendations for a brand new moniker.

“Monkeypox is type of an odd identify to provide to a illness that’s now afflicting people,” mentioned Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. authorities’s main skilled on infectious ailments.

Individuals line up for the monkeypox vaccine at St. John’s Effectively Youngster & Household Heart in Los Angeles.

Advertisement

(Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Occasions)

However tossing out the outdated identify is simpler than deciding on a brand new one.

Already, public well being companies, researchers and nonprofit organizations around the globe have taken it upon themselves to abbreviate or shorten the controversial identify. However at this level there’s little settlement on what to name the illness that has sickened greater than 46,700 individuals around the globe.

The California Division of Public Well being is referring to it as MPX — pronounced “M-P-X” or “em-pox” — because it waits for the WHO to choose a brand new identify. Officers in Oregon, Vermont, New Jersey and elsewhere have gone with hMPXV. Some LGBTQ neighborhood organizations in Canada use Mpox.

Advertisement

Altering the identify of an infectious illness in the midst of a rising outbreak could appear dangerous. However consultants are assured it may be finished — and that it could be riskier to do nothing. They concern the present identify may discourage sufferers from looking for therapy, trigger individuals to shun those that are contaminated, and reinforce racist tropes.

“Is there going to be one answer that’s going to make each single particular person glad? Nope,” mentioned Dr. Perry N. Halkitis, an infectious-disease epidemiologist and dean of the Rutgers College of Public Well being. “However there’s going to be one answer that’s going to be the least offensive of the entire options, and it’s going to maneuver us in a barely higher route with this illness.”

A microscope photo of a cell, shown in blue, infected by monkeypox particles, in yellow

A electron micrograph photograph exhibits monkeypox particles, in yellow, infecting a cell.

(Nationwide Institute of Allergy and Infectious Ailments)

The identify dates again to 1958, when the virus was first documented in a bunch of lab monkeys in a Copenhagen analysis institute. It’s an orthopoxvirus, a sort that’s typically named for the animals by which they’re initially recognized. Its unique supply within the wild stays unknown, although it’s far more widespread in rodents than in primates.

Advertisement

Monkeypox was first recorded in people in 1970, in a 9-month-old boy within the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In previous outbreaks animals — particularly rodents — have been the first supply of transmission to people.

The illness is endemic in rural elements of western and central Africa, the place a number of thousand circumstances and scores of deaths are seen annually in women and men of all ages. Till not too long ago, the virus was hardly ever recognized to unfold from individual to individual. However within the present outbreak in Europe and North America, the overwhelming majority of circumstances have concerned transmission amongst males who’ve intercourse with males.

The situation — characterised by a rash and lesions that may appear to be pimples, bumps or blisters — can unfold by means of extended skin-to-skin contact with these lesions, which can be in hard-to-see locations or mistaken for different pores and skin points.

A cousin of smallpox, it acquired its identify greater than a half a century earlier than the WHO, the World Group for Animal Well being and the Meals and Agriculture Group of the United Nations set greatest practices for labeling ailments in 2015. Two of the no-no’s? Names that consult with international locations or geographical areas, and names tied to animals.

Phrases akin to “swine flu” and “Center East Respiratory Syndrome” have had “unintended unfavourable impacts by stigmatizing sure communities or financial sectors,” Dr. Keiji Fukuda, a former assistant director-general for well being safety on the WHO, mentioned in 2015.

Advertisement
A medical worker injecting vaccine into a person's forearm

A medical employee offers a dose of the monkeypox vaccine at St. John’s Effectively Youngster & Household Heart in Los Angeles.

(Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Occasions)

“We’ve seen sure illness names provoke a backlash towards members of specific spiritual or ethnic communities, create unjustified limitations to journey, commerce and commerce, and set off useless slaughtering of meals animals,” he mentioned. “This could have severe penalties for peoples’ lives and livelihoods.”

Considerations like these had been voiced in June about the truth that the 2 main teams of the monkeypox virus had been generally known as the Congo Basin clade and the West African clade. A global group of scientists referred to as for these labels to be dropped on the grounds that linking the illness to Africa “is just not solely inaccurate however can be discriminatory and stigmatizing.”

Christian Happi, who helped put the marketing campaign in movement, took problem with media retailers’ use of historic photographs of African sufferers for example an outbreak in the UK and North America, calling it, “nothing else however racism to the core.”

Advertisement

The WHO agreed with the scientists. This month, it introduced that the Congo Basin clade will now be generally known as Clade one or I, and the West African clade can be generally known as Clade two or II.

“This was a giant victory,” mentioned Happi, the founder and director of the African Heart of Excellence for Genomics of Infectious Ailments in Redeemer’s College, Ede, Nigeria. “We in Africa will now not settle for to be undermined. We’ll stand as much as something that’s towards the picture of this continent or that tries to undermine the picture of this continent.”

A medical worker injecting vaccine into a person's left arm

Medical assistant Susana Alvarenga offers a dose of the monkeypox vaccine Aug. 10 at St. John’s Effectively Youngster & Household Heart.

(Irfan Khan / Los Angeles Occasions)

Ask individuals what they dislike in regards to the identify “monkeypox” and also you’ll probably get a special reply from every of them.

Advertisement

For Halkitis, it’s that it displays “a historical past of nomenclature associated to ailments that assigns blame.” He cited the early days of the AIDS epidemic, when the illness was mislabeled as “gay-related immune deficiency” or “GRID.”

“Utilizing the phrase ‘monkey’ to consult with a virus not solely immediately hyperlinks it to an animal that’s related to the African continent, but in addition associates doubtlessly the habits of homosexual males as ‘monkey-like,’” Halkitis mentioned. “Within the palms of the fallacious individuals” that may stigmatize those that is likely to be affected by the illness, he added.

Halkitis isn’t involved that altering the virus’ identify mid-outbreak will sow confusion, however he did acknowledge that developing with one thing new gained’t be simple.

In a current seminar at Rutgers, he referred to the illness as “MPX,” an alternate he referred to as “completely not splendid” after studying that MPX was the identify for a sort of submachine gun. He referred to as “Mpox” a potential possibility, however not a fantastic one as a result of “the monkey attribution doesn’t actually go away.”

A crowd of people at a table

Individuals verify in to get a monkeypox vaccination Aug. 9 at a walk-up web site at Barnsdall Artwork Park in Hollywood.

(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Occasions)

Advertisement

“I feel there’s some actually sensible individuals on the market who work in advertising who can consider a great identify,” he mentioned.

Dr. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wooden Johnson Basis, mentioned the present identify creates a false and disparaging affiliation between monkeys and individuals who catch the illness, which may create limitations for these looking for care.

Besser was appearing director of the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention through the H1N1 flu pandemic in 2009. That illness was generally known as “swine flu,” a apply that “created false associations of people that acquired the flu with having had contact with pigs.” (The pork trade took a significant hit as effectively, he mentioned.)

“There all the time are challenges in altering a reputation of a illness within the midst of an outbreak, however that shouldn’t be a barrier to altering the identify if the identify in and of itself is inflicting hurt,” Besser mentioned. Certainly, he mentioned, the scientific neighborhood ought to have a look at “a wholesale rebranding of numerous ailments.”

Advertisement

“There are numerous viruses which have been named after totally different locations in Africa, which contributes to an inappropriate affiliation of illness and pestilence to elements of Africa,” Besser mentioned.

Kathleen Corridor Jamieson, director of the College of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Public Coverage Heart and an skilled on science communication, takes problem with the truth that the identify monkeypox “doesn’t convey helpful data.”

The “pox” half is okay as a result of the general public is acquainted with that phrase, she mentioned. However the “monkey” half would “counsel it infects monkeys.”

She mentioned the general public will simply adapt to a brand new identify as soon as there’s a consensus about what that must be.

“You’d wish to have finished it earlier than the outbreak,” she mentioned. However, “individuals will shortly neglect what you used to name it.”

Advertisement

The ultimate phrase on a brand new identify rests with the keepers of the Worldwide Classification of Ailments, a complete catalog of well being problems maintained by the WHO.

The renaming course of is anticipated to take quite a few months, in response to the company. The WHO will replace the general public by the top of the 12 months.

“I’m positive we is not going to give you a ridiculous identify,” mentioned WHO spokesperson Fadela Chaib.

Feedback left on proposals posted on a WHO web site illustrate why discovering a brand new identify gained’t be simple.

To somebody suggesting “Magnuspox”: “Illness names ought to ideally not use individuals’s correct names. There are individuals referred to as Magnus, and so they shouldn’t have their names related to this illness.”

Advertisement

To a different proposing “Pox22″: “Monkeypox was first found in people in 1970, so Pox70 would match higher in the event you wished to call it like COVID-19.”

And concerning “tinypox”: “monkeypox lesions are even greater than smallpox ones, so tiny is out of the query.”

RÉZO Santé, a Montreal-based nonprofit that gives well being providers to the queer neighborhood, submitted a proposal to undertake “Mpox,” a reputation generated by an alliance of Canadian LGBTQ organizations.

“There have been individuals who instantly noticed that monkeypox in its present type had a little bit of a stigmatizing look and it was actually necessary for us to maneuver away from that as shortly as potential,” mentioned Samuel Miriello, the director of HR and Partnerships for the group. Mpox “is the simplest identify change to know.”

The group not too long ago related with Jean-Yves Duclos, the Canadian well being minister, to debate the brand new identify, however he frightened that making a change earlier than the WHO decides on a brand new identify may end in confusion, Miriello mentioned. (Duclos didn’t reply to a request for remark.)

Advertisement

There’s one other potential drawback with Mpox — it’s already the identify of a degenerative illness that afflicts mutants, together with X-Males akin to Rogue and Cyclops, within the Marvel universe.

Occasions workers author Marissa Evans contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

If you're living with a drug or mental health problem, here's where to look for help

Published

on

If you're living with a drug or mental health problem, here's where to look for help

Fatal overdoses in the U.S. fell for the first time in five years in 2023, according to preliminary estimates recently released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, but UCLA researcher Joseph Friedman warns that the new findings should not be interpreted to mean that the nation’s drug and mental health crises are abating.

Friedman has analyzed “deaths of despair” that result from overdose, suicide and liver disease due to alcoholism and found that while death rates for white Americans have dipped, rates have risen in recent years among people of color in the U.S., especially among Native and Black Americans. Illegal opioids such as fentanyl have ravaged Black and low-income communities in Los Angeles.

While it’s difficult to pinpoint the exact reasons behind substance abuse or suicide, Friedman as well as other experts in addiction medicine and mental health say racial inequality, economic distress and historical trauma have aggravated those problems in marginalized communities.

If you or someone you know needs immediate help for a mental health, substance-use or suicidal crisis, call or text 988, or chat online by visiting the suicide and crisis line’s website. For mental health resources and referrals, call the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health’s Help Line 24/7 at (800) 854-7771.

Advertisement

Here are other organizations that offer information, counseling and support services:

Nakeya Fields, a licensed clinical social worker in Pasadena, founded the Black Mental Health Task Force, a coalition that brings together mental health professionals, clients, nonprofits, community organizations, educators and others in California to raise awareness about mental wellness. Her Therapeutic Play Foundation offers activities designed to improve resilience and coping skills through creative arts, play and sports. It provides individual, couples, group and family therapy for Black, Latinx, LGBTQ+ and other members of marginalized populations.

The American Indian Counseling Center, a division of the Los Angeles County Mental Health Department, offers crisis intervention, 24/7 intensive mental health services and counseling for all ages, as well as physician consultations for medications and referrals to culturally relevant support groups. Call (562) 402-0677 and ask to speak with the on-duty worker.

United American Indian Involvement’s behavioral health program provides outpatient substance use disorder treatment and mental health services to American Indians and Alaska Natives living throughout Los Angeles County. Visit the website or call (213) 202-3970.

Melanin and Mental Health offers an online network of Black and brown mental healthcare providers that is searchable by geographic area, issue type and treatment sought. It’s also possible to filter results by therapists’ racial background and specialty, as well as by insurance carrier.

Advertisement

The Black Mental Health Alliance offers confidential referrals to culturally competent mental health professionals who are in its database of licensed therapists.

Painted Brain advocates for mental wellness in underserved L.A. communities by offering self-care, relaxation and therapeutic art and play sessions, support groups and trainings for mental health professionals. As part of its peer-led model, many of the staff have experienced mental health issues themselves. Its community center and art space is located at 5980 W. Pico Blvd. in Los Angeles.

The Los Angeles LGBT Center offers individual, couples, family, group therapy and psychiatric care, as well as support for people struggling with substance use. The center has locations in West Hollywood, at Mi Centro in East L.A., at its Trans Wellness Center near MacArthur Park and in South L.A.’s Leimert Park neighborhood.

The Community Health Project Los Angeles provides services to people who use drugs by way of a harm-reduction approach that emphasizes offering clean needles as well as education on how to respond to an overdose.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

Are 'deaths of despair' really more common for white Americans? A UCLA report says no

Published

on

Are 'deaths of despair' really more common for white Americans? A UCLA report says no

Nakeya Fields has seen how the stresses that come with being Black — racial injustice, financial strain, social isolation — can leave people feeling hopeless and push some into substance abuse.

It’s one of the reasons the Pasadena social worker started offering “therapeutic play” gatherings for Black mothers like herself and children.

“I’m trying to host more safe spaces for us to come and share that we’re suffering,” the 32-year-old said. “And honestly, the adults need play more than kids.”

Yet while Black and brown mental health practitioners such as Fields have labored to address these issues within their communities, a very different conversation has been occurring in the nation at large.

For years, discussions about America’s substance-abuse crisis have focused almost exclusively on the narrative that it is white, middle-age adults who face the greatest risk of dying from drug overdoses, alcoholic liver disease and suicide.

Advertisement

The theory, which was presented by two Princeton economists in 2015 and based on data from 1999 to 2013, argued that despair was behind rising premature mortality rates among white Americans, especially those who were less educated.

Virtually overnight, the “deaths of despair” concept began to drive the national discourse over populist far-right politics; the rise of Donald Trump; and deepening political polarization over such topics as addiction treatment, law enforcement and immigration.

But after roughly a decade, researchers at UCLA and elsewhere have begun to dismantle this idea.

In a study published recently in the journal JAMA Psychiatry, authors found that deaths of despair rates for middle-age Black and Native Americans have surged past those of white Americans as the overdose crisis moves from being driven by prescription opioids to illegal drugs such as fentanyl and heroin.

While the opioid crisis did raise drug overdose deaths among white Americans for a time, it was an anomaly, said Joseph Friedman, a social medicine expert at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine who was the lead author of the journal analysis. In fact, by 2022 the rate for white Americans had started to dip.

Advertisement

“What’s really important is that now, with these three causes of death, the gap has closed, and it’s moving in the other direction,” Friedman said.

Sandra Mims, a community health worker with Community Health Project L.A., puts out boxes of Narcan — a naloxone nasal spray that reverses the effects of opioid overdose — at an event at MacArthur Park in Los Angeles on International Overdose Awareness Day.

(Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)

The analysis found that deaths of despair for Black Americans hit a rate of 103.81 per 100,000 people in 2022, compared with 102.63 for white Americans. The rate for Native American and Alaska Native populations was even higher at 241.7 per 100,000 people in 2022.

Advertisement

The UCLA analysis doesn’t specify the midlife personal issues that might have led to addiction or suicide.

But the authors say that flaws in the methodology of the 2015 deaths of despair report skewed its conclusions about who was most at risk. Specifically, Friedman said that it failed to give enough consideration to long-standing racial inequities that Black Americans experience in income, educational attainment, incarceration and access to quality medical care, all of which can contribute to drug use and poor mental health outcomes. And statistics for Native Americans weren’t factored in at all.

“It was burned into the American psyche that it was white people in the rural U.S.,” Friedman said. “It was just a very small piece of the truth that was very interesting but was widely sold as something it wasn’t.”

Another recent worrying sign, Friedman says: Deaths of despair among Latinos are starting to catch up to those among Black and Native Americans.

Princeton professors Anne Case and her husband Angus Deaton, winner of the 2015 Nobel Prize in economic sciences, were thrust into the media spotlight when their deaths of despair findings were first published. Deaton told NPR that during a visit to the White House, even President Obama asked him about the phenomenon.

Advertisement

Their 2020 book, “Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism,” was described by publisher Princeton University Press as “a troubling portrait of the American dream in decline.”

“For the white working class, today’s America has become a land of broken families and few prospects. As the college educated become healthier and wealthier, adults without a degree are literally dying from pain and despair,” the publisher said.

Fields, who employs yoga and pottery in her therapy, said this framing was misleading and racially biased.

“I’m actually flabbergasted that somebody has a term called ‘deaths of despair,’” Fields said. “It’s ‘despair’ when white people experience this suffering. But when we experience it, it’s just what we have to deal with.”

Nakeya Fields

Nakeya Fields says it’s important to address mental wellness issues early, before people reach a crisis point and become another statistic.

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Both Friedman and Fields say their critiques are not intended to minimize deaths among white Americans.

Still, Friedman wonders: “How do we empower Black and Native American communities in a way that enables them to treat these problems?”

Racism must be considered when trying to make sense of the crisis in premature deaths, says Dr. Helena Hansen, head of UCLA’s Department of Psychiatry and a senior author on Friedman’s analysis. Hansen, who is Black and specializes in addiction psychiatry, also co-authored the book “Whiteout: How Racial Capitalism Changed the Color of Opioids in America.”

For years, pharmaceutical companies steered expensive prescription pain medications, such as the opioid Oxycontin, as well as the most effective medications for opioid-use disorder, to white Americans with good access to healthcare, she said.

Advertisement

But at the same time, Black and brown Americans were unfairly subjected to law enforcement policies that prioritized incarceration for illegal drug use over increasing access to more humane medical strategies to help them, further harming already vulnerable communities, Hansen said.

“In our society, people with access to the new technologies and pharmaceuticals are more likely to be white,” Hansen says. “None of this is by accident. All of this is the direct result of careful racially and class-segmented marketing strategies by pharmaceutical companies.”

This two-tiered system arose because drug manufacturers, doctors and policymakers have for too long failed to see people from historically marginalized communities who live with addiction and mental health crises as worthy of the same sympathy and treatments that many white Americans receive, Hansen says.

Joseph Gone, a professor of anthropology at Harvard who has spent 25 years studying the intersection of colonialism, culture and mental health in Indigenous communities, agreed.

“Deaths of despair have been a reality for Indigenous communities since conquest and dispossession,” he said.

Advertisement

“It’s amazing how much grief our people contend with from early deaths — there are not that many communities in America that bear it quite the way we do,” said Gone, who is a member of the Aaniiih-Gros Ventre tribal nation of north-central Montana. “Until we acknowledge and take responsibility for the casualties of colonization, which endure to this day through deaths of despair, it’s going to be very hard to turn this around.”

Gone, who has collaborated with Friedman on previous research, says the mental health crisis in tribal nations is aggravated by widespread joblessness and generational poverty, and a lack of healthcare resources to treat people in need of immediate or long-term treatment.

Just one traveling psychiatrist serves reservations spread across both Montana and Wyoming — a region covering more than 243,300 square miles — mostly to manage patients’ prescriptions, he says.

And “for all of Indian country, we’re talking about a very small number of in-patient psychiatric facilities,” Gone says.

General practitioners can serve as a first line of defense, but they are not necessarily equipped to address the ongoing life crises that can lead to excessive drug and alcohol use, Gone says.

Advertisement

Fields says it’s important to address mental wellness issues early, before people reach a crisis point and become another statistic.

While her focus remains on Black women, she’s developed additional programming for adults, families and children, such as developmental screenings that measure for high stress levels. In June, Fields will co-present “Rap 4 Peace,” a conference and gala featuring hip-hop artists talking about mental health and reducing gun violence.

“This ‘tragedy of despair’ lives in us,” Fields says. “We breathe it. We go outside hoping that nobody will harm us or our children because they feel threatened by us. This is truly harmful to our bodies.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

SpaceX plans to launch 90 rockets from Vandenberg Space Force Base by 2026. Could that harm the coast?

Published

on

SpaceX plans to launch 90 rockets from Vandenberg Space Force Base by 2026. Could that harm the coast?

SpaceX plans to launch 90 rockets into space from a Santa Barbara County military base by 2026, tripling the number of blasts rocking the coastal community — and raising concerns from neighbors and environmental groups about the effects on marine life.

Founded by billionaire Elon Musk, SpaceX has ramped up the number of rocket launches from Vandenberg Space Force Base in recent years, and it has made clear its desire to increase the frequency of blastoffs. But during a California Coastal Commission hearing Friday, U.S. Space Force officials outlined for the first time its own plans to multiply the number of launches from the base, from 37 in 2023 to more than 120 a year by 2026.

The overwhelming majority of those rocket liftoffs would be conducted by SpaceX, which has already done more launches from the base than the commission has approved.

Last year SpaceX breached an agreement with the commission that limited the number of launches to six, sending 28 rockets into space.

Advertisement

It is seeking an agreement with the commission to do 36 launches a year, increasing to 90 in 2026.

The decision by the commission, which was created to protect the state’s coastal resources, will directly affect residents and marine life near the military base that hear and feel the rockets’ sonic booms.

It could also redirect the future of SpaceX, whose pursuit to redefine space exploration is already closely tied with U.S. military interests, given its work as a military contractor.

“The ultimate goal is for this to be more routine and not a huge deal,” said Space Force Col. Bryan Titus, operations vice commander at the base.

Formed in 2019, the U.S. Space Force has been looking to improve its ability to send rockets into space, Titus said, so SpaceX’s ability to launch with more frequency is a benefit to the U.S. military.

Advertisement

SpaceX launched 96 rockets in 2023 from Vandenberg and three other facilities: Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Merritt Island, Fla., and SpaceX Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas.

Environmental groups argue that turning launches into a routine event could affect marine life.

“We’re concerned that more frequent launches will result in permanent changes,” said Ana Citrin, legal and policy director for the Gaviota Coast Conservancy.

Federal agencies, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service, monitor the effects of the liftoffs on such animals as sea otters, bats, western snowy plovers, California least terns and California red-legged frogs.

Thus far, the monitoring has shown that some of the animals might react to the blastoff by flushing, or fleeing from their nests and homes, but they return soon after, according to U.S. Space Force officials. No long-term effects have been seen, they said.

Advertisement

SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment.

Flushing or hunkering down after a blast are already signs of wildlife exhibiting signs of stress, said Duncan Leitch, a professor of integrative biology at UCLA.

Most animals can adapt to infrequent incidents, but exposure to more frequent stressful incidents can change their biology as well as their behavior, he said.

In the worst-case scenarios, he said, the ability of birds to communicate could be impeded, and migratory birds could avoid the area. Fish and other animals that use sound to communicate and navigate underwater — including whales — could be affected too.

“Over a longer period of time, there may be reductions in the population of fish as they move away from the sound, or they may be affected to the point that it affects their health,” Leitch said. “It would change the ecosystem as far as other animals that rely on the fish.

Advertisement

“Having sounds that are well into the damaging, or painful, range of decibels now occurring [100] times a year, the animals might not have the ability to change their behavior or accommodate these types of sounds.”

Some environmental groups, including the Surfrider Foundation, are asking the commission to reject the increase.

SpaceX “intends to begin increasing very rapidly, so we’re very concerned about this,” said Mandy Sackett, senior California policy coordinator for the Surfrider Foundation.

More frequent launches could change the way wildlife in the area responds in the long term, environmental groups said.

Members of the California Coastal Commission are also asking whether SpaceX should be entitled to circumvent the permit process, as federal agencies are.

Advertisement

Federal entities negotiate agreements with the commission but ultimately can move ahead even without commission approval. In such cases, the commission’s recourse would be through mediation or the courts.

Because SpaceX is a U.S. Space Force contractor, military officials argue that all launch operations at the base by the company are “federal activities.”

But U.S. Space Force officials said only 25% of the rockets launched into space by SpaceX are carrying payloads for the Department of the Defense.

The vast majority of the liftoffs are for the company’s private benefit, raising questions about why SpaceX can dispense with permits when 75% of its blasts from the base don’t involve the U.S. government.

“That is still pretty skewed for me,” Commissioner Mike Wilson said during a meeting Friday.

Advertisement

Some commissioners — whose focus is usually on environmental protection, development and water issues during their monthly meetings — also brought up the war in Ukraine during Friday’s discussion.

“I question the national security public benefit of concentrating that much power, literally communication power, in one company that we’re enabling in this case,” Wilson said. “[SpaceX] has already showed that it will play in international conflicts at the will of one human being.”

Wilson was referring to reports that Musk’s company refused to allow Ukraine to use satellite internet service from Starlink, a subsidiary of SpaceX, to help it carry out an attack against Russia in September 2022.

“If the idea is that we’re supporting these permits on the side that we’re promoting national defense, and then a single company is able to dismantle our allies during armed conflict — that really doesn’t align,” Commissioner Justin Cummings said.

“I suspect that would violate our strategies around national defense.”

Advertisement

Titus declined to address the question, saying it was “out of my lane,” but he said he would try to get answers to address the commissioners’ concerns.

Some commissioners on Friday also argued that SpaceX, not U.S. military officials, should be making the company’s case in front of the agency.

“When this comes back, I think it would be really important that a representative from SpaceX comes to the meeting,” Cummings said.

Cummings said it was “ridiculous” for SpaceX not to appear at the meeting, despite multiple efforts from the agency to have SpaceX officials speak.

“They obviously refuse to because they’ve never shown up,” he said.

Advertisement

On Friday, Commission Chair Caryl Hart suggested an agreement might not be possible unless SpaceX changes its stance.

“From my perspective,” Hart said, “I think we’re going to continue to hit significant obstacles in achieving a federal consistency ruling without having SpaceX.”

Continue Reading

Trending